Skip to main content
Log in

Metal Concentrations, Foraging Distances, and Fledging Success of Great Blue Herons Nesting along the Hanford Reach of the Columbia River

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An ecological risk assessment of the spatial distribution of metal concentrations along the Hanford Reach of the free-flowing Columbia River in southcentral Washington, identified great blue herons, Ardea herodias, at potential risk through the ingestion of contaminated riverine biota, especially fish. We measured metal concentrations in livers of pre-flight herons from the Hanford Reach and excrement samples taken from the same nests. Nests were distributed among three colonies situated upstream and downstream from nine retired plutonium production reactors along the river where metals in reactor coolant waters had been released directly into the river or disposed to shoreline retention basins and ditches. Distances traveled by parent herons to foraging areas along the river shore were determined by visually tracking parent birds as they flew from nests to upriver and downriver foraging sites. Foraging flight distances varied between colonies with mean distances ranging between 0.7 and 3.1 km. Cadmium, Cr, and Pb concentrations were higher in excrement than in the livers of pre-flight herons but the opposite was noted for Cu, Hg, and Zn. Highest metal concentrations of Cr, Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb, were measured in excrement taken from heron nests at the colony located upstream from all reactors. These results were consistent with metal concentrations reported in river sediment from the same regions, indicating excrement from the heron nests may be a useful indicator of dietary uptake of metals by herons. Fledging success and eggshell thickness measurements were used as an index of health of the local heron population. The results indicate that the reproductive health of great blue herons nesting along the Hanford Reach is among the highest reported in the continental United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, C.D.: 1990, Aquatic Bioenvironmental Studies: The Hanford Experience 1944–1984, Elsevier, New York, 306 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J.M., Brandt, C.A. and Dauble, D.D.: 1998, ‘Species selection for an ecological risk assessment,’, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17, 2354–2357.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blus, L.J., Henny, C.J. and Kaiser, T.E.: 1980, ‘Pollution ecology of great blue herons in the Columbia Basin, Oregon and Washington,’, Murrclet 61, 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collazo, J.A.: 1981, ‘Some aspects of the breeding ecology of the great blue heron at Heyburn State Park,’, Northwest Sci. 55, 293–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushing, C.E., Watson, D.G., Scott, A.J. and Gurtisen, M.: 1981, Decrease of radionuclides in Columbia River biota following closure of Hanford reactors’, Health Phys. 41, 59–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dirkes, D.C. and Hanf, R.W.: 1988, Hanford Site Environmental Report for Calendar Year 1997, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, R.: 2000, Chemical Risk Assessment, Health Hazards to Humans, Plants and Animals, Vol. 1, Metals, Lewis Publishers, New York, 738 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, S.E., Butler, R.W., Norstrom, R.S. and Whitehead, P.E.: 1989, ‘Environmental contaminants and reproductive success of great blue herons (Ardea herodias) in British Columbia 1986–87,’, Environ. Pollut. 59, 91–114.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzner, R.E. Blus L.J., Henny, C.J. and Carlile, D.W.: 1988, ‘Organochlorine residues in great blue herons from the Northwestern United States,’, Colon Waterbirds 11(2), 293–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzner, R.E., Rickard, W.H. and Hinds, W.T.: 1982, ‘Excrement from heron colonies for environmental assessment of toxic elements,’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 1, 383–386.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gochfeld, M.: 1975, ‘Developmental defects in common terns of Western Long Island, New York,’, Auk 92, 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goede, A.A.: 1985, ‘Mercury, selenium, arsenic, and zinc in Waders from the Dutch Wadden Sea,’, Environ. Pollut. 37, 287–309.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halbrook, R.S., Brewer Jr., R.L. and Buehler, D.A.: 1999, ‘Ecological risk assessment in a large river–reservoir. 7. Environmental contaminant accumulation and effects in great blue heron,’, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 18(4), 641–648.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henny, C.J. and Bethers, M.R.: 1971, ‘Population ecology of the great blue heron with special reference to Western Oregon,’, Can. Field-Nat. 85, 205–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henny, C.J., Hill, E.F., Hoffman, D.J., Spalding, M.G. and Grove, R.A.: 2002, ‘Nineteen century mercury: Hazard to wading birds and cormorants of the Carson River, Nevada,’, Ecotoxicology 11, 213–231.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, V.A.: 1999, ‘Contaminant loading limits for a major north temperate river system: A benthic eco risk assessment approach,’, Adv. Environ. Eng. 3, 28–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marco, J.D.: 1997, ‘Factors Affecting Great Blue Heron Reproduction in Southcentral Washington,’, Master of Science Thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.

  • Mielke, P.W.: 1991, ‘The application of multivariate permutation methods based on distance functions in the earth sciences,’, Earth Sci. Rev. 31(1), 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, G.W. and Crecelius, E.A.: 2001, Simultaneously Extracted Metals/Acid-Soluble Sulfide and Total Metals in Surface Sediment from the Hanford Reach of the Columbia River and the Lower Snake River, PNNL-13417, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, G.W., Tiller, B.L., Antonio, E.J., Poston, T.M. and Van Verst, S.P.: 2003, Survey of Radiological and Chemical Contaminants in the Near-Shore Environment at the Hanford Site 300 Area, PNNL-13692, Rev. 1, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R.T.: 1969, ‘The Contamination of Food Chains,’, in: Hickey, S.S. (ed), Peregrine Falcon Populations, Their Biology and Decline, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, USA, pp. 529–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, H.M.: 1970, ‘Breeding ecology of great blue herons and common egrets in Central California,’, Condor 72, 407–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, H.M. and Winkler, D.W.: 1985, ‘Clutch size, timing of laying and reproduction success in a colony of great blue herons and great egrets,’, Auk 102, 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickard, W.H. and Tiller, B.L.: 2003, ‘Observations on the nesting distribution of great blue herons on the Hanford Reach of the Columbia River,’, Northwest Sci. 77, 352–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D.R., Furness, R.W. and Barrett, R.T.: 1992, ‘Mercury concentrations in seabirds from colonies in the Northeast Atlantic,’, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 23, 383–389.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL): 1998, Screening Assessment and Requirements for a Comprehensive Assessment, DOE/RL-96-16, Rev. 1, Technical Report, DOE-RL, Richland, WA, USA.

  • Vermeer, K.: 1969, ‘Great blue heron colonies in Alberta,’, Can. Field-Nat. 83, 237–242.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brett L. Tiller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tiller, B.L., Marco, J.D. & Rickard, W.H. Metal Concentrations, Foraging Distances, and Fledging Success of Great Blue Herons Nesting along the Hanford Reach of the Columbia River. Environ Monit Assess 104, 71–79 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-1603-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-1603-y

Keywords

Navigation