Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Technology gaps, social outreach and financial sustainability of South Asian MFIs: bootstrap DEA meta-frontier approach

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) operate to achieve twin objectives: financial and social. South Asian MFIs have a major industry share in terms of clients and loan portfolios. However, the operating environment in terms of culture, legalities, technology, regulations, and funding is heterogeneous. Additionally, the diverse environment also affects the MFIs' performance in different ways. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to examine the dual goals (financial and social) of MFIs operating in South Asia. The authors incorporate bootstrap data envelopment analysis to measure bias-corrected efficiency scores. Additionally, to account for technological heterogeneity, we have opted for a meta-frontier approach. The authors also estimated the technology gap ratios and relative inefficiencies of individual MFIs. Our analysis is based on 2258 observations of MFIs operating during the years 2005 to 2018 in India, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Pakistan. Our results confirm that MFIs in the South Asian constituency are inclined towards financial goals rather than social outreach. Moreover, managerial inefficiency is the main cause of the lower level of performance in the selected region. Therefore, MFIs need to allocate resources efficiently and adopt the latest technology to further enhance social as well as financial performance levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abd Rahman, M. S., Al-Okaily, M., Ismail, W. N. S. W., & Ali, A. (2020). Measuring success of accounting information system: Applying the DeLone and McLean model at the organizational level. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 98, 2697–2706.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Afsharian, M., Ahn, H., & Kamali, S. (2022). Performance analytics in incentive regulation: A literature review of DEA publications. Decision Analysis, 4, 100079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2022.100079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alalwan, A. A., Al-Fraihat, D., Rehman, S. U., Alkhwaldi, A. F., & Al-Okaily, A. (2022). Investigating antecedents of mobile payment systems decision making: A mediated model. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-10-2021-0171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Fraihat, D., Al-Debei, M. M., & Al-Okaily, A. (2022). Factors influencing the decision to utilize eTax systems during the COVID-19 pandemic: The moderating role of anxiety of COVID-19 infection. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 18, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ali, A., Ramakrishnan, S., Faisal, F., & Ullah, Z. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of global research trends on microfinance institutions and microfinance: Suggesting new research agendas. International Journal of Finance and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Kofahi, M., Shiyyab, F. S., & Al-Okaily, A. (2023). Determinants of user satisfaction with financial information systems in the digital transformation era: Insights from emerging markets. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-12-2022-0285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Mezeini, N. K., Oukil, A., & Al-Ismaili, A. M. (2020). Investigating the efficiency of greenhouse production in Oman: A two-stage approach based on data envelopment analysis and double bootstrapping. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Okaily, A., Ai Ping, T., & Al-Okaily, M. (2023). Evaluation of data analytics-oriented business intelligence technology effectiveness: an enterprise-level analysis. Business Process Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-10-2022-0546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Okaily, A., Ai Ping, T., Al-Okaily, M., Iranmanesh, M., & Al-Betar, M. (2023). The efficiency measurement of business intelligence systems in the big data-driven economy: A multidimensional model. Information Discovery and Delivery. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-01-2022-0008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Okaily, M. (2021). Assessing the effectiveness of accounting information systems in the era of COVID-19 pandemic. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-08-2021-0148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Okaily, M. (2022). Toward an integrated model for the antecedents and consequences of AIS usage at the organizational level. EuroMed Journal of Business. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-05-2022-0100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Al-Okaily, M. (2023). Does AIS usage matter in SMEs performance? An empirical investigation under digital transformation revolution. Information Discovery and Delivery. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-08-2022-0072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Okaily, M., & Al-Okaily, A. (2022). An empirical assessment of enterprise information systems success in a developing Country: The Jordanian experience. The TQM Journal, 34, 1958–1975. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-09-2021-0267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Qudah, A. A., Al-Okaily, M., Alqudah, A., & Ghazlat, A. (2022). Mobile payment adoption in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. Electronic Commerce Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09577-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Al-Qudah, H., Al-Qudah, A. A., Al-Qadi, N. S., Elrehail, H., & Al-Okaily, A. (2022). Does financial awareness increase the acceptance rate for financial inclusion? An empirical examination in the era of digital transformation, Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-08-2021-0710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alshater, M. M., Saba, I., Supriani, I., & Rabbani, M. R. (2022). Fintech in islamic finance literature: A review. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ashta, A., & Herrmann, H. (2021). Artificial intelligence and fintech: An overview of opportunities and risks for banking, investments, and microfinance. Strategic Change, 30, 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Awaworyi Churchill, S. (2020). Microfinance financial sustainability and outreach: Is there a trade-off? Empirical Economics, 59, 1329–1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01709-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aws, A. L., Ping, T. A., & Al-Okaily, M. (2021). Towards business intelligence success measurement in an organization: A conceptual study. Journal of System and Management Sciences, 11, 155–170. https://doi.org/10.33168/JSMS.2021.0210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ayayi, A. G., & Wijesiri, M. (2022). Is there a trade-off between environmental performance and financial sustainability in microfinance institutions? Evidence from South and Southeast Asia. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31, 1552–1565. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Aziz, F., Sheikh, S. M., & Shah, I. H. (2022). Financial inclusion for women empowerment in South Asian countries. Journal of Financial Regulation. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRC-11-2021-0092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Banna, H., Mia, M. A., Nourani, M., & Yarovaya, L. (2022). Fintech-based financial inclusion and risk-taking of microfinance institutions (MFIs): Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Finance Research Letters, 45, 102149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Beisland, L. A., Djan, K. O., Mersland, R., & Randøy, T. (2021). Measuring social performance in social enterprises: A global study of microfinance institutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 171, 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04417-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ben Salem, A., & Ben Abdelkader, I. (2023). Diversification and performance of microfinance institutions: does Islamic microfinance model matter? International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-01-2022-0031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bharti, N., & Malik, S. (2022). Financial inclusion and the performance of microfinance institutions: Does social performance affect the efficiency of microfinance institutions? Social Responsibility Journal, 18(4), 858–874. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-03-2020-0100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bibi, U., & Balli, H. O. (2022). Trade-offs in South Asian MFIs: Regulation and governance structure. Applied Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2022.2145011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bibi, U., Balli, H. O., Matthews, C. D., & Tripe, D. W. (2018). Impact of gender and governance on microfinance efficiency. J. Int. Financial Mark. Inst. Money, 53, 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen, L., Huang, Y., Li, M. J., & Wang, Y. M. (2020). Meta-frontier analysis using cross-efficiency method for performance evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 280, 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.06.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chiu, C. R., Liou, J. L., Wu, P. I., & Fang, C. L. (2012). Decomposition of the environmental inefficiency of the meta-frontier with undesirable output. Energy Econ., 34, 1392–1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dorfleitner, G., Forcella, D., & Nguyen, Q. A. (2022). The digital transformation of microfinance institutions: An empirical analysis. Journal of Applied Accounting, 23, 454–479. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-02-2021-0041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dutta, U. P., & Kankaria, L. (2022). Performance of microfinance institutions under economic growth and fluctuations: Evidence from South Asian Countries. In Microfinance to combat global recession and social exclusion: An empirical investigation (pp. 51–62). Springer.

  33. Fall, F. S., Tchuigoua, H. T., Vanhems, A., & Simar, L. (2021). Gender effect on microfinance social efficiency: A robust nonparametric approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 295, 744–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.03.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Farooq, S., Ahmad, A., Liaqat, F., & Ali, F. H. (2022). Understanding relevance of business environment for financial performance: The case of Asian non-banking microfinance institutions. Vision. https://doi.org/10.1177/097226292210819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120, 253–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fei, R., & Lin, B. (2016). Energy efficiency and production technology heterogeneity in China’s agricultural sector: A meta-frontier approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 109, 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Feng, C., Wang, M., Zhang, Y., & Liu, G. C. (2018). Decomposition of energy efficiency and energy-saving potential in China: A three-hierarchy meta-frontier approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 1054–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gupta, P. K., & Sharma, S. (2021). Literature review on effect of microfinance institutions on poverty in South Asian countries and their sustainability. International Journal of Emerging Markets. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-07-2020-0861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gutiérrez-Nieto, B., Serrano-Cinca, C., & Molinero, C. M. (2009). Social efficiency in microfinance institutions. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60, 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hassan, M. K., Alshater, M. M., Hasan, R., & Bhuiyan, A. B. (2021). Islamic microfinance: A bibliometric review. Global Finance Journal, 49, 100651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2021.100651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hassan, M. K., & Tufte, D. R. (2001). The x-efficiency of a group-based lending institution: The case of the Grameen Bank. World Development, 29, 1071–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00014-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hassan, M. K., Rabbani, M. R., & Rashid, M. (Eds.). (2023). FinTech in Islamic financial institutions: Scope, challenges, and implications in Islamic Finance. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hassan, M. K., Zulfikar, Z., Rabbani, M. R., & Atif, M. (2022). Fintech trends: Industry 4.0, Islamic Fintech, and its digital transformation. In FinTech in Islamic Financial Institutions: Scope, challenges, and implications in Islamic Finance (pp. 113–130). Springer.

  44. Hayami, Y. (1969). Sources of agricultural productivity gap among selected countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51, 564–575. https://doi.org/10.2307/1237909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hayami, Y., & Ruttan, V. W. (1970). Agricultural productivity differences among countries. The American Economic Review, 60, 895–911.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hermes, N., & Hudon, M. (2018). Determinants of the performance of microfinance institutions: A systematic review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32, 1483–1513. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hossain, S., Galbreath, J., Hasan, M. M., & Randøy, T. (2020). Does competition enhance the double-bottom-line performance of microfinance institutions? The Journal of Banking and Finance, 113, 105765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2020.105765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hudon, M., Labie, M., & Reichert, P. (2020). What is a fair level of profit for social enterprise? Insights from microfinance. Journal of Business Ethics, 162, 627–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3986-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Khan, A., & Shireen, S. (2020). Drivers of financial and operational efficiency of MFIs: Empirical evidences from Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27, 2679–2697. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-11-2019-0515

  50. Khursheed, A. (2022). Exploring the role of microfinance in women’s empowerment and entrepreneurial development: A qualitative study. Future Business Journal, 8, 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-022-00172-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Li, L. Y., Hermes, N., & Meesters, A. (2019). Convergence of the performance of microfinance institutions: A decomposition analysis. Economic Modelling, 81, 308–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.05.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Maitrot, M. (2019). Understanding social performance: A ‘practice drift’at the frontline of microfinance institutions in Bangladesh. Dev Change, 50, 623–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Memon, A., Akram, W., Abbas, G., Chandio, A. A., Adeel, S., & Yasmin, I. (2022). Financial sustainability of microfinance institutions and macroeconomic factors: A case of South Asia. South Asian Journal Macroeconomics Public Finance, 11, 116–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/22779787211007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. MFIN (2020). Annual Report, Microfinance Institutions Network, New Delhi

  55. Mia, M. A., & Soltane, B. I. B. (2016). Productivity and its determinants in microfinance institutions (MFIs): Evidence from South Asian countries. Economic Analysis and Policy, 51, 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2016.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mimouni, K., Smaoui, H., & Temimi, A. (2022). Subsidies versus deposits and cost inefficiency in microfinance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 198, 212–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. MIX market (2020) Global outreach and financial performance benchmark report-2020, MIX Market, USA

  58. Mohamed, T. S., & Elgammal, M. M. (2023). Does the extent of branchless banking adoption enhance the social and financial performance of microfinance institutions? Applied Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2023.2177595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Morgan, P. J. (2022). Fintech and financial inclusion in Southeast Asia and India. Asian Economic Policy Review, 17, 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. O’Donnell, C. J., Rao, D. S. P., & Battese, G. E. (2008). Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios. Empirical Economics, 34, 231–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-007-0119-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Piot-Lepetit, I., & Tchakoute Tchuigoua, H. (2022). Ownership and performance of microfinance institutions in Latin America: A pseudo-panel malmquist index approach. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73, 1167–1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1895683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Ponce, L. A. B., Rocha, A. R., & Navarro, R. P. (2021). A causality approach in the analysis of the trade-off between financial sustainability and outreach. Finance Research Letters, 42, 101920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.101920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. PWC (2020) Microfinance in Asia: A mosaic future outlook, 2020, New Delhi

  64. Quayes, S. (2021). An analysis of the mission drift in microfinance. Applied Economics Letters, 28(15), 1310–1316. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1813240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Shen, Z., Bai, K., Hong, T., & Balezentis, T. (2021). Evaluation of carbon shadow price within a non-parametric meta-frontier framework: The case of OECD. ASEAN and BRICS. Applied Energy, 299, 117275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Economics, 136, 31–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Song, M., & Li, H. (2019). Estimating the efficiency of a sustainable Chinese tourism industry using bootstrap technology rectification. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 143, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Tone, K., Toloo, M., & Izadikhah, M. (2020). A modified slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 287, 560–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Walheer, B. (2023). Meta-frontier and technology switchers: a nonparametric approach. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.05.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Wanke, P., Hassan, M. K., Azad, M. A. K., Rahman, M. A., & Akther, N. (2022). Application of a distributed verification in Islamic microfinance institutions: A sustainable model. Financial Innovation, 8, 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00384-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Wejesiri, M., Vigano, L., & Meoli, M. (2015). Efficiency of microfinance institutions in Sri Lanka: A two-stage double bootstrap DEA approach. Economic Modelling, 47, 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Xi, X., Xi, B., Miao, C., Yu, R., Xie, J., Xiang, R., & Hu, F. (2022). Factors influencing technological innovation efficiency in the Chinese video game industry: Applying the meta-frontier approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178, 121574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Yu, M. M., See, K. F., & Hsiao, B. (2022). Integrating group frontier and metafrontier directional distance functions to evaluate the efficiency of production units. European Journal of Operational Research, 301, 254–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.10.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thank you so much for the constructed comments and suggestions. The observations have provided the right direction to authors which lead to significant improvement in the manuscript quality. The authors have also checked entire manuscript for other possibles errors.

Funding

Tonmoy Choudhury would like to acknowledge the support of King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals for financial assistance under grant numbers INFE2207 and EC213001. All omissions and errors remain with the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Mangement Technology (IMT) Nagpur, Nagpur, Maharastra, 441502, India

    Asif Khan

  2. Department of Finance, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, New Delhi, 110016, India

    Anju Goswami

  3. Department of Accounting and Finance, KFUPM Business School, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, 31261, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia

    Tonmoy Choudhury

Authors
  1. Asif Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anju Goswami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tonmoy Choudhury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asif Khan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, A., Goswami, A. & Choudhury, T. Technology gaps, social outreach and financial sustainability of South Asian MFIs: bootstrap DEA meta-frontier approach. Electron Commer Res (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-023-09747-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-023-09747-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation