Skip to main content
Log in

An analysis of the effects of electronic commerce on the Korean economy using the CGE model

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the economic effects of foreign direct online purchasing on the Korean economy using computable general equilibrium and to analyze the future growth of electronic commerce. We assumed that foreign online direct purchasing has reduced transaction costs in two ways: reduction of tariff equivalents and a decline in direct import prices. Simulation results showed that the reduction of both tariff equivalents and import prices due to an increase in foreign direct online purchasing increased the public welfare of the Korean economy. We also found that the reduction of import prices had a greater impact on the welfare increase than did the tariff reduction. Therefore, electronic commerce has a positive impact on the Korean economy, and we expect that businesses in the field will be diversified and prosper in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It refers to the manufacturing industry excluding the consumer goods industry.

  2. It refers to the consumer goods industry.

  3. Consumption of a good means that it is consumed in the market together with goods imported from abroad as well as goods produced domestically. Even if domestic goods and imported goods are of the same quality, since production costs are different between domestic markets and foreign markets and tariffs are applied to imported goods, there will be price differences between domestic goods and imported goods. In this way, an incomplete substitute relationship is formed between domestic and imported goods, which is referred to as Armington’s composite goods.

  4. For the modeling process, we referred to the source: https://www.gams.com/latest/gamslib_ml/libhtml/gamslib_stdcge.html .

References

  1. Ackerman, F., Gallagher, K., & Nadal, A. (2001). The limits of economic modeling in the FTAA environmental review. Comments filed with the US Trade Representative’s Office.

  2. Amiti, M., & Konings, J. (2007). Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: Evidence from Indonesia. American Economic Review, 97(5), 1611–1638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arrow, K. J., & Debreu, G. (1954). Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 22(3), 265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Auerbach, A. J., & Kotlikoff, L. J. (1987). Evaluating fiscal policy with a dynamic simulation model. The American Economic Review, 77(2), 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ballard, C. L., Shoven, J. B., & Whalley, J. (1985). General equilibrium computations of the marginal welfare costs of taxes in the United States. The American Economic Review, 75(1), 128–138.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baourakis, G., Kourgiantakis, M., & Migdalas, A. (2002). The impact of e-commerce on agro-food marketing: The case of agricultural cooperatives, firms and consumers in Crete. British Food Journal, 104(8), 580–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Benjamin, R., & Wigand, R. (1995). Electronic markets and virtual value chains on the information superhighway. Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 62–73.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berthon, P., Pitt, L. F., & Watson, R. T. (1996). The World Wide Web as an advertising medium. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(1), 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brandt, L., & Morrow, P. M. (2017). Tariffs and the organization of trade in China. Journal of International Economics, 104, 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng, W. L., Sachs, J., & Yang, X. (2000). A general-equilibrium re-appraisal of the Stolper–Samuelson theorem. Journal of Economics, 72(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dahlman, C. J. (1979). The problem of externality. The Journal of Law and Economics, 22(1), 141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. De Muro, P., & Salvatici, L. (2001). The common agricultural policy in multisectoral models. Osservatorio delle Politiche Agricole dell’UE Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.313601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dixon, P. B., & Rimmer, M. T. (1998). Forecasting and policy analysis with a dynamic CGE model of Australia. Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers op-90, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.

  14. Escobar-Rodríguez, T., & Bonsón-Fernández, R. (2017). Analysing online purchase intention in Spain: Fashion e-commerce. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 15(3), 599–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Francois, J., Martens, B., & Yang, F. (2014). The macro-economic impact of cross-border eCommerce in the EU, Institute for prospective technological studies digital economy working paper (No. 2014-10).

  16. Frechtling, D. C., & Horvath, E. (1999). Estimating the multiplier effects of tourism expenditures on a local economy through a regional input-output model. Journal of Travel Research, 37(4), 324–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fullerton, D., & Rogers, D. L. (1993). Who bears the lifetime tax burden?. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Garicano, L., & Kaplan, S. N. (2001). The effects of business-to-business e-commerce on transaction costs. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 49(4), 463–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gregory, G. D., Ngo, L. V., & Karavdic, M. (2019). Developing e-commerce marketing capabilities and efficiencies for enhanced performance in business-to-business export ventures. Industrial Marketing Management, 78, 146–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guo, B., & Zhou, S. (2017). What makes population perception of review helpfulness: An information processing perspective. Electronic Commerce Research, 17(4), 585–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hallegatte, S. (2008). An adaptive regional input-output model and its application to the assessment of the economic cost of Katrina. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 28(3), 779–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hamad, H., Elbeltagi, I., & El-Gohary, H. (2018). An empirical investigation of business-to-business e-commerce adoption and its impact on SMEs competitive advantage: The case of Egyptian manufacturing SMEs. Strategic Change, 27(3), 209–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Harberger, A. C. (1962). The incidence of the corporation income tax. Journal of Political Economy, 70(3), 215–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hosoe, N. (2004). Computable general equilibrium modeling with GAMS. Tokyo: National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Todd, P. A. (1996). Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the World Wide Web. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 1(2), 59–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitale, M. (2000). Consumer trust in an Internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1(1–2), 45–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Johansen, L. (1960). A multisectoral model of economic growth (Vol. 82). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kalakota, R., & Whinston, A. B. (1996). Frontiers of electronic commerce (Vol. 487). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kemp, M. C., & Shimomura, K. (2003). A dynamic Heckscher–Ohlin model: The case of costly factor reallocation. The Japanese Economic Review, 54(3), 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim, J., & Moon, J. Y. (1998). Designing towards emotional usability in customer interfaces—Trustworthiness of cyber-banking system interfaces. Interacting with Computers, 10(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kshetri, N. B. (2001). Determinants of the locus of global e-commerce. Electronic Markets, 11(4), 250–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Luong, T. A. (2011). The impact of input and output tariffs on firms’ productivity: Theory and evidence. Review of International Economics, 19(5), 821–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McCole, P., Ramsey, E., & Williams, J. (2010). Trust considerations on attitudes towards online purchasing: The moderating effect of privacy and security concerns. Journal of Business Research, 63(9–10), 1018–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Miyazaki, A. D., & Fernandez, A. (2001). Consumer perceptions of privacy and security risks for online shopping. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Moon, S. (1999). The substitution elasticities between domestic goods and imports in Korea: Computable general equilibrium model approach. Kyong Je Hak Yon Gu, 47(4), 47–81. (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pyatt, G., & Round, J. I. (1985). Social accounting matrices: A basis for planning. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Robinson, S., Cattaneo, A., & El-Said, M. (1998). Estimating a social accounting matrix using cross entropy methods (No. 607-2016-40280).

  38. Robinson, S., & Roland-Holst, D. W. (1988). Macroeconomic structure and computable general equilibrium models. Journal of Policy Modeling, 10(3), 353–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Robson, E. N., Wijayaratna, K. P., & Dixit, V. V. (2018). A review of computable general equilibrium models for transport and their applications in appraisal. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 116, 31–53.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Round, J. (2003). Social accounting matrices and SAM-based multiplier analysis. The Impact of Economic Policies on Poverty and Income Distribution: Evaluation Techniques and Tools, 14, 261–276.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rutherford, T. F. (1999). Applied general equilibrium modeling with MPSGE as a GAMS subsystem: An overview of the modeling framework and syntax. Computational Economics, 14(1–2), 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Saridakis, G., Lai, Y., Mohammed, A. M., & Hansen, J. M. (2018). Industry characteristics, stages of E-commerce communications, and entrepreneurs and SMEs revenue growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Scarf, H. (1967). On the computation of equilibrium prices (No. 232). New Haven, CT: Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics at Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Shagdar, E., & Nyamdaa, O. (2017). Impacts of import tariff reforms on Mongolia’s economy: CGE analysis with the GTAP 8.1 data base. The Northeast Asian Economic Review, 5(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Shelanski, H. A., & Klein, P. G. (1995). Empirical research in transaction cost economics: A review and assessment. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 11(2), 335–361.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Strader, T. J., & Shaw, M. J. (1997). Characteristics of electronic markets. Decision Support Systems, 21(3), 185–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Subramaniam, C., & Shaw, M. (2002). A study of the value and impact of B2B e-commerce: The case of web-based procurement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(4), 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang, Y., & Lee, S. (2017). The effect of cross-border e-commerce on China’s international trade: An empirical study based on transaction cost analysis. Sustainability, 9(11), 2028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Williamson, O. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Xiong, B. (2017). Food safety and food imports in Europe: The risk of aflatoxins in pistachios. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 20(1), 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yang, Z. X. (2010). Research on trade model of transaction costs based on ecommerce. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 26, 218–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yu, M. (2014). Processing trade, tariff reductions and firm productivity: Evidence from Chinese firms. The Economic Journal, 125(585), 943–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Yu, Y., Wang, X., Zhong, R. Y., & Huang, G. Q. (2017). E-commerce logistics in supply chain management: Implementations and future perspective in furniture industry. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(10), 2263–2286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhu, H., Ou, C. X., van den Heuvel, W. J. A., & Liu, H. (2017). Privacy calculus and its utility for personalization services in e-commerce: An analysis of consumer decision-making. Information & Management, 54(4), 427–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by Hansung University (Grant No. TBD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taehwan Kim.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 24 Equations for the CGE modelFootnote 4

  1. 1.

    Composite factor aggregation function: \(Y_{j} = b_{j} \mathop \prod \nolimits_{h} F_{hj}^{{\beta_{hj} }}\)

  2. 2.

    Factor demand function: \(F_{hj} = \frac{{\beta_{hj} p_{j}^{y} }}{{r_{h} }}Y_{j}\)

  3. 3.

    Intermediate demand function: \(X_{ij} = ax_{ij} Z_{j}\)

  4. 4.

    Composite factor demand function: \(Y_{j} = ay_{j} Z_{j}\)

  5. 5.

    Unit cost function: \(P_{j}^{s} = ay_{j} p_{j}^{y} + \mathop \sum \nolimits_{i} ax_{ij} p_{i}^{q}\)

\(ay_{j}\): the coefficient for minimum requirements of value added for one unit of gross outputs, \(p_{j}^{s}\): supply price of the jth good, \(p_{i}^{q}\): price of the jth intermediate good, \(p_{j}^{y}\): price of value added of the jth firm

  1. 6.

    Direct tax revenue function: \(T_{j} = \tau_{j} Z_{j}\)

  2. 7.

    Production tax revenue function: \(TZ_{j} = \tau z_{j} P_{j} Z_{j}\)

  3. 8.

    Import tariff revenue function: \(T_{i}^{m} = \tau m_{i} p_{i}^{m} M_{i}\)

  4. 9.

    Government demand function: \(X_{i}^{g} = \frac{{\mu_{i} }}{{p_{i}^{q} }}\left( {\mathop \sum \nolimits_{j} T_{j} - S^{g} } \right)\)

\(X_{i}^{g}\): public consumption of the ith commodity, Tj: tax revenue from production of the jth commodity, τj: tax rate on production of the jth commodity in terms of local currency per unit, Sg: public saving, μi: share of expenditure for the jth commodity

  1. 10.

    Investment demand function: \(X_{i}^{v} = \frac{{\lambda_{i} }}{{p_{i}^{q} }}\left( {S + S^{g} + \varepsilon S^{f} } \right)\)

S: private saving, Sf: foreign saving, \(X_{i}^{v}\): investment demand for the ith commodity, ε: exchange rate, λi: share of expenditure for the ith commodity (\(0 \le \lambda_{i} \le 1,\mathop \sum \nolimits_{i} \lambda_{i} = 1).\)

  1. 11.

    Private saving function: \(S^{p} = {\text{ssp}} \cdot \sum\nolimits_{h} {FF\left( h \right)p_{h}^{f} }\)

  2. 12.

    Government saving function: \(S^{g} = {\text{ssg}} \cdot ({\text{Td}} + \sum\nolimits_{j} {Tz_{j} + \sum\nolimits_{j} {Tm_{j} } } )\)

  3. 13.

    Household demand function: \(X_{i}^{p} = \frac{{\alpha_{i} }}{{p_{i}^{q} }}(\sum\nolimits_{h} {r_{h} FF_{h} - S} ) \forall i\)

  4. 14.

    World export price equation: \(p_{i}^{e} = {{\upvarepsilon }}p_{i}^{{W_{e} }} , \quad \forall i\)

  5. 15.

    World import price equation: \(p_{i}^{m} = {{\upvarepsilon }}p_{i}^{{W_{m} }} , \quad \forall i\)

  6. 16.

    Balance of payments: \(\mathop \sum \limits_{{}} P_{i}^{{W_{e} }} E_{i} + S^{f} = \mathop \sum \limits_{{}} p_{i}^{{W_{m} }} M_{i}\)

\(P_{i}^{{W_{e} }}\): export price of the ith commodity in foreign currency terms, \(P_{i}^{{e_{{}} }}\): export price of the ith commodity in local currency terms, Ei: amount of exports of the ith commodity, \(P_{i}^{{W_{m} }}\): import price of the ith commodity in foreign currency terms, \(P_{i}^{{m_{{}} }}\): import price of ith commodity in local currency terms, Mi: amount of imports of the ith commodity

  1. 17.

    Armington Function: \(Q_{i} = \gamma_{i} \left( {\delta m_{i} M_{i}^{{\eta_{i} }} + \delta d_{i} D_{i}^{{\eta_{i} }} } \right)^{{\frac{1}{{\eta_{i} }}}}\)

Di: input of the ith domestically produced good, γi: productivity parameter of the ith composite good production function, \(\delta m_{i} ,\delta d_{i}\): share parameter of the ith composite good production function \((\delta m_{i} + \delta d_{i} = 1, \delta m_{i} , \delta d_{i} \ge 1)\), ηi: parameter related to elasticity of substitution; \(\begin{aligned}\eta_{i} = \left( {\sigma_{i} - 1}\right)/\sigma_{i},\quad \eta_{i} \le 1, \sigma_{i} & = - {{\frac{{{\text{d}}\left( {\frac{{M_{i} }}{{D_{i} }}} \right)}}{{\frac{{M_{i} }}{{D_{i} }}}}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\frac{{{\text{d}}\left( {\frac{{M_{i} }}{{D_{i} }}} \right)}}{{\frac{{M_{i} }}{{D_{i} }}}}} {\frac{{{\text{d}}\left( {\frac{{p_{i}^{m} }}{{p_{i}^{d} }}} \right)}}{{\frac{{p_{i}^{m} }}{{p_{i}^{d} }}}}}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {\frac{{{\text{d}}\left( {\frac{{p_{i}^{m} }}{{p_{i}^{d} }}} \right)}}{{\frac{{p_{i}^{m} }}{{p_{i}^{d} }}}}}}:\,{\text{ elasticity}}\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{substitution}} \\ \end{aligned}\)

  1. 18.

    Import demand function: \(M_{i} = \left( {\frac{{\gamma_{i}^{{\eta_{i} }} \delta m_{i} p_{i}^{q} }}{{p_{i}^{m} }}} \right)^{{\frac{1}{{1 -\eta_{i} }}}} Q_{i}\)

  2. 19.

    Domestic good demand function: \(D_{i} = \left( {\frac{{\gamma_{i}^{{\eta_{i} }} \delta d_{i} p_{i}^{q} }}{{p_{i}^{d} }}} \right)^{{\frac{1}{{1 -\eta_{i} }}}} Q_{i}\)

  3. 20.

    Transformation function: \(Z_{i} = \theta_{i} \left( {\xi e_{i} E_{i}^{{\varphi_{i} }} + \xi d_{i} D_{i}^{{\varphi_{i} }} } \right)^{{\frac{1}{{\varphi_{i} }}}}\)

θi: productivity parameter of the ith firm’s transformation function, \(\xi e_{i} ,\xi d_{i}\): share parameters of the ith firm’s transformation function \((\xi e_{i} + \xi d_{i} = 1, \xi e_{i} ,\quad \xi d_{i} \ge 0),\phi_{i}\): parameter related to elasticity of transformation; \(\phi_{i} = \left( {\psi_{i} + 1} \right)/\psi_{i} , \phi_{i} \ge 1\), \(\psi_{i} = - {{\frac{{{\text{d}}\left( {\frac{{E_{i} }}{{D_{i} }}} \right)}}{{\frac{{E_{i} }}{{D_{i} }}}}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\frac{{{\text{d}}\left( {\frac{{E_{i} }}{{D_{i} }}} \right)}}{{\frac{{E_{i} }}{{D_{i} }}}}} {\frac{{{\text{d}}\left( {\frac{{p_{i}^{e} }}{{p_{i}^{d} }}} \right)}}{{\frac{{p_{i}^{e} }}{{p_{i}^{d} }}}}}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {\frac{{{\text{d}}\left( {\frac{{p_{i}^{e} }}{{p_{i}^{d} }}} \right)}}{{\frac{{p_{i}^{e} }}{{p_{i}^{d} }}}}}}\): elasticity of transformation of the ith firm’s transformation function

  1. 21.

    Export supply function: \(E_{i} = \left[ {\frac{{\theta_{i}^{{\varphi_{i} }} \zeta e_{i} \left( {\tau_{i} + p_{i}^{s} } \right)}}{{p_{i}^{e} }}} \right]^{{\frac{1}{{1 - \varphi_{i} }}}} Z_{i}\)

  2. 22.

    Domestic good supply function: \(D_{i} = \left[ {\frac{{\theta_{i}^{{\varphi_{i} }} \zeta d_{i} \left( {\tau_{i} + p_{i}^{s} } \right)}}{{p_{i}^{d} }}} \right]^{{\frac{1}{{1 - \varphi_{i} }}}} Z_{i}\)

  3. 23.

    Market clearing condition: \(Q_{i} = X_{i}^{p} + X_{i}^{t} + X_{i}^{v} + \mathop \sum \nolimits_{j} X_{ij}\)

  4. 24.

    Factor market clearing condition: \(\mathop \sum \nolimits_{j} F_{hj} = FF_{h}\)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cho, Y., Kim, T. & Roh, J. An analysis of the effects of electronic commerce on the Korean economy using the CGE model. Electron Commer Res 21, 831–854 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-019-09358-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-019-09358-3

Keywords

Navigation