Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hypothetical interventions to prevent stroke: an application of the parametric g-formula to a healthy middle-aged population

  • CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE
  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of interventions on multiple lifestyle and metabolic risk factors, initiated in midlife or later in a healthy population, on the long-term risk of first-ever stroke is not known. A particular methodological challenge in observational studies is to estimate the unbiased effect of a time-varying exposure in presence of time-varying confounders, if those confounders are affected by prior exposure. In such cases, the parametric g-formula can be applied to estimate an unbiased effect. We applied the parametric g-formula to estimate the 18-years (1994–2012) cumulative stroke risk under different scenarios of hypothetical interventions on levels of blood pressure, cholesterol, weight, physical activity, smoking and alcohol intake; and compared these to the observed scenario, to calculate the population risk ratios and risk differences. Among 14,796 eligible participants in the prospective, population-based Tromsø study (baseline mean age 46.1 years, 51% women), the observed 18-years stroke risk was 5.9%. A feasible joint hypothetical intervention on six lifestyle and metabolic risk factors would reduce the 18-year stroke risk by 32% (95% confidence interval 16, 44). A combination of more intensive interventions reduced the estimated 18-years stroke risk by 64% (95% confidence interval 40, 80). Blood pressure reduction and quitting smoking significantly reduced the risk when applied separately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Feigin VL, Krishnamurthi RV, Parmar P, Norrving B, Mensah GA, Bennett DA, et al. Update on the Global Burden of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke in 1990–2013: The GBD 2013 Study. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45:161–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kissela BM, Khoury JC, Alwell K, Moomaw CJ, Woo D, Adeoye O, et al. Age at stroke: temporal trends in stroke incidence in a large, biracial population. Neurology. 2012;79:1781–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al. heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(10):e46–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ezzati M, Hoorn SV, Rodgers A, Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Murray CJL, et al. Estimates of global and regional potential health gains from reducing multiple major risk factors. Lancet. 2003;362:271–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Neal B, MacMahon S, Chapman N, Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration. Blood pressure lowering treatment trialists’ collaboration. effects of ACE inhibitors, calcium antagonists, and other blood-pressure-lowering drugs: results of prospectively designed overviews of randomised trials. Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration. Lancet. 2000;356:1955–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R, Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360:1903–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mihaylova B, Emberson J, Blackwell L, Keech A. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials. Lancet. 2012;380:581–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Estruch R, Ros E, Salas-Salvadó J, Covas M-I, Corella D, Arós F, et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with a Mediterranean diet. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1279–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Howard BV, Van Horn L, Hsia J, Manson JE, Stefanick ML, Wassertheil-Smoller S, et al. Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of cardiovascular disease: the Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial. JAMA. 2006;295:655–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chiuve SE, Rexrode KM, Spiegelman D, Logroscino G, Manson JE, Rimm EB. Primary prevention of stroke by healthy lifestyle. Circulation. 2008;118:947–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Larsson SC, Akesson A, Wolk A. Healthy diet and lifestyle and risk of stroke in a prospective cohort of women. Neurology. 2014;83:1699–704.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Y, Tuomilehto J, Jousilahti P, Wang Y, Antikainen R, Hu G. Lifestyle factors on the risks of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1811–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawes CMM, Rodgers A, Bennett DA, Parag V, Suh I, Ueshima H, et al. Blood pressure and cardiovascular disease in the Asia Pacific region. J Hypertens. 2003;21:707–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Di Angelantonio E, Sarwar N, Perry P, Kaptoge S, Ray KK, Thompson A, et al. Major lipids, apolipoproteins, and risk of vascular disease. JAMA. 2009;302:1993–2000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Robins JM, Hernán MA. Estimation of the causal effects of time-varying exposures. In: Fitzmaurice G, Davidian M, Verbeke G, Molenberghs G, editors. Longitudinal data analysis. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press; 2009. p. 553–99.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robins J. A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect. Math Model. 1986;7:1393–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Taubman SL, Robins JM, Mittleman MA, Hernán MA. Intervening on risk factors for coronary heart disease: an application of the parametric g-formula. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38:1599–611.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mansournia MA, Etminan M, Danaei G, Kaufman JS, Collins G. Handling time-varying confounding in observational research. BMJ. 2017;359:j4587.

  20. Jacobsen BK, Eggen AE, Mathiesen EB, Wilsgaard T, Njølstad I. Cohort profile: the Tromso Study. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41:961–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Eggen AE, Mathiesen EB, Wilsgaard T, Jacobsen BK, Njølstad I. The sixth survey of the Tromso Study (Tromso 6) in 2007–2008: collaborative research in the interface between clinical medicine and epidemiology: study objectives, design, data collection procedures, and attendance in a multipurpose population-based health survey. Scand J Public Health. 2013;41:65–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. The World Health Organization MONICA Project. (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease): a major international collaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41:105–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nohlert E, Öhrvik J, Tegelberg Å, Tillgren P, Helgason ÁR. Long-term follow-up of a high- and a low-intensity smoking cessation intervention in a dental setting—a randomized trial. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:592.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Galanti MR, Ivarsson BH, Helgason AR, Gilljam H. Smoking cessation: gender on the agenda. Drugs Educ Prev Pol. 2002;1:71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Raistrick D, Heather N, Godfrey C. Review of the Effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems. National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse. 2006. pp. 1–212.

  26. Program National Cholesterol Education. Third report of the National Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Circulation. 2001;106:3143–421.

    Google Scholar 

  27. SPRINT Research Group. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2103–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Danaei G, Pan A, Hu FB, Hernán MA. Hypothetical midlife interventions in women and risk of type 2 diabetes. Epidemiology. 2013;24:122–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Garcia-Aymerich J, Varraso R, Danaei G, Camargo CA, Hernán MA. Incidence of adult-onset asthma after hypothetical interventions on body mass index and physical activity: an application of the parametric g-formula. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179:20–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Young JG, Cain LE, Robins JM, O’Reilly EJ, Hernán MA. Comparative effectiveness of dynamic treatment regimes: an application of the parametric g-formula. Stat Biosci. 2011;3:119–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ettehad D, Emdin CA, Kiran A, Anderson SG. Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016;387:957–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kurth T, Everett BM, Buring JE, Kase CS, Ridker PM, Gaziano JM. Lipid levels and the risk of ischemic stroke in women. Neurology. 2007;68:556–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Shahar E, Chambless LE, Rosamond WD, Boland LL, Ballantyne CM, McGovern PG, et al. Plasma lipid profile and incident ischemic stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Stroke. 2003;34:623–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bots ML, Elwood PC, Nikitin Y, Salonen JT, de Concalves AF, Inzitari D, et al. Total and HDL cholesterol and risk of stroke. EUROSTROKE: a collaborative study among research centres in Europe. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56:i19–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Meschia JF, Bushnell C, Boden-Albala B, Braun LT, Bravata DM, Chaturvedi S, et al. Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45:3754–832.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Peters SAE, Huxley RR, Woodward M. Smoking as a risk factor for stroke in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 81 cohorts, including 3,980,359 individuals and 42,401 strokes. Stroke. 2013;44:2821–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Shah RS, Cole JW. Smoking and stroke: the more you smoke the more you stroke. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2010;8:917–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Kawachi I, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Manson JE, Rosner B, et al. Smoking cessation and decreased risk of stroke in women. JAMA. 1993;269:232–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Reynolds K, Lewis B, Nolen J, Kinney GL. Alcohol consumption and risk of stroke: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2003;289:579–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Larsson SC, Wallin A, Wolk A, Markus HS. Differing association of alcohol consumption with different stroke types: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2016;14:178.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Wannamethee SG, Shaper AG. Patterns of alcohol intake and risk of stroke in middle-aged British men. Stroke. 1996;27:1033–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hillbom M, Numminen H, Juvela S. Recent heavy drinking of alcohol and embolic stroke. Stroke. 1999;30:2307–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Anderson P, Chisholm D, Fuhr DC. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies and programmes to reduce the harm caused by alcohol. Lancet. 2009;373:2234–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bye EK, Amundsen EJ, Lund M. Bruk av tobakk, rusmidler og vanedannende legemidler i Norge-hovedfunn fra SIRUS’befolkningsundersøkelse i 2012. Statens Institutt for rusmiddelforskning (SIRUS). Statistikkrapport 6/2013.

  45. Taubman S, Hernan MA. Does obesity shorten life? The importance of well-defined interventions to answer causal questions. Int J Obes. 2008;32(suppl 3):S8–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Priyanka Jain, Stein Harald Johnsen, Inger Njølstad, Maja-Lisa Løchen for valuable contribution; and to all the participants in the Tromsø Study.

Funding

The Tromsø Study has been supported by the Research Council of Norway; the Norwegian Council on Cardiovascular Disease; the Northern Norway Regional Health Authority; the University of Tromsø; the Norwegian Foundation for Health and Rehabilitation; and the Odd Berg Research Foundation. AM. Vangen-Lønne receives a research grant from the Northern Norway Regional Health Authority.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne M. Vangen-Lønne.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 852 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vangen-Lønne, A.M., Ueda, P., Gulayin, P. et al. Hypothetical interventions to prevent stroke: an application of the parametric g-formula to a healthy middle-aged population. Eur J Epidemiol 33, 557–566 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-017-0344-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-017-0344-x

Keywords

Navigation