Skip to main content
Log in

Selection by socioeconomic factors into the Danish National Birth Cohort

European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background Low participation at recruitment to the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC) has raised concern about non-participation bias. Objective To study the socioeconomic pattern of participation to the DNBC. Methods Independently of the DNBC, we identified the DNBC source population in two geographical areas of Denmark by means of local birth registers with full coverage. Socioeconomic information came from national registers, and the source population consisted of 48,560 births including 15,290 participating women. For every socioeconomic characteristic, we estimated the prevalence ratio [prevalence (participants)/prevalence (source population)] which corresponds to the relative representation of the group (presented in percentages with 95% confidence intervals). Results The overall participation rate was 31%. Women outside the work force or with no further education than compulsory school were underrepresented in the DNBC by 62% (59%; 64%) and 43% (41%; 45%), respectively. Also, women were underrepresented by 18% (13%; 23%) if they were unemployed, by 22% (20%; 24%) if they were in the lowest income group, 38% (35%; 40%) if they received a high proportion of social benefits, and 28% (24%; 31%) if they were singles. Particularly women with low resources according to two socioeconomic factors were strongly underrepresented, typically by 50–67%. Conclusion Groups with low socioeconomic resources in terms of education, occupation, income and civil status are underrepresented in the DNBC compared to the background population. These discrepancies must be taken into account when results from the DNBC and other cohorts of pregnant women are interpreted—especially when descriptive results are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Abbreviations

CPR-number:

Danish unique personal identifier which is based on “Det Centrale Personregister” (“The Danish Civil Registration System”)

DNBC:

Danish National Birth Cohort

GP:

General Practitioner

PR:

Prevalence ratio

References

  1. Hartge P. Raising response rates: getting to yes. Epidemiology. 1999;105–7.

  2. Nohr EA, Frydenberg M, Henriksen TB, Olsen J. Does low participation in cohort studies induce bias? Epidemiology. 2006;17(4):413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Austin MA, Criqui MH, Barrett-Connor E, Holdbrook MJ. The effect of response bias on the odds ratio. Am J Epidemiol. 1981;114(1):137–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stang A. Nonresponse research—an underdeveloped field in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol. 2003;18(10):929–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lundberg I, Damström Thakker K, Hällström T, Forsell Y. Determinants of non-participation, and the effects of non-participation on potential cause-effect relationships, in the PART study on mental disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2005;40(6):475–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Olsen J, Melbye M, Olsen SF, Sorensen TI, Aaby P, Andersen AM, et al. The Danish National Birth Cohort—its background, structure and aim. Scand J Public Health. 2001;29(4):300–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shahar E, Folsom AR, Jackson R. The effect of nonresponse on prevalence estimates for a referent population: insights from a population-based cohort study. Ann Epidemiol. 1996;6(6):498–506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boeing H, Korfmann A, Bergmann MM. Recruitment procedures of EPIC-Germany. Ann Nutr Metab. 1999;43:205–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown WJ, Bryson L, Byles JE, Dobson AJ. Women’s Health Australia: recruitment for a national longitudinal cohort study. Women Health. 1998;28(1):23–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldberg M, Chastang JF, Leclerc A, Zins M, Bonenfant S, Bugel I, et al. Socioeconomic, demographic, occupational, and health factors associated with participation in a long-term epidemiologic survey: a prospective study of the French GAZEL cohort and its target population. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Korkeila K, Suominen S, Ahvenainen J, Ojanlatva A, Rautava P, Helenius H, et al. Non-response and related factors in a nation-wide health survey. Eur J Epidemiol. 2001;17(11):991–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Olsen A, Tjonneland A, Engholm G, Overvad K. Socio-economic determinants for participation in the Danish EPIC Diet, Cancer and Health cohort. IARC scientific publications. 2002;15655.

  13. Sogaard AJ, Selmer R, Bjertness E, Thelle D. The Oslo Health Study: the impact of self-selection in a large, population-based survey. Int J Equity Health. 2004;3(1):3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stang A, Moebus S, Dragano N, Beck EM, Möhlenkamp S, Schmermund A, et al. Baseline recruitment and analyses of nonresponse of the Heinz Nixdorf recall study: identifiability of phone numbers as the major determinant of response. Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20(6):489–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Boshuizen HC, Viet AL, Picavet HSJ, Botterweck A, van Loon AJM. Non-response in a survey of cardiovascular risk factors in the Dutch population: determinants and resulting biases. Public Health. 2006;120(4):297–308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fejer R, Hartvigsen J, Kyvik K, Jordan A, Christensen H, Høilund-Carlsen P. The Funen neck and chest pain study: analysing non-response bias by using national vital statistic data. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21(3):171–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Martikainen P, Laaksonen M, Piha K, Lallukka T. Does survey non-response bias the association between occupational social class and health? Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(2):212–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tjonneland A, Olsen A, Boll K, Stripp C. Study design, exposure variables, and socioeconomic determinants of participation in diet, cancer and health: a population-based prospective cohort study of 57, 053 men and women in Denmark. Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(4):432–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van Heuvelen MJ, Hochstenbach JB, Brouwer WH, de Greef MH, Zijlstra GA, van Jaarsveld E, et al. Differences between participants and non-participants in an RCT on physical activity and psychological interventions for older persons. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2005;17(3):236.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Boesen E, Boesen S, Christensen S, Johansen C. Comparison of participants and non-participants in a randomized psychosocial intervention study among patients with malignant melanoma. Psychosomatics. 2007;48(6):510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang N, Shih S, Chang H, Chou Y. Record linkage research and informed consent: who consents? BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7(1):18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Det Centrale Personregister [Internet]. Det Centrale Personregister. 2009 September 6; [cited 2009 Sep 6] Available from: http://www.cpr.dk/cpr/.

  23. Danmarks Statistik/Statistics Denmark. Danmarks Statistik [Internet]. Danmarks Statistik. 2009 September 6; [cited 2009 Sep 6] Available from: http://www.dst.dk/.

  24. Thygesen L. The register-based system of demographic and social statistics in Denmark. Stat J UN Econ Comm Eur. 1995;12(1):49.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hernán MA, Hernandez-Diaz S, Robins JM. A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology. 2004;15(5):615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Professor Jørn Olsen for valuable and constructive suggestions when writing this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tine Neermann Jacobsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacobsen, T.N., Nohr, E.A. & Frydenberg, M. Selection by socioeconomic factors into the Danish National Birth Cohort. Eur J Epidemiol 25, 349–355 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9448-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9448-2

Keywords

Navigation