Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nile water pollution and technical efficiency of crop production in Egypt: an assessment using spatial and non-parametric modelling

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agriculture is considered one of the vital activities in Egypt; it consumes about 83 % of the Egyptian Nile water quota. This activity is becoming negatively affected by water pollution causing negative repercussion on land productivity and subsequently food security. This paper assesses the water quality for agriculture along the mainstream of the Nile in Egypt through spatial distributions modelling of total dissolved solids (TDS), using spatial statistical analysis. The study’s sample frame consists of 78 sampling points collected in February 2008 and located on the Nile mainstream and its two branches, Rosetta and Damietta. Exploratory spatial data analysis is carried out on the TDS, followed by plotting and modelling the experimental semi-variogram. Then, cross validation is executed in order to determine the best fitting model. Finally, surface mapping is generated by performing spatial interpolation, using kriging technique. The generated surface map shows that the TDS levels increase from Upper to Lower Egypt, exceeds the standard limit in Beni-Suef and Rosetta branch. In fact, high levels of TDS are known to have a negative effect on Egyptian agriculture through harmfully affecting the soil and consequently the crop yields. Therefore, an analysis of the effect of water pollution on technical efficiency of crop production is conducted using a non-parametric mathematical programming approach to frontier estimation. The results of this estimation indicated that the TDS is overutilized in all governorates except Aswan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For details on this database and its construction consult Abou-Ali and Kheir-El-Din (2010).

  2. This assumption allows representing the technology using an isoquant corresponding to producing one unit of output.

  3. For a review of DEA contributions, history, models and interpretation see Seiford 1996, Cooper et al. 2007, and Cooper et al. 2004.

  4. The best mix of inputs to produce the same output, since an input oriented measure is adopted.

References

  • Abou-Ali H, Kheir-El-Din H (2010) Economic efficiency of crop production in Egypt, Egyptian center for economic studies (ECES) working paper series, 155

  • Bordalo A, Nilsumranshit W, Chalermwat K (2001) Water quality and used of the Bnagpakong River. Water Res 35(15):3635–3642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CAPMAS (2009) Egypt in numbers. CAPMAS, Egypt

  • Central Department of Environmental Affairs—Center of Environmental Monitoring and Studies of the Working Environment (CEMSWE)—Ministry of Health, The Annual Report of the Results of the National Network for monitoring the water Pollutants of the Nile River and its Branches in 2008. Ministry of Health, Egypt (2008) (in Arabic)

  • Chang H (2008) Spatial analysis of water quality trends in the Han River Basin, South Korea. Water Res 42(13):3285–3304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2007) Data envelopment analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, USA

  • Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Zhu J (2004) Data envelopment analysis: History, models and interpretations. In: Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Zhu J (eds) Handbook on data envelopment analysis. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, 71. Springer, USA, pp 1–39

  • Dowd P (2003) Testing for constant spatial mean using the global D-statistic. Comput Geosci 29(8):1057–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmahdi A, Afify A, Abdin A (2008) Development of a GIS-based decision support tool and assessment of Nile River water quality. Int J Water 4(1/2):55–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emamgholizadeh S (2008) Water quality assessment of the Kopal River (Iran), international meeting on soil fertility, land management and agroclimatology, Turkey, pp 827–837

  • Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc 120(3):253–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Flipo N, Jeannee N, Poulin M, Even S, Ledoux E (2007) Assessment of nitrate pollution in the Grand Morin Aquifers (France): combined use of geostatistics and physically based modelling. Envion Pollut 146(1):241–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • French J (2005) Exploring spatial correlation in rivers. Colorado State University, Dissertation

  • Forsund FR, Lovell CAK, Schmidt PA (1980) A survey of frontier production functions and of their relationship to efficiency measurement. J Econ 13(1):5–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin MJ, Dale MT (2005) Spatial analysis—a guide for ecologists, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamad S (2008) Spatial analysis of groundwater level and hydrochemsitry in the South Al Jabal Al Akhdar area using GIS. Slazburg University, Dissertation

  • Johnston K, Hoef J, Krivoruchko K, Lucas N (2001) Using ArcGIS geostatistical analyst, GIS by ESRI, Illustrated edn. ESRI, New York

  • Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation (MALR), Agricultural Farm Income Survey. MALR, Egypt (2003/2004)

  • Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation (MALR) (2009) Strategy for sustainable agricultural development 2030, 3rd edn. MALR, Egypt

  • Matheron G (1962) Traité de géostatistique appliquée, 1st edn. Technip Editions, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran PAP (1950) Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37(1):17–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang Y, Higman J, Thompson J, O’Toole T, Campbell D (2002) Charecterization and spatial distribution of heavy metals in sediment from Cedar and Ortega Rivers subbbasin. J Contam Hydrol 54(1/2):19–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman S, Hossain F (2008) Spatial assessment of water quality in peripheral rivers of Dhaka City for optimal relocation of water intake pointl. Water Resour Manag 22(3):377–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford LH (1996) Data envelopment analysis: the evolution of the state of the art (1978–1995). J Prod Anal 7:99–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarangi A, Madramootoo CA, Enright P (2006) Comparison of spatial variability techniques for runoff estimation from Canadian watershed. Biosyst Eng 95(2):295–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente JR (2004) Economic efficiency of agricultural production in Brazil. Rev Econ Soc Rural 42(2):201–222

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2011) World Development Indicators. World Bank, Washington DC, USA

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are most grateful to Reda Mazloum, Abdel Hameed El-Shaarawi and Aliaa Zahran for their valuable comments, and to the Ministry of Health, CAPMAS and the Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation for making the data available for this research. The usual disclaimer applies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amira El-Ayouti.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Ashis SenGupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abou-Ali, H., El-Ayouti, A. Nile water pollution and technical efficiency of crop production in Egypt: an assessment using spatial and non-parametric modelling. Environ Ecol Stat 21, 221–238 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-013-0252-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-013-0252-5

Keywords

Navigation