Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What Every Teacher Should Know: Reflections on “Educating the Developing Mind”

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past half century, much has been learned about the ways in which students develop and learn. Unfortunately, this knowledge often does not find its way into the classroom. Teachers can begin to use this knowledge by focusing on a few key ideas. They need to go beyond the presentation of content to helping students acquire strategies for processing that content. They need to achieve a balance between knowledge and process (rather than choose one or the other). They need to minimize teaching content in isolation, choosing instead to contextualize the content in real-life experiences and applications. Finally, they need to help students learn to make informed, defensible decisions on their own. Changes in curriculum, both at the macro- and micro-levels can assist teachers in making these changes in their teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B. (2010). Teacher education for tomorrow. Hillsborough: Center for Teaching Quality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment, 1(2), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego: Academic Press.

  • Brophy, J., & Alleman, J. (2003). Social studies excursions, K-3, book one: Powerful units on food, clothing, and shelter. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • California State Board of Education (2000). Science standards for California public schools. Sacramento, CA: Author.

  • Campos, M. R. (2005). Passive bystander or active participant: The dilemmas and social responsibilities of teachers, PRELAC Journal, 1, 1–193. Available online at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001446/144666e.pdf.

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., LePage, P., Hammerness, K., & Duffy, H. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daro, P., Mosher, F., & Corcoran, T. (2011). Learning trajectories in mathematics: A foundation for standards, curriculum, assessment, and instruction. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Available online at http://www.cpre.org/ccii/images/stories/ccii_pdfs/learning%20trajectories%20in%20math_ccii%20report.pdf.

  • DeFranco, T. C., & Curcio, F. R. (1997). A division problem with a remainder embedded across two contexts: Children’s solutions in restrictive versus real-world settings. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 19(2), 58–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical thinking. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. J. (2001). New meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, M. (2008). Learning progressions: Supporting instruction and formative assessment. Washington: Council of Chief State School Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, E. R. (2004). School culture and change: An examination of the effects of school culture on the process of change. Essays in Education, 12 (entire). Available online at http://www.usca.edu/essays/vol122004/hinde.pdf.

  • Hirsch, Ed. Jr. (Ed.) (2007). What your sixth grader needs to know: Fundamentals of a good sixth-grade education. New York: Doubleday.

  • Pogrow, S. (1990). Challenging at-risk students: Findings from the HOTS program. Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 389–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. C. (2006). Curriculum assessment. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 141–159). Washington: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimabukoro, J. (2010). For educational change – teachers are the key. Educational Technology and Change. Retrieved September 22, 2010, from http://etcjournal.com/2010/07/28/for-educational-change-teachers-are-the-key/.

  • Weinstein, C. (1989). Teacher education students’ preconceptions of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA

    Lorin W. Anderson

Authors
  1. Lorin W. Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorin W. Anderson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, L.W. What Every Teacher Should Know: Reflections on “Educating the Developing Mind”. Educ Psychol Rev 24, 13–18 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9189-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9189-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation