Skip to main content
Log in

The active ingredient is not always to blame: in response to Serra et al. (2023)

  • Matters Arising
  • Published:
Ecotoxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Related Article was published on 06 February 2023

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Jane C. Stout for comments on an early version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project received funding from the Government Of Ireland Post-Doctoral Research Program: GOIPD/2022/580.

Author contributions

EAS wrote the manuscript alone.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward A. Straw.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Straw, E.A. The active ingredient is not always to blame: in response to Serra et al. (2023). Ecotoxicology 33, 235–237 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-024-02733-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-024-02733-3

Navigation