Skip to main content
Log in

A Note on Emissions Taxes and Incomplete Information

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In contrast with what we perceive is the conventional wisdom about setting a second-best emissions tax to control a uniformly mixed pollutant under uncertainty, we demonstrate that setting a uniform tax equal to expected marginal damage is not generally efficient under incomplete information about firms’ abatement costs and damages from pollution. We show that efficient taxes will deviate from expected marginal damage if marginal damage is increasing and there is uncertainty about the slopes of the marginal abatement costs of regulated firms. Moreover, tax rates will vary across firms if a regulator can use observable firm-level characteristics to gain some information about how the firms’ marginal abatement costs vary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baliga S, Maskin E (2003) Mechanism design for the environment, chapter 7. In: Maller KG, Vincent JR (eds) Handbook of environmental economics. vol 3. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baranzini A, Goldemberg J, Speck S (2000) A future for carbon taxes. Ecological Economics 32: 395–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol WJ, Oates WE (1988) The theory of environmental policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bye B, Nyborg K (2003) Are differentiated carbon taxes inefficient? A general equilibrium analysis. Energy Journal 24: 95–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta P, Hammond P, Maskin E (1980) On imperfect information and optimal pollution control. Rev Econ Stud 47(5): 857–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel M, Karp L (2001) Taxes and quotas for a stock pollutant with multiplicative uncertainty. J Public Econ 82(1): 91–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel M, Karp L (2002) Taxes versus quotas for a stock pollutant. Resour Energy Econ 24(4): 367–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwerel E (1977) To tell the truth: imperfect information and optimal pollution control. Rev Econ Stud 44(3): 595–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffont JJ (1977) More on prices vs. quantities. Rev Econ Stud 44(1): 177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malcomson J (1978) Prices vs. quantities: a critical note on the use of approximations. Rev Econ Stud 45(1): 203–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moledina A, Coggins J, Polasky S, Costello C (2003) Dynamic environmental policy with strategic firms: Prices versus quantities. J Environ Econ Manage 45(2S): 356–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell R, Pizer W (2003) Regulating stock externalities under uncertainty. J Environ Econ Manage 45(2, Supplement 1): 416–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quirion P (2004) Prices versus quantities in a second-best setting. Environ Resour Econ 29(3): 337–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts M, Spence M (1976) Effluent charges and licenses under uncertainty. J Public Econ 5: 193–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavins R (1996) Correlated uncertainty and policy instrument choice. J Environ Econ Manage 30: 218–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman M (1974) Prices vs. quantities. Rev Econ Stud 41(4): 477–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman M (1978) Reply to “Prices vs. quantities: a critical note on the use of approximations” by James M Malcomson. Rev Econ Stud 45(1): 209–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Chávez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chávez, C., Stranlund, J.K. A Note on Emissions Taxes and Incomplete Information. Environ Resource Econ 44, 137–144 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9257-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9257-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation