Skip to main content
Log in

Hurdle and Latent Class Approaches to Serial Non-Participation in Choice Models

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In repeated choice modelling studies, it is often the case that individuals always select the status quo option. Although this pattern may reflect considered choices, they may also be the result of alternative decisions about whether to participate in the choice process at all. Alternative methods of dealing with this behaviour, each with associated implications for estimates of economic values, are presented. In particular we consider the alternative strategies of excluding such individuals from the data, using hurdle models to explicitly model this group, and propose the use of latent class models to endogenously allow for different preference structures. An advantage of the latent class approach is that the form of the non-participation need not be defined in advance. These approaches are considered using UK choice experiment data on food choices where the attributes include genetic modification of food. The latent class approach reveals the presence of two forms of non-participation in the data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csake F(eds) Second international symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary, pp 267–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva M, Swait J (1986) The Akaike likelihood ratio index. Transp Sci 20(2): 133–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxall PC, Adamowicz WL (2002) Understanding heterogeneous preferences In random utility models: a latent class approach. Environ Resour Econ 23: 421–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozdogan H (1987) Model-selection and Akaike’s information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika 52: 345–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns J, van de Pol M, Lloyd A (2002) Decision making heuristics and the elicitation of preferences: being fast and frugal about the future. Health Econ 11: 655–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark KA (2003) Nonparametric model discrimination in international relations. J Conflict Resolut 47(1): 72–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consumers Association (2002) GM dilemmas—consumers and genetically modified foods. Policy report, UK Which

  • Hensher DA (2006) How do respondents process stated choice experiments? Attribute consideration under varying information load. J Appl Economet 21(6): 861–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1984) Choice, values and frames. Am Psychol 39(4): 341–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancsar E, Louviere JJ (2006) Deleting ‘irrational’ responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?. Health Econ 15(8): 797–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marris C, Wynne B, Simmons P, Weldon S (2001) Public perceptions of agricultural biotechnologies in Europe. Final report of the PABE research project. http://www.pabe.net

  • MORI (2003) GM food opposition continues, 3 July 2003. http://www.mori.com/polls/2003/gmfood.shtml

  • Pollak RA, Wales TJ (1991) The likelihood dominance criterion: a new approach to model selection. J Econom 47(2–3): 227–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rekola M (2003) Lexicographic preferences in contingent valuation: a theoretical framework with illustrations. Land Econ 79(2): 277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby D, Young T, Burton M (2004) Consumer willingness to pay to reduce GMOs in food and increase the robustness of GM labelling. Report to UK Dept of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)

  • Rokeach (1968) Beliefs, attitudes, and values: a theory of organization and change. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Saelensminde K (2006) Causes and consequences of lexicographic choices in stated choice studies. Ecol Econ 59(3): 331–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6(2): 461–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swait J (2001) Choice set generation within the generalized extreme value family of discrete choice models. Transp Res Part B, pp 643–666

  • Swait J, Ben-Akiva M (1987) Empirical test of a constrained choice discrete model: mode choice in São Paulo, Brazil. Transp Res B 21B: 103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swait J, Adamowicz W (2001) The influence of task complexity on consumer choice, a Latent class model of decision switching strategy. J Consumer Res 28: 135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Train (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • von Roger H, Roger H, Massey DM, Adamowicz W (2005) Serial non-participation in repeated discrete choice models. Am J Agric Econ 87(4): 1061–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Rigby.

Additional information

This paper draws work commissioned by UK Department of Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). The views presented in this paper are those of the authors alone and should not be regarded as those of DEFRA or of individuals within DEFRA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burton, M., Rigby, D. Hurdle and Latent Class Approaches to Serial Non-Participation in Choice Models. Environ Resource Econ 42, 211–226 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9225-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9225-9

Keywords

Navigation