Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between wages and the risk of work-related death for male blue-collar workers. The size of the premium for risk and its statistical significance depend heavily on the inclusion of industry dummy variables into the regression. Irrespective of the type of risk variable used, controlling for industry at a finer breakdown lowers the price of risk and its statistical significance. Estimates of the value of a statistical life (VSL) proved to be more robust when an aggregated risk measure at three-digit occupational level was used. In this case, the VSL varied from 0.79 million USD (for the model with industry dummy variables at the three-digit level) to 2.41 million USD (for the model without industry dummy variables). To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first study estimating VSL using the compensating wage differential approach for countries in Central-Eastern Europe.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Black D, Galdo J, Liu L (2003) How robust are hedonic wage estimates of the price of risk? Environmental Protection Agency
Brown C (1980) Equalizing differences in the labor market. Q J Econ 94(1): 113–134
Dickens WT (1984) Differences between risk premiums in union and nonunion wages and the case for occupational safety regulation. Am Econ Rev 74(2): 320–323
Dillingham AE (1985) The influence of risk variable definition on value-of-life estimates. Econ Inquiry 23(2): 277–294
Dorman P, Hagstrom P (1998) Wage compensation for dangerous work revisited. Ind Labor Relat Rev 52(1): 116–135
Kniesner TJ, Leeth JD (1991) Compensating wage differentials for fatal injury risk in Australia, Japan, and the United States. J Risk Uncertain 4(1): 75–90
Leigh JP (1995) Compensating wages, value of a statistical life, and inter-industry differentials. J Environ Econ Manage 28(1): 83–97
Leigh JP, Folsom RN (1984) Estimates of the value of accident avoidance at the job depend on the concavity of the equalizing differences curve. Q Rev Econ Bus 24(1): 56–66
Marin A, Psacharopoulos H (1982) The reward for risk in the labor market: evidence from the United Kingdom and a reconciliation with other studies. J Polit Econ 90(4): 827–853
Mellow W, Sider H (1983) Accuracy of response in labor market surveys: evidence and implications. J Labor Econ 1(4): 331–344
Moore MJ, Viscusi WK (1990) Discounting environmental health risks: new evidence and policy implications. J Environ Econ Manage 18: 51–62
Riboud M, Sanchez-Paramo C, Silva-Jauregui C (2002) Does eurosclerosis matter? Institutional reform and labor market performance in central and eastern European countries in the 1990s. World Bank working paper no. 591
Sandy R, Elliott RF (1996) Unions and risk: their impact on the level of compensation for fatal risk. Economica 63(250): 291–309
Thaler R, Rosen S (1975) The value of saving a life: evidence from the labor market. In: Terleckyj NE(eds) Household production and consumption. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 265–300
Viscusi WK (2004) The value of life: estimates with risks by occupation and industry. Econo Inquiry 42: 29–48
Viscusi WK, Aldy JE (2003) The value of a statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world. J Risk Uncertain 27(1): 5–76
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Giergiczny, M. Value of a Statistical Life—the Case of Poland. Environ Resource Econ 41, 209–221 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9188-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9188-2