Abstract
Since January 2005 the European Union has launched an EU-internal emissions trading scheme (EU ETS) for emission-intensive installations as the central pillar to comply with the Kyoto Protocol. The EU ETS will be linked to a Kyoto emissions market where greenhouse gas emission allowances of signatory Kyoto countries can be traded. In this paper we investigate the implications of Russian market power for environmental effectiveness and regional compliance costs to the Kyoto Protocol taking into account potential linkages between the Kyoto emissions market and the EU ETS. We find that Russia may have incentives to join the EU ETS as long as the latter remains relatively separated from the Kyoto international emissions market. In this case, Russia can exert monopolistic price discrimination between two separated markets thereby maximizing revenues from hot air sales. The EU will be able to substantially reduce compliance costs if it does not restrain itself to EU-internal emission regulation schemes. However, part of the gains from extra-EU emissions trading will come at the expense of environmental effectiveness as (more) hot air will be drawn in.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernard A, Paltsev S, Reilly JM, Vielle M, Viguier L (2003) Russia’s role in the Kyoto protocol. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No. 98
Böhringer C (2000) Cooling down hot air—a global CGE analysis of post-Kyoto carbon abatement strategies. Energy Policy 28:779–789
Böhringer C (2002) Climate politics from Kyoto to Bonn: from little to nothing?. Energy J 23: 51–71
Böhringer C (2003) The Kyoto protocol: a review and perspectives. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 19: 451–466
Böhringer C, Löschel A (2003) Market power and hot air in international emissions trading: the impacts of U.S. withdrawal from Kyoto-protocol. Appl Econ 35:651–664
Böhringer C, Hoffmann T, Lange A, Löschel A, Moslener U (2005) Assessing emission regulation in Europe: an interactive simulation approach. Energy J 26:1–22
Dimaranan BV, McDougall RA (2006) Global trade, assistance, and production: The GTAP 6 Data Base. Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University
Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13. October 2003, Official Journal of the European Union, L 275/32
DOE (2005) International energy outlook. U.S. Department of Energy, July 2005
EU (1999) EU Council of Ministers, Commission Communication, Preparing for Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol, COM (1999), Annex 1, available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/docum/99230_en.pdf
EU (2003a) Directive establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council directive 96/61/EC, European Commission, Brussels, available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/climat/030723provisionaltext.pdf
EU (2003b) European energy and transport—Trends to 2030, European Commission, Brussels, available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/energy_transport/figures/trends_2030/index_en.htm
EU (2004) Directive 2004/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 amending Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community, in respect of the Kyoto Protocol’s project mechanisms, European Commission, Brussels, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/climat/emission/pdf/dir_2004_101_en.pdf
EU (2005) Further guidance on allocation plans for the 2008 to 2012 trading period of the EU Emission Trading Scheme, COM(2005) 703 final. European Commission, Brussels, available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/climat/pdf/nap_2_guidance_en.pdf
Golub A, Strukova E (2004) Russia and the GHG market. Clim Change 63:223–243
Hagem C, Kallbekken S, Maestad O, Westskog H (2006) Market power with interdependent demand: sale of emission permits and natural gas from Russia. Environ Resour Econ 34: 211–227
Hagem C, Maestad O (2006) Russian exports of emission permits under the Kyoto Protocol: The interplay with non-competitive fuel markets. Resour Energy Econ 28:54–73
Klepper G, Peterson S (2004) The EU emissions trading scheme—allowance prices, trade flows, competitiveness effects. Eur Environ 14:201–218
Klepper G, Peterson S (2005) Trading hot-air. The influence of permit allocation rules, market power and the US withdrawal from the Kyoto protocol. Environ Resour Econ 32: 205–228
Klepper G, Peterson S (2006) Marginal abatement cost curves in general equilibrium: the influence of world energy prices. Resour Energy Econ 28:1–23
Lecocq F, Shalizi Z (2004) Will the Kyoto Protocol affect growth in Russia? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3454
Löschel A, Zhang Z (2002) The economic and environmental implications of the US repudiation of the Kyoto Protocol and the subsequent deals in Bonn and Marrakech. Rev World Economics—Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 138:711–746
McKibbin WJ, Wilcoxen PJ (2002) The role of economics in climate change policy. J Econ Perspect 16:107–129
Michaelowa A, Koch T (1999) Critical issues in current climate policy. “Hot air”, multi-level emission trading registries and changes in emission commitments due to international conflicts. HWWA-Report 194. HWWA-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Hamburg
Paltsev SV (2000) The Kyoto protocol: ‘Hot air’ for Russia?, Working Paper 00–9. University of Colorado, Boulder
UNFCCC (2006) Greenhouse gas inventory data for 1994, available at: http://ghg.unfccc.int/tables/na2_1994.html
Varian HR (1989) Price discrimination. In: Schmalensee R, Willig RD (eds) Handbook of industrial organization, vol. 1. Elsevier Science Publishers
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Böhringer, C., Moslener, U. & Sturm, B. Hot air for sale: a quantitative assessment of Russia’s near-term climate policy options. Environ Resource Econ 38, 545–572 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9089-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9089-4