Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Business school education and technology–a case study

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the holistic integration approach that a management school has to adopt, so that the students are equipped with enough skills and techniques to face the challenges of the varying business dynamics. There is a need for Business schools to integrate academic activities with all other relevant processes such that at the end of their tenure, the students are ready to tackle issues related to society, business and technology. However, for this to happen, the Business schools need to redesign their approach for framing the curriculum. Instead of designing a standalone curriculum, the Business schools need to understand the requirements of all stakeholders such as recruiters, business, students and faculty. The Business schools can achieve this by gaining knowledge through research, consulting and delivering through improved pedagogy using technology. For this research, data was collected by conducting primary survey of 5 Business schools taken as case study and using secondary source to get details of their processes. The findings can be used by any other Business school aspiring to produce effective managers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akbaba-Altun, S. (2006). Complexity of integrating computer technologies into education in turkey. Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 176–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albion, P. R., & Ertmer, P. (2002). Beyond the foundations: the role of vision and belief in teachers’ preparation for integration of technology. Technology Trends, 46(5), 34–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebell, D., Russell, M., & O’Dwyer, L. (2004). Measuring teachers’ technology uses: why multiplemeasures are more revealing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(1), 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning and computing survey: Is Lary Cuban right? Retrieved May 4, 2009, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/ccsso.pdf

  • Belland, B. (2009). Using the theory of habitus to move beyond the study of barriers to technology integration. Computers & Education, 52(2), 353–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, J., & Kemp, N. (1987). The strategic role of management development. Management Education and Development, 18(3), 158–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J. A., Spreitzer, G. M., & Lawler, E. E. (1999). Introduction: The challenges of effective change leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology Forman, S. (1998, February). Undergraduate education reform. Paper presented at the AACSB undergraduate Program Seminar Charlottesville, VA.

  • Forman, G. E., Edwards, C. P., & Gandini L. (1998). The hundred languages of children: The reggio emilia approach: Advanced reflections. Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group.

  • Guha, S. (2003). Are we technologically prepared?—Teachers’ perspective on the causes of comfort or discomfort in using computers at elementary grade teaching. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 17(1), 317–349. AACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P., & Snidvongs, K. (2008). Education leaders: is there anything to learn from business management? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 36(1), 11–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C. (1994). 1993 Presidential address: what if the academy actually mattered? Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, A., Hodgkinson, M., Peltier, J. W., & Drago, W. A. (2004). Interaction and virtual learning. Strategic Change, 13(4), 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into k-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huff, A. S., & Huff, J. O. (2001). Re-focusing the business school agenda. British Journal of Management, 12, S49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (2008). Educational technology: A definition with commentary. New York: Taylor & Francis Group/LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, B. (1992). Industry to B. Schools: smarten up on TQM or else. Electronic Business, 18, 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karci, C., & Akar-Vural, R. (2011). Teachers’ Views with regard to teaching English in multigraded classrooms. Elementary Education Online, 10(2), 593–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology and classroom practices: an international study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurt, S. (2010). Technology use in elementary education in turkey: a case study. New Horizons in Education, 58(1), 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: knowns, unknowns and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77, 575–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the source of innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

  • McCannon, M., & Crews, T. B. (2000). Assessing the technology needs of elementary school teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2), 11–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCuddy, M.K. & Pirie, W. L. (1998, February). Contributing to a skilled workforce: Val-paraiso University’s Approach. Paper presented at the AACSB undergraduate Program seminar, Charlottesville, VA.

  • McDonald, K. S., & Mansour-Cole, D. (2000). Change requires intensive care: an experiential exercise for learners in university and corporate settings. Journal of Management Education, 24(1), 128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mentz, M., & Mentz, K. (2003). Managing technology integration into schools: a south African perspective. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 186–200.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C., & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1523–1537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and technology: a review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozdemir, S., & Kilic, E. (2007). Integrating information and communication technologies in the Turkish primary school system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(5), 907–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37, 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1977). Effects of an MBA and socioeconomic origins on business school graduates’ salaries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 698–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender, J. C. (1995). Underlying antinomies: An historical analysis of US graduate business education and its problems. Available: http://www.iris.nyit.edu/~spender

  • Tannenbaum, S. I. (2002). A strategic view of training and learning. In K. Kraignr (Ed.), Creating, implementing, and managing effective training and development: State-of-the-Art lessons for practice (pp. 10–52). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Wexley, K. N., & Baldwin, T. T. (1986). Management development. Journal of Management, 12(2), 278.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjay Mohapatra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohapatra, S. Business school education and technology–a case study. Educ Inf Technol 20, 335–346 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9287-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9287-3

Keywords

Navigation