Abstract
In the UK, approaches to developing, encouraging and extending children’s’ thinking are of considerable professional interest. Teachers and researchers have explored a number of different strategies. These are categorized in recent Department for Education and Skills (DFES) guidance into three broad areas: philosophical, cognitive intervention, and brain-based learning approaches. Within all these approaches, spoken language has been identified as essential for collaborative learning of any kind and in some, information technology is also seen as a potentially supportive collaborative medium (McGuiness, 1999).
This paper takes the form of a case study of children aged 10–11, from two Primary schools and considers the place of diagrammatic software in supporting children’s’ exploration and representation of ideas. The case study provides some concrete examples of ways in which the children made links between their discussion of ideas and their visual record. Children were recorded as they worked together to produce their map and as they reported to their peers on its completion.
Data were collected over a six week period using observational schedules, field notes, and pupil feedback. The analysis of maps themselves was a central concern as this as techniques for this are not yet fully established, although some significant work is available (e.g. Mavers et al., 2002) The study showed the ease with which all pupils adapted to the use of the software.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnheim, R. (1969) Visual Thinking, University of California Press, Berkley, California.
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., and Hanesian, H. (1978) Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View, (2nd Edition), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, NY.
Bruner, J. S. (1964) The course of cognitive growth. American Psychologist, 19, 1–15.
Bruner, J. S. (1986) Actual Minds, Posible Worlds, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Bruner, J. S. (1996) The Culture of Education, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
Dawes, L. Mercer, N., and Wegerif, R. (2000) Thinking together: A programme of activities for developing thinking skills at KS2 Birmingham: Questions Publishing.
DfEE (Department for Education and Employment) and QCA (Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (1999) The National Curriculum in England, HMSO, London.
Donald, J. G. (2002) Learning to Think, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Feuerstein, R., Rand Y., Hoffman, M.B., and Miller, R. (1980) Instrumental Enrichment: An Intervention Programme for Cognitive Modifiability. University Park Press, Baltimore.
Forman, E. and McPhail, J. (1993). Vygotskian perspectives on children’s collaborative problem-solving activities. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, and C. Addison Stone (eds.). Contexts for learning. Sociocultural Dynamics in Children’s Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Hibberd, R. E., Jones, A. C., and Morris, E. J. (2002) The Use of Concept Mapping as a Means to Promote and Assess Student Knowledge Acquisition (CALRG Report No. 202). The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
Higgins, S. (2001) Thinking Through Primary Teaching. Chris Kington Publishing, Cambridge.
Johnson, S. (2001) Teaching Thinking Skills (Impact No 8). The Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain.
Kress, G. (1997) Before writing: Rethinking the paths to Literacy. Routledge, London.
Kress, G. and van Leewen, T. (1990) Reading images, Deakin University.
Lawson, M. J. (1994) Concept mapping. In T. Husén and T.N. Postlethwaite (eds.), The International Encyclopaedia of Education (2nd Edition) Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK.
Mavers, D., Somekh, B., and Restorick, J. (2002) Interpreting the externalized images of pupils’ conceptions of ICT: Methods for the analysis of concept maps. Computers in Education 38, 187–207.
McGuinness, C. (1999) From thinking skills to thinking classrooms: A review and evaluation of approaches for developing pupils’ thinking. DFEE Research Report RR115, London.
McClure, J.R. and Bell, P.E. (1990) Effects of an Environmental Education-Related STS Approach Instruction on Cognitive Structures of Preservice Science Teachers. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Novak, J.D. and Gowin, D.R. (1984) Learning How to Learn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Novak, J.D. and Mussonda, D. (1991) A twelve year longitudinal study of science concept learning. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 117–153.
Reid, J., Forrestal, P., and Cook, J. (1989) Small Group Learning in the Classroom. Chalkface Press, Western Australia.
Roth, W.M. (1994) Student Views of Collaborative Concept Mapping: An Emancipatory Research Project. Science Education, 1, 1–34.
Roth, W.M. and Roychoudhury, A. (1994) Science discourse through collaborative concept mapping: New perspectives for the teacher. International Journal of Science Education, 16, 437–455.
Somekh, B. and Mavers, D. (2003) Mapping learning Potential: Students’ conceptions of ICT in their world. Assessment in Education, 10(3), 409–420.
Somekh, B. and Pearson, M. (2003) Concept-mapping as a research tool: A study of primary children’s representations of information and communication technologies (ICT). Education and Information Technologies, 8(1), 5–22.
Wegerif, R. (2002) Thinking skills, technology and learning: A review of the literature for NESTA FutureLab http://www.nestafuturelab.org
Wegerif, R. and Scrimshaw, P. (eds.) (1997) Computers and talk in the primary classroom, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon.
Williams, S. (2002) Memory, creativity and the brain: An interview with Tony Buzan. Teaching Thinking, 7, 24–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cook, D., Ralston, J. Building the Cognitive Bridge: Children, Information Technology and Thinking. Educ Inf Technol 10, 207–223 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-005-3001-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-005-3001-z