Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bevacizumab for salvage treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • SHORT REPORT
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Although various new agents have been developed for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), overall survival rates have changed little in the last half century. We conducted meta-analysis to verify the clinical efficacy of bevacizumab for the salvage treatment of MBC. Event-based hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were derived, and a test of heterogeneity was applied. Four studies, with a total of 2,860 patients, met the inclusion criteria for analysis. The pooled results of clinical efficacies were: HR for progression free survival 0.69 (95% CI, 0.58–0.81, z = 4.54, P <0.001); HR for overall survival 0.92 (95% CI, 0.82–1.03, z =1.44, P = 0.15); and HR for the clinical objective response rate 1.53 (95% CI, 1.37–1.71, z = 7.37, P < 0.001). In terms of overall survival, subgroup analysis demonstrated statistically significant improvement for the bevacizumab combination in the initial therapy subgroup (HR, 0.878; 95% CI, 0.771–0.999, z = 1.98, P = 0.048). Hypertension and proteinura were more common in the bevacizumab combination arm; however, these toxicities were managed with therapy. In conclusion, meta-analysis suggested benefits of a carefully managed bevacizumab-containing salvage regimen for patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed Her-2 negative MBC who have not received previous cytotoxic therapy. This treatment could improve both progression free survival and overall survival rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Pal SK, Gupta R, Bernstein L, Mortimer J (2008) Lack of survival benefit in metastatic breast cancer with newer chemotherapy agents: The City of Hope cancer experience. 2008 Breast Cancer Symposium abstract 95

  2. Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406:747–752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10869–10874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, Hastie T, Marron JS, Nobel A et al (2003) Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8418–8423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Reis-Filho JS, Westbury C, Pierga JY (2006) The impact of expression profiling on prognostic and predictive testing in breast cancer. J Clin Pathol 59:225–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rouzier R, Perou CM, Symmans WF, Ibrahim N, Cristofanilli M, Anderson K et al (2005) Breast cancer molecular subtypes respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 11:5678–5685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanahan D, Folkman F (1996) Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis. Cell 86:353–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Folkman J, Cole P, Zimmerman S (1966) Tumor behavior in isolated perfused organs: in vitro growth and metastases of biopsy material in rabbit thyroid and canine intestinal segment. Ann Surg 164:491–502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Folkman J (1971) Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med 285:1182–1186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferrara N (1999) Role of vascular endothelial growth factor in the regulation of angiogenesis. Kidney Int 56:794–814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim KJ, Li B, Winer J, Armanini M, Gillett N, Phillips HS et al (1993) Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis suppresses tumour growth in vivo. Nature 362:841–844

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cobleigh MA, Langmuir VK, Sledge GW, Miller KD, Haney L, Novotny WF et al (2003) A phase I/II dose-escalation trial of bevacizumab in previously treated metastatic breast cancer. Semin Oncol 30:117–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L (1998) Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Stat Med 17:2815–2834

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes MR (2007) Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials 8:16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller KD, Chap LI, Holmes FA, Cobleigh MA, Marcom PK, Fehrenbacher L et al (2005) Randomized phase III trial of capecitabine compared with bevacizumab plus capecitabine in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:792–799

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller K, Wang M, Gralow J, Dickler M, Cobleigh M, Perez EA et al (2007) Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med 357:2666–2676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pivot X, Verma S, Thomssen C, Passos-Coelho JL, Latini L, Ciruelos E et al (2009) Clinical benefit of bevacizumab (BV) plus first-line docetaxel (D) in elderly patients (pts) with locally recurrent (LR) or metastatic breast cancer (MBC): AVADO study. J Clin Oncol 27:15s supple; abstr 1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Robbert NJ, Dieras V, Glaspy J, Brufsky A, Bondarenko I, Lipatov O et al (2009) RIBBON-1: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab (B) for first-line treatment of HER-2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). J Clin Oncol 27:15s supple; abstr 1005

    Google Scholar 

  20. Greenberg PA, Hortobagyi GN, Smith TL, Ziegler LD, Frye DK, Buzdar AU (1996) Long-term follow-up of patients with complete remission following combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 14:2197–2205

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dedes KJ, Matter-Walstra K, Schwenkglenks M, Pestalozzi BC, Fink D, Brauchli P, Szucs TD (2009) Bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel for HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer: An economic evaluation. Eur J Cancer 45(8):1397–1406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None of the authors have potential conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae Hong Seo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, JB., Woo, O.H., Park, K.H. et al. Bevacizumab for salvage treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Invest New Drugs 29, 182–188 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-009-9310-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-009-9310-0

Keywords

Navigation