Skip to main content
Log in

Magnetic Compression Anastomosis Is a Good Treatment Option for Patients with Completely Obstructed Benign Biliary Strictures: A Case Series Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Completely obstructed benign biliary strictures (BBS) is a difficult-to-treat condition. Surgery is the main treatment modality with high morbidity and mortality. Recently, the magnetic compression anastomosis (MCA) technique was employed in such cases with low complication rates.

Aims

To evaluate the effectiveness of the MCA in completely obstructed BBS.

Methods

21 MCA procedures were performed in 19 patients with completely obstructed BBS. All patients had percutaneous biliary access. Magnets were located to the proximal side of the obstruction via percutaneous biliary sheath and the distal side endoscopically. The procedure was terminated as the magnets attracted. Either self-expandable fully covered metallic stent and/or a growing number of plastic stents were introduced after recanalization was achieved.

Result

A total number of 19 patients with completely obstructed BBS resulting from cholecystectomy or liver transplant underwent 21 MCA procedures. Among those, 19 (90.5%) interventions were successful. The median stricture length that had been measured after magnet attraction was 4 mm (range 1–10 mm). The median magnet coupling time in successful cases was 9 days (range 4–27 days). No correlation was found between magnet coupling time and stricture length (p = 0.27). Complications were observed in 6 (cholangitis:1, magnet migration:2, magnet entrapment:3) of 19 successful MCA procedures. Fifteen of the 19 successful procedures had at least a period of stent-free follow-up. Recurrence of stenosis occurred in 7 procedures, of which 4 remained stent-free with retreatment. Eventually, 12 procedures had stent-free last status.

Conclusions

MCA is an effective and safe treatment option in completely obstructed BBS. Further studies are required for procedural standardization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shimada H, Endo I, Shimada K, Matsuyama R, Kobayashi N, Kubota K. The current diagnosis and treatment of benign biliary stricture. Surg today. 2012;42:1143–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jang SI, Rhee K, Kim H, Kim YH, Yun J, Lee KH et al. Recanalization of refractory benign biliary stricture using magnetic compression anastomosis. Endoscopy. 2014;46:70–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yamanouchi E, Kawaguchi H, Endo I, Arakawa H, Yamaguchi T, Sakuyama K. A new interventional method: magnetic compression anastomosis with rare-earth magnets. Cardiovasc InterventRadiol. 1998;21:S155.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Itoi T, Kasuya K, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Tsuchiya T, Kurihara T et al. Magnetic compression anastomosis for biliary obstruction: review and experience at Tokyo medical university hospital. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18:357–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jang SI, Kim JH, Won JY, Lee KH, Kim HW, You JW et al. Magnetic compression anastomosis is useful in biliary anastomotic strictures after living donor liver transplantation. GastrointestEndosc. 2011;74:1040–1048.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chang JH, Lee I, Choi MG, Han SW. Current diagnosis and treatment of benign biliary strictures after living donor liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:1593–1606.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jang SI, Lee KH, Yoon HJ, Lee DK. Treatment of completely obstructed benign biliary strictures with magnetic compression anastomosis: follow-up results after recanalization. GastrointestEndosc. 2017;85:1057–1066.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Parlak E, Koksal AS, Kucukay F, Eminler AT, Toka B, Uslan MI. A novel technique for the endoscopic treatment of complete biliary anastomosis obstructions after liver transplantation: through-the-scope magnetic compression anastomosis. GastrointestEndosc. 2017;85:841–847.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li Y, Sun H, Yan X, Wang S, Dong D, Liu X et al. Magnetic compression anastomosis for the treatment of benign biliary strictures: a clinical study from China. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:2541–2550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ersoz G, Tekin F, Bozkaya H, Parildar M, Turan I, Karasu Z et al. Magnetic compression anastomosis for patients with a disconnected bile duct after living-donor related liver transplantation: a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2016;48:652–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Itoi T, Yamanouchi E, Ikeuchi N, Kasuya K, Iwamoto H, Tsuchida A. Magnetic compression duct-to-duct anastomosis for biliary obstruction in a patient with living donor liver transplantation. Gut Liver. 2010;4:S96–S98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jang SI, Cho JH, Lee DK. Magnetic compression anastomosis for the treatment of post-transplant biliary stricture. Clin Endosc. 2020;53:266–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Takao S, Matsuo Y, Shinchi H, Nakajima S, Aikou T, Iseji T et al. Magnetic compression anastomosis for benign obstruction of the common bile duct. Endoscopy. 2001;33:988–990.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Akita H, Hikita H, Yamanouchi E, Marubashi S, Nagano H, Umeshita K et al. Use of a metallic-wall stent in the magnet compression anastomosis technique for bile duct obstruction after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2008;14:118–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Okajima H, Kotera A, Takeichi T, Ueno M, Ishiko T, Hirota M et al. Magnet compression anastomosis for bile duct stenosis after duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:473–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Oya H, Sato Y, Yamanouchi E, Yamamoto S, Hara Y, Kokai H et al. Magnetic compression anastomosis for bile duct stenosis after donor left hepatectomy: a case report. Transplant Proc. 2012;44:806–809.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ersoz G, Tekin F, Bozkaya H, Parildar M, Turan I, Ozutemiz O et al. Magnetic compression anastomosis for post-traumatic disconnected bile duct. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2016;79:60–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Umemura A, Sasaki A, Nitta H, Takahara T, Hasegawa Y, Wakabayashi G. Magnetic compression anastomosis for the stricture of the choledochocholedochostomy after ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2014;7:361–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakaseko Y, Shiba H, Yamanouchi E, Takano Y, Sakamoto T, Imazu H et al. Successful treatment of stricture of duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis after living-donor liver transplantation of the left lobe: a case report. Transplant Proc. 2017;49:1644–1648.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Koksal AS, Eminler AT, Parlak E, Gurakar A. Management of biliary anastomotic strictures after liver transplantation. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2017;31:207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ödemiş B, Başpınar B, Torun S, Coşkun O. Magnet-assisted endoscopic choledochoduodenostomy in anomalous opening of the common bile duct into the duodenal bulb. Endoscopy. 2020;52:E386–E387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jang SI, Choi J, Lee DK. Magnetic compression anastomosis for treatment of benign biliary stricture. Dig Endosc. 2015;27:239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahmad DS, Faulx A. Management of postcholecystectomy biliary complications: a narrative review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115:1191–1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dhawan R, Kapoor V. Quality of life after repair (hepatico-jejunostomy) for post-cholecysyectomy bile duct injury. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2021;25:S317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sahoo MR, Ali MS, Sarthak S, Nayak J. Laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy for benign biliary stricture: a case series of 16 patients at a tertiary care centre in India. J Minim Access Surg. 2021. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_223_20.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang X, Yu WL, Fu XH, Zhu B, Zhao T, Zhang YJ. Early versus delayed surgical repair and referral for patients with bile duct injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2020;271:449–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ismael HN, Cox S, Cooper A, Narula N, Aloia T. The morbidity and mortality of hepaticojejunostomies for complex bile duct injuries: a multi-institutional analysis of risk factors and outcomes using NSQIP. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19:352–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our precious experienced ERCP nurses Meftune Koçer and Esme Küçük for their hard work during the procedures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bülent Ödemiş.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Drs Bülent Ödemiş, Batuhan Başpınar, Muharrem Tola and Serkan Torun have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

All authors above contributed the following aspects of the manuscript: conception and design, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the article, critical revision of the article for important intellectual content, final approval of the article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ödemiş, B., Başpınar, B., Tola, M. et al. Magnetic Compression Anastomosis Is a Good Treatment Option for Patients with Completely Obstructed Benign Biliary Strictures: A Case Series Study. Dig Dis Sci 67, 4906–4918 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-022-07381-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-022-07381-3

Keywords

Navigation