Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Combining K-72 Hepatic Failure with 15 Individual T-Codes to Identify Patients with Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury in the Electronic Medical Record

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to determine the utility of combining three K72 codes (hepatic failure) with 15 individual T-Codes (drug toxicity/poisoning) to identify potential DILI cases.

Methods

The EMR was searched for encounters that had a K72 code combined with a T-code that also met minimal liver injury laboratory criteria between 10/1/15 and 9/30/18. After manual chart review, a DILIN expert opinion causality score (1–5) was assigned to each case.

Results

Among the 345 patient encounters identified, mean age was 57 years, 53% were male, and 89% Caucasian. Thirty-seven cases (10.7%) were adjudicated as probable DILI with antibiotics being the most frequently identified suspect drugs. Of the 308 non-DILI cases, liver injury was most commonly due to congestive hepatopathy (38%) and hepatic metastases (15%). The probable-DILI cases were significantly more likely to have hepatocellular liver injury (57% vs 32.5%, p = 0.01), higher total bilirubin levels (7.7 vs 4.6 mg/dl, p = 0.03), and more severe liver injury scores (p < 0.01). The K72.0 (acute/ subacute hepatic failure) yielded the most DILI cases (29) compared to K72.9 (13) and K72.1 (0). The positive predictive value of the searching algorithm was 10.7% and improved to 15% when using only the K72.0 codes.

Conclusions

K72 codes combined with drug poisoning T-codes had a low positive predictive value in identifying patients with idiosyncratic DILI. These data support further refinement of ICD-10-based algorithms to detect DILI cases in the EMR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ALF:

Acute liver failure

ALP:

Alkaline phosphatase

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

DILI:

Drug-induced liver injury

DILIN:

Drug-induced liver injury network

EMR:

Electronic medical record

ICD:

International classification of diseases

INR:

International normalized ratio

IQR:

Interquartile range

SD:

Standard deviation

ULN:

Upper limit of normal

References

  1. Chalasani N, Fontana RJ, Bonkovsky HL et al. Causes, clinical features, and outcomes from a prospective study of drug-induced liver injury in the United States. Gastroenterology 2008;135:1934e1–4. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reuben A, Koch DG, Lee WM. Acute Liver Failure Study Group. Drug-induced acute liver failure: results of a U.S. multicenter, prospective study. Hepatology 2010;52:2065–2076. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.23937.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ostapowicz G, Fontana RJ, Schiødt FV et al. Results of a prospective study of acute liver failure at 17 tertiary care centers in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:947–954. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-137-12-200212170-00007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Watkins PB. Drug safety sciences and the bottleneck in drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011;89:788–790. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2011.63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fontana RJ. Pathogenesis of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury and clinical perspectives. Gastroenterology 2014;146:914–928. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2013.12.032.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chalasani NP, Hayashi PH, Bonkovsky HL et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: the diagnosis and management of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Am J Gastroenterol 2014;109:950–966. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2014.131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilke RA, Xu H, Denny JC et al. The emerging role of electronic medical records in pharmacogenomics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011;89:379–386. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2010.260.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yeboah-Korang A, Louissaint J, Tsung I, Prabhu S, Fontana RJ. Utility of a computerized ICD-10 algorithm to identify idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury cases in the electronic medical record. Drug Saf 2020;43:371–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-019-00903-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. ICD-10 Version:2016. https://icd.who.int/browse10/2016/en. Accessed September 28, 2020.

  10. Chalasani N, Bonkovsky HL, Fontana R et al. Features and outcomes of 899 patients with drug-induced liver injury: the DILIN prospective study. Gastroenterology 2015;148:1340-1352.e7. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aithal GP, Watkins PB, Andrade RJ et al. Case definition and phenotype standardization in drug-induced liver injury. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011;89:806–815. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2011.58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Regev A, Seeff LB, Merz M et al. Causality assessment for suspected DILI during clinical phases of drug development. Drug Saf 2014;37:S47-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0185-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Church RJ, Kullak-Ublick GA, Aubrecht J et al. Candidate biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of drug-induced liver injury: an international collaborative effort. Hepatology 2019;69:760–773. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Benesic A, Jalal K, Gerbes AL. Drug-drug combinations can enhance toxicity as shown by monocyte-derived hepatocyte-like cells from patients with idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Toxicol Sci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfz156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Uetrecht J. Mechanisms of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Adv Pharmacol 2019;85:133–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apha.2018.12.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Au JS, Navarro VJ, Rossi S. Review article: drug-induced liver injury—its pathophysiology and evolving diagnostic tools. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011;34:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04674.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILN) Network retrospective—full text view-ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00360646. Accessed August 5, 2020.

  18. Forns J, Cainzos-Achirica M, Hellfritzsch M et al. Validity of ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes used to identify acute liver injury: a study in three European data sources. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2019;28:965–975. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Tan EH, Low EXS, Dan YY, Tai BC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of algorithms used to identify drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in health record databases. Liver Int 2018;38:742–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.13646.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lewis JH, Stine JG. Review article: prescribing medications in patients with cirrhosis—a practical guide. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013;37:1132–1156. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.12324.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rockey DC, Seeff LB, Rochon J et al. Causality assessment in drug-induced liver injury using a structured expert opinion process: comparison to the Roussel–Uclaf causality assessment method. Hepatology 2010;51:2117–2126. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.23577.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hassan A, Fontana RJ. The diagnosis and management of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Liver Int 2019;39:31–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.13931.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Winkler V, Ott JJ, Becher H. Reliability of coding causes of death with ICD-10 in Germany. Int J Public Health 2010;55:43–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-009-0053-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. de Abajo FJ, Montero D, Madurga M, García Rodríguez LA. Acute and clinically relevant drug-induced liver injury: a population based case-control study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2004;58:71–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02133.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Jeremy Louissaint was supported by the NIH T32DK062708 Grant. Amoah Yeboah-Korang was supported by the 2018 AASLD Foundation Advanced/Transplant Hepatology Award. Robert J. Fontana has received research support from Gilead, BristolMyersSquibb, and Abbvie and consults for Sanofi.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Roles a. Concept: L, Y-K, F, b. Data Acquisition: L, K, Y-K, c. Statistical Analysis: L, K, d. Writing: L, d. Revision: F, Y-K, K.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. Fontana.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have a conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Louissaint, J., Kassab, I., Yeboah-Korang, A. et al. Combining K-72 Hepatic Failure with 15 Individual T-Codes to Identify Patients with Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury in the Electronic Medical Record. Dig Dis Sci 67, 4243–4249 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07223-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07223-8

Keywords

Navigation