Abstract
Background
The aim of this study was to determine the utility of combining three K72 codes (hepatic failure) with 15 individual T-Codes (drug toxicity/poisoning) to identify potential DILI cases.
Methods
The EMR was searched for encounters that had a K72 code combined with a T-code that also met minimal liver injury laboratory criteria between 10/1/15 and 9/30/18. After manual chart review, a DILIN expert opinion causality score (1–5) was assigned to each case.
Results
Among the 345 patient encounters identified, mean age was 57 years, 53% were male, and 89% Caucasian. Thirty-seven cases (10.7%) were adjudicated as probable DILI with antibiotics being the most frequently identified suspect drugs. Of the 308 non-DILI cases, liver injury was most commonly due to congestive hepatopathy (38%) and hepatic metastases (15%). The probable-DILI cases were significantly more likely to have hepatocellular liver injury (57% vs 32.5%, p = 0.01), higher total bilirubin levels (7.7 vs 4.6 mg/dl, p = 0.03), and more severe liver injury scores (p < 0.01). The K72.0 (acute/ subacute hepatic failure) yielded the most DILI cases (29) compared to K72.9 (13) and K72.1 (0). The positive predictive value of the searching algorithm was 10.7% and improved to 15% when using only the K72.0 codes.
Conclusions
K72 codes combined with drug poisoning T-codes had a low positive predictive value in identifying patients with idiosyncratic DILI. These data support further refinement of ICD-10-based algorithms to detect DILI cases in the EMR.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ALF:
-
Acute liver failure
- ALP:
-
Alkaline phosphatase
- ALT:
-
Alanine aminotransferase
- AST:
-
Aspartate aminotransferase
- DILI:
-
Drug-induced liver injury
- DILIN:
-
Drug-induced liver injury network
- EMR:
-
Electronic medical record
- ICD:
-
International classification of diseases
- INR:
-
International normalized ratio
- IQR:
-
Interquartile range
- SD:
-
Standard deviation
- ULN:
-
Upper limit of normal
References
Chalasani N, Fontana RJ, Bonkovsky HL et al. Causes, clinical features, and outcomes from a prospective study of drug-induced liver injury in the United States. Gastroenterology 2008;135:1934e1–4. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.011.
Reuben A, Koch DG, Lee WM. Acute Liver Failure Study Group. Drug-induced acute liver failure: results of a U.S. multicenter, prospective study. Hepatology 2010;52:2065–2076. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.23937.
Ostapowicz G, Fontana RJ, Schiødt FV et al. Results of a prospective study of acute liver failure at 17 tertiary care centers in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:947–954. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-137-12-200212170-00007.
Watkins PB. Drug safety sciences and the bottleneck in drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011;89:788–790. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2011.63.
Fontana RJ. Pathogenesis of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury and clinical perspectives. Gastroenterology 2014;146:914–928. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2013.12.032.
Chalasani NP, Hayashi PH, Bonkovsky HL et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: the diagnosis and management of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Am J Gastroenterol 2014;109:950–966. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2014.131.
Wilke RA, Xu H, Denny JC et al. The emerging role of electronic medical records in pharmacogenomics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011;89:379–386. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2010.260.
Yeboah-Korang A, Louissaint J, Tsung I, Prabhu S, Fontana RJ. Utility of a computerized ICD-10 algorithm to identify idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury cases in the electronic medical record. Drug Saf 2020;43:371–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-019-00903-5.
ICD-10 Version:2016. https://icd.who.int/browse10/2016/en. Accessed September 28, 2020.
Chalasani N, Bonkovsky HL, Fontana R et al. Features and outcomes of 899 patients with drug-induced liver injury: the DILIN prospective study. Gastroenterology 2015;148:1340-1352.e7. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.006.
Aithal GP, Watkins PB, Andrade RJ et al. Case definition and phenotype standardization in drug-induced liver injury. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011;89:806–815. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2011.58.
Regev A, Seeff LB, Merz M et al. Causality assessment for suspected DILI during clinical phases of drug development. Drug Saf 2014;37:S47-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0185-4.
Church RJ, Kullak-Ublick GA, Aubrecht J et al. Candidate biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of drug-induced liver injury: an international collaborative effort. Hepatology 2019;69:760–773. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29802.
Benesic A, Jalal K, Gerbes AL. Drug-drug combinations can enhance toxicity as shown by monocyte-derived hepatocyte-like cells from patients with idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Toxicol Sci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfz156.
Uetrecht J. Mechanisms of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Adv Pharmacol 2019;85:133–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apha.2018.12.001.
Au JS, Navarro VJ, Rossi S. Review article: drug-induced liver injury—its pathophysiology and evolving diagnostic tools. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011;34:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04674.x.
Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILN) Network retrospective—full text view-ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00360646. Accessed August 5, 2020.
Forns J, Cainzos-Achirica M, Hellfritzsch M et al. Validity of ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes used to identify acute liver injury: a study in three European data sources. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2019;28:965–975. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4803.
Tan EH, Low EXS, Dan YY, Tai BC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of algorithms used to identify drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in health record databases. Liver Int 2018;38:742–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.13646.
Lewis JH, Stine JG. Review article: prescribing medications in patients with cirrhosis—a practical guide. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013;37:1132–1156. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.12324.
Rockey DC, Seeff LB, Rochon J et al. Causality assessment in drug-induced liver injury using a structured expert opinion process: comparison to the Roussel–Uclaf causality assessment method. Hepatology 2010;51:2117–2126. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.23577.
Hassan A, Fontana RJ. The diagnosis and management of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Liver Int 2019;39:31–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.13931.
Winkler V, Ott JJ, Becher H. Reliability of coding causes of death with ICD-10 in Germany. Int J Public Health 2010;55:43–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-009-0053-7.
de Abajo FJ, Montero D, Madurga M, García Rodríguez LA. Acute and clinically relevant drug-induced liver injury: a population based case-control study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2004;58:71–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02133.x.
Funding
Jeremy Louissaint was supported by the NIH T32DK062708 Grant. Amoah Yeboah-Korang was supported by the 2018 AASLD Foundation Advanced/Transplant Hepatology Award. Robert J. Fontana has received research support from Gilead, BristolMyersSquibb, and Abbvie and consults for Sanofi.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Roles a. Concept: L, Y-K, F, b. Data Acquisition: L, K, Y-K, c. Statistical Analysis: L, K, d. Writing: L, d. Revision: F, Y-K, K.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have a conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Louissaint, J., Kassab, I., Yeboah-Korang, A. et al. Combining K-72 Hepatic Failure with 15 Individual T-Codes to Identify Patients with Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury in the Electronic Medical Record. Dig Dis Sci 67, 4243–4249 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07223-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07223-8