Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Risk Factors Between Small Intestinal Ulcerative and Vascular Lesions in Occult Versus Overt Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstracts

Background and Aims

The detailed risk factors such as bleeding pattern, comorbidities, and medication usage of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) are largely unknown. We evaluated the risk factors related to ulcerative and vascular lesions of the small intestine diagnosed by capsule endoscopy or balloon-assisted endoscopy in OGIB cases.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 390 OGIB cases (occult, n = 101; overt, n = 289) in our hospital between January 2005 and March 2011 using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine the related risk factors.

Results

In occult (n = 36) and overt (n = 120) OGIB cases, some lesions were detected in the small intestine. Ulcerative and vascular lesions were detected in both occult (n = 25, 69.4 %; n = 8, 22.2 %, respectively) and overt (n = 57, 47.5 %; n = 39, 32.5 %, respectively) cases. For ulcerative lesions, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were identified as a risk factor in overt cases [odds ratio (OR) 2.974, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.522–5.809, P = 0.001]. For vascular lesions, lowest hemoglobin level (OR 0.634, 95 % CI 0.422–0.953, P = 0.028) and hematologic disease (OR 8.575, 95 % CI 1.076–68.309, P = 0.042) were identified as risk factors in occult cases, whereas hemodialysis (OR 3.71, 95 % CI 1.315–10.467, P = 0.013) was identified in overt cases. Additionally, liver cirrhosis was noted as a risk factor in both occult (OR 7.453, 95 % CI 1.213–45.773, P = 0.013) and overt (OR 4.900, 95 % CI 2.099–11.443, P < 0.001) OGIB cases.

Conclusion

There are differences in risk factors related to ulcerative versus vascular lesions in the small intestine in occult and overt OGIB cases. Differences were seen in both medication usage and comorbidities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rockey DC. Occult gastrointestinal bleeding. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:38–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Matsumoto T, Moriyama T, Esaki M, et al. Performance of antegrade double-balloon enteroscopy: comparison with push enteroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:392–398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mylonaki M, Fritscher-Ravens A, Swain P. Wireless capsule endoscopy: a comparison with push enteroscopy with gastroscopy and colonoscopy negative gastrointestinal bleeding. Gut. 2003;52:1122–1126.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Saurin JC, Delvaux M, Gaudin JL, et al. Diagnostic values of endoscopic capsule in patients with obscure bleeding: blinded comparison with video push enteroscopy. Endoscopy. 2003;35:576–584.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Constamagna G, Shah SK, Riccioni ME, et al. A prospective trial comparing small bowel radiographs and video capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:999–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Saperas E, Dot J, Videla S, et al. Capsule endoscopy versus computed tomography or standard angiography for the diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:731–737.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Teshima CW, Kuipers EJ, van Zanten SV, et al. Double balloon enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: an updated meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26:796–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakamura M, Niwa Y, Ohmiya N. Preliminary comparison of capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding. Endoscopy. 2006;38:59–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carey EJ, Leighton JA, Heigh RI, et al. A single-center experience of 260 consecutive patients undergoing capsule endoscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:89–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goenka MK, Majumder S, Kumar S, et al. Single center experience of capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:774–778.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakayama S, Tominaga K, Obayashi T, et al. The prevalence of adverse events associated with double-balloon enteroscopy from a single-centre dataset in Japan. Dig Liver Dis. 2014;46:706–709.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pennazio M, Santucci R, Rondonotti E, et al. Outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy: report of 100 consecutive cases. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:643–653.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Selby W. Can clinical features predict the likelihood of finding abnormalities when using capsule endoscopy in patients with GI bleeding of obscure origin? Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:782–787.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Redondo-Cerezo E, Perez-Vigara G, Perez-Sola A, et al. Diagnostic yield and impact of capsule endoscopy on management of patients with gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure origin. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52:1376–1381.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sidhu R, Sanders DS, Kapur K, et al. Factors predicting the diagnostic yield and intervention in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding investigated using capsule endoscopy. J Gastrointest Liver Dis. 2009;18:273–278.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lepileur L, Dray X, Antonietti M, et al. Factors associated with diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding by video capsule enteroscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:1376–1380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shahidi NC, Ou G, Svarta S, et al. Factors associated with positive findings from capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:1381–1385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sakai E, Endo H, Taniguchi L, et al. Factors predicting the presence of small bowel lesions in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Dig Endosc. 2013;25:412–420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cúrdia Gonçalves T, Magalhães J, Boal Carvalho P. Is it possible to predict the presence of intestinal angioectasias? Diagn Ther Endosc. 2014;461602:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldstein JL, Eisen GM, Lewis B, et al. Video capsule endoscopy to prospectively assess small bowel injury with celecoxib, naproxen plus omeprazole, and placebo. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3:133–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maiden L, Thjodleifsson B, Theodors A, et al. A quantitative analysis of NSAID-induced small bowel pathology by capsule enteroscopy. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:1172–1178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Graham DY, Opekun AR, Willingham FF, et al. Visible small-bowel intestinal mucosal injury in chronic NSAID users. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3:55–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Watanabe T, Sugimori S, Kameda N, et al. Small bowel injury by low-dose enteric-coated aspirin and treatment with misoprostol: a pilot study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;11:1279–1282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Watanabe T, Takeuchi T, Handa O, et al. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of high-dose rebamipide treatment for low-dose aspirin-induced moderate-to-severe small intestinal damage. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0122330.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ohmori T, Konishi H, Nakamura S, et al. Abnormalities of the small intestine detected by capsule endoscopy in hemodialysis patients. Intern Med. 2012;51:1455–1460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sugano K, Marcon N. The first international workshop on double balloon endoscopy: a consensus meeting report. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:7–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xin L, Liao Z, Jiang YP, et al. Indications, detectability, positive findings, total enteroscopy, and complications of diagnostic double-balloon endoscopy: a systematic review of data over the first decade of use. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:563–570.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Richardson JD, Lordon RE. Gastrointestinal bleeding caused by angiodysplasia: a difficult problem in patients with chronic renal failure receiving hemodialysis therapy. Am Surg. 1993;59:636–638.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. De Palma GD, Rega M, Masone S, et al. Mucosal abnormalities of the small bowel in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension: a capsule endoscopy study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:529–534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazunari Tominaga.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Tetsuo Arakawa has participated in advisory committees for Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and Eisai Co. Ltd. Yasuhiro Fujiwara has participated in advisory committees for Eisai Co. Ltd. All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okamoto, J., Tominaga, K., Sugimori, S. et al. Comparison of Risk Factors Between Small Intestinal Ulcerative and Vascular Lesions in Occult Versus Overt Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Dig Dis Sci 61, 533–541 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-015-3904-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-015-3904-5

Keywords

Navigation