Abstract
Background
Both 22- and 25-gauge needles are used for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of lesions, yet limited data exist on whether either offers an advantage over the other in terms of specimen cellularity and quality.
Aim
The aim of this study was to compare sample quality for 22- and 25-gauge needles in EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic and peri-pancreatic lesions.
Methods
Between October 2005 and June 2006, 12 patients with pancreatic or peripancreatic lesions underwent EUS-guided FNA with both 22- and 25-gauge Wilson-Cook Echotip needles. All procedures were performed with an Olympus linear echoendoscope by the same endoscopist to eliminate operator-dependent variability. Needle order was selected randomly, and two passes were made with each needle, consisting of ten uniform to-and-fro movements on each pass with 10-ml syringe suction. The specimens were immediately stained and independently reviewed by two cytopathologists, who were blinded to the needle used. Cellularity was graded as 0 to 6, with 6 being most cellular.
Results
No statistically significant difference in cellularity was detected between the two needle size groups by cytologist 1 (mean difference, 0.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], −1.22 to 1.30; p = 0.94) or by cytologist 2 (mean difference, 0.2; 95% CI, −1.23 to 1.65; p = 0.76). When the data from both cytologists were combined, no significant difference in cellularity was detected between the two needle sizes (mean difference, 0.125; 95% CI, −1.22 to 1.47; p = 0.84). No significant difference in cellularity was detected between cytologists 1 and 2 (mean difference, 0.17; 95% CI, −0.15 to 0.48; p = 0.27). When the order in which needles were used was compared, no significant difference in cellularity was detected (p = 0.75). Three mechanical failures occurred with 25-gauge needles, but none occurred with 22-gauge needles. The visibility of the needles on EUS did not differ. Cytologic diagnoses were achieved in all cases: seven pancreatic adenocarcinomas, one pancreatic giant cell carcinoma, one pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, one metastatic non-small cell carcinoma, one metastatic colon carcinoma, and one pancreatitis. There were no procedure-related complications.
Conclusions
Both FNA needles provided accurate diagnoses in all patients. There was no significant difference between the 22- and 25-gauge needle groups in the independent interpretation of two cytopathologists with respect to cellular yield and ability to render a diagnosis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fisher L, Segarajasingam DS, Stewart C, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: performance and outcomes. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:90–96.
Lin F, Staerkel G. Cytologic criteria for well differentiated adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens. Cancer. 2003;99:44–50.
Niederhuber JE, Brennan MF, Menck HR. The national cancer data base report on pancreatic cancer. Cancer. 1995;76:1671–1677.
Cohen MB, Egerter DP, Holly EA, Ahn DK, Miller TR. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: regression analysis to identify improved cytologic criteria. Diagn Cytopathol. 1991;7:341–345.
Mitchell ML, Carney CN. Cytologic criteria for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 1985;83:171–176.
Fekete PS, Nunez C, Pitlik DA. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the pancreas: a study of 61 cases. Diagn Cytopathol. 1986;2:301–306.
Al-Kaisi N, Siegler EE. Fine needle aspiration cytology of the pancreas. Acta Cytol. 1989;33:145–152.
Kocjan G, Rode J, Lees WR. Percutaneous fine needle aspiration cytology of the pancreas: advantage and pitfalls. J Clin Pathol. 1989;42:341–347.
Robins DB, Katz RL, Evans DB, et al. Fine needle aspiration of the pancreas. In quest of accuracy. Acta Cytol. 1995;39:1–10.
Payne M, Staerkel G, Gong Y. Indeterminate diagnosis in fine-needle aspiration of the pancreas: reasons and clinical implications. Diagn Cytopathol. 2009;37:21–29.
Itoi T, Itokawa F, Sofuni A. Puncture of solid pancreatic tumors guided by endoscopic ultrasonography: a pilot study series comparing Tru-Cut and 19-gauge and 22-gauge aspiration needles. Endoscopy. 2005;37:362–366.
Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Komaki T, et al. Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Tru-Cut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:384–390.
Puri R, Vilmann P, Saftoiu A, et al. Randomized controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle sampling with or without suction for better cytological diagnosis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;31:1–6.
Afify AM, al-Khafaji BM, Kim B, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas. Diagnostic utility and accuracy. Acta Cytol. 2003;47:341–348.
Eloubeidi MA, Jhala D, Chieng DC, et al. Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients with suspected pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer. 2003;99:285–292.
Tadic M, Kujundzic M, Stoos-Veic T, et al. Role of repeated endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in small solid pancreatic masses with previous indeterminate and negative cytological findings. Dig Dis. 2008;26:377–382.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by Cook Endoscopy (Winston-Salem, NC, USA), which provided all of the 22- gauge and 25-gauge Wilson-Cook Echotip needles.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, J.H., Stewart, J., Ross, W.A. et al. Blinded Prospective Comparison of the Performance of 22-Gauge and 25-Gauge Needles in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of the Pancreas and Peri-pancreatic Lesions. Dig Dis Sci 54, 2274–2281 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-009-0906-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-009-0906-1