Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The questionable legitimacy of non-state anti-corruption bodies: a case study of the Tennis Integrity Unit

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rise of non-state governance to tackle corruption, social harm and misbehaviour within globalised industries often produces key questions about the credibility and effectiveness of ‘private’ enforcement. This articles uses the case study of the ‘Tennis Integrity Unit’ (TIU) to explore the struggles of non-state, transnational anti-corruption bodies to build and maintain legitimacy. Heightened media attention and specific allegations of complacent, under-enforcement against match-fixing in January 2016 highlighted the deficit of trust in the TIU which has prompted a review of the industry’s anti-corruption efforts. While non-state governance bodies are always likely to be considered suspect, there are specific ways in which such bodies, including the TIU, can attempt to improve their legitimacy through enhancing transparency, embracing forms of ‘meta-regulation’ and appreciating the ‘dialectic’ nature of legitimacy through expanding the involvement and participation of key stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cole, W. (2015). Institutionalizing a global anti-corruption regime: Perverse effects on country outcomes, 1984-2012. International Journal of Comparative Society, 56(1), 53–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gutterman, E. (2014). The legitimacy of transnational NGOs: Lessons from the experience of Transparency International in Germany and France. Review of International Studies, 40(2), 391–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bayley, D., & Shearing, C. (1996). The future of policing. Law and Society Review, 30(3), 585–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnston, L., & Shearing, C. (2003). Governing Security: Explorations in Policing and Justice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wood, J., & Shearing, C. (2007). Imagining Security. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bernstein, S. (2011). Legitimacy in intergovernmental and non-state global governance. Review of International Political Economy, 18(1), 17–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2007). Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework. Regulation and Governance, 1(4), 347–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Black, J. (2008). Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. Regulation and Governance, 2(2), 137–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brassett, J., & Tsingou, E. (2011). The politics of legitimate global governance. Review of International Political Economy, 18(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grabosky, P. (2013). Beyond Responsive Regulation: The expanding role of non-state actors in the regulatory process. Regulation and Governance, 7(1), 114–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Rourke, D. (2006). Multi-stakeholder regulation: Privatizing or socializing global labor standards? World Development, 34(5), 899–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Blake, H., & Templon, J. (2016a). The Tennis Racket. A Buzzfeed News/BBC Investigation http://www.buzzfeed.com/heidiblake/the-tennis-racket#.bxZLJW8wn. Accessed 1 March 2016.

  13. Beetham, D. (1991). The legitimation of power. London: Macmillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Blake, H., & Templin, H., (2016b). The Italian Job. A Buzzfeed News/BBC Investigation http://www.buzzfeed.com/heidiblake/heres-the-evidence-of-worldwide-match-fixing-prosecutors-say?bftwuk&utm_term=.sdJ1M720G#.er5jlLwV0. Accessed 12 Apr 2016.

  15. Dorward, I. (2015a). Fixing in tennis: The public perception. DW on Sport (blog) http://www.sportdw.com/2015/10/fixing-in-tennis-public-perception.html. Accessed 1 March 2016.

  16. Culture, Media and Sport Committee (2016). Oral Evidence: Match Fixing in Tennis HC 862 http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/culture-media-and-sport-committee/match-fixing-in-tennis/oral/29768.html. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.

  17. Rumsby, B. (2016). Tennis match-fixing row escalates as Italian prosecutors ‘name’ 20 high-profile players and sport’s leaders accused of ignoring evidence. The Telegraph http://www.telegraph.co.uk/tennis/2016/03/15/tennis-match-fixing-row-escalates-as-sports-leaders-accused-of-i/. Accessed 2 Dec 2016.

  18. Cambers, S. (2014). Organised crime has already infiltrated tennis, says security expert. The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2014/nov/25/organised-crime-tennis-security-expert. Accessed 2 Dec 2016.

  19. Wertheim, J. (2016). Sports gambling consultant Scott Ferguson addresses match-fixing. Sports Illustrated http://www.si.com/tennis/2016/01/18/australian-open-scott-ferguson-match-fixing-betting-tennis#. Accessed 29 Feb 2016.

  20. Berlincioni, S. (2015). I was banned but I am not guilty: Interview with Arkadiusz Kocyla. Last Word on Sports http://lastwordonsports.com/2015/09/23/banned-not-guilty-interview-arkadiusz-kocyla/. Accessed 1 March 2016.

  21. Besser, L. & Stevens, J. (2016). Bad Sport. ABC Four Corners http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/stories/2016/02/01/4395832.htm. Accessed 1 March 2016.

  22. Minder, R. (2016). Arrests made in Spain after Tennis match-fixing. The New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/01/sports/tennis/match-fixing-arrests-spain.html?smid=tw-nytsports&smtyp=cur&_r=0. Accessed 2 Dec 2016.

  23. Visentin, L. (2016). Ex-professional tennis player Nick Lindahl conviced of match-fixing. The Sydney Morning Herald http://www.smh.com.au/sport/tennis/exprofessional-tennis-player-nick-lindahl-convicted-of-match-fixing-20160418-go93jr.html. Accessed 2 Dec 2016.

  24. Tyler, T. (2004). Enhancing Police Legitimacy. The Annals of the American academy of political and social science, 593, 84–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gilad, S. (2010). It runs in the family: Meta-regulation and its siblings. Regulation and Governance, 4, 485–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, B. (2012). Beyond Procedural Justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in Criminal Justice. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(1), 119–170.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sparks, R. (1994). Can prisons be legitimate? Penal politics, privatization, and the timeliness of an old idea. British Journal of Criminology, 34(5), 14–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Loader, I., & Walker, N. (2007). Civilizing Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. TIU Remit (2016). Tennis Integrity Unit Website. http://www.tennisintegrityunit.com/remit.php/. Accessed 1 March 2016.

  30. Braithwaite, J. (2008). Regulatory Capitalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Coleman, W., & Porter, T. (2000). International institutions, globalization and democracy: Assessing the challenges. Global Society, 14(3), 377–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Held, D. (1995). Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Aitchison, A., & Blaustein, J. (2013). Policing for democracy or democratically responsive policing? Examining the limits of externally driven police reform. European Journal of Criminology, 10(4), 496–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. About the TIU (2016). Tennis Integrity Unit website. http://www.tennisintegrityunit.com/about-tiu. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.

  35. Shearing, C., & Wood, J. (2003a). Governing security for common goods. International journal of the sociology of Law, 31, 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shearing, C., & Wood, J. (2003b). Nodal Governance, democracy, and the new ‘denizens’. Journal of Law and Society, 30(3), 400–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shearing, C., & Wood, J. (2007). Imagining Security. London: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Loader, I. (2000). Plural policing and democratic governance. Social and Legal Studies, 9(3), 323–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wright, J., & Head, B. (2009). Reconsidering regulation and governance theory: A learning approach. Law and Policy, 31(2), 192–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. White, A. (2011). The new political economy of private security. Theoretical Criminology, 16(1), 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Snacken, S. (2013). Legitimacy of penal policies: Punishment between normative and empirical legitimacy. In A. Crawford & A. Hucklesby (Eds.), Legitimacy and Compliance in Criminal Justice. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Weber, M. (1978). In G. Roth & C. Wittich (Eds.), Economy and Society: An outline of interpretative sociology. London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., & Murray, K. (2013). Compliance with the law and policing by consent: notes on police and legal legitimacy. In A. Crawford & A. Hucklesby (Eds.), Legitimacy and Compliance in Criminal Justice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Black, J. (2009). Legitimacy and the competition for regulatory share. LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 14. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1424654. Accessed 29 Feb 2016.

  45. Gunn, B., & Rees, J. (2008). Environmental Review of Integrity in Professional Tennis. http://www.sportingintelligence.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Integrity-in-tennis.pdf. Accessed 29 March 2016.

  46. BBC News (2008). Davydenko cleared of match-fixing. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/tennis/7612536.stm. Accessed 29 Feb 2016.

  47. Tennis Integrity Unit Briefing Note October 2016 (2016). Tennis Integrity Unit website. http://tennisintegrityunit.com/media-releases/tennis-integrity-unit-briefing-note-october-2016. Accessed 5 Dec 2016.

  48. TIU (2016). Tennis Integrity Unit Website. http://www.tennisintegrityunit.com/tiu_resources.php. Accessed 1 March 2016.

  49. Clarey, C. (2016). Tennis’s watchdog seems to operate in the dark. New York Times 18/1/2016. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/19/sports/tennis/tenniss-watchdog-seems-to-operate-in-the-dark.html?smid=tw-share&_r=0. Accessed 29 March 2016.

  50. Statement from Tennis Governing Bodies 17/1/2016 – Tennis Integrity Unit. http://www.usopen.org/en_US/news/articles/2016-01-17/statement_from_tennis_governing_bodies_tennis_integrity_unit.html. Accessed 1 March 2016.

  51. Mitchell, K. (2016). Tennis needs full transparency to preserve image after match-fixing claims. The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2016/jan/23/tennis-transparency-match-fixing-claims?CMP=share_btn_tw. Accessed 1 March 2016.

  52. Statement from Tennis Governing Bodies 27/1/2016 – Tennis Announces Independent Review. http://www.tennisintegrityunit.com/downloads/20160127093857-statement-from-tennis-governing-bodies--tennis-announces-independent-review.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2016.

  53. Cox, S. (2016). Tennis match fixing: Evidence of suspected match fixing revealed. BBC News http://www.bbc.com/sport/tennis/35319202. Accessed 1 March 2016.

  54. Culture, Media and Sport Committee (2016). Tennis Match Fixing Investigated by Committee http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/culture-media-and-sport-committee/inquiries/parliament-2015/inquiry/. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.

  55. Hoerr, K. (2016). Former tennis pro Nick Lindahl pleads guilty to match-fixing charge. ABC News, http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-25/tennis-player-nick-lindahl-pleads-guilty-to-match-fixing-charge/7111768. Accessed 1 March 2016.

  56. Rothenberg, B. (2016). An invitation into the shadowy world of match-fixing. New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/28/sports/tennis/australian-open-match-fixing-essay.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=0. Accessed 29 March 2016.

  57. Rothenberg, B. (2015). Game, set and (fixed) match. Slate. http://www.slate.com/articles/sports/sports_nut/2015/02/denys_molchanov_match_fixing_allegations_pro_tennis_has_a_match_fixing_problem.html. Accessed 29 March 2016.

  58. Dorward, I. (2014). How to fix a tennis match. DW on Sports. http://www.sportdw.com/2014/08/how-to-fix-tennis-match-by-boy.html. Accessed 1 March 2016.

  59. Dorward, I. (2015b). How to fix a tennis match (by Denys Molchanov). DW on Sport. http://www.sportdw.com/2015/02/fix-tennis-match-denys-molchanov.html. Accessed 1 March 2016.

  60. Dorward, I. (2015c). How to fix a tennis match (by Andrey Golubev and Aleksandr Nedovyesov). DW on Sport. http://www.sportdw.com/2015/07/fix-tennis-golubev-nedovyesov.html. Accessed 1 March 2016.

  61. Tombs, S. (2002). Understanding regulation? Social and Legal Studies, 11(1), 113–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Gibbs, L. (2016). The real problems behind tennis’ match-fixing scandal. Think Progress http://thinkprogress.org/sports/2016/01/20/3741236/tennis-match-fixing-scandal/. Accessed 1 March 2016.

  63. Cambers, S. (2016). Tennis must act to smash match-fixing racket. Sydney Morning Herald http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/saturdays-tennis-corruption-read-by-simon-camber-freelancer-20160120-gm9y0j.html. Accessed 29 March 2016.

  64. Bucci, N. (2016). Match fixing: Police quiz Australian players and coaches. The Age http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/match-fixing-police-quiz-australian-players-and-coaches-20160118-gm8c24.html. Accessed 1 March 2016.

  65. Bolton, D. (2016). Tennis match fixing: Claims of corruption at Wimbledon and other tournaments as David Cameron calls for investigation. The Independent http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/tennis/tennis-match-fixing-corruption-wimbledon-a6818361.html. Accessed 1 Apr 2016.

  66. Malone, P. (2016). Tennis officials under fire for lack of funding to exposing match fixers. The Herald Sun http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/tennis/tennis-officials-under-fire-for-lack-of-funding-to-exposing-match-fixers/news-story/e976538c6729b9619f9bb5ede0c1be73. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.

  67. Harris, N. (2013). Fixing, doping, whistle-blowing: Secrets that tennis prefers not to discuss. Sporting Intelligence http://www.sportingintelligence.com/2013/06/24/fixing-doping-whistle-blowing-secrets-that-tennis-prefers-not-to-discuss-240601/. Accessed 1 March 2016.

  68. Liebling, A. (2004). Prisons and their moral performance: A study of values, quality and prison life. Oxford: Clarendon Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Sparks, R., & Bottoms, A. E. (1995). Legitimacy and order in prisons. British Journal of Sociology, 46(1), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Bomhoff, J., & Meuwese, A. (2011). The meta-regulation of transnational private regulation. Journal of Law and Society, 38(1), 138–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Statement from Governing Bodies of International Tennis 12/2/2016 - Tennis Integrity Unit website. http://tennisintegrityunit.com/independent-reviews/statement-governing-bodies-international-tennis. Accessed 5 December 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Arts and Education, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3216, Australia

    Diarmaid Harkin

Authors
  1. Diarmaid Harkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diarmaid Harkin.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 250 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harkin, D. The questionable legitimacy of non-state anti-corruption bodies: a case study of the Tennis Integrity Unit. Crime Law Soc Change 68, 167–185 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9680-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9680-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation