Abstract
The international policy currently adopted to combat the growing phenomenon of trafficking in human beings (THB) is victim centred. The policy intends to fully address this phenomenon, focusing on victim protection as well as preventing and criminalising such conduct. In Spain, efforts are underway to achieve internationally established standards. However, the research we present here shows how much work remains to be done, particularly in trafficking cases that are less well known, such as trafficking for exploiting victims in criminal activities. Our research aimed to better understand the processes of trafficking for criminal exploitation and to determine whether the criminal justice system is prepared to detect and protect victims of such processes. The qualitative study we developed investigates cases of 45 migrant women held in two Spanish prisons and evidences that there are individuals victimised in the highest degree. At least ten respondents had been victims of trafficking, and not only were they not identified as such by legal authorities, they were also imprisoned for a crime that their traffickers forced them to commit.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The latter integrates the mens rea of trafficking itself, as the effective exploitation of the victim is not required in order to understand that the trafficking act is perfected
Referring to the prosecution of the conduct of trafficking, the offence of trafficking in human beings is included in the 2010 Spanish Penal Code, in Art. 177 bis CP, with a minimum sentence of 5–8 years in prison. Immigration regulations were also amended in 2009, including, besides the need to identify victims, a recovery and reflection period of up to 30 days for victims of trafficking and the possibility of granting a residence permit for exceptional circumstances of up to 5 years. Politically speaking, the former socialist government adopted some mechanisms to protect victims of trafficking. Thus, a comprehensive plan was adopted to combat human trafficking for the 2009–2011 period, which was aimed solely at victims of trafficking for sexual exploitation. On 25 October 2011, the Protocol Framework to Protect Victims of Human Trafficking was adopted, protecting victims of any type of trafficking, which emphasised the need for identification.
In fact, application of these mitigating circumstances would fulfil the function that is currently entrusted to the personal clause for lifting the penalty in Article 177 bis.11 of the Spanish Penal Code for crimes committed by the victim as a result of the exploitation suffered. This clause was introduced in the Reform of the Spanish Criminal Code in 2011 and can therefore be applied to cases tried after its entry into force.
References
Almeda, E. (2002). Corregir y Castigar. El Ayer y Hoy de las Cárceles de Mujeres. Barcelona: Edicions Bellaterra.
Aronowitz, A. A. (2009). Human trafficking. Human misery. The global trade in human beings. Westport: Praeger.
Bales, K. (2004). Disposable people: new slavery in the global economy, revised edition. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.
Centre D’estudis Jurídics i Formació Especializada (2010). Estrangers a les Presons Catalanes. Informe Executiu. PDF. Available from www.gencat.cat/justicia/passim. Accessed 09 May 2012.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore: Sage Publications.
Defensor del Pueblo. (2012a). Human trafficking in Spain. Invisible victim. Madrid: Defensor del Pueblo. PDF. Available from http://www.defensordelpueblo.es/. Accessed 07 Mar 2014.
Defensor del Pueblo. (2012b). Seguimiento del informe presentado en 2012. Madrid: Defensor del Pueblo. PDF. Available from http://www.defensordelpueblo.es/. Accessed 07 Mar 2014.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2002). Introduction. The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1–41). Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Directive 2011/36/UE. Directive 2011/36/UE of the European Parliment and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framwork Decision 2002/629/JHA [OJ L 101 of 15.4.2011]
Gimenez-Salinas, E., et al. (2006). L’Opinió de les Dones Recluses a Catalunya sobre l’Encarcerament. Justidata, 45(9), 1–16.
Kangaspunta, K. (2007). Collecting data on human trafficking; availability, reliability and comparability of trafficking data. In E. Savona & G. Stefanizzi (Eds.), Measuring human trafficking: complexities and pitfalls. New York: Springer/Ispac. pp. 27 and ff.
Kouritzin, S. G., Piquemal, N., & Norman, R. (2009). Qualitative research. Challenging the orthodoxies in standard academic discourse(s). New York/London: Routledge.
Lackzco. (2005). Introduction. Data and research on human trafficking. In Lackzco & Gozdziak (Eds.), Data and research on human trafficking: a global survey. Geneva: International Organization for Migration. pp. 5 and ff.
Lackzco. (2007). Enhancing data collection and research on trafficking in persons. In E. Savona & G. Stefanizzi (Eds.), Measuring human trafficking: complexities and pitfalls. New York: Springer/Ispac. pp. 37 and ff.
Lincoln, Y. (2002). Institutional review boards and methodological conservatism. The challenge to and from phenomenological paradigms. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 165–181). Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Morse, J. M. (2005). Asuntos Críticos en los Métodos de Investigación Cualitativa. Alicante: Publicaciones Universidad de Alicante.
Obokata, T. (2006). Trafficking in human beings from a human rights perspective: towards a holistic approach. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Ribas, N., Almeda, E., & Bodelón, E. (2006). Rastreando lo Invisible. Mujeres Extranjeras en las Cárceles. Anthropos Editorial: Barcelona.
Ruiz Olabuénaga, J. I. (2009). Metodología de la Investigación Cualitativa (4th ed.). Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto.
Scarpa, S. (2008). Trafficking in human beings. Modern slavery. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tyldum, & Brunovskis. (2005). Describing the unobserved: methodological challenges in empirical studies on human trafficking. In Lackzco & Gozdziak (Eds.), Data and research on human trafficking: a global survey. Geneva: International Organization for Migration. pp. 17 and ff.
UNODC (2009a). Trafficking in persons; analysis on Europe. Vienna, PDF. Available from www.unodc.org. Accessed 07 Mar 2014.
UNODC (2009b). Global report on trafficking in persons. PDF. Available from www.unodc.org. Accessed 10 May 2012.
Villacampa, C. (2010). El delito de Trata de Seres Humanos. Una Incriminación Dictada desde el Derecho Internacional. Aranzadi-Thomson Reuters: Cizur Menor.
Winterdyk, J., & Reichel, P. (2010). Introduction to special issue: human trafficking: issues and perspectives. European Journal of Criminology, 2010(7), 5–10.
Zhang, S. X. (2007). Smuggling and trafficking in human beings. All roads lead to America. Westport/Connecticut/London: Praeger.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Villacampa, C., Torres, N. Trafficked Women in Prison: The Problem of Double Victimisation. Eur J Crim Policy Res 21, 99–115 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-014-9240-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-014-9240-z