Abstract
In 2012, the Government of Victoria, Australia, introduced a new form of non-custodial disposition known as the “community correction order” (“CCO”). In 2014, the Victorian Court of Appeal was asked to provide guidance to sentencing courts so that CCOs could fulfil their potential as an alternative to imprisonment. The Court’s guideline judgment concluded that the advent of the CCO had the potential to transform sentencing in Victoria but that this would depend upon the community being properly informed about the capacity of a CCO to operate punitively, as well as to promote rehabilitation. This did not occur, however, and there was strident criticism of the judgment as authorising inadequate punishment of serious offences. Although sentencing courts have utilised the CCO appropriately in the light of the judgment, the Government recently legislated to restrict its availability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The Hon. Justice Chris Maxwell AC is President of the Court of Appeal, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. E-mail: cm@supcourt.vic.gov.au
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maxwell, C. Non-custodial Dispositions and the Politics of Sentencing. Crim Law Forum 28, 541–561 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-017-9324-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-017-9324-9