Skip to main content
Log in

Non-custodial Dispositions and the Politics of Sentencing

  • Published:
Criminal Law Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2012, the Government of Victoria, Australia, introduced a new form of non-custodial disposition known as the “community correction order” (“CCO”). In 2014, the Victorian Court of Appeal was asked to provide guidance to sentencing courts so that CCOs could fulfil their potential as an alternative to imprisonment. The Court’s guideline judgment concluded that the advent of the CCO had the potential to transform sentencing in Victoria but that this would depend upon the community being properly informed about the capacity of a CCO to operate punitively, as well as to promote rehabilitation. This did not occur, however, and there was strident criticism of the judgment as authorising inadequate punishment of serious offences. Although sentencing courts have utilised the CCO appropriately in the light of the judgment, the Government recently legislated to restrict its availability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Maxwell.

Additional information

The Hon. Justice Chris Maxwell AC is President of the Court of Appeal, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. E-mail: cm@supcourt.vic.gov.au

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maxwell, C. Non-custodial Dispositions and the Politics of Sentencing. Crim Law Forum 28, 541–561 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-017-9324-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-017-9324-9

Navigation