Abstract
The response styles theory by Nolen-Hoeksema (J Abnorm Psychol 100:569–582, 1991) suggests that rumination in response to depressed mood exacerbates and prolongs depression, while distraction ameliorates it. In addition, research has shown that rumination is associated with several undesirable interpersonal outcomes, including greater interpersonal problems and less satisfying social support. In a sample of depressed patients (n = 67) receiving cognitive-behavioral therapy, the current study investigated whether patients’ use of ruminative and distractive responses to depressed mood influences the therapeutic alliance and the patients’ receptivity to therapeutic interventions. Ruminative responses were neither predictive of the therapeutic alliance nor of patients’ receptivity. However, the more the patients reported distractive responses to depressed mood, the better therapists judged their receptivity in therapy and the better they evaluated the therapeutic alliance. In the course of therapy, distractive responses were also associated with patients’ ratings of the alliance. Implications for future research and psychotherapeutic practice are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The study was approved by the ethics committee of the German Society of Psychology (DGPs).
Due to low internal consistency of the TEQ total score, it was further explored to what extent rumination and/or distraction were predictive of any subscale of the TEQ in early-, mid- and late-treatment—controlling for pretreatment symptom severity. Rumination was not predictive of any TEQ subscale at any time period. Distraction was not associated with any TEQ subscale in early treatment—yet, pretreatment distraction scores were associated with the TEQ subscale “trustworthiness” in mid- (β = .31; P < .05) and late treatment (β = .36; P < .01). Pretreatment distraction was further associated with the TEQ subscales “independence” (β = .30; P < .05), “consensus” (β = .46; P < .01) and “autonomy” (β = .31; P < .05) in late treatment. Again, none of the overall models reached statistical significance.
References
Ackermann, S., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (2003). A review of therapist characteristics and techniques positively impacting the therapeutic alliance. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1–33.
Addis, M. E., & Carpenter, K. M. (1999). Why, why, why?: Reason-giving and rumination as predictors of response to activation- and insight-oriented treatment rationales. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(7), 881–894.
Ambühl, H. (1991). Die Aufnahmebereitschaft des Klienten als zentrales Bindeglied zwischen therapeutischer Tätigkeit und Therapieerfolg. In D. Schulte (Ed.), Therapeutische Entscheidungen [Therapeutic decisions] (pp. 71–87). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Arnow, B. A., Spangler, D., Klein, D. N., & Burns, D. D. (2004). Rumination and distraction among chronic depressives in treatment: A structural equation analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 28, 67–83.
Aymanns, P., Filipp, S. H., & Klauer, T. (1995). Family support and coping with cancer: Some determinants and adaptive correlates. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 107–124.
Baldwin, S. A., Wampold, B. E., & Imel, Z. E. (2007). Untangling the alliance-outcome correlation: Exploring the relative importance of therapist and patient variability in the alliance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 842–852.
Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1987). Beck depression inventory—Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Garbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck depression inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77–100.
Benazon, N. R., & Coyne, J. C. (2000). Living with a depressed spouse. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 71–79.
Castonguay, L. G., Constantino, M. J., & Grosse Holtforth, M. (2006). The working alliance: Where are we and where should we go? Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 43(3), 271–279.
Ciesla, J. A., & Roberts, J. E. (2002). Self-directed thought and response to treatment for depression: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 16, 435–453.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Constantino, M. J., Castonguay, L. G., & Schut, A. J. (2002). The working alliance. A flagship for the “scientist-practitioner” model in psychotherapy. In G. S. Tryon (Ed.), Counseling based on process research. Applying what we know (pp. 81–131). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
De Shazer, S. (1985). Keys to solution in brief therapy. New York: Norton & Co.
First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. W. B. (1996). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric.
Hautzinger, M. (2000). Kognitive Verhaltenstherapie bei Depressionen [Cognitive behavioural therapy of depression]. Weinheim: PVU.
Hautzinger, M., Bailer, M., Worall, H., & Keller, F. (1995). Beck-depressions-inventar. Bern: Hans Huber Verlag.
Hermer, M., & Röhrle, B. (2008). Handbuch der therapeutischen Beziehung [Handbook of the therapeutic alliance]. Tübingen: dgvt-Verlag.
Huffziger, S., Reinhard, I., & Kuehner, C. (2009). A longitudinal study of rumination and distraction in formerly depressed inpatients and community controls. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 746–756.
Jones, N. P., Siegle, G. J., & Thase, M. E. (2008). Effects of rumination and initial severity on remission to cognitive therapy for depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 591–604.
Joormann, J. (2006). Differential effects of rumination and dysphoria on the inhibition of irrelevant emotional material: Evidence from a negative priming task. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 30, 149–160.
Kanter, J. W., Busch, A. M., & Rusch, L. C. (2009). Behavioral activation. London: Routledge.
Koban, C., & Willutzki, U. (2007). Stimmung und Therapieerfolg in der Psychotherapie [Patients’ mood and psychotherapeutic outcome]. Verhaltenstherapie, 17, 100–108.
Kühner, C., Huffziger, S., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2007). RSQ-D: Response styles questionnaire—Deutsche version. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Kwon, P., & Olson, M. L. (2007). Rumination and depressive symptoms: Moderating role of defence style immaturity. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 715–724.
Lam, D., Schuck, N., Smith, N., Farmer, A., & Checkley, S. (2003). Response style, interpersonal difficulties and social functioning in major depressive disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 75, 279–283.
Lyubomirsky, S., & Tkach, C. (2004). The consequences of dysphoric rumination. In C. Papageorgiou & A. Wells (Eds.), Depressive rumination: Nature, theory and treatment (pp. 21–41). New York: Wiley.
Mallinckroadt, B., & Nelson, M. L. (1991). Counselor training level and the formation of the therapeutic working alliance. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 133–138.
Miranda, R., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2007). Brooding and reflection: Rumination predicts suicidal ideation at 1-year follow-up in a community sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 3088–3095.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1991). Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 569–582.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Davis, C. G. (1999). “Thanks for sharing that”: Ruminators and their social support networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 801–814.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Morrow, J. (1991). A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: The 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(1), 115–121.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 400–424.
Orlinsky, D. E., Ronnestad, H. M., & Willutzki, U. (2004). Fifty years of psychotherapy process-outcome research: Continuity and change. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s Handbook of Psychotherapy and behaviour change (5th ed., pp. 307–389). New York: Wiley.
Pearson, K. A., Watkins, E. R., Mullan, E. G., & Moberly, N. J. (2010). Psychosocial correlates of depressive rumination. Behavior Research and Therapy. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2010.05.007.
Rude, S. S., Little Maestas, K., & Neff, K. (2007). Paying attention to distress: What’s wrong with rumination? Cognition and Emotion, 21, 843–864.
Rushton, J. P., Brainerd, C. J., & Pressley, M. (1983). Behavioral development and construct validity: The principle of aggregation. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 18–38.
Schmaling, K. B., Dimidjian, S., Katon, W., & Sullivan, M. (2002). Response styles among patients with minor depression and dysthymia in primary care. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 350–356.
Schulte, D. (1996). Therapieplanung. Hogrefe: Göttingen.
Schulte, D., & Eifert, G. H. (2002). What to do when manuals fail? The dual model of psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 9, 213–328.
Schwartz, J. L., & MacCombs-Thomas, A. (1995). Perceptions of coping responses exhibited in depressed males and females. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 849–860.
Teismann, T., Willutzki, U., Michalak, J., & Schulte, D. (2008). Bedeutung von Rumination und Ablenkung für den Therapieerfolg depressiver Patienten [Relevance of rumination and distraction to therapy outcome of depressed patients]. Verhaltenstherapie, 18, 215–222.
Thomsen, D. K. (2006). The association between rumination and negative affect: A review. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 1216–1235.
Treynor, W., Gonzalez, R., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003). Rumination reconsidered: A psychometric analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 247–259.
Wells, A. (2009). Metacognitive therapy for anxiety and depression. New York: Guilford press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teismann, T., Michalak, J., Willutzki, U. et al. Influence of Rumination and Distraction on the Therapeutic Process in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Depression. Cogn Ther Res 36, 15–24 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-010-9347-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-010-9347-6
Keywords
Profiles
- Johannes Michalak View author profile