Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Designing a Data Visualisation for Interdisciplinary Scientists. How to Transparently Convey Data Frictions?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates how the frictions that emerge while synthesising disparate datasets can be transparently conveyed in a single data visualisation. We encountered this need while being embedded in an academic consortium of four epistemologically-distant scientific teams, who wanted to develop new interdisciplinary hypotheses from their merged datasets. By inviting these scientists to collaboratively develop visualisation prototypes of their data within their own and then towards the other disciplines, we uncovered four data frictions that relate to discipline-specific interpretations of data, methodological approaches, ways of handling data uncertainties, as well as the large differences in dataset scale and granularity. We then recognised how the resulting visualisation prototypes contained several promising techniques that addressed these frictions transparently, such as retaining their overall visualisation context and using visual translators to mediate between differing scales. Driven by critical data discourse that calls for frictions to be foregrounded rather than be occluded, we generalised these techniques into a series of actionable design considerations. While originating from a single case of an interdisciplinary collaboration, we believe that our findings form a crucial step towards enabling a more transparent and accountable interdisciplinary data visualisation practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anwar, Afian; Bernhard Klein; Matthias Berger; and Stefan Muller Arisona (2015). Value lab Asia: A space for physical and virtual interdisciplinary research and collaboration. In IV’15: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Information Visualisation. Barcelona, Spain, 22-24 July 2015. Washington DC: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 348–353.

  • Baker, Karen S.; Steven J. Jackson; and Jerome R. Wanetick (2005). Strategies Supporting Heterogeneous Data and Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Towards an Ocean Informatics Environment. In HICSS: Proceedings of the IEEE 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI, USA, 6 January 2005. Washington DC: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 1–10.

  • Bonde, Morten; Claus Bossen; and Peter Danholt (2019). Data-work and Friction: Investigating the Practices of Repurposing Healthcare Data. Health Informatics Journal, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 558–566.

  • Borgman, Christine L.; Jillian C. Wallis; and Matthew S. Mayernik (2012). Who’s Got the Data? Interdependencies in Science and Technology Collaborations. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 485–523.

  • Boukhelifa, Nadia; Marc Emmanuel Perrin; Samuel Huron; and James Eagan (2017). How Data Workers Cope with Uncertainty: A Task Characterisation Study. In CHI’17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver, CO, USA, 6-11 May 2017. New York: ACM Press, pp. 3645–3656.

  • Bowen, Glenn A. (2006). Grounded Theory and Sensitizing Concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 12–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, Geoffrey C and Susan Leigh Star (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, Richard E. (1998). Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd Davis, Stephen; Olivia Vane; and Florian Kräutli (2021). Can I Believe What I See? Data Visualization and Trust in the Humanities. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 522–546.

  • Brandt, Eva; Thomas Binder; and Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders (2013). Tools and techniques: Ways to Engage Telling, Making and Enacting. In Simonsen, Jesper and Toni Robertson, (eds), Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 145–181.

  • Correll, Michael (2019). Ethical Dimensions of Visualization Research. In CHI’19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, UK, 4-9 May 2019. New York: ACM Press, pp. 1–13.

  • D’Ignazio, Catherine and Lauren F Klein (2020). Data feminism. Cambridge: MIT press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dörk, Marian; Patrick Feng; Christopher Collins; and Sheelagh Carpendale (2013). Critical InfoVis: Exploring the Politics of Visualization. In CHI EA’13: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Extended Abstracts, Paris, France, 27 April - 2 May 2013. New York: ACM Press, pp. 2189–2198.

  • Drucker, Johanna (2011). Humanities Approaches to Graphical Display. DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1.

  • Drucker, Johanna (2015). Graphical Approaches to the Digital Humanities. In A New Companion to Digital Humanities. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, Johanna (2018). Non-representational Approaches to Modeling Interpretation in a Graphical Environment. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 248–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Paul N. (2010). A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. Cambridge: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Paul N.; Matthew S. Mayernik; Archer L. Batcheller; Geoffrey C. Bowker; and Christine L. Borgman (2011). Science Friction: Data, Metadata, and Collaboration. Social Studies of Science, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 667–690.

  • Faniel, Ixchel M. and Trond E. Jacobsen (2010). Reusing Scientific Data: How earthquake Engineering Researchers Assess the Reusability of Colleagues’ Data. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 19, no. 3-4, pp. 355–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitelman, Lisa (2013). Raw Data is an Oxymoron. Cambridge: MIT press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, Steven R.; Radu Jianu; Caroline Ziemkiewicz; Hua Guo; and David Laidlaw (2012). Different Strokes for Different Folks: Visual Presentation Design Between Disciplines. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 2411–2420.

  • Gordon, Eric and Stephen Walter (2019). Meaningful inefficiencies: Resisting the logic of technological efficiency in the design of civic systems. In The Playful Citizen. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 310–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gortana, Flavio; Franziska von Tenspolde; Daniela Guhlmann; and Marian Dörk (2018). Off the Grid: Visualizing a Numismatic Collection as Dynamic Piles and Streams. Open Library of Humanities, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–25.

  • Hall, Kyle Wm.; Adam J. Bradley; Uta Hinrichs; Samuel Huron; Jo Wood; Christopher Collins; and Sheelagh Carpendale (2019). Design by Immersion: A Transdisciplinary Approach to Problem-Driven Visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 109–118.

  • Hey, Tony; Stewart Tansley; and Kristin Tolle (2009). The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Microsoft Research.

  • Hinrichs, Uta; Stefania Forlini; and Bridget Moynihan (2019). In Defense of Sandcastles: Research Thinking Through Visualization in Digital Humanities. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, vol. 34, no. October 2018, pp. I80–I99.

  • Hullman, Jessica (2020). Why Authors Don’t Visualize Uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 130–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hullman, Jessica and Nicholas Diakopoulos (2011). Visualization rhetoric: Framing Effects in Narrative Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 2231–2240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hullman, Jessica; Paul Resnick; and Eytan Adar (2015). Hypothetical Outcome Plots Outperform Error Bars and Violin Plots for Inferences about Reliability of Variable Ordering. PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1–25.

  • Jirotka, Marina; Charlotte P. Lee; and Gary M. Olson (2013). Supporting Scientific Collaboration: Methods, Tools and Concepts. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 22, no. 4-6, pp. 667–715.

  • Jirotka, Marina; Rob Procter; Mark Hartswood; Roger Slack; Andrew Simpson; Catelijne Coopmans; Chris Hinds; and Alex Voss (2005). Collaboration and Trust in Healthcare Innovation: The eDiaMoND Case Study. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 369–398.

  • Kale, Alex; Matthew Kay; and Jessica Hullman (2019). Decision-Making Under Uncertainty in Research Synthesis. In CHI’19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, UK, 4-9 May 2019. New York: ACM Press, pp. 1–14.

  • Karasti, Helena; Karen S. Baker; and Eija Halkola (2006). Enriching the Notion of Data Curation in e-Science: Data Managing and Information Infrastructuring in the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) network. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 321–358.

  • Kay, Matthew; Tara Kola; Jessica R. Hullman; and Sean A. Munson (2016). When (ish) is My Bus? User-centered Visualizations of Uncertainty in Everyday, Mobile Predictive Systems. In CHI’16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, USA, 7 - 12 May 2016. New York: ACM Press, pp. 5092–5103.

  • Kennedy, Helen; Rosemary Lucy Hill; Giorgia Aiello; and William Allen (2016). The work that visualisation conventions do. Information Communication and Society, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 715–735.

  • Kerzner, Ethan; Sarah Goodwin; Jason Dykes; Sara Jones; and Miriah Meyer (2018). A Framework for Creative Visualization-Opportunities Workshops. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 748–758.

  • Kitchin, Rob. (2021). Data Lives: How Data Are Made and Shape Our World. Bristol: Bristol University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, Ha-Kyung; Zhicheng Liu; and Karrie Karahalios (2019). Trust and Recall of Information across Varying Degrees of Title Visualization Misalignment. In CHI’19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, UK, 4-9 May 2019. New York: ACM Press, pp. 1–13.

  • Korn, Matthias and Amy Voida (2015). Creating Friction: Infrastructuring Civic Engagement in Everyday Life. Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • League of European Research Universities (2016). Interdisciplinarity and the 21st century research-intensive university. Technical Report November 2016.

  • Ledford, Heidi (2015). How to Solve the World’s Biggest Problems. Nature, vol. 525, no. 7569, pp. 308–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Crystal; Tanya Yang; Gabrielle Inchoco; Graham M. Jones; and Arvind Satyanarayan (2021). Viral Visualizations: How Coronavirus Skeptics Use Orthodox Data Practices to Promote Unorthodox Science Online, Virtual, 8-13 May 2021. In CHI’21: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, pp. 1–18.

  • Liu, Jiali; Nadia Boukhelifa; and James R Eagan (2020a). Understanding the Role of Alternatives in Data Analysis Practices. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 66–76.

  • Liu, Yang; Tim Althoff; and Jeffrey Heer (2020b). Paths Explored, Paths Omitted, Paths Obscured: Decision Points & Selective Reporting in End-to-End Data Analysis. In CHI’20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Virtual, 25-30 April 2020. New York: ACM Press, pp. 1–14.

  • Liu, Zhicheng and John T Stasko (2010). Mental models, visual reasoning and interaction in information visualization: A top-down perspective. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 999–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loukissas, Yannis (2019). All Data are Local: Thinking Critically in a Data-Driven Society. Cambridge: MIT press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, Lev (2011). What is Visualisation? Visual Studies, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 36–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao, Yaoli; Dakuo Wang; Michael Muller; Kush R. Varshney; Ioana Baldini; Casey Dugan; and Aleksandra Mojsilovic (2019). How Data Scientists Work Together with Domain Experts in Scientific Collaborations: To Find the Right Answer or to Ask the Right Question? Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 3, no. GROUP, pp. 1–23.

  • Marai, G. Elisabeta (2018). Activity-Centered Domain Characterization for Problem-Driven Scientific Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 913–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, James W. (2018). Scientists’ Reuse of Old Empirical Data: Epistemological Aspects. Philosophy of Science, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 755–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCurdy, Nina; Julie Gerdes; and Miriah Meyer (2019). A Framework for Externalizing Implicit Error Using Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 925–935.

  • McNutt, Andrew; Gordon Kindlmann; and Michael Correll (2020). Surfacing Visualization Mirages. In CHI’20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Virtual, 25-30 April 2020. New York: ACM Press, pp. 1–16.

  • Meyer, Miriah and Jason Dykes (2019). Criteria for Rigor in Visualization Design Study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oleksik, Gerard; N Milic-Frayling; and Rachel Jones (2012). Beyond Data Sharing: Artifact Ecology of a Collaborative Nanophotonics Research Centre. In CSCW’12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, Washington, USA, 11 - 15 February 2012. New York: ACM Press, pp. 1165–1174.

  • Padilla, Lace; Matthew Kay; and Jessica Hullman (2020). Uncertainty visualization.

  • Padilla, Lace; Maia Powell; Matthew Kay; and Jessica Hullman (2021). Uncertain About Uncertainty: How Qualitative Expressions of Forecaster Confidence Impact Decision-Making With Uncertainty Visualizations. Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 11, no. January,.

  • Paine, Drew and Charlotte P. Lee (2017). “Who Has Plots?”: Contextualizing Scientific Software, Practice, and Visualizations. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 1, no. CSCW, pp. 1–21.

  • Panagiotidou, Georgia; Jan Aerts; and Andrew Vande Moere (2020). GoCo: A Gamified Activity for Winnowing Visualization Projects with Interdisciplinary Experts. In VisActivities: IEEE VIS Workshop on Data Vis Activities to Facilitate Learning, Reflecting, Discussing, and Designing, Virtual, 25 October 2020.

  • Panagiotidou, Georgia and Andrew Vande Moere (2018). Retaining Potentially Meaningful Spatial Structural Aspects Across Discipline Specific Concept Maps. In VIS4DH: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Visualization for the Digital Humanities. Part of IEEE VIS 2018. Berlin, Germany, 21 October 2018.

  • Passi, Samir and Steven J. Jackson (2017). Data Vision: Learning to See Through Algorithmic Abstraction. In CSCW’17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, Portland, OR, USA, 25 February - 1 March 2017. New York: ACM Press, pp. 2436–2447.

  • Passi, Samir and Steven J. Jackson (2018). Trust in Data Science: Collaboration, Translation, and Accountability in Corporate Data Science Projects. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 2, no. CSCW, pp. 1–28.

  • Ricketts, Delanie and Dan Lockton (2019). Mental Landscapes: Externalizing Mental Models through Metaphors. Interactions, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 86–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittenbruch, Markus; Kellie Vella; Margot Brereton; James Hogan; Daniel Johnson; Julian Heinrich; and Sean O’Donoghue (2021). Collaborative Sense-making in Genomic Research: The Role of Visualisation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol.  pp. 1.

  • Sacha, Dominik; Hansi Senaratne; Bum Chul Kwon; Geoffrey Ellis; and Daniel A. Keim (2016). The Role of Uncertainty, Awareness, and Trust in Visual Analytics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 240–249.

  • Sedlmair, Michael; Miriah Meyer; and Tamara Munzner (2012). Design Study Methodology: Reflections from the Trenches and the Stacks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 2431–2440.

  • Thomas, James J. and Kristin A. Cook (2005). Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. IEEE Computer Society, vol.  pp. 184.

  • Van Der Bles, Anne Marthe; Sander Van Der Linden; Alexandra L.J. Freeman; James Mitchell; Ana B. Galvao; Lisa Zaval; and David J. Spiegelhalter (2019). Communicating Uncertainty about Facts, Numbers and Science. Royal Society Open Science, vol. 6, no. 5,.

  • Van House, Nancy A.; Mark H. Butler; and Lisa R. Schiff (1998). Cooperative Knowledge Work and Practices of Trust: Sharing Environmental Planning Data Sets. In CSCW’98: Proceedings of the 1998 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, Washington, USA, 14 - 18 November 1998. New York: ACM Press, pp. 335–343.

  • Walker, Rick; Aiden Slingsby; Jason Dykes; Kai Xu; Jo Wood; Phong H. Nguyen; Derek Stephens; B. L.William Wong; and Yongjun Zheng (2013). An Extensible Framework for Provenance in Human Terrain Visual Analytics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2139–2148.

  • Wiggins, Andrea; Alyson Young; and Melissa A. Kenney (2018). Exploring visual representations to support data re-use for interdisciplinary science. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 554–563.

  • Young, Alyson L. and Wayne G. Lutters (2015). (Re)defining Land Change Science through Synthetic Research Practices. In CSCW’15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 14 - 18 March 2015. New York: ACM Press, pp. 431–442.

  • Young, Alyson L. and Wayne G. Lutters (2017). Infrastructuring for Cross-Disciplinary Synthetic Science: Meta-Study Research in Land System Science. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 26, no. 1-2, pp. 165–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Amy X.; Michael Muller; and Dakuo Wang (2020). How do Data Science Workers Collaborate? Roles, Workflows, and Tools. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 4, no. CSCW, pp. 1–23.

  • Zuk, Torre and Sheelagh Carpendale (2007). Visualization of Uncertainty and Reasoning. In Butz, Andreas; Brian Fisher; Antonio Krüger; Patrick Olivier; and Shigeru Owada, (eds), Smart Graphics. SG 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 164–177.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research[x]Design and Sagalassos Archaeological Research Project, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Georgia Panagiotidou

  2. Sagalassos Archaeological Research Project, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Jeroen Poblome

  3. Center for Statistics, Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium

    Jan Aerts

  4. Research[x]Design, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Andrew Vande Moere

Authors
  1. Georgia Panagiotidou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeroen Poblome
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jan Aerts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrew Vande Moere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgia Panagiotidou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Panagiotidou, G., Poblome, J., Aerts, J. et al. Designing a Data Visualisation for Interdisciplinary Scientists. How to Transparently Convey Data Frictions?. Comput Supported Coop Work 31, 633–667 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-022-09432-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-022-09432-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation