Abstract
Large-scale analyses like the National Climate Assessment (NCA) contain a wealth of information critical to national and regional responses to climate change but tend to be insufficiently detailed for action at state or local levels. Many states now engage in assessment processes to meet information needs for local authorities. The goals of state climate assessments (SCAs) should be to provide relevant, actionable information to state and local authorities, and to generate primary sources, build networks and inform stakeholders. To communicate local climate impacts to decision makers, SCAs should express credibility, salience and legitimacy. They can provide information (e.g., case studies, data sets) and connect stakeholders to the NCA and its process. Based on our experience in the Vermont Climate Assessment (VCA), we present a framework to engage decision makers in SCAs using a fluid network of scientific experts and knowledge brokers to conduct subject area prioritization, data analysis and writing. The VCA addressed economic, environmental and social impacts of climate change at local scales to increase resiliency and manage risk. Knowledge brokers communicated VCA findings through their own stakeholder networks. We include a qualitative impact evaluation, and believe our framework for interaction among scientists, knowledge brokers and stakeholders to be an effective structure for SCAs and a transformative experience for students.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
An important function of the Weather Forecast Office was to interpret long data records. Some sites appear to have extensive continuous records, but in fact the station had relocated a number of times. Without the institutional memory of the local office this might have been overlooked.
References
Adaptation Subcommitte (2010) The Impacts of Climate Change on Connecticut Agriculture, Infrastructure, Natural Resources and Public Health. Govenor’s Steering Committee on Climate Change,, State of Connecticut
Betts AK (2011) Vermont Climate Change Indicators. Weather, Clim Soc 3:106–115
Buizer JL et al. (2016) Building a sustained climate assessment process. Clim Chang 135(1):23–37
Cash D et al. (2002) Salience, Credibility, Legitimacy and Boundaries: Linking Research, Assessment and Decision Making (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 372280). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
Cash DW et al. (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. P Natl. Acad Sci 100(14):8087–8091
Cash DW et al. (2006). Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc, 11(2), 8.
Cloyd ET, Moser SC, Maibach EW, Maldonado JK, Chen T (2016) Engagment in the third US National Climate Assessment: Committment, capacity and communication for impact. Clim Chang 135(1):39–54
Commonwealth of Massachusetts (2013) Global Warming Solutions Act 5-Year Progress Report. Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
EPA (2015) Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990–2012. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Florida Division of Air Resource Management (2010) Inventory of Florida Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 1990–2007. Florida Department of Environmental Protection.
Galford et al., Eds (2014). Considering Vermont’s Future in a Changing Climate: The First Vermont Climate Assessment. Gund Institute for Ecological Economics, 219 pp.
Goodman LA (1961) Snowball sampling. Ann Math Stat 32:148–170
Guilbert et al. (2014) Impacts of Projected Climate Change over the Lake Champlain Basin in Vermont. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 53:1861–1875
Hayhoe et al. (2008) Regional Climate Change Projections for the Northeast USA. Mitig. Adapt Strat Glob Change 13:425–436
Hayhoe et al. (2006) Past and future changes in climate and hydrological indicators in the U.S. Northeast. Clim Dyn 28:381–407
Heckathron DD (1997) Respondent-Driven Sampling: A New Approach to the Study of Hidden Populations. Soc Probl 44:174–199
Hegger D, Lamers M, Van Zeijl-Rozema A, Dieperink C (2012) Conceptualising joint knowledge production in regional climate change adaptation projects: success conditions and levers for action. Environ Sci Pol 18:52–65
IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contributions of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
Jacobs K, Buizer J (2016) Building community, credibility, and knowledge: the third US National Climate Assessment. Clim Chang 135(1):9–22
Karl TR, Mellilo JM, Peterson TC (2009) Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kunkel et al. (2013) Regional Climate Trends and Scenarios for the U.S. National Climate Assessment: Part 1. Climate of the Northeast U.S. NOAA Technical Report NESDIS 142–1 87 pp., NOAA, National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service, Washington, D.C.
Landsberg K, Egan S, Hardesty J, Sloane S (2015) Alaska State Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory. State of Alaska.
Lemos MC, Kirchhoff CJ, Ramprasad V (2012) Narrowing the climate information usability gap. Nat Clim Chang 2(11):789–794
McNie EC (2013) Delivering Climate Services: Organizational Strategies and Approaches for Producing Useful Climate-Science Information. Weather, Climate & Society 5(1):14–26
Meadow et al. (2015) Moving toward the Deliberate Coproduction of Climate Science Knowledge. Weather, Climate, and Society 7(2):179–191
Melillo JM, Richmond T, Yohe G (2014) Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC
Meyer M (2010) The rise of the knowledge broker. Sci Commun 32(1):118–127
Moser SC, Luers AL (2008) Managing climate risks in California: the need to engage resource managers for successful adaptation to change. Clim Chang 87(1):309–322
Moser SC (2014) Communicating Adaptation ot Climate Change: The Art and Science of Public Engagement when Climate Change Comes Home. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 5(3):337–358
Oregon Global Warming Commission (2013) Report to Legislature. Oregon Global Warming Commission, Salem, Oregon
Palchak E, Nash J, Galford GL (2015) The Vermont climate assessment: a problem-based model to bridge National Climate Research and local resilience. Michigan journal of. Sustain For 3(20150915)
RGGI (2013) RGGI Model Rule vol 1. Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont
Spreen M, Zwaagstra R (1994) Personal network sampling, outdegree analysis and multilevel analysis: Introducting the network concept in studies of hidden populations. Int Sociol 9:475–491
State of California (2015) California Greenhouse Gas Emissions for 2000 to 2013-- Trends of Emissions and Other Indicators vol 2015. State of California, Scramento, CA
State of Washington (2014) Washington Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program-- Reported Emissions for 2012 and 2013. State of Washington.
Strait R, Roe S, Lindquist H, Mullen M, Hsu Y (2007) Final Vermont Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Reference Case Projections 1990–2030. VT Dept of Environmental Conservation. Montpelier, VT
VT ANR (2013) Climate Change Adaptation Framework. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources and TetraTech. Montpelier, VT, 140 pp
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a collaborative grant from the Gund Institute for Ecological Economics at the University of Vermont. G. Galford was supported by the Gund Institute. G. Galford, A. Hoogenboom, K. Underwood and A. Betts were supported by Vermont EPSCoR with funds from the National Science Foundation Grant EPS-1101317. UVM’s Office of Community-University Partnerships and Service Learning provided Service Learning course designation and a teaching assistant. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, the state climatologist, Dr. Dupigny-Giroux, UVM Extension, SkiVermont, Vermont Tourism and Marketing, Green Mtn. Power, VT Department of Public Service, VT Agency of Education, and Vermont Natural Resources Council provided important feedback on the concept and content.
The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the National Weather Service.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Galford, G.L., Nash, J., Betts, A.K. et al. Bridging the climate information gap: a framework for engaging knowledge brokers and decision makers in state climate assessments. Climatic Change 138, 383–395 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1756-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1756-4