Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of three simulation approaches for assessing yield of rainfed sunflower in a Mediterranean environment for climate change impact modelling

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The determination of the impact of climate change on crop yield at a regional scale requires the development of new modelling methodologies able to generate accurate yield estimates with reduced available data. In this study, different simulation approaches for assessing yield have been evaluated. In addition to two well-known models (AquaCrop and Stewart function), a methodological proposal considering a simplified approach using an empirical model (SOM) has been included in the analysis. This empirical model was calibrated using rainfed sunflower experimental field data from three sites located in Andalusia, southern Spain, and validated using two additional locations, providing very satisfactory results compared with the other models with higher data requirements. Thus, only requiring weather data (accumulated rainfall from the beginning of the season fixed on September 1st, and maximum temperature during flowering) the approach accurately described the temporal and spatial yield variability observed (RMSE = 391 kg ha−1). The satisfactory results for assessing yield of sunflower under semi-arid conditions obtained in this study demonstrate the utility of empirical approaches with few data requirements, providing an excellent decision tool for climate change impact analyses at a regional scale, where available data is very limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken RM (2005) Applying thermal time scales to sunflower development. Agron J 97(3):746–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Almaraz JJ, Mabood F, Zhou X, Gregorich EG, Smith DL (2008) Climate change, weather variability and corn yield at a higher latitude locale: Southwestern Quebec. Clim Change 88:187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez R (2009) Predicting average regional yield and production of wheat in the Argentine Pampas by an artificial neural network approach. Eur J Agron 30:70–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabelguenne M, Debaeke P, Bouniols A (1999) EPICphase, a version of the EPIC model simulating the effects of water and nitrogen stress on biomass and yield, taking account of developmental stages: validation on maize, sunflower, sorghum, soybean and winter wheat. Agr Syst 60:175–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calviño PA, Sadras VO, Andrade FH (2003) Quantification of environmental and management effects on the yield of late-sown soybean. Field Crops Res 83:67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chimenti CA, Hall AJ (2001) Grain number responses to temperature during floret differentiation in sunflower. Field Crops Res 72:177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chimenti CA, Hall AJ, Sol López M (2001) Embryo-growth rate and duration in sunflower as affected by temperature. Field Crops Res 69:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicchino M, Rattalino Edreira JI, Uribelarrea M, Otegui ME (2010) Heat stress in field-grown maize: response of physiological determinants of grain yield. Crop science 50:1440–1448

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor D, Jones TR (1985) Response of sunflower to strategies of irrigation. II. Morphological and physiological responses to water stress. Field Crops Res 12:91–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doorenbos J, Kassam AH (1979) Yield response to water. FAO. Irrigation and drainage paper N° 33. FAO, Rome, p 193

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Vila M, Fereres E (2012) Combining the simulation crop model AquaCrop with an economic model for the optimization of irrigation management at farm level. Eur J Agron 36(1):21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimeno V, Fernández-Martínez JM, Fereres E (1989) Winter plating as a means of drought escape in sunflower. Field Crops Res 22:307–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göksoy AT, Demir AO, Turan ZM, Dagüstü N (2004) Responses of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) to full and limited irrigation at different growth stages. Field Crops Res 87:167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Grassini P, Hall AJ, Mercau JL (2009) Benchmarking sunflower water productivity in semiarid environments. Field Crops Res 110:251–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilioni L, Lhomme JP (2006) Modelling the daily course of capitulum temperature in a sunflower canopy. Agric For Meteorol 138:258–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall AJ, Feoli C, Ingaramo J, Balzarini M (2013) Gaps between farmer and attainable yields across rainfed sunflower growing regions of Argentina. Field Crops Res 143:119–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen JW, Jones JW (2000) Scaling-up crop models for climate variability applications. Agr Syst 65:43–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao TC, Heng L, Steduto P, Rojas-Lara B, Raes D, Fereres E (2009) AquaCrop—the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: III. Parameterization and testing for maize. Agron J 101:448–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katerji N, van Hoorn JW, Hamdy A, Mastrorilli M, Karam F (1998) Salinity and drought, a comparison of their effects on the relationship between yield and evapotranspiration. Agric Water Manage 36:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau S, Mitchell RAC, Barnett V, Colls JJ, Craigon J, Moore KL, Payne RW (1998) Testing winter wheat simulation models’ predictions against observed UK grain yields. Agric For Meteorol 89:85–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell DB, Burke MB (2010) On the use of statistical models to predict crop yield responses to climate change. Agric For Meteorol 150:1443–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorite IJ, Mateos L, Fereres E (2005) Impact of spatial and temporal aggregation of input parameters on the assessment of irrigation scheme performance. J Hydrol 300:286–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MARM (2009) Anuario de estadística 2009. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriondo M, Giannakopoulos C, Bindi M (2011) Climate change impact assessment: the role of climate extremes in crop yield simulation. Clim Change 104:679–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen JE, Bocher PK, Jensen T (2000) Comparison of scales of climate and soil data for aggregating simulated yield of winter wheat in Denmark. Agr Ecosyst Environ 82:213–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palisade (2013) Evolver, the genetic algorithm solver for Microsoft Excel (Version 6)—user guide. Palisade Corporation, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereyra-Irujo GA, Aguirrezabal LAN (2007) Sunflower yield and oil quality interactions and variability: analysis through a simple simulation model. Agric For Meteorol 143:252–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piquemal M, Cavalié G, Poeydomenge O, Botella-Brandibas A (1990) Activité métabolique et translocation chez le tournesol soumis à un stress hydrique. In: Blanchet R, Merrien A (eds) Le tournesol et l’eau. Cetiom Publications, Paris, pp 32–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploschuk EL, Hall AJ (1995) Capitulum position in sunflower affects grain temperature and duration of grain filling. Field Crops Res 44:111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raes D, Geerts S, Kipkorir E, Wellens J, Sahli A (2006) Simulation of yield decline as a result of water stress with a robust soil water balance model. Agric Water Manage 81:335–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez-Villegas J, Jarvis A, Läderach P (2013) Empirical approaches for assessing impacts of climate change on agriculture: the EcoCrop model and a case study with grain sorghum. Agric For Meteorol 170:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi M, Losavio N, Flagella Z (2003) Evaluation and application of the OILCROP-SUN model for sunflower in southern Italy. Agr Syst 78:17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rondanini D, Savin R, Hall AJ (2003) Dynamics of fruit growth and oil quality of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) exposed to brief intervals of high temperature during grain filling. Field Crops Res 83:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rondanini D, Mantese A, Savin R, Hall AJ (2006) Responses of sunflower yield and grain quality to alternating day/night temperature regimes during grain filling: effects of timing, duration and intensity of exposure to stress. Field Crops Res 96:48–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadras VO, Calviño PA (2001) Quantification of grain yield response to soil depth in soybean, maize, sunflower, and wheat. Agron J 93:577–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos C, Lorite IJ, Tasumi M, Allen RG, Fereres E (2008) Integrating satellite-based evapotranspiration with simulation models for irrigation management at the scheme level. Irrig Sci 26:277–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steduto P, Hsiao TC, Fereres E, Raes D (2012) Crop yield response to water. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 66. Rome

  • Stewart J, Cuenca R, Pruitt W, Hagan R, Tosso J (1977) Determination and utilization of water: production functions for principal California crops. W-67 Calif. Univ. of California, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Therond O, Hengsdijk H, Casellas E, Wallach D, Adam M, Belhouchette H, Oomen R, Russell G, Ewert F, Bergez JE, Janssen S, Wery J, Van Ittersum MK (2011) Using a cropping system model at regional scale: low-data approaches for crop management information and model calibration. Agr Ecosyst Environ 142:85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban D, Roberts M, Schlenker W, Lobell DB (2012) Projected temperatures changes indicate significant increase in interannual variability of U.S. maize yields. Clim Change 112:525–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA-SCS (1972) National engineering handbook. USDA-SCS. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Linden P, Mitchell JFB (2009) ENSEMBLES: climate change and its impacts: summary of research and results form the ENSEMBLES project. Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, 160 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ittersum MK, Cassman KG, Grassini P, Wolf J, Tittonell P, Hochman Z (2013) Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance—a review. Field Crops Res 143:4–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villalobos FJ, Hall AJ, Ritchie JT, Orgaz F (1996) OILCROP-SUN: a development, growth, and yield model of sunflower crop. Agron J 88(3):403–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield DM, Connor DJ, Hall AJ (1989) Carbon dioxine balance of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) subjected to water stress during grain-filling. Field Crops Res 20:65–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to express their gratitude RAEA-sunflower technicians for their collaboration. Part of this study was funded by grant P10-EXC10-0036 / AGR-6126 from the Regional Government of Andalusia. The excellent revision by the anonymous referees is greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ignacio J. Lorite.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

García-López, J., Lorite, I.J., García-Ruiz, R. et al. Evaluation of three simulation approaches for assessing yield of rainfed sunflower in a Mediterranean environment for climate change impact modelling. Climatic Change 124, 147–162 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1067-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1067-6

Keywords

Navigation