Abstract
The processability and quality of viscose are mainly influenced by the properties of dissolving pulps. Acid sulfite (AS) and prehydrolysis kraft (PHK) are the main commercial processes for the production of dissolving pulps. In this paper, the properties of dissolving pulps obtained from the AS and PHK processes, with respect to purity, molecular weight distribution (MWD), porosity, surface area, accessibility and reactivity, were comparatively evaluated. The results indicated that the PHK pulps had higher α-cellulose, lower S10/S18 content, and narrower MWD than the AS pulps, which can be ascribed to the different reaction mechanisms in the acid and alkaline pulping processes. The traditional parameters (S10/S18, α-cellulose and intrinsic viscosity) were insufficient to evaluate the pulp quality when comparing with dissolving pulps from different pulping processes. The Fock reactivity and the Chinese filterability tests were applied to evaluate their end-use properties in the rayon production process. The AS pulps had better accessibility than the PHK pulps (larger pore size and volume and thinner primary wall), supporting the conclusion that the AS samples exhibited higher reactivity that the PHK samples. The results from the Fock reactivity and Chinese filterability corresponded well.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brice R (2012) High purity cellulose through 2020 In: The cellulose gap Monte Carlo. http://csales.ch/cellulosegap2012_lineup.php
Duan C, Long Y, Li J, Ma X, Ni Y (2015) Changes of cellulose accessibility to cellulase due to fiber hornification and its impact on enzymatic viscosity control of dissolving pulp. Cellulose 22:2729–2736
Engstrom A-C, Ek M, Henriksson G (2006) Improved accessibility and reactivity of dissolving pulp for the viscose process: pretreatment with monocomponent endoglucanase. Biomacromolecules 7:2027–2031
Fatehi P, Ryan J, Ni Y (2013) Adsorption of lignocelluloses of model pre-hydrolysis liquor on activated carbon. Bioresour Technol 131:308–314
Figueiredo A, Evtuguin D, Saraiva J (2010) Effect of high pressure treatment on structure and properties of cellulose in eucalypt pulps. Cellulose 17:1193–1202
Fischer K, Schmidt I (2008) Hemicellulose in dissolving pulp and its behaviour during its processing to viscose. Macromol Symp 262:85–88
Ford ENJ, Mendon SK, Thames SF, Rawlins JW (2010) X-ray diffraction of cotton treated with neutralized vegetable oil-based macromolecular crosslinkers. J Eng Fiber Fabr 5(2):10–20
French AD, Santiago Cintrón M (2013) Cellulose polymorphy, crystallite size, and the Segal Crystallinity Index. Cellulose 20:583–588
Gehmayr V, Sixta H (2012) Pulp properties and their influence on enzymatic degradability. Biomacromolecules 13:645–651
Grönqvist S et al (2014) Fibre porosity development of dissolving pulp during mechanical and enzymatic processing. Cellulose 21:3667–3676
Hamilton JK, Thompson NSA (1960) Chemical comparison of kraft and sulfite pulps. Pulp Pap Mag Can 60:263–272
Ibarra D, Köpcke V, Ek M (2009) Exploring enzymatic treatments for the production of dissolving grade pulp from different wood and non-wood paper grade pulps. Holzforschung 63(6):721–730
Ibarra D, Köpcke V, Ek M (2010) Behavior of different monocomponent endoglucanases on the accessibility and reactivity of dissolving-grade pulps for viscose process. Enzyme Microb Technol 47:355–362
Jayme G, Van Köppen A (1950) Strukturelle und chemische Unterschiede zwischen Sulfit und Sulfatzellstoffen. Das Pap 4(23):455–462
Luce JE (1964) Radial distribution of properties through the cell wall. Pulp Pap Mag Can 65:419–423
Matin M, Rahaman MM, Nayeem J, Sarkar M, Jahan MS (2015) Dissolving pulp from jute stick. Carbohydr Polym 115:44–48
Miao Q, Chen L, Huang L, Tian C, Zheng L, Ni Y (2014a) A process for enhancing the accessibility and reactivity of hardwood kraft-based dissolving pulp for viscose rayon production by cellulase treatment. Bioresour Technol 154:109–113
Miao Q, Tian C, Chen L, Huang L, Zheng L, Ni Y (2014b) Combined mechanical and enzymatic treatments for improving the Fock reactivity of hardwood kraft-based dissolving pulp. Cellulose 22(1):803–809
Page D (1983) The origin of the differences between sulfite and kraft pulps. Pulp Pap Mag Can 84(3):15–20
Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parilla PA, Johnson DK (2010) Research cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol Biofuels 3:1–10
Saka S, Matsumura H (2004) Wood pulp manufacturing and quality characteristics. Macromol Symp 208:37–48
Schild G, Sixta H (2011) Sulfur-free dissolving pulps and their application for viscose and lyocell. Cellulose 18:1113–1128
Serrano-Ruiz JC, West RM, Dumesic JA (2010) Catalytic conversion of renewable biomass resources to fuels and chemicals. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng 1:79–100
Sixta H (2000) Comparative evaluation of TCF bleached hardwood dissolving pulps. Lenzing Ber 79:119–128
Sixta H (2006a) Pulp properties and applications. Handbook of pulp, vol 2. Wiley, New York, pp 1022–1062
Sixta H (2006b) Pulp properties and applications. Handbook of pulp, vol 2. Wiley, New York, pp 1042–1043
Sixta H (2006c) Pulp purification. Handbook of pulp, vol 2. Wiley, New York, pp 933–966
Sixta H, Borgards A (1999) New technology for the production of high-purity dissolving pulps. Das Pap 53(4):220–234
Sixta H et al (2013) Novel concepts of dissolving pulp production. Cellulose 20:1547–1561
Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker D (2008) Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. LAP-002 NREL Analytical Procedure National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden
Strunk P, Eliasson B, Hägglund C, Agnemo R (2011) The influence of properties in cellulose pulps on the reactivity in viscose manufacturing. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 26:81–89
Strunk P, Lindgren Å, Agnemo B, Eliasson B (2012a) Chemical changes of cellulose pulps in the processing to viscose dope. Cell Chem Technol 46(9):559–569
Strunk P, Lindgren Å, Agnemo R, Eliasson B (2012b) Properties of cellulose pulps and their influence on the production of a cellulose ether. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 27(1):24–34
Tian C, Zheng L, Miao Q, Nash C, Cao C, Ni Y (2013) Improvement in the Fock test for determining the reactivity of dissolving pulp. Tappi J 12(11):21–26
Tian C, Zheng L, Miao Q, Cao C, Ni Y (2014) Improving the reactivity of kraft-based dissolving pulp for viscose rayon production by mechanical treatments. Cellulose 21(5):3647–3654
Treiber EE (1988) ZellstoffefürModalfasern. Lenzing Ber 64:19–22
Van Heiningen A (2006) Converting a kraft pulp mill into an integrated forest biorefinery. Pulp Pap Can 107:38–43
Wang Q, Liu S, Yang G, Chen J, Ni Y (2015) Cationic polyacrylamide enhancing cellulase treatment efficiency of hardwood kraft-based dissolving pulp. Bioresour Technol 183:42–46
Wollboldt RP, Zuckerstätter G, Weber HK, Larsson PT, Sixta H (2010) Accessibility, reactivity and supramolecular structure of E. globulus pulps with reduced xylan content. Wood Sci Technol 44(4):533–546
Young RA (1994) Comparison of the properties of chemical cellulose pulps. Cellulose 1(2):107–130
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Canada Research Chairs and NSERC CRD programs, and the Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission (Grant No. 12ZCZDGX01100). The authors also thank Ven Reddy from department of science in University of New Brunswick (UNB) for the XRD measurements.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duan, C., Li, J., Ma, X. et al. Comparison of acid sulfite (AS)- and prehydrolysis kraft (PHK)-based dissolving pulps. Cellulose 22, 4017–4026 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0781-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0781-1