Abstract
Host tissue microenvironment plays key roles in cancer progression and colonization of secondary organs. One example is ovarian cancer, which colonizes the peritoneal cavity and especially the omentum. Our research indicates that the interaction of ovarian cancer cells with the omental microenvironment can activate a stress-kinase pathway involving the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 4 (MKK4). A combination of clinical correlative and functional data suggests that MKK4 activation suppresses growth of ovarian cancer cells lodged in omentum. These findings prompted us to turn our focus to the cellular composition of the omental microenvironment and its role in regulating cancer growth. In this review, in addition to providing an overview of MKK4 function, we highlight a use for metastasis suppressors as a molecular tool to study cancer cell interaction with its microenvironment. We review features of the omentum that makes it a favorable microenvironment for metastatic colonization. In conclusion, a broader, evolutionary biology perspective is presented which we believe needs to be considered when studying the evolution of cancer cells within a defined microenvironment. Taken together, this approach can direct new multi-dimensional lines of research aimed at a mechanistic understanding of host tissue microenvironment, which could be used to realize novel targets for future research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lin, H., Balic, M., Zheng, S., Datar, R., & Cote, R. J. (2011). Disseminated and circulating tumor cells: role in effective cancer management. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 77(1), 1–11.
McGowan, P. M., Kirstein, J. M., & Chambers, A. F. (2009). Micrometastatic disease and metastatic outgrowth: clinical issues and experimental approaches. Future Oncology, 5(7), 1083–1098.
Sosa, M. S., Avivar-Valderas, A., Bragado, P., Wen, H. C., & Aguirre-Ghiso, J. A. (2011). ERK1/2 and p38α/β signaling in tumor cell quiescence: opportunities to control dormant residual disease. Clinical Cancer Research, 17(18), 5850–5857.
Taylor, J., Hickson, J., Lotan, T., Yamada, D. S., & Rinker-Schaeffer, C. (2008). Using metastasis suppressor proteins to dissect interactions among cancer cells and their microenvironment. Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, 27(1), 67–73.
Wikman, H., Vessella, R., & Pantel, K. (2008). Cancer micrometastasis and tumour dormancy. Apmis, 116(7-8), 754–770.
Klein, C. A. (2009). Parallel progression of primary tumours and metastases. Nature Reviews Cancer, 9(4), 302–312.
Gatenby, R. A., & Gillies, R. J. (2008). A microenvironmental model of carcinogenesis. Nature Reviews Cancer, 8(1), 56–61.
Chung, L. W. K., Huang, W. C., Sung, S. Y., Wu, D., Odero-Marah, V., Nomura, T., et al. (2006). Stromal–epithelial interaction in prostate cancer progression. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer, 5(2), 162–170.
Cunha, G. R., & Ricke, W. A. (2011). A historical perspective on the role of stroma in the pathogenesis of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Differentiation, 82, 168–172.
Kenny, P. A., & Bissell, M. J. (2003). Tumor reversion: correction of malignant behavior by microenvironmental cues. International Journal of Cancer, 107(5), 688–695.
Kaplan, R. N., Rafii, S., & Lyden, D. (2006). Preparing the “soil”: the premetastatic niche. Cancer Research, 66(23), 11089–11093.
Peinado, H., Lavothskin, S., & Lyden, D. (2011). The secreted factors responsible for pre-metastatic niche formation: old sayings and new thoughts. Seminars in Cancer Biology, 21(2), 139–146.
Gerber, S. A., Rybalko, V. Y., Bigelow, C. E., Lugade, A. A., Foster, T. H., Frelinger, J. G., et al. (2006). Preferential attachment of peritoneal tumor metastases to omental immune aggregates and possible role of a unique vascular microenvironment in metastatic survival and growth. The American Journal of Pathology, 169(5), 1739.
Khan, S. M., Funk, H. M., Thiolloy, S., Lotan, T. L., Hickson, J., Prins, G. S., et al. (2010). In vitro metastatic colonization of human ovarian cancer cells to the omentum. Clinical and Experimental Metastasis, 27(3), 185–196.
Wilkosz, S., Ireland, G., Khwaja, N., Walker, M., Butt, R., de Giorgio-Miller, A., et al. (2005). A comparative study of the structure of human and murine greater omentum. Anatomy and Embryology, 209(3), 251–261.
Hickson, J. A., Huo, D., Vander Griend, D. J., Lin, A., Rinker-Schaeffer, C. W., & Yamada, S. D. (2006). The p38 kinases MKK4 and MKK6 suppress metastatic colonization in human ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Research, 66(4), 2264.
Yamada, S. D., Hickson, J. A., Hrobowski, Y., Vander Griend, D. J., Benson, D., Montag, A., et al. (2002). Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 4 (MKK4) acts as a metastasis suppressor gene in human ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Research, 62(22), 6717.
Khan, S. M., Taylor, J. L., & Rinker-Schaeffer, C. W. (2010). Disrupting ovarian cancer metastatic colonization: insights from metastasis suppressor studies. Journal of Oncology, 2010, 286925.
Bainer, R. O., Taylor, J. V., Yamada, D. S., Montag, A., Lingen, M. W., Gilad, Y., et al. (2012). Time-dependent transcriptional profiling links gene expression to mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 4 (MKK4)-mediated suppression of omental metastatic colonization. Clinical and Experimental Metastasis, 29, 397–408.
Taylor, J. L., Szmulewitz, R. Z., Lotan, T., Hickson, J., Griend, D. V., Yamada, S. D., et al. (2008). New paradigms for the function of JNKK1/MKK4 in controlling growth of disseminated cancer cells. Cancer Letters, 272(1), 12–22.
Lancaster, J., Dressman, H., Clarke, J., Sayer, R., Martino, M., Cragun, J., et al. (2006). Identification of genes associated with ovarian cancer metastasis using microarray expression analysis. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 16(5), 1733–1745.
Lotan, T., Hickson, J., Souris, J., Huo, D., Taylor, J., Li, T., et al. (2008). c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase activating kinase 1/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 4-mediated inhibition of SKOV3ip. 1 ovarian cancer metastasis involves growth arrest and p21 up-regulation. Cancer Research, 68(7), 2166.
Collins, D., Hogan, A. M., O’Shea, D., & Winter, D. C. (2009). The omentum: anatomical, metabolic, and surgical aspects. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 13(6), 1138–1146.
Morison, R. (1906). Remarks on some functions of the omentum. British Medical Journal, 1(2350), 76.
Platell, C., Cooper, D., Papadimitriou, J. M., & Hall, J. C. (2000). The omentum. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 6(2), 169–176.
Dux, K. (1990). Anatomy of the greater and lesser omentum in the mouse with some physiological implications. In H. S. Goldsmith (Ed.), The omentum: research and clinical applications (pp. 19–43). New York: Springer.
Michailova, K. N., & Usunoff, K. G. (2004). The milky spots of the peritoneum and pleura: structure, development and pathology. Biomedical Reviews, 15, 47–66.
Williams, R. (1990). Angiogenesis and the greater omentum. In H. S. Goldsmith (Ed.), The omentum: research and clinical applications (pp. 45–61). New York: Springer.
Mironov, V., Gusev, S., & Baradi, A. (1979). Mesothelial stomata overlying omental milky spots: scanning electron microscopic study. Cell and tissue research, 201(2), 327–330.
Simer, P. H. (1934). On the morphology of the omentum, with especial reference to its lymphatics. American Journal of Anatomy, 54(2), 203–228.
Nieman, K. M., Kenny, H. A., Penicka, C. V., Ladanyi, A., Buell-Gutbrod, R., Zillhardt, M. R., et al. (2011). Adipocytes promote ovarian cancer metastasis and provide energy for rapid tumor growth. Nature Medicine, 17(11), 1498–1503.
Cai, J., Tang, H., Xu, L., Wang, X., Yang, C., Ruan, S., et al. (2011). Fibroblasts in omentum activated by tumor cells promote ovarian cancer growth, adhesion and invasiveness. Carcinogenesis, 33(1), 20–29.
Gerber, S. A., Rybalko, V. Y., Bigelow, C. E., Lugade, A. A., Foster, T. H., Frelinger, J. G., et al. (2006). Preferential attachment of peritoneal tumor metastases to omental immune aggregates and possible role of a unique vascular microenvironment in metastatic survival and growth. [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural]. The American Journal of Pathology, 169(5), 1739–1752. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2006.051222.
Sorensen, E. W., Gerber, S. A., Sedlacek, A. L., Rybalko, V. Y., Chan, W. M., Lord, E. M., et al. (2009). Omental immune aggregates and tumor metastasis within the peritoneal cavity. Immunologic research, 45(2), 185–194.
Szmulewitz, R. Z., Clark, R., Lotan, T., Otto, K., Taylor Veneris, J., Macleod, K., et al. (2011). MKK4 suppresses metastatic colonization by multiple highly metastatic prostate cancer cell lines through a transient impairment in cell cycle progression. International Journal of Cancer, 130, 509–520.
Vander Griend, D. J., Kocherginsky, M., Hickson, J. A., Stadler, W. M., Lin, A., & Rinker-Schaeffer, C. W. (2005). Suppression of metastatic colonization by the context-dependent activation of the c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase kinases JNKK1/MKK4 and MKK7. Cancer Research, 65(23), 10984.
Thiolloy, S., & Rinker-Schaeffer, C. W. (2011). Thinking outside the box: using metastasis suppressors as molecular tools. Seminars in Cancer Biology, 21(2), 89–98. doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2010.12.008.
Gatenby, R. A., Gillies, R. J., & Brown, J. S. (2011). Of cancer and cave fish. Nature Reviews Cancer, 11(4), 237–238.
Laland, K. N., Day, R. L., & Odling-Smee, F. J. (2003). Rethinking adaptation: the niche-construction perspective. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 46(1), 80–95.
Bissell, M., & Barcellos-Hoff, M. (1987). The influence of extracellular matrix on gene expression: is structure the message? Journal of Cell Science, 8(Supplement), 327.
Xu, R., Boudreau, A., & Bissell, M. J. (2009). Tissue architecture and function: dynamic reciprocity via extra- and intra-cellular matrices. Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, 28(1), 167–176.
Knopeke, M. T., Ritschdorff, E. T., Clark, R., Vander Griend, D. J., Khan, S., Thobe, M., et al. (2011). Building on the foundation of daring hypotheses: Using the MKK4 metastasis suppressor to develop models of dormancy and metastatic colonization. FEBS Letters, 585, 3159–3165.
Acknowledgments
Financial support was provided by the Pardee Foundation (J.T.V., C.W.R-S.), NCI/NIH 2RO1CA089569 (J.T.V., N.S., V.K., R.C., C.W.R-S.), DOD W81XWH-09-1-0127 (R.C., V.K., C.W.R-S.), Lederer Fund (J.T.V.), Section of Urology Research Funds (C.W. R-S, J.T.V.), NIH Grant T32 GM007197 (R. B.), and Graduate Training in Growth and Development T32 HD07009 (J.T.V.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Venkatesh Krishnan and Nathan Stadick contributed equally.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krishnan, V., Stadick, N., Clark, R. et al. Using MKK4’s metastasis suppressor function to identify and dissect cancer cell–microenvironment interactions during metastatic colonization. Cancer Metastasis Rev 31, 605–613 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-012-9371-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-012-9371-y