Abstract
Patients with ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) have an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events in the future, which is widespread but underdiagnosed. The purpose of this study is to explore the application value of adenosine stress myocardial contrast echocardiography (ASMCE) in INOCA disease, so that clinicians can early identify and intervene patients with left ventricular function subclinical impairment in INOCA. We enrolled 118 patients with INOCA by ASMCE and invasive coronary angiography (ICA), 97 of whom had complete data. The study population was divided into two subgroups depending on coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR): impaired CFVR group (n = 34) and normal CFVR group (n = 63). Global longitudinal strain endocardial myocardial (GLSendo), mid-myocardial (GLSmid) and epicardial myocardial (GLSepi) increased after stress in both groups; transmural strain, wall motion scored index (WMSI) and myocardial perfusion scored index (MPSI) increased and FORCE decreased in impaired CFVR group after stress, but there was no difference in normal group before and after stress. There was no significant difference in left ventricular myocardial mechanical parameters, including ΔGLSendo, ΔGLSmid, ΔGLSepi, GLSendo-epi Reserve, Δpeak strain dispersion (PSD), PSD Reserve between the two groups, but ΔEF, strain reserve and left ventricular contractile reserve (LVCR) in the impaired CFVR group were lower than those in the normal CFVR group, while ΔWMSI and ΔMPSI were increased. CFVR can be a clinically valuable indicator in the ASMCE diagnosis of patients with microvascular angina pectoris in INOCA. In the evaluation of left ventricular function in INOCA patients, attention should be paid not only to myocardial deformation, but also to the dynamic changes of LVCR and myocardial perfusion during peak hyperemia.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- CFVR:
-
Coronary flow velocity reserve
- EF:
-
Ejection fraction
- LVCR:
-
Left ventricular contractile reserve
- ASMCE:
-
Adenosine stress myocardial contrast echocardiography
- ICA:
-
Invasive coronary angiography
- GLS:
-
Global longitudinal strain
- INOCA:
-
Ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries
- MVA:
-
Microvascular angina
- 2D-STE:
-
Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography
- MCE:
-
Myocardial contrast echocardiography
References
Del Buono M, Montone RA, Camilli M et al (2021) Coronary microvascular dysfunction across the spectrum of cardiovascular diseases: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 78:1352–1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.042
Crea F, Camici PG, Bairey Merz CN (2014) Coronary microvascular dysfunction: an update. Eur Heart J 35:1101–1111. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht513
Task Force M, Montalescot G, Sechtem U et al (2013) ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 34:2949–3003. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht296
DeVore AD, McNulty S, Alenezi F et al (2017) Impaired left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: insights from the RELAX trial. Eur J Heart Fail 19:893–900. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.754
Kunadian V, Chieffo A, Camici PG et al (2020) An EAPCI expert consensus document on ischaemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries in collaboration with European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation Endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group. Eur Heart J 41:3504–3520. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa503
Ciampi Q, Zagatina A, Cortigiani L et al (2021) Prognostic value of stress echocardiography assessed by the ABCDE protocol. Eur Heart J 42:3869–3878. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab493
Mattoso AAA, Kowatsch I, Tsutsui JM et al (2013) Prognostic value of qualitative and quantitative vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion echocardiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 26:539–547
Lee SH, Shin D, Lee JM et al (2022) Clinical relevance of ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries according to coronary microvascular dysfunction. J Am Heart Assoc 11:e025171. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.121.025171
Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D et al (2021) AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 144:e368–e454. https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000001030
Schroder J, Michelsen MM, Mygind ND et al (2021) Coronary flow velocity reserve predicts adverse prognosis in women with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease: results from the iPOWER study. Eur Heart J 42:228–239. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa944
Sicari R, Rigo F, Cortigiani L et al (2009) Additive prognostic value of coronary flow reserve in patients with chest pain syndrome and normal or near-normal coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 103:626–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.10.033
Ong P, Safdar B, Seitz A et al (2020) Diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction in the clinic. Cardiovasc Res 116:841–855. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvz339
Michelsen MM, Pena A, Mygind ND et al (2018) Coronary microvascular dysfunction and myocardial contractile reserve in women with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease. Echocardiography 35:196–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.13767
Yang N, Su YF, Li WW et al (2019) Microcirculation function assessed by adenosine triphosphate stress myocardial contrast echocardiography and prognosis in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease. Medicine 98:e15990. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000015990
Schroder J, Prescott E (2021) Doppler echocardiography assessment of coronary microvascular function in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease. Front Cardiovasc Med 8:723542. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.723542
Michelsen MM, Mygind ND, Pena A et al (2017) Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography compared with positron emission tomography for assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction: The iPOWER study. Int J Cardiol 228:435–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.004
Filice M, Golino M, Denora M et al (2022) Coronary microvascular dysfunction and findings of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients with microvascular angina. Minerva Med. https://doi.org/10.23736/s0026-4806.21.07135-4
Ikonomidis I, Tzortzis S, Paraskevaidis I et al (2012) Association of abnormal coronary microcirculatory function with impaired response of longitudinal left ventricular function during adenosine stress echocardiography in untreated hypertensive patients. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 13:1030–1040. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jes071
Jovanovic I, Tesic M, Giga V et al (2019) Impairment of coronary flow velocity reserve and global longitudinal strain in women with cardiac syndrome X and slow coronary flow. J Cardiol 76:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.02.005
Al-Mohaissen M (2022) Echocardiographic assessment of primary microvascular angina and primary coronary microvascular dysfunction. Trends Cardiovas Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2022.02.007
Mandoli GE, Cameli M, Minardi S et al (2018) Layer-specific strain in dipyridamole stress echo: a new tool for the diagnosis of microvascular angina. Echocardiography 35:2005–2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.14180
Schnell F, Matelot D, Daudin M et al (2017) Mechanical dispersion by strain echocardiography: a novel tool to diagnose hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in athletes. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 30:251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2016.11.013
Panting JR, Gatehouse PD, Yang GZ et al (2002) Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. N Engl J Med 346:1948–1953. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa012369
Leong-Poi H, Rim SJ, Le DE et al (2002) Perfusion versus function: the ischemic cascade in demand ischemia: implications of single-vessel versus multivessel stenosis. Circulation 105:987–992. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc0802.104326
Funding
This study was supported by the kunming Health Commission Grant (Grant Numbers 2022-09-02-001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. QW and YD proposed the conceptual design of the article, LZ performed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript, PX was responsible for image off-line analysis, and QL and XS were responsible for image acquisition. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent to publish
Not applicable.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval for this study was given by the Medical Ethics Committee of Yanan Hospital of Kunming City (Ethics Approval Number 2022-062-01). This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki for the involvement of humans.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, L., Wang, Q., Xu, P. et al. Evaluation of left ventricular function in ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries: a research based on adenosine stress myocardial contrast echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 39, 349–357 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02740-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02740-7