Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Cancer Research Network: a platform for epidemiologic and health services research on cancer prevention, care, and outcomes in large, stable populations

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The ability to collect data on patients for long periods prior to, during, and after a cancer diagnosis is critical for studies of cancer etiology, prevention, treatment, outcomes, and costs. We describe such data capacities within the Cancer Research Network (CRN), a cooperative agreement between the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and organized health care systems across the United States.

Methods

Data were extracted from each CRN site’s virtual data warehouse using a centrally written and locally executed program. We computed the percent of patients continuously enrolled ≥1, ≥5, and ≥10 years before cancer diagnosis in 2012–2015 (year varied by CRN site). To describe retention after diagnosis, we computed the cumulative percentages enrolled, deceased, and disenrolled each year after the diagnosis for patients diagnosed in 2000.

Results

Approximately 8 million people were enrolled in ten CRN health plans on December 31, 2014 or 2015 (year varied by CRN site). Among more than 30,000 recent cancer diagnoses, 70 % were enrolled for ≥5 years and 56 % for ≥10 years before diagnosis. Among 25,274 cancers diagnosed in 2000, 28 % were still enrolled in 2010, 45 % had died, and 27 % had disenrolled from CRN health systems.

Conclusions

Health plan enrollment before cancer diagnosis was generally long in the CRN, and the proportion of patients lost to follow-up after diagnosis was low. With long enrollment histories among cancer patients pre-diagnosis and low post-diagnosis disenrollment, the CRN provides an excellent platform for epidemiologic and health services research on cancer incidence, outcomes, and costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lyman GH, Levine M (2012) Comparative effectiveness research in oncology: an overview. J Clin Oncol. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.45.9792

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carpenter WR, Meyer A-M, Abernethy AP, Sturmer T, Kosorok MR (2012) A framework for understanding cancer comparative effectiveness research data needs. J Clin Epidemiol 65(11):1150–1158. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.06.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Abernethy AP, Etheredge LM, Ganz PA, Wallace P, German RR, Neti C, Bach PB, Murphy SB (2010) Rapid-learning system for cancer care. J Clin Oncol 28(27):4268–4274. doi:10.1200/jco.2010.28.5478

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. National Cancer Institute Introduction to PROSPR. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://healthcaredelivery.cancer.gov/prospr/introduction.html. Accessed 20 Nov 2015

  5. National Cancer Institute NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) Home Page. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://ncorp.cancer.gov/about/. Accessed 20 Nov 2015

  6. Wagner EH, Greene SM, Hart G, Field TS, Fletcher S, Geiger AM, Herrinton LJ, Hornbrook MC, Johnson CC, Mouchawar J, Rolnick SJ, Stevens VJ, Taplin SH, Tolsma D, Vogt TM (2005) Building a research consortium of large health systems: the Cancer Research Network. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 35:3–11. doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgi032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hornbrook MC, Hart G, Ellis JL, Bachman DJ, Ansell G, Greene SM, Wagner EH, Pardee R, Schmidt MM, Geiger A, Butani AL, Field T, Fouayzi H, Miroshnik I, Liu L, Diseker R, Wells K, Krajenta R, Lamerato L, Neslund Dudas C (2005) Building a virtual cancer research organization. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 35:12–25. doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgi033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nekhlyudov L, Greene SM, Chubak J, Rabin B, Tuzzio L, Rolnick S, Field TS (2013) Cancer Research Network: using integrated healthcare delivery systems as platforms for cancer survivorship research. J Cancer Surviv 7(1):55–62. doi:10.1007/s11764-012-0244-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Geiger AM, Buist DS, Greene SM, Altschuler A, Field TS (2008) Survivorship research based in integrated healthcare delivery systems: the Cancer Research Network. Cancer 112(11 Suppl):2617–2626. doi:10.1002/cncr.23447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP Jr, Weiss NS (1992) A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 326(10):653–657. doi:10.1056/NEJM199203053261001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Doubeni CA, Weinmann S, Adams K, Kamineni A, Buist DS, Ash AS, Rutter CM, Doria-Rose VP, Corley DA, Greenlee RT, Chubak J, Williams A, Kroll-Desrosiers AR, Johnson E, Webster J, Richert-Boe K, Levin TR, Fletcher RH, Weiss NS (2013) Screening colonoscopy and risk for incident late-stage colorectal cancer diagnosis in average-risk adults: a nested case-control study. Ann Intern Med 158(5 Pt 1):312–320. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303050-00003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Geiger AM, Thwin SS, Lash TL, Buist DS, Prout MN, Wei F, Field TS, Ulcickas Yood M, Frost FJ, Enger SM, Silliman RA (2007) Recurrences and second primary breast cancers in older women with initial early-stage disease. Cancer 109(5):966–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ritzwoller DP, Carroll NM, Delate T, Hornbrook MC, Kushi L, Bowles EJ, Loggers ET, Menter A (2014) Comparative effectiveness of adjunctive bevacizumab for advanced lung cancer: the cancer research network experience. J Thorac Oncol 9(5):692–701. doi:10.1097/JTO.0000000000000127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Loggers ET, Fishman PA, Peterson D, O’Keeffe-Rosetti M, Greenberg C, Hornbrook MC, Kushi LH, Lowry S, Ramaprasan A, Wagner EH, Weeks JC, Ritzwoller DP (2014) Advanced imaging among health maintenance organization enrollees with cancer. J Oncol Pract 10(4):231–238. doi:10.1200/JOP.2013.001258

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bowles EJA, Wellman R, Feigelson HS, Onitilo AA, Freedman AN, Delate T, Allen LA, Nekhlyudov L, Goddard KAB, Davis RL, Habel LA, Yood MU, Mccarty C, Magid DJ, Wagner EH, Pharmacovigilance Study Team (2012) Risk of heart failure in breast cancer patients after anthracycline and trastuzumab treatment: a retrospective cohort study. J Nat Cancer Inst 104(17):1293–1305. doi:10.1093/jnci/djs317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Prouty CD, Mazor KM, Greene SM, Roblin DW, Firneno CL, Lemay CA, Robinson BE, Gallagher TH (2014) Providers’ perceptions of communication breakdowns in cancer care. J Gen Intern Med 29(8):1122–1130. doi:10.1007/s11606-014-2769-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Geiger AM, Castellino SM, Tooze JA, Altschuler A, Month S, Mertens AC, Nekhlyudov L, Greene SM (2013) Potential role of community-based healthcare system data in research on survivors of adolescent and young adult cancer. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2(2):53–58. doi:10.1089/jayao.2012.0033

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ross TR, Ng D, Brown JS, Pardee R, Hornbrook MC (2014) The HMO Research Network Virtual Data Warehouse: A Public Data Model to Support Collaboration. EGEMS (Wash DC) 2 (1):Article 2. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1049

  19. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program Site Recode ICD-O-3/WHO 2008 Definition. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://seer.cancer.gov/siterecode/icdo3_dwhoheme/index.html. Accessed 5 Jan 2015

  20. Field TS, Cernieux J, Buist D, Geiger A, Lamerato L, Hart G, Bachman D, Krajenta R, Greene S, Hornbrook MC, Ansell G, Herrinton L, Reed G (2004) Retention of enrollees following a cancer diagnosis within health maintenance organizations in the Cancer Research Network. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(2):148–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Table 1.5 Age-Adjusted SEER Incidence and U.S. Death Rates and 5-Year Relative Survival (Percent) By Primary Cancer Site, Sex and Time Period. National Cancer Institute. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2012/results_merged/topic_survival.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2015

  22. Boudreau DM, Yu O, Miglioretti DL, Buist DSM, Heckbert SR, Daling JR (2007) Statin use and breast cancer risk in a large population-based setting. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16(3):416–421. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-06-0737

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Clough-Gorr KM, Thwin SS, Bosco JLF, Silliman RA, Buist DSM, Pawloski PA, Quinn VP, Prout MN (2012) Incident malignancies among older long-term breast cancer survivors and an age-matched and site-matched nonbreast cancer comparison group over 10 years of follow-up. Cancer 119(8):1478–1485. doi:10.1002/cncr.27914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Buist DS, Bosco JL, Silliman RA, Gold HT, Field T, Yood MU, Quinn VP, Prout M, Lash TL, Breast Cancer Outcomes in Older Women Investigators (2013) Long-term surveillance mammography and mortality in older women with a history of early stage invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 142(1):153–163. doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2720-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Award Number U24CA171524 to Lawrence H. Kushi, ScD. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. At Group Health, the collection of cancer incidence data used in this study was supported by the Cancer Surveillance System of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, which is funded by Contract Nos. N01-CN-67009 and N01-PC-35142 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute, with additional support from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and the State of Washington. At Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, the project was also supported in part by the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program, through the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), Grant No. UL1TR000427. The authors would like to thank Dr. Virginia Quinn for comments on previous versions of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Chubak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Human and animal rights statement

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 120 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chubak, J., Ziebell, R., Greenlee, R.T. et al. The Cancer Research Network: a platform for epidemiologic and health services research on cancer prevention, care, and outcomes in large, stable populations. Cancer Causes Control 27, 1315–1323 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-016-0808-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-016-0808-4

Keywords