Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diet and lifestyle factors interact with MAPK genes to influence survival: the Breast Cancer Health Disparities Study

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

MAPK genes are activated by a variety of factors related to growth factors, hormones, and environmental stress.

Methods

We evaluated associations between 13 MAPK genes and survival among 1,187 nonHispanic White and 1,155 Hispanic/Native American (NA) women diagnosed with breast cancer. We assessed the influence of diet, lifestyle, and genetic ancestry on these associations. Percent NA ancestry was determined from 104 Ancestry Informative Markers. Adaptive rank truncation product (ARTP) was used to determine gene and pathway significance.

Results

Associations were predominantly observed among women with lower NA ancestry. Specifically, the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) pathway was associated with all-cause mortality (P ARTP = 0.02), but not with breast cancer-specific mortality (P ARTP = 0.10). However, MAP2K1 and MAP3K9 were associated with both breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality. MAPK12 (P ARTP = 0.05) was only associated with breast cancer-specific mortality, and MAP3K1 (P ARTP = 0.02) and MAPK1 (P ARTP = 0.05) were only associated with all-cause mortality. Among women with higher NA ancestry, MAP3K2 was significantly associated with all-cause mortality (P ARTP = 0.04). Several diet and lifestyle factors, including alcohol consumption, caloric intake, dietary folate, and cigarette smoking, significantly modified the associations with MAPK genes and all-cause mortality.

Conclusions

Our study supports an association between MAPK genes and survival after diagnosis with breast cancer, especially among women with low NA ancestry. The interaction between genetic variation in the MAPK pathway with diet and lifestyle factors for all women supports the important role of these factors for breast cancer survivorship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Imajo M, Tsuchiya Y, Nishida E (2006) Regulatory mechanisms and functions of MAP kinase signaling pathways. IUBMB Life 58(5–6):312–317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hirosumi J, Tuncman G, Chang L, Gorgun CZ, Uysal KT, Maeda K, Karin M, Hotamisligil GS (2002) A central role for JNK in obesity and insulin resistance. Nature 420(6913):333–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee YH, Giraud J, Davis RJ, White MF (2003) c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) mediates feedback inhibition of the insulin signaling cascade. J Biol Chem 278(5):2896–2902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Qi M, Elion EA (2005) MAP kinase pathways. J Cell Sci 118(Pt 16):3569–3572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Seger R, Krebs EG (1995) The MAPK signaling cascade. FASEB J 9(9):726–735

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Blenis J (1993) Signal transduction via the MAP kinases: proceed at your own RSK. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90(13):5889–5892

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Esteva FJ, Sahin AA, Smith TL, Yang Y, Pusztai L, Nahta R, Buchholz TA, Buzdar AU, Hortobagyi GN, Bacus SS (2004) Prognostic significance of phosphorylated P38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and HER-2 expression in lymph node-positive breast carcinoma. Cancer 100(3):499–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Slattery ML, John EM, Torres-Mejia G, Lundgreen A, Herrick JS, Baumgartner KB, Hines LM, Stern MC, Wolff RK (2012) Genetic variation in genes involved in hormones, inflammation and energetic factors and breast cancer risk in an admixed population. Carcinogenesis 33(8):1512–1521

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Slattery ML, Sweeney C, Edwards S, Herrick J, Baumgartner K, Wolff R, Murtaugh M, Baumgartner R, Giuliano A, Byers T (2007) Body size, weight change, fat distribution and breast cancer risk in Hispanic and non-Hispanic White women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 102(1):85–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. John EM, Horn-Ross PL, Koo J (2003) Lifetime physical activity and breast cancer risk in a multiethnic population: the San Francisco Bay area breast cancer study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12(11 Pt 1):1143–1152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. John EM, Phipps AI, Davis A, Koo J (2005) Migration history, acculturation, and breast cancer risk in Hispanic women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14(12):2905–2913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Slattery ML, Caan BJ, Duncan D, Berry TD, Coates A, Kerber R (1994) A computerized diet history questionnaire for epidemiologic studies. J Am Diet Assoc 94(7):761–766

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Murtaugh MA, Sweeney C, Giuliano AR, Herrick JS, Hines L, Byers T, Baumgartner KB, Slattery ML (2008) Diet patterns and breast cancer risk in Hispanic and non-Hispanic White women: the Four-Corners Breast Cancer Study. Am J Clin Nutr 87(4):978–984

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Horn-Ross PL, John EM, Lee M, Stewart SL, Koo J, Sakoda LC, Shiau AC, Goldstein J, Davis P, Perez-Stable EJ (2001) Phytoestrogen consumption and breast cancer risk in a multiethnic population: the Bay Area Breast Cancer Study. Am J Epidemiol 154(5):434–441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164(4):1567–1587

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155(2):945–959

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu K, Li Q, Bergen AW, Pfeiffer RM, Rosenberg PS, Caporaso N, Kraft P, Chatterjee N (2009) Pathway analysis by adaptive combination of P-values. Genet Epidemiol 33(8):700–709

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kai Yu OL, Wheeler W (2011) ARTP gene and pathway p-values computed using the adaptive rank truncated product. In: 2.0.0 edn. R package

  19. Nyholt DR (2004) A simple correction for multiple testing for single-nucleotide polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium with each other. Am J Hum Genet 74(4):765–769

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li J, Ji L (2005) Adjusting multiple testing in multilocus analyses using the eigenvalues of a correlation matrix. Heredity 95(3):221–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mueller H, Flury N, Eppenberger-Castori S, Kueng W, David F, Eppenberger U (2000) Potential prognostic value of mitogen-activated protein kinase activity for disease-free survival of primary breast cancer patients. Int J Cancer 89(4):384–388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kwan ML, Weltzien E, Kushi LH, Castillo A, Slattery ML, Caan BJ (2009) Dietary patterns and breast cancer recurrence and survival among women with early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 27(6):919–926

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kwan ML, Kushi LH, Weltzien E, Tam EK, Castillo A, Sweeney C, Caan BJ (2010) Alcohol consumption and breast cancer recurrence and survival among women with early-stage breast cancer: the life after cancer epidemiology study. J Clin Oncol 28(29):4410–4416

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim EH, Willett WC, Fung T, Rosner B, Holmes MD (2011) Diet quality indices and postmenopausal breast cancer survival. Nutr Cancer 63(3):381–388

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu AH, Gomez SL, Vigen C, Kwan ML, Keegan TH, Lu Y, Shariff-Marco S, Monroe KR, Kurian AW, Cheng I et al (2013) The California Breast Cancer Survivorship Consortium (CBCSC): prognostic factors associated with racial/ethnic differences in breast cancer survival. Cancer Causes Control 24(10):1821–1836

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would also like to acknowledge the contributions of the following individuals to the study: Sandra Edwards for data harmonization oversight; Jennifer Herrick for data management and data harmonization; Erica Wolff and Michael Hoffman for laboratory support; Carolina Ortega for her assistance with data management for the Mexico Breast Cancer Study, Jocelyn Koo for data management for the San Francisco Bay Area Breast Cancer Study; Dr Tim Byers for his contribution to the 4-Corners Breast Cancer Study; and Dr Josh Galanter for assistance in selection of AIMs markers. The Breast Cancer Health Disparities Study was funded by Grant CA14002 from the National Cancer Institute to Dr Slattery. The San Francisco Bay Area Breast Cancer Study was supported by Grants CA63446 and CA77305 from the National Cancer Institute, Grant DAMD17-96-1-6071 from the US Department of Defense and Grant 7PB-0068 from the California Breast Cancer Research Program. The collection of cancer incidence data used in this study was supported by the California Department of Public Health as part of the statewide cancer reporting program mandated by California Health and Safety Code Sect. 103885; the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program under contract HHSN261201000036C awarded to the Cancer Prevention Institute of California; and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Program of Cancer Registries, under agreement #1U58 DP000807-01 awarded to the Public Health Institute. The 4-Corners Breast Cancer Study was funded by Grants CA078682, CA078762, CA078552, and CA078802 from the National Cancer Institute. The research also was supported by the Utah Cancer Registry, which is funded by contract N01-PC-67000 from the National Cancer Institute, with additional support from the State of Utah Department of Health, the New Mexico Tumor Registry, and the Arizona and Colorado cancer registries, funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Program of Cancer Registries and additional state support. The contents of this manuscript are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the National Cancer Institute or endorsement by the State of California Department of Public Health, the National Cancer Institute, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or their Contractors and Subcontractors. The Mexico Breast Cancer Study was funded by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) (SALUD-2002-C01-7462).

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martha L. Slattery.

Additional information

Novelty This study evaluates lifestyle and genetic factors that influence breast cancer survival. These factors are evaluated in a large genetically admixed population.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Slattery, M.L., Hines, L.H., Lundgreen, A. et al. Diet and lifestyle factors interact with MAPK genes to influence survival: the Breast Cancer Health Disparities Study. Cancer Causes Control 25, 1211–1225 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-014-0426-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-014-0426-y

Keywords

Navigation