Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Influence of Unrelated and Related Diversification on Fraudulent Reporting

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study suggests that unrelated diversification has a positive influence on the probability of fraudulent reporting whereas related diversification has a negative influence on the probability of fraudulent reporting. The strength of the influence of these corporate level strategies is contingent on the moral character of the firm. Unrelated diversification provides opportunity for financial innovation within the firm’s internal capital market, which can result in fraudulent reporting. This is more likely when the moral character of the firm is driven by a conscienceless financial self-interest motive, as implied by the firm’s contempt toward the larger community (in terms of damage inflicted on the interests of people outside the firm). In contrast, related diversification, where product divisions focus on mutual sharing and monitoring of operational activities, can reduce the probability of fraudulent reporting. This is more likely when constituents within the firm view themselves as moral citizens, as implied by the firm’s benevolence toward the larger community. Hence, while unrelated diversification focuses the energies of managers within the firm on financial manipulation, related diversification focuses these energies on productive purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson, E., & Park, C. (1994). Concealment of negative organizational outcomes: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1302–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almer, E., Gramling, A., & Kaplan, S. (2008). Impact of post-restatement actions taken by a firm on non-professional investors’ credibility perceptions. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand, V., Ashforth, B. E., & Joshi, M. (2005). Business as usual: the acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. The Academy of Management Executive (1993–2005), 19(4), 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthaud Day, M. L., Certo, S. T., Dalton, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2006). A changing of the guard: Executive and director turnover following corporate financial restatements. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1119–1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. In B. M. Staw & R. M. Kramer (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 25, pp. 1–52). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergh, D. D. (1997). Predicting divestiture of unrelated acquisitions: An integrative model of ex ante conditions. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 715–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A. P., Dukerich, J. M., Brown, P. R., & Brett, J. F. (1996). What’s wrong with the treadway commission report? Experimental analyses of the effects of personal values and codes of conduct on fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(2), 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, T. H. (1996). Predicted change in operational synergy and post-acquisition performance of acquired businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, M., Kraft, A., & Weiss, I. S. (2007). The effect of reporting frequency on the timeliness of earnings: The cases of voluntary and mandatory interim reports. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 43(2–3), 181–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. D., & Reimers, J. L. (2005). Unethical and fraudulent financial reporting: Applying the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(2), 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, S. (2009). The influence of national culture and institutional voids on family ownership of large firms: A country level empirical study. Journal of International Management, 15(1), 32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, S., & Bass, A. E. (2013a). Comparing virtue, consequentialist, and deontological ethics based corporate social responsibility: Mitigating microfinance risk in institutional voids. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1963-0.

  • Chakrabarty, S., & Bass, A. E. (2013b). Encouraging entrepreneurship: Microfinance, knowledge support, and the costs of operating in institutional voids. Thunderbird International Business Review, 55(5), 545–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, S., & Bass, A. E. (2013c). Institutionalizing ethics in institutional voids: Building positive ethical strength to serve women microfinance borrowers in negative contexts. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1833-9

  • Chakrabarty, S., & Wang, L. (2012). The long-term sustenance of sustainability practices in MNCs: A dynamic capabilities perspective of the role of R&D and internationalization. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(2), 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, S., & Wang, L. (2013). Climate change mitigation and internationalization: The competitiveness of multinational corporations. Thunderbird International Business Review, 55(6), 673–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, S., & Whitten, D. (2011). The sidelining of top IT executives in the governance of outsourcing: Antecedents, power struggles, and consequences. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(4), 799–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, S., Whitten, D., & Green, K. W. (2008). Understanding service quality and relationship quality in is outsourcing: Client orientation and promotion, project management effectiveness, and the task–technology–structure fit. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(2), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffee, J. C., Jr. (2005). A theory of corporate scandals: Why the USA and Europe differ. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(2), 198–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colbert, G. J., & Spicer, B. H. (1995). A multi-case investigation of a theory of the transfer pricing process. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(6), 423–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, K. J., & Slemrod, J. (2007). The economics of earnings manipulation and managerial compensation. The RAND Journal of Economics, 38(3), 698–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, W. N., Jiraporn, P., Young Sang, K., & Nemec, C. (2004). Earnings management following duality-creating successions: Ethnostatistics, impression management, and agency theory. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 267–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, M. A., Foley, C. F., & Hines, J. R. (2004). A Multinational perspective on capital structure choice and internal capital markets. The Journal of Finance, 59(6), 2451–2487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewaelheyns, N., & Van Hulle, C. (2010). Internal capital markets and capital structure: Bank versus internal debt. European Financial Management, 16(3), 345–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, R. S., & Fryxell, G. E. (1999). Are conglomerates less environmentally responsible? An empirical examination of diversification strategy and subsidiary pollution in the U.S. chemical industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 21(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durnev, A. R. T., & Kim, E. H. (2005). To steal or not to steal: Firm attributes, legal environment, and valuation. The Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1461–1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. G., & White, H. C. (1988). Price and authority in inter-profit center transactions. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S17–S51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efendi, J., Srivastava, A., & Swanson, E. P. (2007). Why do corporate managers misstate financial statements? The role of option compensation and other factors. Journal of Financial Economics, 85(3), 667–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairfield, P. M., Pinkowitz, L., & Tang, V. W. (2008). Acquisitions to mask earnings management. Georgetown University Working Paper 1–42.

  • Gertner, R. H., Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. (1994). Internal versus external capital markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4), 1211–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. R., Li, S., & Qiu, J. (2008). Corporate misreporting and bank loan contracting. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(1), 44–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, K. W., Chakrabarty, S., & Whitten, D. (2007). Organisational culture of customer care: Market orientation and service quality. International Journal of Services and Standards, 3(2), 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1987). R&D patents and productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, D., & Gerchak, Y. (2002). Quantifying operational synergies in a merger/acquisition. Management Science, 48(4), 517–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heald, M. (2005). The social responsibilities of business: Company and community, 1900–1960. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), 405–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennes, K. M., Leone, A. J., & Miller, B. P. (2008). The importance of distinguishing errors from irregularities in restatement research: The case of restatements and CEO/CFO turnover. The Accounting Review, 83(6), 1487–1519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. W. L. (1994). Diversification and economic performance: Bringing structure and corporate management back into the picture. In R. P. Rumelt, D. E. Schendel, & D. J. Teece (Eds.), Fundamental issues in strategy (pp. 297–321). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2009). Strategic management: competitiveness and globalization: Concepts and cases. Mason, IA: South-Western Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B. (1982). Moral hazard in teams. The Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), 324–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquemin, A. P., & Berry, C. H. (1979). Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 27(4), 359–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (2001). Corporate budgeting is broken—Let’s fix it. Harvard Business Review, 79(10), 94–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (2003). Paying people to lie: The truth about the budgeting process. European Financial Management, 9(3), 379–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S., Pany, K., Samuels, J., & Zhang, J. (2009). An examination of the association between gender and reporting intentions for fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpoff, J. M., Lee, D. S., & Martin, G. S. (2008). The cost to firms of cooking the books. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43, 581–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kedia, S., & Philippon, T. (2009). The economics of fraudulent accounting. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(6), 2169–2199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochhar, R., & Hitt, M. A. (1998). Linking corporate strategy to capital structure. Strategic Management Journal, 19(6), 601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, L. D., & Fryxell, G. E. (1988). An empirical study of the predictors of corporate social performance: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(12), 951–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, B., & Murphy, P. (2009). The impact of ethics education on reporting behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(3), 397–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. R. (2008). The attitude toward and rationalization of fraudulent financial reporting. Queen’s School of Business Research Paper No. 01-08.

  • Murphy, P., & Dacin, M. (2011). Psychological pathways to fraud: Understanding and preventing fraud in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, J. J. P., Priem, R. L., Coombs, J. E., & Gilley, K. M. (2006). Do CEO stock options prevent or promote fraudulent financial reporting? Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 483–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palepu, K. (1985). Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmrose, Z.-V., Richardson, V. J., & Scholz, S. (2004). Determinants of market reactions to restatement announcements. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(1), 59–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. (2003). Prior performance characteristics of related and unrelated acquirers. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 471–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Millar, V. E. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63(4), 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raju, B. R. (2009). Letter dated 7th January 2009 to the Board of Directors of Sat yam Computer Services Ltd from its Chairman B. Ramalinga Raju. http://www.hindu.com/nic/satyam-chairman-statement.pdf.

  • Rezaee, Z. (2005). Causes, consequences, and deterrence of financial statement fraud. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(3), 277–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. (2000). The dark side of internal capital markets: Divisional rent-seeking and inefficient investment. Journal of Finance, 55(6), 2537–2564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, W. E. (2002). Effects of materiality, risk, and ethical perceptions on fraudulent reporting by financial executives. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(3), 241–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staubus, G. J. (2005). Ethics failures in corporate financial reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(1), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. C. (1989). Efficient capital markets, inefficient firms: A model of myopic corporate behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(4), 655–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. C. (1997). Internal capital markets and the competition for corporate resources. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 111–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strike, V. M., Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2006). Being good while being bad: Social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 850–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone, A. (1997). The business of benevolence: Industrial paternalism in progressive America. London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • USGAO. (2002). GAO-03-138 financial statement restatements: Trends, market impacts, regulatory responses, and remaining challenges. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office (USGAO).

    Google Scholar 

  • USGAO. (2003). GAO-03-395R financial statement restatement database. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office (USGAO).

    Google Scholar 

  • USGAO. (2007). GAO-06-678 financial restatements: Update of public company trends, market impacts, and regulatory enforcement activities. Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office (USGAO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, D., Chakrabarty, S., & Wakefield, R. (2010). The strategic choice to continue outsourcing, switch vendors, or backsource: Do switching costs matter? Information and Management, 47(3), 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wydick, B. (1999). Can social cohesion be harnessed to repair market failures? Evidence from group lending in Guatemala. The Economic Journal, 109(457), 463–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zardkoohi, A., Bierman, L., Panina, D., & Chakrabarty, S. (2011). Revisiting a proposed definition of professional service firms. Academy of Management Review, 36(1, Dialogue), 180–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Bartol, K. M., Smith, K. G., Pfarrer, M. D., & Khanin, D. M. (2008). CEOs on the edge: Earnings manipulation and stock-based incentive misalignment. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 241–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, College of Business Administration, University of Nebraska - Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588-0491, USA

    Subrata Chakrabarty

Authors
  1. Subrata Chakrabarty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subrata Chakrabarty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chakrabarty, S. The Influence of Unrelated and Related Diversification on Fraudulent Reporting. J Bus Ethics 131, 815–832 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2023-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2023-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation