Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethical Exemplification and the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct: An Empirical Investigation of Auditor and Public Perceptions

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research applies the impression management theory of exemplification in an accounting study by identifying and measuring differences in both auditor and public perceptions of exemplary behaviors. The auditors were divided into two groups, one of which reported self-perceptions (A-S) while the other group reported their perceptions of a typical auditor (A-O). There were two separate public groups, which gave their perceptions of a typical auditor and were divided based on their levels of accounting sophistication. The more sophisticated public group was comprised of bank loan officers (LO) while the less sophisticated public group consisted of investment club members (IC). Comparisons were made on 30 behaviors contained in the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct, which served as the basis for the research instrument. Profile analysis, a special form of MANOVA technique, was used to analyze the results. A-S perceptions were the highest of the four treatment levels and were significantly higher (i.e., more exemplary) than the perceptions of both the A-O and LO groups. The more sophisticated user group (LO) provided the lowest perceptions of the four treatment levels. For at least four of the six measures, the LO treatment group perceived the typical auditor to be less exemplary than both the IC and A-O treatments. There were no differences in perceptions between the A-O group and IC. Additional analysis revealed that auditors overrated the degree to which the public relied on financial statements. However, both public groups reported a reasonably high level of reliance on financial statements when making decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Khalik, A. R.: 1973, ‘The Effect of Aggregating Accounting Reports on the Quality of the Lending Decision: An Empirical Investigation’, Journal of Accounting Research 11(Sup.), 104–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Aerts W. (1994). On the Use of Accounting Logic as an Explanatory Category in Narrative Accounting Disclosures. Accounting, Organizations and Society 19(4/5):337–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen P. W., Ng C. K. (2001). Self Interest Among CPAs May Influence their Moral Reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics 33:29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport G. (1955). Becoming. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants: 2002a, Letter to Members (AICPA, New York, NY). http://www.aicpa.org/info/letter_02_01.htm

  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants: 2002b, Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 99. (AICPA, New York, NY)

  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants: 1997, Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 82 (AICPA, New York, NY)

  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (1991). AICPA Professional Standards, Vol. 2. (AICPA, New York, NY)

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkin R. M., Baumgardner A. H. (1986). Self-presentation and Self-evaluation: Processes of Self-control and Social Behavior. In: Baumeister R. F. (eds). Public Self and Private Self. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 75–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Balvers R. J., MacDonald B., Miller R. E. (1988). Under pricing of New Issues and the Choice of Auditor as a Signal of Investment Banker Reputation. The Accounting Review 63(4):605–662

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron R. A. (1985). Self-presentation in Job Interviews: When there can be ‘Too Much of a Good Thing’. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 16:16–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass B. (1988). Inspirational Processes of Leadership. Journal of Management Development 7(5):21–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Benau, M., A. Garcia, C. G. Humphrey, P. Mozier and W. S. Turley: 1993, The International Journal of Accounting 28(4), 281

  • Best P. J., Buckby S., Tan C. (2001). Evidence of the Audit Expectation Gap in Singapore. Managerial Auditing Journal 16(3):134–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass D. J., Butterfield K. D., Skaggs B. C. (1998). Relationships and Unethical Behavior: A Social Network Perspective. Academy of Management Review 23(1):14–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner S. N., Molander E. A. (1977). Is the Ethics of Business Changing? Harvard Business Review 55(1):57–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Responsible Politics: 2002, Lobbying Expenditures, 1997–2001. Retrieved from http://www.opensecrets.org/news/accountants/accountants lobbying.asp

  • Clatworthy M, Jones M.J. (2003). Financial Reporting of Good News and Bad News: Evidence from Accounting Narratives. Accounting and Business Research 33(3):171

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley C. H. (1902). Human Nature and the Social Order. Scribner’s, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalos P. (1985). Financial Distress: A Comparative Study of Individual, Model, and Committee Assessments. Journal of Accounting Research 23(2):527–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins A., Schultz N. (1995). A critical examination of the AICPA code of professional conduct. Journal of Business Ethics 14:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conger J. A. (1989). Leadership: the art of empowering others. Academy of Management Executive 31(1):17–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Demery P. (1997). AICPA: Racing for a New Identity Before its Too Late. The Practical Accountant 30(4):26–34

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRupo J. F. (1995). Advertisements Designed to Broaden CPA Recognition. Journal of Accountancy 180(4):108–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, C. S.: 2001, ‘Profile Analysis: Multidimensional Scaling Approach’, Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 7(16). Retrieved July 12, 2006 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=16

  • DiPiazza, Jr., A. Samuel, and Robert G. Eccles: 2002, Building Public Trust: The Future of Corporate Reporting (John Wiley & Sons © 2002)

  • Dutton J.E., Dukerich J.M. (1991). Keeping an Eye on the Mirror: Image and Identity in Organizational Adaptation. Academy of Management Journal 34 (3):517–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach K. D., Sutton R. I. (1992). Acquiring Organizational Legitimacy Through Illegitimate Actions: A Marriage of Institutional and Impression Management Theories. Academy of Management Journal 35:699–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farwell L., Wohlwend-Lloyd R. (1998). Narcissistic Processes: Optimistic Expectations, Favorable Self-evaluations, and Self-enhancing Attributions. Journal of Personality 66(1):65–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felson R.B. (1981). Ambiguity and Bias in the Self-concept. Social Psychology Quarterly 44(1):64–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell O.C., Gresham L. (1985). A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing. Journal of Marketing 49:87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Financial Accounting Standards Board. (1986). Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts. FASB, Hartford CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogarty T. J., Heian J. B., Knutson D. L. (1991). The Rationality of Doing Nothing: Auditors’ Responses to Legal Liability in an Institutionalized Environment. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 2(3):201–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel M.S. (1989). Professional Codes: Why, How and with What Impact? Journal of Business Ethics 8:109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner W. L., Martinko M. J. (1988). Impression Management in Organizations. Journal of Management 14(2):321–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gay, G. and P. Schelluch: 1993, ‘The Impact of The Longform Audit Report on Users’ Perceptions of the Auditor’s Role’, The Australian Accounting Review 3(November), 1–11

  • Gilbert D. T., Jones E. (1986). Exemplification: The Self-presentation of Moral Character. Journal of Personality 54:593–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, D. and P. Mallery: 2003, SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 11.0 update, 4th ed. (Allyn & Bacon, Boston)

  • Giacalone R.A., Rosenfeld P. (1986). Self-presentation and Self-promotion in an Organizational Setting. Journal of Social Psychology 126:321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gloeck, J. D. and H. Jager: 1993, The Audit Expectation Gap in the Republic of South Africa, Working Paper, School of Accountancy, University of Pretoria

  • Godfrey, J., P. Mather and A. Ramsay: 2003, ‘Earnings and Impression Management in Financial Reports: The Case of CEO Changes’, Abacus 39(1), 95

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins T.G., Olsen W.E. (1972). Restating the Ethics Code: A Decision for the Times. Journal of Accountancy 157(1):33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • http://www.complianceweek.com/s/documents/mcdon- ough-speech-090903.pdf

  • http://www.sec.gov/rules/pcaob/pcaob200310/hays042 304.pdf

  • Humphrey, C. G., P. Mozier and W. S. Turley: 1993, ‘The Audit Expectation Gap in Britain: An Empirical Investigation’, Accounting and Business Research 23(Summer), 395–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakubowski S.T., Broce P., Stone J., Conner C. (2002). SAS 82’s Effect on Fraud Discovery. The CPA Journal 72(2): 42

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.A. & Wichern, D.W. (1988). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones E. E., Pittman T. S. (1982). Toward a General Theory of Strategic Self-presentation. In: Suls J. (eds). Psychological Perspectives on the Self, vol 1. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 231–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinney W. R. Jr. (1999). Auditor Independence: A Burdensome Constraint or Core Value? Accounting Horizons 13(1):69–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis D., Schmidt S.M., Wilkinson I. (1980). Intraorganizational Influence Tactics: Explorations in Getting One’s Way. Journal of Applied Psychology 65:440–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG International. www.kpmg.com. July 14, 2004

  • Labaton, S.: 2002, ‘Enron’s Collapse: The Lobbying’, The New York Times, Jan 19, p. 1

  • Larson M. S. (1977). The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary M. R., Kowalski R. M. (1990). Impression Management: A Literature Review and Two Component Models. Psychological Bulletin 107:34–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libby R. (1975). Accounting Ratios and the Prediction of Failure: Some Behavioral Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 13(1):150–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, A. M.: 1984, ‘The Audit Report: Time for a Change?’ Singapore Accountant, Sept/Oct, pp. 17–21

  • Macdonald, W. A. (Chairman): 1988, Report of the Commission to Study the Public’s Expectation of Audits. CICA

  • Mayhew B.W. (2001). Auditor Reputation Building. Journal of Accounting Research 39(3):599–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, W. (Chairman): 2003, Speech Made to the Georgia State Society of CPAs, Retrieved from http://www.complianceweek.com/s/documents/mcdonough-speech-090903.pdf

  • McEnroe J.E., Martens S.C. (2001). Auditors’ and Investors’ Perceptions of the Expectation Gap. Accounting Horizons 15(4):345–358

    Google Scholar 

  • McInnes, W. M.: 1994, ‘The Audit Expectation Gap in the Republic of South Africa’, Accounting and Business Research 24(Summer), 282–283

  • Mead G. H. (1932). Mind, Self, and Society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed, A. A., W. L. Gardner and J. G. P. Paolillo: 1996, ‘A Taxonomy of Organizational Impression Management Tactics’, Unpublished manuscript

  • Moore, Stephens, Hays L.L.P. Hays: 2004, Letter to Securities and Exchange Commission. Retrieved from http://www.sec.gov/rules/pcaob/pcaob200310/hays 042304.pdf

  • Neu D. (1991). Trust, Impression Management and the Public Accounting Profession. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 2:295–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey J. (1986). Sociocultural Perspectives on Ingratiation In: Maher B. (eds). Progress in Experimental Personality Research. Academic Press, New York, pp. 205–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, B.: 1993, ‘An Empirical Study of the Audit Expectation-Performance Gap’, Accounting and Business Research 24(Winter), 49–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston A.M., Cooper D.J., Scarbrough D.P., Chilton R.C. (1995). Changes in the Code of Ethics of the U. S. Accounting Profession, 1917 and 1988: The Continual Quest for Legitimation. Accounting, Organizations and Society 20(6):507–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, D.: 1985, Employee Ingratiation: The Role of Management. Academy of Management Review 10(3):342–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. J., C. S. Smith and P. H. Mihalek: 1990, ‘Are Corporate Codes of Conduct Effective?’ Management Accountant (September), 72 (3), 34–35

  • Rogers C.R. (1959). A Theory of Therapy, Personality and Interpersonal Relationships, as Developed in the Client-Centered Framework. In: Koch S. (eds). Psychology: A Study of a Science Vol. 3. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 184–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum v. Adler: 1983, 461 A.2d. 138 138 (NJ)

  • Sharbaugh, J.: 2004, ‘Great Expectations–Closing the Gap’, Today’s CPA, March/April, p. 46

  • Schneider D. J. (1981). Tactical Self-presentations: Towards a Broader Conception. In: Tedeschi J. T. (eds). Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research. Academic Press, New York, pp. 23–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaub M. K. (1988).Restructuring the Code of Professional Ethics: A Review of the Anderson Committee Report and its Implications. Accounting Horizons 2(4):89–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz M. (2001). The Nature of the Relationship between Corporate Codes of Ethics and Behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics 32:247–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stocks M.H., Harrell A. (1995). The Impact of an Increase in Accounting Information Level on the Judgment Quality of Individuals and Groups. Accounting, Organizations and Society 20(7/8):685–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick B.G., Fidell L.S. (1989). Using Multivariate Statistics, 2nd edn. Harper Collins Publishers, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor S.E., Brown J. (1988). Illusion and Well-being: A Social Psychological Perspective on Mental Health. Psychological Bulletin 103:193–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Senate: 1933, Hearings on S. 875 Before the Senate Committee on Banking and Currency. 73rd Congress, 1st Session (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, Harding University, P.O. Box 10774, Searcy, AR, 72149, USA

    Phil A. Brown

  2. Patterson School of Accountancy, University of Mississippi, Mississippi, MS, 38677, USA

    Morris H. Stocks & W. Mark Wilder

Authors
  1. Phil A. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Morris H. Stocks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. W. Mark Wilder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Mark Wilder.

Additional information

Philip A. Brown is an Associate Professor and Directtor of the Accounting Program at Harding University in Searcy, Arkansas. He has a bachelor's degree from Harding University, an MBA from West Virginia University and a Ph.D. from the University of Mississippi. His research interests are in accounting ethics and in accounting education. He has published in Advances in Accounting, The Journal of Accounting and Finance Research, and others. He is a CPA in the State of Arkansas.

Morris H. Stocks serves as the Dean of the Patterson School of Accountancy at the Universtiy of Mississippi. He received his undergraduate degree in accounting from Trevecca Nazarene University, his Masters degree from Middle Tennessee State University and his Ph.D. from the University of South Carolina. He is a Certified Public Accountant in the State of Mississippi. He is a behavioral accounting researcher and has published in Accounting, Organizations and Society, Accounting Horizons, Behavioural Research in Accounting, Decision Sciences Journal, Advances in Accounting, Advances in Accounting Information Systems, Advances in Behavioral Accounting Research, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Advances in Taxation and others.

W. Mark Wilder is KPMG Lecturer and Associate Professor of Accountancy at The University of Mississippi. His educational background includes a bachelor's degree in mathematics from The University of Alabama, an MBA from the University of South Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Accounting from Florida State University. He is a CPA in the State of Mississippi. Mark has published in Accounting Horizons, Advances in Taxation, the Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, the Journal of Computer and Information Systems, the CPA Journal, and others. In the past 2 years he has received several awards, including the top two campus-wide faculty awards at Ole Miss and also the MSCPA Outstanding Educator Award. In 2004 he was inducted into the Alabama Tennis Hall of Fame.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, P.A., Stocks, M.H. & Wilder, W.M. Ethical Exemplification and the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct: An Empirical Investigation of Auditor and Public Perceptions. J Bus Ethics 71, 39–71 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9124-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9124-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation