Abstract
Purpose
Breast cancer (BC) accounts for roughly 30% of new cancers diagnosed in women each year; thus, this cancer type represents a substantial burden for people and health care systems. Despite the existence of effective therapies to treat BC, drug resistance remains a problem and is a major cause of treatment failure. Therefore, new drugs and treatment regimens are urgently required to overcome resistance. Recent research indicates that inhibition of the endosomal recycling pathway, an intracellular membrane trafficking pathway that returns endocytosed proteins back to the plasma membrane, may be a promising strategy to downregulate clinically relevant cell surface proteins such as HER2 and HER3, and to overcome drug resistance.
Methods
To investigate the molecular mechanism of action of an endosomal recycling inhibitor (ERI) called primaquine, we performed a reverse-phase protein array (RPPA) assay using a HER2-positive breast cancer cell line. The RPPA findings were confirmed by Western blot and RT-qPCR in several BC cell lines. Novel drug combinations were tested by MTT cell viability and clonogenic assays.
Results
Among the signalling molecules downregulated by ERIs were estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-α) and androgen receptor. We confirmed this finding in other breast cancer cell lines and show that downregulation occurs at the transcriptional level. We also found that ERIs synergise with tamoxifen, a standard-of-care therapy for breast cancer.
Discussion
Our data suggest that combining ERIs with hormone receptor antagonists may enhance their efficacy and reduce the emergence of drug resistance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer type in women, and with an ageing population, its incidence is increasing [1]. Although rare, BC also occurs in men, accounting for approximately 1% of all cancers in men [2]. BC can be categorised according to the presence or absence of several receptors, allowing it to be classified into a number of subtypes. These include the estrogen receptor (ER), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and progesterone receptor (PR). Luminal A and luminal B breast cancers both express ER. Luminal B-like breast cancer is HER2 positive and ER positive. Basal-like or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) does not express any of these receptors. The subtype influences diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of the tumour [3].
ER is a nuclear hormone receptor that binds to estrogen in the cytoplasm and subsequently translocates into the nucleus to activate expression of estrogen responsive genes. 70–80% of BCs are ER-positive; thus, estrogen and ER are commonly targeted during treatment of this type of cancer. There are two isoforms of ER, alpha and beta, and activation of ER-α by estrogens is primarily responsible for enhanced proliferation in ER-positive BC. In contrast, ER-β has an antiproliferative effect and can counteract the tumorigenic effects of ER-α [4]. Tamoxifen is a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) that binds ER and induces conformational changes in the receptor that inhibits coactivator binding, and thus, prevents its activation. While tamoxifen reduces the mortality rate in ER-positive BC, acquired resistance due to long-term use is estimated to occur in approximately one third of patients [5]. Hence, the risk of recurrence is of considerable clinical concern and leads to a need for novel and innovative ER-targeting treatments [6].
Androgen receptor (AR) is also a nuclear receptor and mediates the effect of androgens by modulating the expression of genes involved in proliferation and survival. Androgen hormones and their receptor play a vital role in normal prostate development, but androgen receptor (AR) is also the main driver in the development of prostate cancer [7].
AR also plays an important role in normal female biology including fertility and breast development. Moreover, it is expressed in 60–80% of breast tumours [8]. Nearly 90% of ER-positive tumours express AR, but less than 30% of ER-negative breast cancers are AR positive. Outcomes for patients with ER-positive/AR-positive tumours are better than those with ER-negative/AR-positive tumours. This is believed to be due to AR competing with ER for binding to estrogen response elements, resulting in impaired transcription of estrogen-regulated genes [9]. In contrast, in ER-negative breast cancers, AR signalling can drive tumour growth. ER activation has also been implicated in prostate cancer progression [10]. Thus, therapeutic strategies that modulate the levels of these nuclear receptors could prove effective at delaying or preventing breast cancer progression.
Recent work from our laboratory has discovered that inhibition of the endosomal recycling of the HER2 receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) leads to downregulation of its signalling, and ultimately to its degradation in lysosomes [11]. Proteins in the plasma membrane are continuously internalised into organelles called early endosomes by a process called endocytosis. This is a means by which the cell controls the strength and duration of their signalling. From early endosomes, cell surface proteins can be returned to the plasma membrane along the endosomal recycling pathway to be re-used, or they are sent to lysosomes for degradation. The majority of endocytosed proteins are recycled back to the plasma membrane [12]. We reported that a small molecule inhibitor of endosomal recycling, called primaquine (PQ), reduces the total protein levels of HER2 and synergises with HER2-targeting therapies. Furthermore, we showed that BC cells with acquired or innate resistance to HER2-targeted therapies have enhanced sensitivity to PQ [11]. We demonstrated that when endosomal recycling is inhibited, internalised HER2 and its heterodimerisation partner, HER3, are diverted to lysosomes for degradation.
To gain a greater understanding of the mechanism of action of PQ, we performed a reverse-phase protein array (RPPA) assay to determine the effect that the drug has on the levels and activation status of approximately 450 proteins that have been implicated in cancer. Interestingly, we found that both ER-α and AR were downregulated in a HER2-amplified cell line that had been treated with PQ. Between 60 and 70% of HER2-positive breast cancers co-express hormone receptors and bidirectional crosstalk between the ER and HER2 signalling pathways has been well established in breast cancer [13]. This has clinical consequences as co-expression of these receptors modulates tumour response to both HER2-targeting and endocrine therapies [13]. Furthermore, activation of the ER signalling pathway has been reported as an escape mechanism for tumours that are subject to HER2 inhibition [14].
We confirmed these findings in other hormone receptor-positive BC cell lines. We also show that endosomal recycling inhibitors synergise with tamoxifen, a standard-of-care therapy for BC. These results suggest that modulating the activity of the endosomal recycling pathway may be a useful strategy for downregulating the activity of hormone receptors in BC.
Materials and methods
Reagents
All cell culture media and supplements were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (UK). Monensin, resazurin, and MG132 were from Sigma-Aldrich, and plasticware was from Sarstedt. Primaquine, lapatinib, enzalutamide, and MTT were purchased from Carbosynth, UK. BafA1 was obtained from Merck.
Antibodies specific for ER-α (#8644), AR (#5153), and HER3 (#12708) were from Cell Signalling Technology. Mouse monoclonal anti-alpha tubulin (T5168) was from Sigma-Aldrich. 680RD-conjugated goat anti-Mouse (C80619-5) and 800CW-conjugated goat anti-Rabbit (C80426-08) secondary antibodies were from LI-COR Biosciences.
Reverse phase protein array (RPPA)
BT474 cells were seeded in a 6-well plate at 5 × 105 cells per well and cultured until the cells had reached 70–80% confluency. The medium was replaced with 2 ml fresh culture medium with or without 10 µM PQ. 24 h later the cells were washed twice with cold PBS and lysed in lysis buffer (1% TX-100; 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.4; 150 mM NaCl; 1.5 mM MgCl2; 1 mM EGTA, 100 mM NaF; 10 mM Na pyrophosphate, 1 mM Na3VO4; 10% glycerol) plus protease inhibitors. Cell and nuclear debris were removed by centrifugation at 20,000 xg. The protein concentration was determined by Bradford assay and adjusted to 1.5 µg/µl with lysis buffer and mixed with 4X Sample buffer plus β-mercaptoethanol, but without bromophenol blue. The cells were heat denatured, snap-frozen, and two biological replicates for each condition were sent on dry ice to the MD Anderson Cancer Center RPPA Core Facility (TX, USA) for RPPA analysis. Protein levels were determined by interpolation of dilution curves to give log2 values. The data were then normalised for protein loading and transformed to linear values. Normalised linear values were transformed to log2 values, and heat maps were generated using Java Treeview.
Cell culture
The human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 (ATCC) was cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM). MDA-MB-134 VI and SUM44-PE cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 media. Authenticated BT474 cells were purchased from CalTag Medsystems and cultured in DMEM. Media were supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum, 1% L-glutamine, and 1% penicillin–streptomycin. Cells were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere at 5% CO2. All cell lines were regularly checked for mycoplasma contamination by fluorescence microscopy using DAPI staining or with MycoAlert Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Lonza).
To knockdown HER3 expression, two independent siRNA duplexes were purchased (Sigma). A siRNA duplex targeting firefly luciferase was used as a negative control (siFLUC). Reverse transfections were performed with a final siRNA concentration of 20 nM using Lipofectamine RNAiMax (Thermo Fisher), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cell lysates were prepared 72 h post-transfection.
Cell viability assays
MTT assay
The MTT assay was used to assess cell viability of cells grown in 2D. 72 h post-drug treatment, MTT (Carbosynth, UK) was added to the cells and incubated for 2–3 h at 37 °C. The cells were solublised with MTT solvent (4 mM HCl, 0.1% NP-40 in isopropanol). The OD570 and OD630 was measured on a MultiSkan Go plate reader (Thermo Scientific). Quadruplicate wells for each treatment were analysed, and each experiment was carried out at least 3 times.
IC50 and synergy
The IC50 values were determined by nonlinear regression of the dose–response data using GraphPad Prism 9.4.1 for PC (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). Synergy was determined by the method of Chou and Talalay [15, 16]. In brief, cells were exposed to 1:1 ratios of the IC50 values of hormone antagonist and endosomal recycling inhibitor at 1/8 × IC50, ¼ × IC50, ½ × IC50, IC50, 2 × IC50, and 4 × IC50. Cell viability was determined after 72 h treatment, and the CI was calculated using the CompuSyn software [17], to determine the presence of synergism (CI < 1) or antagonism (CI > 1).
Clonogenic assays
10,000 MCF-7 cells were seeded into each well of a 12-well plate. After 24 h, medium was replaced with fresh medium containing the respective drug. Media/drug solution was replaced every 3–4 days. Plates were incubated for a total of 10 days. Following drug treatment, the cells were washed with warmed PBS and living cells were stained with 0.5% crystal violet in 20% methanol. Plates were scanned on a flatbed scanner, and ImageJ was used to quantify colonies.
Immunoblot analysis
Whole cell lysates were prepared in RIPA buffer supplemented with phosphatase and protease inhibitors (10 mM NaF + 1 mM NaOV + 1X PIC + 10 mM Na.pyrophosphate + AEBSF + 10 mM β-glycerophosphate). Cells were incubated in the RIPA solution on ice for > 20 min. Lysates were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm to remove cellular and nuclear debris. Bradford assay was used to determine protein concentration, and samples were heat denatured for 5 min at 95 °C in 4X loading buffer.
SDS-PAGE was used to resolve equal amounts of proteins, and the proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose. Revert 700 Total Protein stain (LI-COR Biosciences, UK) was used to reversibly stain the nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were scanned using the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, UK). After washing off the Revert, membranes were blocked with Odyssey Blocking Buffer TBS at room temperature for approximately one hour. Primary antibodies were diluted in Odyssey Blocking Buffer TBS, and membranes were incubated with the primary antibody at 4 °C overnight. IRDye-conjugated secondary antibodies were used for detection with the Odyssey system. Secondary antibody incubation was carried out for one hour. LI-COR Image Studio software was used for densitometry, and bands were normalised against the Revert 700 stain for that sample, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
RT-qPCR
100,000 MCF-7 cells/well were seeded in a 12-well plate. After 48 h, wells were treated for 24 h with the appropriate drug in 1 ml media. Total RNA was extracted using the GenElute Mammalian Total RNA Miniprep Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, #SLCD5747). The extracted RNA samples were reversed transcribed into cDNA using the QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, #163,017,287). The cDNA obtained was then quantitatively amplified using real-time PCR with FastStart Essential DNA Green Master (Roche) ready-to-use SYBR Green I reaction mix on a Roche LightCycler 96 instrument.
Cancer genomics
ERBB2 (HER2), ERBB3 (HER3), ESR1 (ER-α), and AR gene expression in the 68 breast cancer cell lines available in the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) were determined, and the median gene expression for ERBB3 or ERBB2 was used to divide the datasets into high (above median) and low (below median) expressing groups. The same strategy was used to analyse 1903 breast tumours from the METABRIC study available in the cBioPortal database [18, 19].
The protein levels of ER-α, AR, HER2, and HER3 in breast cancer cell lines available in the DepMap Portal database were downloaded and imported into GraphPad Prism where they were subjected to a simple linear regression analysis.
Data analysis
Statistical significance was determined using the Student’s t-test, or where specified a 1-way analysis of variance, using GraphPad Prism. Significance was classified as a P-value of * < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001.
Results
Primaquine downregulates the estrogen and androgen receptors
The BT474 HER2-amplified breast cancer cell line was used to systematically determine the effect of the endosomal recycling inhibitor PQ on cellular signalling networks. Control and PQ-treated BT474 cell lysates were analysed by reverse-phase protein array (RPPA). The top hit was HER2, thus, validating the assay (Fig. 1A). As expected, several proteins and pathways that potentiate HER2 oncogenic signalling were downregulated, including components of the PI3K/Akt/mTor signalling pathway. Interestingly, the hormone receptors ER-α and AR were also downregulated (Fig. 1A). To confirm these findings, lysates from BT474 cells treated with or without 10 µM PQ were analysed by Western blot. An approximately 20% reduction in ER-α protein levels was consistently observed (Fig. 1B). PQ treatment also led to a reduction in the levels of ER-α in the MDA-MB-134 VI and SUM44-PE BC invasive lobular breast carcinoma cell lines (Fig. 1C, D). Both of these cell lines express ER-α but have negligible amounts of AR (Fig. S2A).
We then switched to the canonical hormone receptor-positive MCF-7 cell line which expresses both ER-α and AR (Fig. S2A). MCF-7 cells were treated with IC50 and IC75 concentrations of PQ and a second ERI called monensin [20]. PQ treatment resulted in a 75–80% reduction in the total protein levels of ER-α, and monensin resulted in a 60–70% reduction (Fig. 1E). PQ and monensin induced similar, but more modest, reductions in AR (Fig. 1E). Thus, endosomal recycling inhibitors can downregulate ER-α and AR in multiple HR-positive BC cell lines.
Endosomal recycling inhibitors downregulate ER-α at the transcriptional level
Previous work from our group has shown that inhibition of the endosomal recycling pathway results in the diversion of endocytosed cell surface proteins from the recycling pathway into the degradative pathway, where they are ultimately broken down in lysosomes [11, 21]. To determine if this is also the mechanism by which ER-α and AR are downregulated by PQ and monensin, MCF-7 cells were treated with each endosomal recycling inhibitor alone or in combination with two different lysosomal inhibitors, ammonium chloride and Bafilomycin A1 (BafA1). If the downregulation of ER-α and AR is caused by their degradation in lysosomes, then their protein levels should be restored by addition of lysosomal inhibitors. Unsurprisingly given that ER-α and AR primarily reside in the cytoplasm and not at the plasma membrane, the lysosomal inhibitors had no effect on their downregulation (Fig. 2A). To determine if ER-α and AR are instead degraded by the proteasome, cells were co-treated with the ERIs and the proteasomal inhibitor MG132; however, no restoration of hormone receptor levels was observed (Fig. 2B). Indeed, MG132 alone induced a striking reduction of ER-α and AR protein levels. MG132, as well as other proteasome inhibitors, has been reported to reduce the expression of members of the ERBB family and promote their lysosomal degradation [22].
This family of receptor tyrosine kinases regulates the estrogen-signalling pathway via direct phosphorylation of ER or activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases, which consequently enhances ER signalling [23]. Thus, it can be concluded that the ERI-induced reduction of ER-α and AR protein levels is not due to the lysosomal or proteasomal degradation of these hormone receptors and suggests that the PQ- and monensin-induced downregulation occurs at the transcriptional level. To confirm this, we measured the levels of ESR1 (gene encoding ER-α) and AR mRNA by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (RT-qPCR). Both PQ and monensin led to a significant reduction in the levels of ER-α and AR transcripts in MCF-7 cells (Fig. 2C). Thus, the ERI-induced reduction in ER-α and AR occurs at the transcriptional level.
ER-α downregulation is an indirect consequence of the lysosomal degradation of HER3
It has long been known that the ER-α and AR signalling pathways intersect with the signalling pathways of ERBB family members [24, 25]. HER2 and HER3 have been reported to interact directly with ER-α and mediate its phosphorylation [26], and their signalling is known to influence ER-α and AR gene expression [27,28,29,30,31]. Given that these receptor tyrosine kinases are degraded upon downregulation of the endosomal recycling pathway [11], it is possible that PQ and monensin indirectly downregulate ER-α and AR by promoting the degradation of HER2 and/or HER3. [24, 25]. To investigate this, we analysed publicly available cancer genomics datasets to determine if the expression of HER2 and HER3 is correlated with that of ER-α and AR. First, we stratified the 63 breast cancer cell lines in the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) into two groups, one that expresses above median levels of each RTK and the other that expresses below median levels. Both ESR1 and AR mRNA levels were significantly higher in the ERBB3-high group (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between ER-α and AR protein levels with HER3 protein levels in the 47 breast cancer cell lines for which protein array data were available (Fig. 3B). We next examined whether this positive correlation could also be observed in the ~ 2,000 breast tumours analysed by the METABRIC study [32]. Again, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between the expression of ESR1 and AR mRNA with ERBB3 mRNA (Fig. 3C). The correlation between HER2 expression and both hormone receptors was not as consistent. There was a positive correlation between their mRNA expression levels in the breast cancer cell lines and breast tumours, but no significant correlation at the protein level (Fig. S1A–C).
These results indicate in breast cancer that there is a strong and consistent positive correlation between the expression of HER3 and that of ER-α and AR. To confirm this directly, we depleted HER3 in MCF-7 cells and observed an approximately 30% reduction in ER-α protein levels (Fig. 3D). The effect of HER3 depletion on AR was less consistent. These data demonstrate that the expression of HER3 and ER-α and AR is positively correlated and that knockdown of HER3 results in consistent downregulation of ER-α, supporting the hypothesis that the reduction in ER-α and AR levels upon endosomal recycling inhibitor treatment is due to the degradation of HER3 in lysosomes. The effect of HER2 knockdown was not assessed as MCF-7 cells express negligible levels of HER2 protein (Fig. S2A).
To confirm that the ERBB and ER-α signalling pathways interact in MCF-7 cells, serum-starved cells were stimulated with E2 estradiol to activate ER-α, or EGF, and HRGβ to activate EGFR and HER3, respectively. Both E2 and HRGβ induced the phosphorylation of ER-α, as determined by a mobility shift of the protein observed by Western blot. HRGβ, but not E2, induced the phosphorylation of HER3 (Fig. S2B). These results indicate that in MCF-7 cells HER3 can activate ER-α, but ER-α does not activate HER3, and supports the hypothesis that HER3 regulates the expression and activation of ER-α, but not vice versa.
Endosomal recycling inhibitors synergise with tamoxifen
Given that PQ and monensin indirectly downregulate two hormone receptors that are commonly amplified in BC, we next investigated if they could be combined with commonly used HR-targeting therapies. Tamoxifen is a selective ER modulator widely used to treat ER-positive breast cancer [33]. To determine if the ERIs synergise with tamoxifen, MTT cell viability assays were performed. Synergy occurs when a combination of two or more drugs has a greater effect than that expected from the sum of the effects of the drugs when used individually [34]. MCF-7 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of the ERI alone, tamoxifen alone, or the combination of both drugs, for 72 h. The results indicated that the combination had a greater inhibitory effect on cell viability than either drug alone (Table 1 and Fig. S3). Using the Chou-Talalay method [15], a combination index (CI) of 0.83 was calculated for PQ and tamoxifen in MCF-7 cells, indicating that these two drugs synergise. CI values less than 1 indicate synergy, and CI values greater than 1 indicate antagonism. A stronger synergy was observed between monensin and tamoxifen. Strong synergy between tamoxifen and PQ was also observed in the invasive lobular carcinoma MDA-MB-134 VI cell line which has de novo resistance to tamoxifen [35]. Surprisingly, PQ and tamoxifen displayed antagonism in SUM44-PE cells (Table 1).
These findings were confirmed using clonogenic assays. MCF-7 cells were treated with low doses of the drugs for 10 days, and surviving cells were stained with crystal violet and quantified. In contrast to the cell viability assay, the combination of tamoxifen and PQ did not perform better than tamoxifen alone (Fig. 4A). However, combining monensin with tamoxifen resulted in much greater cytotoxicity than either drug alone (Fig. 4B).
Taken together, these results demonstrate that endosomal recycling inhibitors can modulate the levels of the nuclear receptors ER-α and AR, and that they may be effective at treating certain forms of breast cancer when used in combination with hormone receptor antagonists.
Discussion
Tamoxifen, a drug which inhibits the estrogen receptor, has been used for decades to treat ER-positive breast cancer. Although initially effective, long-term use of tamoxifen has led to approximately 40% of patients developing acquired resistance to this therapy [36]. Thus, new drugs and drug combinations are urgently required that target ER and AR, to overcome this drug resistance.
A novel approach to treating cancer could involve inhibition of the endosomal recycling pathway. Defective endosomal recycling has been implicated in the development and progression of many cancer types, including breast and prostate cancer, and since this pathway is frequently hyperactivated in cancer, a therapeutic dose of an endosomal recycling inhibitor is less likely to affect non-malignant cells [12]. We and others have shown that clinically relevant cell surface proteins such as EGFR, HER2, HER3, N-cadherin, and c-Met, are downregulated when endosomal recycling is inhibited [11, 21, 37,38,39,40].
There are several small molecules that inhibit the endosomal recycling pathway, including PQ and monensin [20, 41], and we recently reported that PQ blocks the recycling of HER2 and HER3 back to the plasma membrane in HER2-positive breast cancer [11]. To gain a greater understanding of the mechanism of action of PQ, we performed a reverse-phase protein array assay using BT474 HER2-positive BC cells to identify proteins and signalling pathways that are altered by PQ treatment. Among the top 30 hits were the hormone receptors ER-α and AR, both of which were downregulated by PQ. We validated these findings by Western blot and then moved to investigate if PQ and monensin could also downregulate ER-α and AR in other BC cancer cell lines. We observed a dose-dependent reduction of the hormone receptors in all BC cell lines tested. Further, we have recently reported similar effects in prostate cancer cells [42].
PQ downregulates HER3 by blocking its trafficking back to the plasma membrane and diverting it to lysosomes where it is degraded. The PQ-induced downregulation of HER3 can be rescued by cotreating cells with a lysosomal inhibitor [11]. However, we were unable to restore hormone receptor levels with lysosomal or proteasomal inhibitors, suggesting that the effect of the ERIs on these proteins occurs by a different mechanism. Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR showed that the downregulation occurred at the transcriptional level, likely as a downstream consequence of the lysosomal degradation of HER3.
ERBB and hormone receptor signalling pathways overlap, and approximately two thirds of HER2 + breast cancers also express hormone receptors. The presence of ER-α influences the response to HER2-targeted therapies while HER2 expression impacts the efficacy of endocrine therapies [13]. Given this crosstalk, we reasoned that there may be a feedback loop that regulates the expression of components of these pathways. MCF-7 cells express high levels of HER3 and minimal levels of EGFR and HER2 (Fig. S2A and [11]), and we observed that both PQ and monensin downregulate HER3 protein levels in these cells (not shown). To investigate if the downregulation of ER-α and AR is an indirect consequence of the ERIs inducing the lysosomal degradation of HER3, we explored cancer genomics databases to determine if there is a correlation between HER3 and hormone receptor expression. We observed a strong positive correlation between HER3 and both ER-α and AR expression in breast cancer cell lines and breast tumours. Furthermore, knockdown of HER3 resulted in a consistent and reproducible reduction in ER-α levels. The effect on AR was more variable. These findings suggest that HER3 regulates ER-α and possibly AR gene expression, and that the effect of PQ and monensin on the hormone receptors is a downstream consequence of the lysosomal degradation of HER3.
HER3 expression has been implicated in resistance to tamoxifen. A study of more than 400 patients with tamoxifen-treated ER-positive breast cancer found that patients whose tumours were also positive for HER2 and HER3 are more likely to relapse while on tamoxifen than those with HER2- and HER3-negative tumours [43]. In addition, siRNA-mediated knockdown of HER3 sensitises breast cancer cell lines to tamoxifen [44]. We investigated whether indirectly downregulating HER3 by inhibiting its endosomal recycling would enhance the efficacy of tamoxifen. Using cell viability and clonogenic assays, we observed that ERIs synergised with tamoxifen in a number of BC cells, including the tamoxifen-resistant invasive lobular carcinoma MDA-MB-134 VI cell line.
Primaquine was approved by the FDA in 1952 to treat patients with malaria and is, thus, a readily available and cost-effective drug with a good safety profile [45]. Therefore, we believe that PQ has the potential to be repurposed as a combination treatment to enhance the efficacy of hormone receptor antagonists and to reduce the emergence of drug resistance. Monensin is a sodium ionophore approved for use as a veterinary medication with a narrow therapeutic window. The FDA has not approved it for use in humans as monensin intoxication can lead to renal failure, rhabdomyolysis, and cardiac failure [46]. Nevertheless, many studies in recent years have demonstrated its potential as a cancer therapeutic [47,48,49,50,51]. Indeed, monensin has been previously reported to reduce the expression of AR in prostate cancer cell lines and to synergise with the anti-androgen flutamide [52]. We have found that ERIs also downregulate AR and synergise with enzalutamide in prostate cancer [42]. Given that monensin displayed strong effects at nanomolar concentrations, with further research and possible modification of its chemical structure monensin could also have clinical utility for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive cancer patients. Since the ERIs do not act directly on the hormone receptors, tumour cells are less likely to develop resistance to these drugs.
Data availability
All datasets are available upon request (a.lindsay@ucc.ie).
References
Lima SM, Kehm RD, Terry MB (2021) Global breast cancer incidence and mortality trends by region, age-groups, and fertility patterns. EClinicalMedicine 38:100985. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECLINM.2021.100985
Ortega MA, Fraile-Martínez O, Asúnsolo Á et al (2020) Signal transduction pathways in breast cancer: the important role of PI3K/Akt/mTOR. J Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9258396
Lattouf H, Poulard C, Treilleux I et al (2016) LKB1, a new biomarker in breast cancer. J Cancer Ther 7:690–699. https://doi.org/10.4236/JCT.2016.710071
Paterni I, Granchi C, Katzenellenbogen JA, Minutolo F (2014) Estrogen receptors alpha (ERα) and beta (ERβ): subtype-selective ligands and clinical potential. Steroids 90:13. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STEROIDS.2014.06.012
Oh JH, Lee JY, Kim KH et al (2020) Elevated GCN5 expression confers tamoxifen resistance by upregulating AIB1 expression in ER-positive breast cancer. Cancer Lett 495:145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CANLET.2020.09.017
Belachew EB, Sewasew DT (2021) Molecular mechanisms of endocrine resistance in estrogen-positive breast cancer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 12:188. https://doi.org/10.3389/FENDO.2021.599586/XML/NLM
Tamburrino L, Salvianti F, Marchiani S et al (2012) Androgen receptor (AR) expression in prostate cancer and progression of the tumor: lessons from cell lines, animal models and human specimens. Steroids 77:996–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STEROIDS.2012.01.008
Kensler KH, Regan MM, Heng YJ et al (2019) Prognostic and predictive value of androgen receptor expression in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: results from the breast international group trial 1–98. Breast Cancer Res 21:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13058-019-1118-Z/FIGURES/4
Peters AA, Buchanan G, Ricciardelli C et al (2009) Androgen receptor inhibits estrogen receptor-α activity and is prognostic in breast cancer. Cancer Res 69:6131–6140. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0452/655145/P/ANDROGEN-RECEPTOR-INHIBITS-ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR
Dobbs RW, Malhotra NR, Greenwald DT et al (2019) Estrogens and prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 22:185–194. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41391-018-0081-6
Mishra A, Hourigan D, Lindsay AJ (2022) Inhibition of the endosomal recycling pathway downregulates HER2 activation and overcomes resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in HER2-positive breast cancer. Cancer Lett 529:153–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2022.01.003
O’Sullivan MJ, Lindsay AJ (2020) The endosomal recycling pathway-at the crossroads of the cell. Int J Mol Sci 2020:6074. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21176074
Pegram M, Jackisch C, Johnston SRD (2023) Estrogen/HER2 receptor crosstalk in breast cancer: combination therapies to improve outcomes for patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-positive breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 9:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-023-00533-2
Swain SM, Shastry M, Hamilton E (2023) Targeting HER2-positive breast cancer: advances and future directions. Nat Rev Drug Discov 22:101–126. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41573-022-00579-0
Chou TC, Talalay P (1984) Quantitative analysis of dose-effect relationships: the combined effects of multiple drugs or enzyme inhibitors. Adv Enzyme Regul 22:27–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0065-2571(84)90007-4
Chou TC (2010) Drug combination studies and their synergy quantification using the chou-talalay method. Cancer Res 70:440–446
Chou TC, Martin N (2005) CompuSyn for drug combinations, A Computer Software for Quantitation of Synergism and Antagonism, and the Determination of IC50, ED50 and LD50 Values[PC software and user’s guide](ComboSyn, Paramus, NJ)
Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U et al (2012) The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov 2:401–404. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0095
Pereira B, Chin S-F, Rueda OM et al (2016) (2016) The somatic mutation profiles of 2,433 breast cancers refine their genomic and transcriptomic landscapes. Nat Commun 7:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11479
Kaiser J, Stockert RJ, Wolkoff AW (1988) Effect of monensin on receptor recycling during continuous endocytosis of asialoorosomucoid. Exp Cell Res 174:472–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(88)90316-3
Lindsay AJ, McCaffrey MW, Lindsay AJ, McCaffrey MW (2016) Rab coupling protein mediated endosomal recycling of N-cadherin influences cell motility. Oncotarget 8:104717–104732. https://doi.org/10.18632/ONCOTARGET.10513
Huynh TK, Ho C-Y, Tsai C-H et al (2019) Proteasome inhibitors suppress ErbB family expression through HSP90-mediated lysosomal degradation. Int J Mol Sci 20:4812. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS20194812
Stern DF (2000) Tyrosine kinase signalling in breast cancer: ErbB family receptor tyrosine kinases. Breast Cancer Res 2:176. https://doi.org/10.1186/BCR51
Ni M, Chen Y, Lim E et al (2011) Targeting androgen receptor in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Cancer Cell 20:119. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CCR.2011.05.026
Mehta A, Tripathy D (2014) Co-targeting estrogen receptor and HER2 pathways in breast cancer. Breast 23:2–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BREAST.2013.09.006
Collins D, Jacob W, Cejalvo JM et al (2017) Direct estrogen receptor (ER) / HER family crosstalk mediating sensitivity to lumretuzumab and pertuzumab in ER+ breast cancer. PLoS One 12:e0177331. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0177331
Stoica GE, Franke TF, Moroni M et al (2003) Effect of estradiol on estrogen receptor-alpha gene expression and activity can be modulated by the ErbB2/PI 3-K/Akt pathway. Oncogene 22:7998–8011. https://doi.org/10.1038/SJ.ONC.1206769
Pietras RJ, Arboleda J, Reese DM et al (1995) HER-2 tyrosine kinase pathway targets estrogen receptor and promotes hormone-independent growth in human breast cancer cells. Oncogene 10:2435–2446
Fukui F, Hayashi S, Yamaguchi Y (2020) Heregulin controls ERα and HER2 signaling in mammospheres of ERα-positive breast cancer cells and interferes with the efficacy of molecular targeted therapy. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 201:105698. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSBMB.2020.105698
Grunt TW, Saceda M, Martin MB et al (1995) Bidirectional interactions between the estrogen receptor and the cerbB-2 signaling pathways: heregulin inhibits estrogenic effects in breast cancer cells. Int J Cancer 63:560–567. https://doi.org/10.1002/IJC.2910630417
Zhou H, Mazan-Mamczarz K, Martindale JL et al (2010) Post-transcriptional regulation of androgen receptor mRNA by an ErbB3 binding protein 1 in prostate cancer. Nucleic Acids Res 38:3619–3631. https://doi.org/10.1093/NAR/GKQ084
Curtis C, Shah SP, Chin S-F et al (2012) The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature 486(7403):346–352. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10983
Martino S, Costantino J, McNabb M et al (2004) The role of selective estrogen receptor modulators in the prevention of breast cancer: comparison of the clinical trials. Oncologist 9:116–125. https://doi.org/10.1634/THEONCOLOGIST.9-2-116
Chou TC (2006) Theoretical basis, experimental design, and computerized simulation of synergism and antagonism in drug combination studies. Pharmacol Rev 58(3):621–681
Sikora MJ, Cooper KL, Bahreini A et al (2014) Invasive lobular carcinoma cell lines are characterized by unique estrogen-mediated gene expression patterns and altered tamoxifen response. Cancer Res 74:1463–1474. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2779/651299/AM/INVASIVE-LOBULAR-CARCINOMA-CELL-LINES-ARE
Mishra A, Srivastava A, Pateriya A et al (2021) Metabolic reprograming confers tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. Chem Biol Interact 347:109602. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CBI.2021.109602
Parachoniak CA, Luo Y, Abella JV et al (2011) GGA3 functions as a switch to promote met receptor recycling, essential for sustained ERK and cell migration. Dev Cell 20:751–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.05.007
Amornphimoltham P, Rechache K, Thompson J et al (2007) Rab-coupling protein coordinates recycling of alpha5beta1 integrin and EGFR1 to promote cell migration in 3D microenvironments. Mol Biol Cell 9:2799–2812. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.9.11.3241
Pietilä M, Sahgal P, Peuhu E et al (2019) SORLA regulates endosomal trafficking and oncogenic fitness of HER2. Nat Commun 10:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10275-0
Al-Akhrass H, Conway JRW, Poulsen ASA et al (2021) A feed-forward loop between SorLA and HER3 determines heregulin response and neratinib resistance. Oncogene 40:1300–1317. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-020-01604-5
Van Weert AWM, Geuze HJ, Groothuis B, Stoorvogel W (2000) Primaquine interferes with membrane recycling from endosomes to the plasma membrane through a direct interaction with endosomes which does not involve neutralisation of endosomal pH nor osmotic swelling of endosomes. Eur J Cell Biol 79:394–399. https://doi.org/10.1078/0171-9335-00062
Fletcher KA, Alkurashi MH, Lindsay AJ (2023) Endosomal recycling inhibitors downregulate the androgen receptor and synergise with enzalutamide. Invest New Drugs. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10637-023-01407-X
Tovey S, Dunne B, Witton CJ et al (2005) Can molecular markers predict when to implement treatment with aromatase inhibitors in invasive breast cancer? Clin Cancer Res 11:4835–4842. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0196
Liu B, Ordonez-Ercan D, Fan Z et al (2007) Downregulation of erbB3 abrogates erbB2-mediated tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer cells. Int J Cancer 120:1874–1882. https://doi.org/10.1002/IJC.22423
Fernando D, Rodrigo C, Rajapakse S (2011) Primaquine in vivax malaria: an update and review on management issues. Malar J 10:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-351/METRICS
Blain M, Garrard A, Poppenga R et al (2017) Survival after severe rhabdomyolysis following monensin ingestion. J Med Toxicol 13:259. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13181-017-0616-6
Chung BM, Raja SM, Clubb RJ et al (2009) Aberrant trafficking of NSCLC-associated EGFR mutants through the endocytic recycling pathway promotes interaction with Src. BMC Cell Biol 10:84. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2121-10-84
Park WH, Jung CW, Park JO et al (2003) Monensin inhibits the growth of renal cell carcinoma cells via cell cycle arrest or apoptosis. Int J Oncol 22:855–860. https://doi.org/10.3892/IJO.22.4.855/HTML
Deng Y, Zhang J, Wang Z et al (2015) Antibiotic monensin synergizes with EGFR inhibitors and oxaliplatin to suppress the proliferation of human ovarian cancer cells. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17523
Wang X, Wu X, Zhang Z et al (2018) Monensin inhibits cell proliferation and tumor growth of chemo-resistant pancreatic cancer cells by targeting the EGFR signaling pathway. Sci Rep 8:17914. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36214-5
Dayekh K, Johnson-Obaseki S, Corsten M et al (2014) Monensin inhibits epidermal growth factor receptor trafficking and activation: synergistic cytotoxicity in combination with EGFR inhibitors. Mol Cancer Ther 13:2559–2571. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-1086/85531/AM/MONENSIN-INHIBITS-EPIDERMAL-GROWTH-FACTOR-RECEPTOR
Ketola K, Vainio P, Fey V et al (2010) Monensin is a potent inducer of oxidative stress and inhibitor of androgen signaling leading to apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther 9:3175–3185. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-0368
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Mr. Anurag Mishra for assistance with immunoblotting and valuable discussions. Prof. Darren O’Connor (Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland) kindly provided the MDA-MB-134 VI and SUM44-PE cell lines.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by the IReL Consortium. This work was supported by funding from the School of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, UCC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KAF and MHA designed and performed experiments. AJL designed and performed experiments and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
10549_2023_7225_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Supplementary Figure 1. Correlation of hormone receptor and HER2 expression in breast cancer. A ESR1 (left) and AR (right) expression positively correlates with ERBB2 expression in breast cancer cell lines from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (N = 68). Data equals mean ± std dev. A Mann-Whitney U statistical analysis test was performed (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01). B Proteomic analysis of ER-α (left), AR (right) and HER2 protein levels in breast cancer cell lines available in the DepMap Portal database (N = 47). C ESR1 (left) and AR (right) expression positively correlates with ERBB2 expression in breast tumours analysed by the METABRIC study and accessible in cBioPortal (N = 1866). The violin plot depicts the median and 25th and 75th percentiles and the whiskers extend to the maximum and minimum values. Data equals mean ± std dev. A Mann-Whitney U statistical analysis test was performed (**** p < 0.0001). Supplementary Figure 2. HER3 and ER-α signalling pathways intersect. A Western blot analysis of HER2, HER3, AR and ER-α protein expression levels in lysates of the indicated breast cancer cell lines. B MCF-7 cells were serum-starved for 24 hours and then stimulated with the indicated growth factor or hormone for 30 minutes. Lysates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. Supplementary Figure 3. Representative dose response curves for the tamoxifen plus ERI combinations in the indicated cell lines. (PDF 369 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Fletcher, K.A., Alkurashi, M.H. & Lindsay, A.J. Endosomal recycling inhibitors downregulate estrogen receptor-alpha and synergise with endocrine therapies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 204, 631–642 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-07225-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-07225-2