Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Different prognosis of young breast cancer patients in their 20s and 30s depending on subtype: a nationwide study from the Korean Breast Cancer Society

  • Clinical trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Numerous studies have demonstrated that breast cancer in young women (BCY) has unfavorable prognostic features and more unfavorable subtypes. However, few studies have evaluated the effect of subtype disparities on breast cancer prognosis by age, especially for BCY. We analyzed breast cancer mortality stratified by tumor subtype according to age among patients younger than 50 years.

Methods

Data from the Korean Breast Cancer Society Registry for patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer when aged less than 50 years between 2003 and 2010 were reviewed retrospectively.

Results

We identified 30,793 patients with breast cancer who were eligible for analysis. Of these, 793 (2.6%) were aged 20–29 and 8926 (28.8%) were aged 30–39. Median follow-up duration was 84 months. Mean age was 42.4 years. Patients in their 20s were more likely to have cancer of advanced stage and higher nuclear grade, present with lymphovascular invasion, and have unfavorable subtypes. Patients in the 20s group showed worse prognosis. In multivariate analysis for overall survival (OS), the hazard ratio (HR) for patients in the 20s group was higher than that for the 30s and 40s groups, and patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) showed higher HR than patients with HER-2 or luminal subtype (all p < 0.0001). When stratified by subtype, luminal subtype showed significantly worse prognosis in the 20s group than the 30s and 40s groups, whereas HER-2 and TNBC subtypes showed no significant difference.

Conclusion

Patients in their 20s with breast cancer had unfavorable characteristics and worse prognosis than patients in their 30s and 40s. When stratified by tumor subtype, patients in their 20s with luminal subtype of breast cancer showed worse prognosis than older patients, whereas HER-2 and TNBC subtypes showed no significant differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Colleoni M, Rotmensz N, Peruzzotti G, Maisonneuve P, Orlando L, Ghisini R, Viale G, Pruneri G, Veronesi P, Luini A, Intra M, Cardillo A, Torrisi R, Rocca A, Goldhirsch A (2006) Role of endocrine responsiveness and adjuvant therapy in very young women (below 35 years) with operable breast cancer and node negative disease. Ann Oncol 17:1497–1503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fredholm H, Eaker S, Frisell J, Holmberg L, Fredriksson I, Lindman H (2009) Breast cancer in young women: poor survival despite intensive treatment. PLoS ONE 4:e7695

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chollet-Hinton L, Anders CK, Tse CK, Bell MB, Yang YC, Carey LA, Olshan AF, Troester MA (2016) Breast cancer biologic and etiologic heterogeneity by young age and menopausal status in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study: a case-control study. Breast Cancer Res 18:79

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Park YH, Lee SJ, Jung HA, Kim SM, Kim MJ, Kil WH, Lee JE, Nam SJ, Ahn JS, Im YH (2015) Prevalence and clinical outcomes of young breast cancer (YBC) patients according to intrinsic breast cancer subtypes: single institutional experience in Korea. Breast 24:213–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kataoka A, Iwamoto T, Tokunaga E, Tomotaki A, Kumamaru H, Miyata H, Niikura N, Kawai M, Anan K, Hayashi N, Masuda S, Tsugawa K, Aogi K, Ishida T, Masuoka H, Iijima K, Kinoshita T, Nakamura S, Tokuda Y (2016) Young adult breast cancer patients have a poor prognosis independent of prognostic clinicopathological factors: a study from the Japanese Breast Cancer Registry. Breast Cancer Res Treat 160:163–172

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Fredholm H, Magnusson K, Lindstrom LS, Garmo H, Falt SE, Lindman H, Bergh J, Holmberg L, Ponten F, Frisell J, Fredriksson I (2016) Long-term outcome in young women with breast cancer: a population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 160:131–143

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kao KJ, Chang KM, Hsu HC, Huang AT (2011) Correlation of microarray-based breast cancer molecular subtypes and clinical outcomes: implications for treatment optimization. BMC Cancer 11:143

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Menen RS, Hunt KK (2016) Considerations for the treatment of young patients with breast cancer. Breast J 22:667–672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sabiani L, Houvenaeghel G, Heinemann M, Reyal F, Classe JM, Cohen M, Garbay JR, Giard S, Charitansky H, Chopin N, Rouzier R, Darai E, Coutant C, Azuar P, Gimbergues P, Villet R, Tunon de Lara C, Lambaudie E (2016) Breast cancer in young women: pathologic features and molecular phenotype. Breast 29:109–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. De Camargo Cancela M, Comber H, Sharp L (2016) HR +/Her2- breast cancer in pre-menopausal women: the impact of younger age on clinical characteristics at diagnosis, disease management and survival. Cancer Epidemiol 45:162–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liedtke C, Rody A, Gluz O, Baumann K, Beyer D, Kohls EB, Lausen K, Hanker L, Holtrich U, Becker S, Karn T (2015) The prognostic impact of age in different molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 152:667–673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Blows FM, Driver KE, Schmidt MK, Broeks A, van Leeuwen FE, Wesseling J, Cheang MC, Gelmon K, Nielsen TO, Blomqvist C, Heikkila P, Heikkinen T, Nevanlinna H, Akslen LA, Begin LR, Foulkes WD, Couch FJ, Wang X, Cafourek V, Olson JE, Baglietto L, Giles GG, Severi G, McLean CA, Southey MC, Rakha E, Green AR, Ellis IO, Sherman ME, Lissowska J, Anderson WF, Cox A, Cross SS, Reed MW, Provenzano E, Dawson SJ, Dunning AM, Humphreys M, Easton DF, Garcia-Closas M, Caldas C, Pharoah PD, Huntsman D (2010) Subtyping of breast cancer by immunohistochemistry to investigate a relationship between subtype and short and long term survival: a collaborative analysis of data for 10,159 cases from 12 studies. PLoS Med 7:e1000279

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Samuel CA, Pinheiro LC, Reeder-Hayes KE, Walker JS, Corbie-Smith G, Fashaw SA, Woods-Giscombe C, Wheeler SB (2016) To be young, black, and living with breast cancer: a systematic review of health-related quality of life in young black breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 160:1–15

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Warner ET, Hu R, Collins LC, Beck AH, Schnitt S, Rosner B, Eliassen AH, Michels KB, Willett WC, Tamimi RM (2016) Height and body size in childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood and breast cancer risk according to molecular subtype in the nurses’ health studies. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 9:732–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Park EH, Min SY, Kim Z, Yoon CS, Jung KW, Nam SJ, Oh SJ, Lee S, Park BW, Lim W, Hur MH (2017) Basic facts of breast cancer in Korea in 2014: the 10-year overall survival progress. J Breast Cancer 20:1–11

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Park B, Choi KS, Lee YY, Jun JK, Seo HG (2012) Trends in cancer screening rates among Korean men and women: results from the Korean national cancer screening survey (KNCSS), 2004–2011. Cancer Res Treat 44:113–120

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahn SH, Son BH, Kim SW, Kim SI, Jeong J, Ko SS, Han W (2007) Poor outcome of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer at very young age is due to tamoxifen resistance: nationwide survival data in Korea–a report from the Korean Breast Cancer Society. J Clin Oncol 25:2360–2368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Adami HO, Malker B, Holmberg L, Persson I, Stone B (1986) The relation between survival and age at diagnosis in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 315:559–563

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Partridge AH, Gelber S, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Focant F, Scullion M, Holmes E, Winer EP, Gelber RD (2013) Effect of age on breast cancer outcomes in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: results from a herceptin adjuvant trial. J Clin Oncol 31:2692–2698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sheridan W, Scott T, Caroline S, Yvonne Z, Vanessa B, David V, Karen G, Stephen C (2014) Breast cancer in young women: have the prognostic implications of breast cancer subtypes changed over time? Breast Cancer Res Treat 147:617–629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Partridge AH, Hughes ME, Warner ET, Ottesen RA, Wong YN, Edge SB, Theriault RL, Blayney DW, Niland JC, Winer EP, Weeks JC, Tamimi RM (2016) Subtype-dependent relationship between young age at diagnosis and breast cancer survival. J Clin Oncol 34:3308–3314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim EK, Noh WC, Han W, Noh DY (2011) Prognostic significance of young age (<35 years) by subtype based on ER, PR, and HER2 status in breast cancer: a nationwide registry-based study. World J Surg 35:1244–1253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Han W, Kang SY (2010) Relationship between age at diagnosis and outcome of premenopausal breast cancer: age less than 35 years is a reasonable cut-off for defining young age-onset breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 119:193–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Walshe JM, Denduluri N, Swain SM (2006) Amenorrhea in premenopausal women after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:5769–5779

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Howell A, Swindell R, Ribeire GC (1996) Ovarian ablation in early breast cancer: overview of the randomised trials. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Lancet 348:1189–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Perez-Fidalgo JA, Rosello S, Garcia-Garre E, Jorda E, Martin-Martorell P, Bermejo B, Chirivella I, Guzman C, Lluch A (2010) Incidence of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea in hormone-sensitive breast cancer patients: the impact of addition of taxanes to anthracycline-based regimens. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120:245–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Regan MM, Pagani O, Francis PA, Fleming GF, Walley BA, Kammler R, Dell’Orto P, Russo L, Szoke J, Doimi F, Villani L, Pizzolitto S, Ohlschlegel C, Sessa F, Peg Camara V, Rodriguez Peralto JL, MacGrogan G, Colleoni M, Goldhirsch A, Price KN, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Viale G (2015) Predictive value and clinical utility of centrally assessed ER, PgR, and Ki-67 to select adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer: TEXT and SOFT trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat 154:275–286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Viale G, Regan MM, Maiorano E, Mastropasqua MG, Dell’Orto P, Rasmussen BB, Raffoul J, Neven P, Orosz Z, Braye S, Ohlschlegel C, Thurlimann B, Gelber RD, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Price KN, Goldhirsch A, Gusterson BA, Coates AS (2007) Prognostic and predictive value of centrally reviewed expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in a randomized trial comparing letrozole and tamoxifen adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal early breast cancer: BIG 1–98. J Clin Oncol 25:3846–3852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sheffield BS, Kos Z, Asleh-Aburaya K, Wang XQ, Leung S, Gao D, Won J, Chow C, Rachamadugu R, Stijleman I, Wolber R, Gilks CB, Myles N, Thomson T, Hayes MM, Bernard PS, Nielsen TO, Chia SK (2016) Molecular subtype profiling of invasive breast cancers weakly positive for estrogen receptor. Breast Cancer Res Treat 155:483–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Anders CK, Hsu DS, Broadwater G, Acharya CR, Foekens JA, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Marcom PK, Marks JR, Febbo PG, Nevins JR, Potti A, Blackwell KL (2008) Young age at diagnosis correlates with worse prognosis and defines a subset of breast cancers with shared patterns of gene expression. J Clin Oncol 26:3324–3330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kang E, Park SK, Lee JW, Kim Z, Noh WC, Jung Y, Yang JH, Jung SH, Kim SW (2016) KOHBRA BRCA risk calculator (KOHCal): a model for predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Korean breast cancer patients. J Hum Genet 61:365–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hershman DL, Kushi LH, Shao T, Buono D, Kershenbaum A, Tsai WY, Fehrenbacher L, Gomez SL, Miles S, Neugut AI (2010) Early discontinuation and nonadherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy in a cohort of 8769 early-stage breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 28:4120–4128

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Murphy CC, Bartholomew LK, Carpentier MY, Bluethmann SM, Vernon SW (2012) Adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy among breast cancer survivors in clinical practice: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 134:459–478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Rosenberg SM, Partridge AH (2015) New insights into nonadherence with adjuvant endocrine therapy among young women with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. doi:10.1093/jnci/djv245

    Google Scholar 

  36. Giuliano AE, Connolly JL, Edge SB, Mittendorf EA, Rugo HS, Solin LJ, Weaver DL, Winchester DJ, Hortobagyi GN (2017) Breast cancer-major changes in the American Joint Committee on cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin 67:290–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF, Geyer CE Jr, Dees EC, Perez EA, Olson JA Jr, Zujewski J, Lively T, Badve SS, Saphner TJ, Wagner LI, Whelan TJ, Ellis MJ, Paik S, Wood WC, Ravdin P, Keane MM, Gomez Moreno HL, Reddy PS, Goggins TF, Mayer IA, Brufsky AM, Toppmeyer DL, Kaklamani VG, Atkins JN, Berenberg JL, Sledge GW (2015) Prospective validation of a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 373:2005–2014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Jasem J, Fisher CM, Amini A, Shagisultanova E, Rabinovitch R, Borges VF, Elias A, Kabos P (2017) The 21-gene recurrence score assay for node-positive, early-stage breast cancer and impact of RxPONDER trial on chemotherapy decision-making: have clinicians already decided? J Natl Compr Canc Netw 15:494–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cardoso F, van’t Veer LJ, Bogaerts J, Slaets L, Viale G, Delaloge S, Pierga JY, Brain E, Causeret S, DeLorenzi M, Glas AM, Golfinopoulos V, Goulioti T, Knox S, Matos E, Meulemans B, Neijenhuis PA, Nitz U, Passalacqua R, Ravdin P, Rubio IT, Saghatchian M, Smilde TJ, Sotiriou C, Stork L, Straehle C, Thomas G, Thompson AM, van der Hoeven JM, Vuylsteke P, Bernards R, Tryfonidis K, Rutgers E, Piccart M (2016) 70-gene signature as an aid to treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med 375:717–729

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wallden B, Storhoff J, Nielsen T, Dowidar N, Schaper C, Ferree S, Liu S, Leung S, Geiss G, Snider J, Vickery T, Davies SR, Mardis ER, Gnant M, Sestak I, Ellis MJ, Perou CM, Bernard PS, Parker JS (2015) Development and verification of the PAM50-based Prosigna breast cancer gene signature assay. BMC Med Genomics 8:54

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article was supported by the Korean Breast Cancer Society, by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (2015R1D1A1A01057585) and by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korean Government (MSIP) (2016R1A5A2945889), and by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI17C1142).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seok Won Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ryu, J.M., Yu, J., Kim, S.I. et al. Different prognosis of young breast cancer patients in their 20s and 30s depending on subtype: a nationwide study from the Korean Breast Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Res Treat 166, 833–842 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4472-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4472-5

Keywords

Navigation