Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and molecular response after neoadjuvant therapy for HR+/HER2− breast cancer: results from two prospective trials

  • Clinical trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 03 April 2017

Abstract

Purpose

The aim was to evaluate the role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in predicting molecular response after preoperative endocrine or cytotoxic treatment for HR+/HER2− patients who do not achieve a pathological complete response.

Methods

Stromal (Str) TIL were centrally evaluated on samples from diagnostic core-biopsies of HR+/HER2− patients included in two prospective randomized trials: the LETLOB trial (neoadjuvant endocrine-based treatment) and the GIOB trial (neoadjuvant chemotherapy-based treatment). Pre- and post-treatment Ki67 was centrally assessed.

Results

StrTIL were evaluable in 111 cases (n = 73 from the LETLOB trial and n = 38 from the GIOB trial). Median StrTIL was 2%. Patients with high StrTIL (StrTIL ≥10%, n = 28) had more frequently breast cancer of ductal histology (p = 0.02), high grade (p = 0.049), and high Ki67 (p = 0.02). After neoadjuvant endocrine treatment (LETLOB cohort), a significant Ki67 suppression (p < 0.01) from pre- to post-treatment was observed in both the low and high StrTIL groups. High StrTIL patients achieve more frequently a relative Ki67 suppression ≥50% from baseline as compared to low StrTIL patients (55 vs. 35%, p non significant). After neoadjuvant chemotherapy (GIOB cohort), a significant Ki67 suppression was observed only for low StrTIL patients (Wilcoxon p = 0.001) and not in the high StrTIL group (p = 0.612). In this cohort, the rate of patients achieving a relative Ki67 suppression ≥50% from baseline was significantly higher in the high vs low StrTIL group (64 vs. 10%, p = 0.003). Geometric mean Ki67 suppression was evaluated in each cohort according to StrTIL: the lowest value (−41%) was observed for high StrTIL cases treated with chemotherapy.

Conclusions

This hypothesis-generating study suggests that in HR+/HER2− breast cancer StrTIL at baseline may influence the achievement of a molecular response after neoadjuvant treatment. Further evaluation in large studies is needed, and interaction with the type of treatment warrants to be explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Charehbili A, Fontein DB, Kroep JR, Liefers GJ, Mieog JS, Nortier JW, van de Velde CJ (2014) Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for endocrine sensitive breast cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 40:86–92. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.06.00

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M et al (2014) Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet 384:164–172. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62422-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, Costa SD, Eidtmann H, Fasching PA, Gerber B, Eiermann W, Hilfrich J, Huober J, Jackisch C, Kaufmann M, Konecny GE, Denkert C, Nekljudova V, Mehta K, Loibl S (2012) Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol 30:1796–1804. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guarneri V, Piacentini F, Ficarra G, Frassoldati A, D’Amico R, Giovannelli S, Maiorana A, Jovic G, Conte P (2009) A prognostic model based on nodal status and Ki-67 predicts the risk of recurrence and death in breast cancer patients with residual disease after preoperative chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 20:1193–1198. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdn761

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. von Minckwitz G, Schmitt WD, Loibl S, Müller BM, Blohmer JU, Sinn BV, Eidtmann H, Eiermann W, Gerber B, Tesch H, Hilfrich J, Huober J, Fehm T, Barinoff J, Rüdiger T, Erbstoesser E, Fasching PA, Karn T, Müller V, Jackisch C, Denkert C (2013) Ki67 measured after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 19:4521–4531. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ellis MJ, Tao Y, Luo J, A’Hern R, Evans DB, Bhatnagar AS, Chaudri Ross HA, von Kameke A, Miller WR, Smith I, Eiermann W, Dowsett M (2008) Outcome prediction for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer based on postneoadjuvant endocrine therapy tumor characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:1380–1388. doi:10.1093/jnci/djn309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Prat A, Fan C, Fernandez A, Hoadley KA, Martinello R, Vidal M, Viladot M, Pineda E, Arance A, Muñoz M, Paré L, Cheang MC, Adamo B, Perou CM (2015) Response and survival of breast cancer intrinsic subtypes following multi-agent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. BMC Med 13:303. doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0540-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Denkert C, Loibl S, Noske A, Roller M, Müller BM, Komor M, Budczies J, Darb-Esfahani S, Kronenwett R, Hanusch C, von Törne C, Weichert W, Engels K, Solbach C, Schrader I, Dietel M, von Minckwitz G (2010) Tumor-associated lymphocytes as an independent predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:105–113. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dieci MV, Griguolo G, Miglietta F, Guarneri V (2016) The immune system and hormone-receptor positive breast cancer: is it really a dead end? Cancer Treat Rev 46:9–19. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.03.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guarneri V, Generali DG, Frassoldati A, Artioli F, Boni C, Cavanna L, Tagliafico E, Maiorana A, Bottini A, Cagossi K, Bisagni G, Piacentini F, Ficarra G, Bettelli S, Roncaglia E, Nuzzo S, Swaby R, Ellis C, Holford C, Conte P (2014) Double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized, phase IIb neoadjuvant study of letrozole-lapatinib in postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 32:1050–1057. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.51.4737

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Guarneri V, Frassoldati A, Ficarra G, Puglisi F, Andreetta C, Michelotti A, Cresti N, Boni C, Bisagni G, Berardi R, Battelli N, Santoro A, Banna G, Bottini A, Di Blasio B, Maiorana A, Piacentini F, Giovannelli S, Jovic G, Conte P (2008) Phase II, randomized trial of preoperative epirubicin-paclitaxel ± gefitinib with biomarker evaluation in operable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 110:127–134. doi:10.1007/s10549-007-9688-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Salgado R, Denkert C, Demaria S et al (2015) The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014. Ann Oncol 26:259–271. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. R Development Core Team (2016) R R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. http://www.rproject.org/. Accessed on June 2016

  14. Denkert C, von Minckwitz G, Darb-Esfahani S, Ingold Heppner B, Klauschen F, Furlanetto J, Pfitzner B, Huober J, Schmitt W, Blohmer J-U, Kümmel S, Engels K, Lederer B, Schneeweiss A, Hartmann A, Jakisch C, Untch M, Hanusch C, Weber K, Loibl S (2016) Evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as predictive and prognostic biomarker in different subtypes of breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy—a metaanalysis of 3771 patients. Abstract S1-09. Presented at the 39th San Antonio breast cancer symposium, December 6–10 2016, San Antonio, Texas, USA

  15. Loi S, Sirtaine N, Piette F, Salgado R, Viale G, Van Eenoo F, Rouas G, Francis P, Crown JP, Hitre E, de Azambuja E, Quinaux E, Di Leo A, Michiels S, Piccart MJ, Sotiriou C (2013) Prognostic and predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in a phase III randomized adjuvant breast cancer trial in node-positive breast cancer comparing the addition of docetaxel to doxorubicin with doxorubicin-based chemotherapy: BIG 02-98. J Clin Oncol 31:860–867. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.41.0902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dieci MV, Mathieu MC, Guarneri V, Conte P, Delaloge S, Andre F, Goubar A (2015) Prognostic and predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in two phase III randomized adjuvant breast cancer trials. Ann Oncol 26:1698–1704. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Stanton SE, Adams S, Disis ML (2016) Variation in the incidence and magnitude of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer subtypes: a systematic review. JAMA Oncol 2:1354–1360. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Issa-Nummer Y, Darb-Esfahani S, Loibl S, Kunz G, Nekljudova V, Schrader I, Sinn BV, Ulmer HU, Kronenwett R, Just M, Kühn T, Diebold K, Untch M, Holms F, Blohmer JU, Habeck JO, Dietel M, Overkamp F, Krabisch P, von Minckwitz G, Denkert C (2013) Prospective validation of immunological infiltrate for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer–a substudy of the neoadjuvant GeparQuinto trial. PLoS ONE 8:e79775. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079775

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Dunbier AK, Ghazoui Z, Anderson H, Salter J, Nerurkar A, Osin P, A’hern R, Miller WR, Smith IE, Dowsett M (2013) Molecular profiling of aromatase inhibitor-treated postmenopausal breast tumors identifies immune-related correlates of resistance. Clin Cancer Res 19:2775–2786. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1000

  20. Generali D, Bates G, Berruti A, Brizzi MP, Campo L, Bonardi S, Bersiga A, Allevi G, Milani M, Aguggini S, Dogliotti L, Banham AH, Harris AL, Bottini A, Fox SB (2009) Immunomodulation of FOXP3 + regulatory T cells by the aromatase inhibitor letrozole in breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 15:1046–1051. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy

    M. V. Dieci, G. Griguolo, Pierfranco Conte & V. Guarneri

  2. Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padua, Italy

    M. V. Dieci, G. Griguolo, Pierfranco Conte & V. Guarneri

  3. Division of Clinical Oncology, S. Anna University Hospital, via Moro 8, 44100, Cona, Ferrara, Italy

    A. Frassoldati

  4. Breast UnitASST Cremona, viale Concordia 1, 26100, Cremona, Italy

    D. Generali

  5. Department of Medical, Surgery & Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Piazza Ospitale 1, 34129, Trieste, Italy

    D. Generali

  6. Division of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera ASMN, IRCSS, Viale Umberto I 50, 42123, Reggio Emilia, Italy

    G. Bisagni

  7. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy

    F. Piacentini

  8. Division of Medical Oncology, Modena University Hospital, via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy

    F. Piacentini

  9. Division of Oncology, “Guglielmo da Saliceto” Hospital, via Taverna 49, 29121, Piacenza, Italy

    L. Cavanna

  10. Division of Medical Oncology, “B.Ramazzini” Hospital, Via Molinari 2, 41012, Carpi, Italy

    K. Cagossi

  11. Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy

    F. Puglisi

  12. Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, Piazzale Santa Maria della Misericordia 15, 33010, Udine, Italy

    F. Puglisi

  13. UO Oncologia Medica I, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Santa Chiara Hospital, via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy

    F. Puglisi

  14. Division of Medical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I, via Conca 71, 60126, Ancona, Italy

    A. Michelotti & R. Berardi

  15. Division of Medical Oncology, Cannizzaro Hospital, via Messina 829, 95126, Catania, Italy

    G. Banna

  16. ICR Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, SM2 5NG, UK

    A. Goubar

  17. Division of Pathology, Modena University Hospital, via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy

    G. Ficarra

Authors
  1. M. V. Dieci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Frassoldati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Generali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Bisagni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. Piacentini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. L. Cavanna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. K. Cagossi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  8. F. Puglisi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  9. A. Michelotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  10. R. Berardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  11. G. Banna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  12. A. Goubar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  13. G. Ficarra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  14. G. Griguolo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  15. Pierfranco Conte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  16. V. Guarneri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierfranco Conte.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The LETLOB study was sponsored and funded by GlaxoSmithKline; the GIOB study was sponsored and funded by Astrazeneca. Moreover, authors acknowledge the following fundings: Istituto Oncologico Veneto project L02P38; University of Padova project 60A07-7808/13.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4219-3.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 276 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dieci, M.V., Frassoldati, A., Generali, D. et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and molecular response after neoadjuvant therapy for HR+/HER2− breast cancer: results from two prospective trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat 163, 295–302 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4191-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4191-y

Keywords