Abstract
To sensibly interact with the environment, like when grasping objects and navigating through space, the brain needs to compute not only target- and environment-related inputs, but also the size and spatial location of the entire body as well as of its parts. The neuronal construction and dynamic updating throughout the entire life of this bodily representation, commonly termed body schema in the literature, appears essential for efficient motor control and skilful tool-use. Meanwhile, recent contributions to the study of spatial multisensory processing have identified the peripersonal space as a particular region surrounding the body that acts as an interface between the body and the environment, for defensive and/or purposeful actions toward objects. In addition, the peripersonal space features plastic properties following tool-use that largely overlap those originally ascribed to the body schema, and have been actually interpreted as reflecting changes in the body schema itself. Here we seek to provide operational definitions and neuronal bases for each of these concepts, questioning whether sufficient evidence exists for them to be considered as the two faces of the same coin.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avillac M, Deneve S, Olivier E, Pouget A, Duhamel JR (2005) Reference frames for representing visual and tactile locations in parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci 8:941–949
Avillac M, Ben Hamed S, Duhamel JR (2007) Multisensory integration in the ventral intraparietal area of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 27:1922–1932
Bender M (1952) Disorders in perception. Thomas, Springfield
Bermúdez JL, Marcel AJ, Eilan N (1995) The body and the self. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Berti A, Frassinetti F (2000) When far becomes near: remapping of space by tool use. J Cogn Neurosci 12:415–420
Bonnier P (1905) L’Aschématie. Revue Neurologique 13:606–609
Botvinick M, Cohen J (1998) Rubber hands “feel” touch that eyes see. Nature 391:756
Brozzoli C, Dematte ML, Pavani F, Frassinetti F, Farnè A (2006) Neglect and extinction: within and between sensory modalities. Restor Neurol Neurosci 24:217–232
Brozzoli C, Pavani F, Urquizar C, Cardinali L, Farnè A (2009) Grasping actions remap peripersonal space. NeuroReport (in press)
Buxbaum LJ, Coslett HB (2001) Specialised structural description of human body parts: evidence from autotopagnosia. Cogn Neuropsychol 14:289–306
Cardinali L, Frassinetti F, Brozzoli C, Urquizar C, Roy AC, Farnè A (under revision) Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema
Cole J, Paillard J (1995) Living without touch and peripheral information about body position and movement: studies with deafferented subjects. In: Bermudes JL, Marcel A, Eilan N (eds) The body and the self. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 245–266
Craske B, Crawshaw M (1974) Differential errors of kinesthesis produced by previous limb positions. J Motor Behav 6:273–278
de Vignemont F (2007) Habeas corpus: the sense of ownership of one’s own body. Mind Language 22:427–449
de Vignemont F, Ehrsson HH, Haggard P (2005) Bodily illusions modulate tactile perception. Curr Biol 15:1286–1290
di Pellegrino G, De Renzi E (1995) An experimental investigation on the nature of extinction. Neuropsychologia 33:153–170
di Pellegrino G, Làdavas E, Farnè A (1997) Seeing where your hands are. Nature 388:730
Di Russo F, Committeri G, Pitzalis S, Spitoni G, Piccardi L, Galati G, Catagni M, Nico D, Guariglia C, Pizzamiglio L (2006) Cortical plasticity following surgical extension of lower limbs. Neuroimage 30:172–183
Dosey MA, Meisels M (1969) Personal space and self-protection. J Pers Soc Psychol 11:93–97
Driver J (1998) The neuropsychology of spatial attention. In: Pashler H (ed) Attention. Psychology Press, Hove, pp 297–340
Duhamel JR, Bremmer F, BenHamed S, Graf W (1997) Spatial invariance of visual receptive fields in parietal cortex neurons. Nature 389:845–848
Duncan J (1980) The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychol Rev 87:272–300
Farnè A, Làdavas E (2000) Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use. NeuroReport 11:1645–1649
Farnè A, Demattè ML, Làdavas E (2003) Beyond the window: multisensory representation of peripersonal space across a transparent barrier. Int J Psychophysiol 50:51–61
Farnè A, Dematte ML, Làdavas E (2005a) Neuropsychological evidence of modular organization of the near peripersonal space. Neurology 65:1754–1758
Farnè A, Iriki A, Làdavas E (2005b) Shaping multisensory action-space with tools: evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia 43:238–248
Fattori P, Kutz DF, Breveglieri R, Marzocchi N, Galletti C (2005) Spatial tuning of reaching activity in the medial parieto-occipital cortex (area V6A) of macaque monkey. Eur J Neurosci 22:956–972
Fogassi L, Gallese V, Fadiga L, Luppino G, Matelli M, Rizzolatti G (1996) Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4). J Neurophysiol 76:141–157
Gallagher S (2005) How the body shapes the mind. Oxford University Press, New York
Galletti C, Kutz DF, Gamberini M, Breveglieri R, Fattori P (2003) Role of the medial parieto-occipital cortex in the control of reaching and grasping movements. Exp Brain Res 153:158–170
Gardner EP, Babu KS, Reitzen SD, Ghosh S, Brown AS, Chen J, Hall AL, Herzlinger MD, Kohlenstein JB, Ro JY (2007) Neurophysiology of prehension. I. Posterior parietal cortex and object-oriented hand behaviors. J Neurophysiol 97:387–406
Gentilucci M, Fogassi L, Luppino G, Matelli M, Camarda R et al (1988) Somatotopic representation in inferior area 6 of the macaque monkey. Exp Brain Res 71:475–490
Graziano MS, Gross CG (1993) A bimodal map of space: somatosensory receptive fields in the macaque putamen with corresponding visual receptive fields. Exp Brain Res 97:96–109
Graziano MSA, Gross CG (1995) The representation of extrapersonal space: a possible role for bimodal, visuo-tactile neurons. In: Gazzaniga MS (ed) The cognitive neuroscience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 1021–1034
Graziano MS, Taylor CS, Moore T (2002) Complex movements evoked by microstimulation of precentral cortex. Neuron 34:841–851
Head H, Holmes G (1911–1912) Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain 34:102–254
Holmes NP, Spence C (2004) The body schema and multisensory representation(s) of peripersonal space. Cogn Process 5:94–105
Holmes NP, Calvert GA, Spence C (2004) Extending or projecting peripersonal space with tools? Multisensory interactions highlight only the distal and proximal ends of tools. Neurosci Lett 372:62–67
Holmes NP, Calvert GA, Spence C (2007) Tool use changes multisensory interactions in seconds: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. Exp Brain Res 183:465–476
Hyvarinen J, Poranen A (1974) Function of the parietal associative area 7 as revealed from cellular discharges in alert monkeys. Brain 97:673–692
Iriki A, Tanaka M, Iwamura Y (1996) Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport 7:2325–2330
Jeannerod M (2008) From myself to other selves: a revised framework for the self-other differentiation. In: Haggard P, Rossetti Y, Cawato M (eds) Attention and performance XXII: sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Johnson Frey SH (2003) What’s so special about human tool use? Neuron 39:201–204
Lackner JR (1988) Some proprioceptive influences on the perceptual representation of body shape and orientation. Brain 111:281–297
Làdavas E, Farnè A (2004) Visuo-tactile representation of near-the-body space. J Physiol Paris 98:161–170
Legrand D, Brozzoli C, Rossetti Y, Farnè A (2007) Close to me: multisensory space representations for action and pre-reflexive consciousness of onself-in-the-world. Conscious Cogn 16:687–699
Makin TR, Holmes NP, Zohary E (2007) Is that near my hand? Multisensory representation of peripersonal space in human intraparietal sulcus. J Neurosci 27:731–740
Makin TR, Holmes NP, Ehrsson HH (2008) On the other hand: dummy hands and peripersonal space. Behav Brain Res 191:1–10
Maravita A, Iriki A (2004) Tools for the body (schema). Trends Cogn Sci 8:79–86
Maravita A, Spence C, Driver J (2003) Multisensory integration and the body schema: close to hand and within reach. Curr Biol 13:R531–R539
Marzocchi N, Breveglieri R, Galletti C, Fattori P (2008) Reaching activity in parietal area V6A of macaque: eye influence on arm activity or retinocentric coding of reaching movements? Eur J NeuroSci 27:775–789
Paillard J (1999) Body schema and body image. A double dissociation in deafferented patient. In: Gantchev GN, Mori S, Massion J (eds) Motor control. Today and tomorrow. Academic Publishing House ‘Prof. M. Drinov’, Sofia, pp 197–214
Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L (1998) Grasping objects and grasping action meanings: the dual role of monkey rostroventral premotor cortex (area F5). Novartis Found Symp 218:81–95; discussion 95–103
Rizzolatti G, Scandolara C, Matelli M, Gentilucci M (1981a) Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. I. Somatosensory responses. Behav Brain Res 2:125–146
Rizzolatti G, Scandolara C, Matelli M, Gentilucci M (1981b) Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. II. Visual responses. Behav Brain Res 2:147–163
Schwoebel J, Coslett HB (2005) Evidence for multiple, distinct representations of the human body. J Cogn Neurosci 174:543–553
Sereno MI, Huang RS (2006) A human parietal face area contains aligned head-centered visual and tactile maps. Nat Neurosci 9:1337–1343
Sirigu A, Grafman J, Bressler K, Sunderland T (1991) Multiple representations contribute to body knowledge processing. Brain 114:629–642
Stein BE, Meredith MA (1993) The merging of the senses. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Ward R, Goodrich S, Driver J (1994) Grouping reduces visual extinction: neuropsychological evidence for weight-linkage in visual selection. Vis Cogn 1:101–129
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is published as part of the Special Issue on Multisensory Integration.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cardinali, L., Brozzoli, C. & Farnè, A. Peripersonal Space and Body Schema: Two Labels for the Same Concept?. Brain Topogr 21, 252–260 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-009-0092-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-009-0092-7