Skip to main content
Log in

Simultaneous phenanthrene and cadmium removal from contaminated soil by a ligand/biosurfactant solution

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodegradation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surfactants and inorganic ligands are pointed as efficient to simultaneous removal of heavy metals and hydrophobic organic pollutants from soil. However, the biosurfactants are potentially less toxic to soil organisms than other chemical agents. Thus, in this study the efficiency of combinations of iodide (I) ligand and surfactants produced by different bacterial species in the simultaneous removal of cadmium (Cd2+) and phenanthrene in a Haplustox soil sample was investigated. Four microbial surfactants and the synthetic surfactant Triton X-100 were tested with different concentrations of ligand. Soil samples contaminated with Cd2+ and phenanthrene underwent consecutive washings with a surfactant/ligand solution. The removal of Cd2+ increased with increased ligand concentration, particularly in solutions containing biosurfactants produced by the bacterial strains Bacillus subtilis LBBMA155 (lipopeptide) and Flavobacterium sp. LBBMA168 (mixture of flavolipids) and Triton X-100. Maximum Cd2+ removal efficiency was 99.2% for biosurfactant produced by Arthrobacter oxydans LBBMA 201 (lipopeptide) and 99.2% for biosurfactant produced by Bacillus sp. LBBMA111A (mixed lipopeptide) in the presence of 0.336 mol iodide l−1, while the maximum efficiency of Triton X-100 removal was 65.0%. The biosurfactant solutions removed from 80 to 88.0% of phenanthrene in soil, and the removal was not influenced by the presence of the ligand. Triton X-100 removed from 73 to 88% of the phenanthrene and, differently from the biosurfactants, iodide influenced the removal efficiency. The results indicate that the use of a single washing agent, called surfactant-ligand, affords simultaneous removal of organic contaminants and heavy metals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramovitch RA, Chang-Qing L, Hicks E, Sinard J (2003) In situ remediation of soils contaminated with toxic metal ions using microwave energy. Chemosphere 53:1077–1085

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bodour AA, Miller-maier RM (1998) Application of a modified drop-collapse technique for surfactant quantification and screening of biosurfactant-producing microorganisms. J Microbiol Method 32:273–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bodour AA, Guerrero-Barajas C, Jiorle BV, Malcomson ME, Paul AK, Somogyi A, Trinh LN, Bates RB, Miller-Maier RM (2004) Structure and characterization of flavolipids, a novel class of biosurfactants produced by Flavobacterium sp. MTN11. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:114–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chu W, Kwan CY (2003) Remediation of contaminated soil by a solvent/surfactant system. Chemosphere 53:9–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dacera DDM, Babel S (2008) Removal of heavy metals from contaminated sewage sludge using Aspergillus niger fermented raw liquid from pineapple wastes. Biores Technol 99:1682–1689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RM, Dworkin D, Lowe WL, Zukpo AJ (1992) Evaluation of commercially available soil-washing processes for site remediation. J Hazard Ind Was 24:515–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Fava F, Di Gioia D (1998) Effects of Triton X-100 and quillaya saponin on the ex situ bioremediation of a chronically polychlorobiphenyl-contaminated soil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 50:623–630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes VC, Albergaria JT, Oliva-Teles T, Delerue-Matos C, De Marco P (2009) Dual augmentation for aerobic bioremediation of MTBE and TCE pollution in heavy metal-contaminated soil. Biodegradation 20:375–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hendershot WH, Lalande H, Duquette M (1993) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirner AV, Pestke FM, Busche U, Eckelhoff A (1998) Testing contaminant mobility in soils and waste materials. J Geochem Explor 64:127–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ho KC, Hui KCC (2001) Chemical contamination of the east river (Dongjiang) and its implication on sustainable development in the Pearl River Delta. Environ Int 26:303–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz S, Gilbert JN, Grilfin WM (1990) Isolation and characterization of a surfactant produced by Bacillus licheniformis 86. J Ind Microbiol 6:243–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe R, Gardinali PR, Cai Y, Sudburry A, Fernandez A, Hay BJ (2003) Organic compounds and trace metals of anthropogenic origin in sediments from Montego Bay, Jamaica: assessment of sources and distribution pathways. Environ Poll 123:291–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin SC, Chen YC, Lin YM (1998) General approach for the development of high-performance liquid chromatography methods for biosurfactant analysis and purification. J Chromatogr 859:149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan CN (2005) Environmental applications for biosurfactants. Environ Poll 133:183–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan CN, Yong RN, Gibbs BF, James S, Bennett HPJ (1999) Metal removal from contaminated soil and sediments by the biosurfactant surfactin. Environ Sci Technol 33:3812–3820

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan CN, Yong RN, Gibbs BF (2001) Heavy metal removal from sediments by biosurfactants. J Hazard Mater 85:111–125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy KR, Chinthamreddy S (2000) Comparison of extractants for removing heavy metals from contaminated clayey soils. Soil Sediment Contam. 9:449–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmelling D, Poster D, Chaychian M, Neta P, Mclaughlin W, Silverman J, Al-Sheikhly M (1998) Application of ionizing radiation to the remediation of materials contaminated with heavy metals and polychlorinated biphenyls. Radiat Phys chem 52:371–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shin M, Barrington SF (2005) Effectiveness of the iodine ligand along with two surfactants on desorbing heavy metals from soils. Water Air Soil Poll 161:193–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shin M, Umebayashi Y, Kanzaki R, Ishiguro S-I (2000) Formation of copper(II) thiocyanato and cadmium(II) iodo complexes in micelles of nonionic surfactants with varying poly(ethylene oxide) chain lengths. J Colloid Interface Sci 225:112–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shin M, Barrington SF, Marshall WD, Kim JW (2004) Simultaneous soil Cd and PCB decontamination using a Surfactant/ligand solution. J Environ Sci Health 39:2783–2798

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (1999) Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. Agricultural Handbook 436, 2nd edn. US Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC

  • Umebayashi Y, Shin M, Ishiguro SI (1997) Thiocyanato and iodo complexation of cadmium (II) ions in micellar solutions of a nonionic surfactant Triton X-100. J Colloid Interface Sci 191:391–397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vater J, Kablitz B, Wilde C, Franke P, Mehta N, Cameotra SS (2002) Matrix-assisted laser desortion ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry of lipopeptide biosurfactants in whole cells and culture filtrates of Bacillus subtilis C-1 isolated from petroleum sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:6210–6219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wasay SA, Barrington S, Tokunaga S (2000) Organic acids for the in situ remediation of soils polluted by heavy metals: soil flushing in columns. Water Air Soil Poll 127:301–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss P, Riss A, Gschmeidler E, Schentz H (1994) Investigation of heavy metal, PAH, PCB patterns and PCDD/F profiles of soil samples from an industrialized urban area (Linz, upper Austria) with multivariate statistical methods. Chemosphere 29:2223–2236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang K, Zhu L, Xing B (2006) Enhanced soil washing of phenanthrene by mixed solutions of TX100 and SDBS. Environ Sci Technol 40:4274–4280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeomans JC, Bremner JM (1988) A rapid and precise method for routine determination of organic carbon in soil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 19:1467–1476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support granted by the FINEP/CTPetro, and the Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq) for the scholarship to one of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tânia M. S. Lima.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lima, T.M.S., Procópio, L.C., Brandão, F.D. et al. Simultaneous phenanthrene and cadmium removal from contaminated soil by a ligand/biosurfactant solution. Biodegradation 22, 1007–1015 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-011-9459-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-011-9459-z

Keywords

Navigation