Abstract
The evolutionary success of a species is linked to its ability to communicate. Auditory, optic and olfactory systems are biological communication channels. Compared to the latter two, auditory systems are less impeded by physical obstructions. Successful species have effectively articulated this to their advantage. Decoding the acoustic dynamics of a landscape can ingeniously be crafted as a rapid tool to assess biological diversity. Here, we present results of the acoustic analysis carried out in three contrasting soundscapes in Kerala, India. Representative sound samples were recorded at Ernakulam, Kerala, India using Marantz PMD 661 III sonic recorder from 6.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m. (IST) from an urban park [Hill Palace Museum (L1)], a sacred grove [Iringole Kavu (L2)], and a legally protected area Salim Ali Bird Sanctuary (L3). Acoustic characteristics of these sites expressed as Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI), Acoustic Diversity Index (ADI), Acoustic Evenness Index (AEI), Bioacoustic Index (BI) and Normalized Difference Soundscape Index (NDSI) were related to corresponding avian diversity. The objective finding reveals the distinctiveness of sonic characteristics and the status of diversity in each soundscape. Rapid assessment of biodiversity using acoustic indices is a prospective option that can be adopted as a means to generate biodiversity indicators of Sustainable Develeopment Goals (SDGs).









Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aji CP (2012) Biodiversity and ecological status of iringolekavu-a sacred grove at ernakulam district in Kerala 5:134–135
Alois P, Cheng V (2007) Key stone species extinction. Overview. http://www.arlingtoninstitute.org/wbp/species-extintion/443
Barber JR, Crooks KR, Fristrup KM (2010) The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends Ecol Evol 25:180–189
Boelman NT, Asner GP, Hart PJ, Martin RE (2007) Multi-trophic invasion resistance in Hawaii: bioacoustics, field surveys, and airborne remote sensing. Ecol Appl 17:2137–2144
Depraetere M, Pavoine S, Jiguet F, Gasc A, Duvail S, Sueur J (2012) Monitoring animal diversity using acoustic indices: implementation in a temperate woodland. Ecol Indic 13:46–54
Easterling DR, Meehl GA, Parnesan C, Changnon SA, Karl TR, Mearns LO (2000) Climate extremes: observations, modeling, and impacts. Science 289:2068–2074
Fairbrass AJ, Rennett P, Williams C, Titheridge H, Jones KE (2017) Biases of acoustic indices measuring biodiversity in urban areas. Ecol Indic 83:169–177
Fletcher H (1953) Speech and hearing in communication. Van Nostrand, New York
Gage SH, Napoletano B, Cooper MC (2001) Assessment of ecosystem biodiversity by acoustic diversity indices. J Acoust Soc Am 109(5):2430
Gage SH, Joo W, Kasten EP, Fox J, Biswas S (2015) Acoustic observations in agricultural landscapes. The ecology of agricultural ecosystems: long-term research on the path to sustainability. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 360–377
Kasten EP, Gage SH, Fox J, Joo W (2012) The remote environmental assessment laboratory’s acoustic library: an archive for studying soundscape ecology. Ecol Inform 12:50–67
Kerala Forest and Wildlife Department (2015). http://www.forest.kerala.gov.in/index.php/wildlife/2015-03-16-09-50-24/2015-06-26-09-04-29/thattekkadu-bird-sanctuary
Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (1996) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca
Li Z, Yu D, Xiong W, Wang Q, Tu M (2006) Testing the higher-taxon approach: a case study of aquatic marcophytes in China’s northwest arid zone and its implications for conservation. Biodivers Conserv 15(11):3401–3416
Ligges U (2009) TuneR: analysis of music. http://r-forge.rproject.org/projects/tuner/
Mumthaz KM, John George M (2017) Occurrence and significance of woodpeckers in Salim Ali Bird Sanctuary, Thattekkad, Kerala. J Glob Biosci 6(10):5301–5307
Obrist MK, Pavan G, Sueur J, Riede K, Llusia D, Marquez R (2010) Bioacoustics approaches in biodiversity inventories. Abc Taxa 8:68–99
Oliver I, Beattie AJ (1993) A possible method for the rapid assessment of biodiversity. Conserv Biol 7(3):562–568
Peterson CR, Dorcas ME (1994) Automated data acquisition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 47–57
Pieretti N, Farina A, Morri D (2011) A new methodology to infer the singing activity of an avian community: the Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI). Ecol Indic 11:868–873
Pijanowski B, Farina A, Gage S, Dumyahn S, Krause B (2011a) What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science. Landsc Ecol 26:1213–1232
Pijanowski B, Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Dumyahn SL, Farina A, Krause BL, Napoletano BM, Gage SH, Pieretti N (2011b) Soundscape ecology: the science of sound in the landscape. Bioscience 61:203–216
Qi J, Gage SH, Joo W, Napoletano B, Biswas S (2008) Soundscape characteristics of an environment: a new ecological indicator of ecosystem health. Wetland and water resource modeling and assessment. CRC Press, New York, pp 201–211
Richards DG, Wiley RH (1980) Reverberations and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in a forest: implication for animal communication. Am Nat 115(3):381–399
Schafer RM (1977) The soundscape: our sonic environment and the tuning of the world. Destiny Books, Rochester
Slabbekoorn H, Ripmeester EAP (2008) Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation. Mol Ecol 17:72–83
Sueur J, Pavoine S, Hamerlynck O, Duvail S (2008) Rapid acoustic survey for biodiversity appraisal. PLoS ONE 3(12):e4065
Sueur J, Farina A, Gasc A, Pieretti N, Pavoine S (2014) Acoustic indices for biodiversity assessment and landscape investigation. Acta Acust United Acust 100:772–781
Sugathan R, Verghese AP (1996) A review of the birds of Thattakad Bird Sanctuary, Kerala. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 93:487–506
R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing (version 3.1.2) (computer program). http://www.R-project.org
Towsey M, Wimmer J, Williamson I, Roe P (2014) The use of acoustic indices to determine avian species richness in audio-recordings of the environment. Ecol Inform 21:110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.11.00
Truax B (1984) Acoustic communication. Ablex Publishing, Norwood
Truax B (1999) Handbook for acoustic ecology, 2nd edn. Cambridge Street Publishing, Vancouver
Tzoulas K, James P (2010) Making biodiversity measures accessible to non-specialists: an innovative method for rapid assessment of urban biodiversity. Urban Ecosyst 13(1):113–127
Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Pijanowski BC (2014). Package ‘soundecology’. Soundscape Ecology (Version 1.1.1) (computer program). http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/soundecology/index.html
Villanueva-Rivera L, Pijanowski B, Doucette J, Pekin B (2011) A primer of acoustic analysis for landscape ecologists. Landsc Ecol 26:1233–1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9636-9
Acknowledgements
Authors thank Dr. R. Sugathan, Ornithologist, Salim Ali Bird Sanctuary, Thattekkad, Mr. Rajesh Junior Ornithologist, Salim Ali Bird Sanctuary, Thattekkad, Mr. Mani, Forest Watcher, Salim Ali Bird Sanctuary, Thattekkad, and Mr. Dineshan, Charge Officer, Hill Palace Museum, Ernakulam for providing assistance and support for the field survey. We also thank Prof. Saji Gopinath, Director, IIITM-K for supporting this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by M.D. Behera, S.K. Behera and S. Sharma.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rajan, S.C., Athira, K., Jaishanker, R. et al. Rapid assessment of biodiversity using acoustic indices. Biodivers Conserv 28, 2371–2383 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1673-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1673-0