Abstract
Mikkelson et al.’s (PLoS One 2(5):e444, 2007) empirical finding of a positive relationship between income inequality and species imperilment in an international context is less-than-compelling for 3 reasons: (a) findings for their limited sample size, which constitutes a relatively small fraction of all countries, may not hold in the context of a more encompassing sample of countries, (b) their aggregate analysis, which includes amphibians, birds, mammals, reptiles, and vascular plants, may mask important taxa-level differences, and (c) the absence of controls for spatial autocorrelation between countries. Using data from 133 countries, we estimate models of factors that influence species imperilment and, controlling for cross-border effects, we reproduce the Mikkelson et al. findings, then demonstrate that they are sensitive to inclusion of additional countries, model specification, and to data aggregation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The descriptive statistics for other years (which affects sample size) are available upon request from authors.
References
Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 19(6):716–723. doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
Arrow K, Bolin B, Costanza R, Dasgupta P, Folke C, Holling CS, Bengt-Owe J, Levin S, Maler KG, Perrings C, Pimentel D (1995) Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Science 268:520–521. doi:10.1126/science.268.5210.520
Babones SJ, Alvarez-Rivadulla MJ (2007) Standardized income inequality data for use in cross-national research. Sociol Inq 77(1):3–22. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2007.00175.x
Boyce JK (1994) Inequality as a cause of environmental degradation. Ecol Econ 11(3):169–178. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(94)90198-8
Cropper M, Griffiths C (1994) The interaction of population growth and environmental quality. AEA Pap Proc 84(2):250–254
Czech B, Krausman PR, Devers PK (2000) Economic associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States. Bioscience 50:593–601. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0593:EAACOS]2.0.CO;2
de Bruyn SM, van den Bergh JCJM, Opschoor JB (1998) Economic growth and emissions: reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves. Ecol Econ 25:161–175. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00178-X
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110:353–377. doi:10.2307/2118443
Heston A, Summers R, Aten B (2006) Penn world table version 6.2. Center for International comparisons of production, income and prices. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
Hettige H, Lucas REB, Wheeler D (1992) The toxic intensity of industrial production: global patterns, trends, and trade policy. AEA Pap Proc 82(2):478–481
Hilton FG, Levinson A (1998) Factoring the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from automotive lead emissions. J Environ Econ Manag 35(2):126–141. doi:10.1006/jeem.1998.1023
International Monetary Fund (2007) World economic outlook database. Available at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2007/02/weodata/index.aspx (cited 12 February 2008)
IUCN (2007) The IUCN red list of threatened species. Available at http://www.iucnredlist.org/info/tables (cited January 15 2008)
List AJ, Gallet CA (1999) The environmental Kuznets curve: does one size fit all? Ecol Econ 31:409–423. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00064-6
McPherson MA, Nieswiadomy ML (2005) Environmental Kuznets curve: threatened species and spatial effects. Ecol Econ 55(3):395–407. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.004
Mikkelson GM, Gonzalez A, Peterson GD (2007) Economic inequality predicts biodiversity loss. PLoS One 25:e444. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000444:10.1371/journal.pone.0000444
Moran PAP (1950) Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37(1/2):17–33. doi:10.2307/2332142
Pandit R, Laband DN (2007a) General and specific spatial autocorrelation: insights from country-level analysis of species imperilment. Ecol Econ 61(1):75–80. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.10.002
Pandit R, Laband DN (2007b) Spatial autocorrelation in country-level models of species imperilment. Ecol Econ 60(3):526–532. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.018
Pandit R, Laband DN (2007c) Threatened species and the spatial concentration of humans. Biodiv Conserv 16(1):235–244. doi:10.1007/s10531-006-9140-8
Pandit R, Laband DN (2009) Economic freedom, corruption, and species imperilment: a cross-country analysis. Soc Nat Resour 22(9) (forthcoming)
Pitt Inequality Project (2006) Standardized income distribution database. Available at http://www.pitt.edu/~inequal/2006SIDD-3-Aug21.xls (cited February 15, 2008). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh
R Development Core Team (2007) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org
Rothman DS (1998) Environmental Kuznets curves: real progress or passing the buck? A case for consumption-based approaches. Ecol Econ 25:177–194. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00179-1
Scruggs LA (1998) Political and economic inequality and the environment. Ecol Econ 26:259–275. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00118-3
Seldon TM, Song D (1994) Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? J Environ Econ Manag 27:147–162. doi:10.1006/jeem.1994.1031
Slottje D, Nieswiadomy M, Redfearn M (2001) Economic inequality and the environment. Environ Model Softw 16:183–194. doi:10.1016/S1364-8152(00)00081-5
Stern DL, Common MS, Barbier EB (1996) Economic growth and environmental degradation: the environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Dev 24:1151–1160. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00032-0
Suri V, Chapman D (1998) Economic growth, trade and energy: implications for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 25:195–208. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00180-8
Torras M, Boyce JK (1998) Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecol Econ 25:147–160. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00177-8
World Resources Institute (2007) Earth trends: environmental information. Available at http://earthtrends.wri.org. Washington DC: World Resources Institute
Yandle B, Vijayaraghavan M, Bhattarai M (2002) The environmental Kuznets curve: a primer. Property Environ Res Cent study 02-1:24
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by Auburn University’s Center for Forest Sustainability and by a McIntire-Stennis grant awarded to the second author and administered through the School of Forestry & Wildlife Sciences at AU. We thank Mike Nieswiadomy for sharing a copy of his spatial weight matrix. Any remaining errors are our responsibility.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pandit, R., Laband, D.N. Economic well-being, the distribution of income and species imperilment. Biodivers Conserv 18, 3219–3233 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9638-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9638-y