Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How can Habitat Selection Affect the use of a Wetland Complex by Waterbirds?

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The factors regulating the distribution of dabbling and diving waterbirds were studied, taking into account habitat selection by the species in a wetland complex of 26 ponds in south-eastern Spain. Such information can be used to management and conservation of wetland threatened bird species. Direct counts and feeding-microhabitat surveys of waterbirds were conducted. The feeding-niche width and the feeding-microhabitat use, as a function of the horizontal spatial gradient in the ponds, were related to the mean size of ponds used for each species. While the more generalist birds, which usually feed close to the shore, probably had available resources in small ponds, specialists that also frequently selected central zones of the pond had proportionally more limited feeding space and, therefore, less resource availability in small ponds. The differences in habitat selection of the different species appeared to encourage their hierarchical disappearance from the wetland complex at the same rate as the ponds diminished in size (‘nested’ pattern). The results support the conservation, restoration or creation of, at least, ponds of greater size in order to preserve extensive open-water zones in the wetlands and maintain the greatest number of specialist, threatened, and area-dependent species, such as the globally endangered White-headed Duck (Oxyura leucocephala).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amat J.A. (1984). Interacciones entre los patos buceadores en una laguna meridional española. Doñana. Acta Vertebrata 11: 105–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Amat J.A. (1988). Respuestas de los patos invernantes en España a diferentes condiciones ambientales. Ardeola 35: 59–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrén H. (1994). Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71: 355–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atmar W. and Patterson B.D. (1993). The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat. Oecologia 96: 373–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernert J.A., Eilers J.M., Eilers B.J., Blok E., Daggett S.G. and Bierly K.F. (1999). Recent wetlands trends (1981/82–1994) in the Willamette Valley, Oregon, USA. Wetlands 19: 545–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bibby C.J., Hill D.A., Burgess N.D. and Mustoe S. (2000). Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • BirdLife International. (2000). Threatened Birds of the World. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown M. and Dinsmore J.J. (1986). Implications of marsh size and isolation for marsh bird management. J. Wildlife Manage. 50: 392–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Casado S. and Montes C. (1995). Guía de los Lagos y Humedales de España. J. M. Reyero Editor, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Cirujano S., Velayos M., Castilla F. and Gíl M. (1992). Criterios Botánicos para la Valoración de las Lagunas y Humedales Españoles (Península Ibérica y las Islas Baleares). Colección Técnica. ICONA, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig R.J. and Beal K.G. (1992). The influence of habitat variables on marsh bird communities of the Connecticut River Estuary. Wilson Bulletin 104: 295–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson C.M., Hollis G.E. and Davis T.J. (1992). Managing Mediterranean Wetlands and their Birds. IWRB, Slimbridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs J.P. (1993). The importance of small wetlands for the persistence of local populations of wetland-associated animals. Wetlands 13: 25–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Giménez E., Navarro J., Oña J.A. and Gómez Mercado F. 2003. Paraje Natural Punta Entinas-Sabinar (Almería). FloraVegetación y Ornitofauna. Monografías Ciencia y Tecnología 22. Servicio de Publicaciones (Universidad de Almería), Almería.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez Mercado F. and Paracuellos M. (1995–96). Hábitats de las albuferas de Adra (Almería) recogidos en el Anexo I de la Directiva 92/43/CEE. Boletín de Ciencias del Instituto de Estudios Almerienses 14: 59–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman M.L. (1991). Ecología Insular. Vedrà, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Green A.J. (1996). Analyses of globally threatened Anatidae in relation to threats, distribution, migration patterns and habitat use. Conserv. Biol. 10: 1435–1445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green A.J. (1998). Comparative feeding behaviour and niche organization in a Mediterranean duck community. Can. J. Zool. 76: 500–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green A.J. and Hughes B. (2001). BWP Update 3: 79–90

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN 2004. 2004 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Http://www.iucnredlist.org.

  • Jobson J.D. (1992). Applied Multivariate Data Analysis. Volume II: Categorical and Multivariate Methods. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson M.G., Sauer J.R., Olsen D.A., Mossman M.J., Hemesath L.M. and Lannoo M.J. (1999). Effects of landscape composition and wetland fragmentation on frog and toad abundance and species richness in Iowa and Wisconsin, U.S.A.. Conserv. Biol. 13: 1437–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson V.L. (1995). Fragmentation of the land-water margin within the northern and central Indian River Lagoon watershed. Bull. Mar. Sci. 57: 267–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton J.H. (1996). Population abundances, geographic ranges and conservation: 1994 Witherby Lecture. Bird Study 43: 3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madroño A., González C. and Atienza J.C. (2004). Libro Rojo de las Aves de España. Dirección General para la Biodiversidad (Ministerio de Medio Ambiente). Sociedad Española de Ornitología/BirdLife, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • May R.M. (1975). Patterns of species abundance and diversity. In: Cody, L.M. and Diamond, J.M. (eds) Ecology and Evolution of Communities, pp 81–120. Belknapp Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McCollin D. (1998). Forest edges and habitat selection in birds: a functional approach. Ecography 21: 247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montes C., Oliver G., Molina F. and Cobos J. (eds), (1995). Bases Ecológicas para la Restauración de Humedales en la Cuenca Mediterránea. Consejería de Medio Ambiente (Junta de Andalucía), Sevilla

    Google Scholar 

  • Mota J.F., Peñas J., Castro H., Cabello J. and Guirado J.S. (1996). Agricultural development vs biodiversity conservation: the Mediterranean semiarid vegetation in El Ejido (Almeríasoutheastern Spain). Biodivers. Conserv. 5: 1597–1617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naugle D.E., Higgins K.F., Nusser S.M. and Johnson W.C. (1999). Scale-dependent habitat use in three species of prairie wetland birds. Landscape Ecol. 14: 267–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson L. (1972). Local distribution, food choice and food consumption of diving ducks on a South Swedish lake. Oikos 23: 82–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson L. (1978). Breeding waterfowl in eutrophicated lakes in south Sweden. Wildfowl 29: 101–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Nudds T.D., Sjöberg K. and Lundberg P. (1994). Ecomorphological relationships among Paleartic dabbling ducks on Baltic coastal wetlands and a comparison with the Neartic. Oikos 69: 295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega M., Casas J.J., Aguilera P.A. and Castro H. (2000). Hydrochemical characterization of wetlands in a semi-arid region of eastern Andalucía (AlmeríaSpain): a preliminary study. Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 27: 372–377

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega F., Paracuellos M. and Guerrero F. (2004). Corología de macrófitos acuáticos de Andalucía Oriental. Lazaroa 25: 179–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen M. and Black J.M. (1990). Waterfowl Ecology. Blackie and Son Ltd., Glasgow, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Paracuellos M., Oña J.A., López Martos J.M., Matamala J.J., Salas G. and Nevado J.C. (1994). Caracterización de los humedales almerienses en función de su importancia provincial para las aves acuáticas. Oxyura 7: 183–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Paracuellos M. and Tellería J.L. (2004). Factors affecting the distribution of a waterbird community: the role of habitat configuration and bird abundance. Waterbirds 27: 446–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons K.C., Brown S.C., Erwin R.M., Czech H.A. and Coulson J.C. (2002). Managing Wetlands for Waterbirds: Integrated Approaches. Waterbirds 25(Special Publication 2): 1–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrins C.M. and Ogilvie M.A. (1998). The Complete Birds of the Western Paleartic CD-ROM, Version 1.0. Oxford University Press, Optimedia, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöysä H. (1983). Resource utilization relations between the Coot (Fulica atra) and other waterfowl species. Finish Game Res. 40: 37–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey Benayas J.M., Colomer M.G.S. and Levassor C. (1999). Effects of areaenvironmental status and environmental variation on species richness per unit area in Mediterranean wetlands. J. Vege. Sci. 10: 275–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savard J.-P.L., Boyd W.S. and Smith G.E.J. (1994). Waterfowl–wetland relationships in the Aspen Parkland of British Columbia: comparison of analytical methods. Hydrobiologia 279/280: 309–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreer J.F. and Kovacs K.M. (1997). Allometry of diving capacity in air-breathing vertebrates. Can. J. Zool. 75: 339–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer C.L. (1990). Nature Reserves. Island Theory and Conservation Practice. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal R.R. and Rohlf F.J. (1994). Biometry. W. H. Freeman & Co, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellería J.L. (1986). Manual para el Censo de los Vertebrados Terrestres. Raíces, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellería J.L. and Santos T. (2001). Fragmentación de hábitats forestales y sus consecuencias. In: Zamora, R. and Pugnaire, F.I. (eds) Ecosistemas Mediterráneos. Análisis Funcional, pp 293–317. Colección Textos Universitarios 32. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Asociación Española de Ecología Terrestre, Granada

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres Esquivias J.A. (2003). Las Malvasías Cordobesas Veinticinco Años Después. Diputación de Córdoba, Córdoba

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vessen J., Hecker N. and Tucker G.M. 1997. Inland wetlands. In: Tucker G.M. and Evans M.I.(eds) Habitats for Birds in Europe: a Conservation Strategy for the Wider Environment. BirdLife Conservation Series 6. BirdLife International, Cambridge, pp. 125–158.

  • Verboom J., Foppen R., Chardon P., Opdam P. and Luttikhuizen P. (2001). Introducing the key patch approach for habitat nerworks with persistent populations: an exemple for marshland birds. Biol. Conserv. 100: 89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein W. and Schmid B. (1999). Conservation of arthropod diversity in montane wetlands: effect of altitudehabitat quality and habitat fragmentation on butterflies and grasshoppers. J. Appl. Ecol. 36: 363–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker R.H. and Likens G.E. (1973). Primary production: the biosphere and man. Hum. Ecol. 1: 357–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens J.A. (1989). The Ecology of Bird Communities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariano Paracuellos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paracuellos, M. How can Habitat Selection Affect the use of a Wetland Complex by Waterbirds?. Biodivers Conserv 15, 4569–4582 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-5820-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-5820-z

Key words

Navigation