Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Resolving the Conflicts Between Biodiversity Conservation and Socioeconomic Development in China: Fuzzy Clustering Approach

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Resolving the conflicts between biodiversity conservation and socioeconomic development is a global pursuit for the long-run prospects of the human species. Based on Wenchuan County, a typical county in southwestern China, a group of 20 indicators quantifying regional biodiversity and socioeconomic development was established to classify and evaluate the county area spatially. A fuzzy c-means clustering (FCM) algorithm was used as the classification method. Three indices including BD, DL and DR characterizing the value of biodiversity, the level and rate of socioeconomic development of the delineated regions were formulated. The results indicated that Wenchuan County was optimally classified into 4 types of regions (region I to IV). The area percentages of the regions vary widely from 4.3 to 65.7%. The sequences of the regions on biodiversity, socioeconomic development level, and socioeconomic development rate were, respectively, IV > II > III > I, I > III > II > IV and III >I >II >IV. The spatial strategy on coordinating biodiversity conservation and regional development is to develop mainly from the east(I, II, III) and to conserve mainly in the west(IV). Eco-industry, such as eco-tourism and eco-agriculture, need to be emphasized in the process of regional development. The quantitative methods used here may have a wide applicability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ando A., Camm J., Polasky S. and Solow A. (1998). Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation. Science 279: 2126–2128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beck M.W. and Odaya M. (2001). Ecoregional planning in marine environments: identifying priority sites for conservation in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwater Ecosyst. 11: 235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek J.C. (1981). Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek J. (1994). Fuzzy models-what are they and why?. In: Marks, R.J. (eds) Fuzzy Logic Technology and Applications, IEEE Technology Update Series, Tecnichnacal Activities Board, Piscataway, NJ 3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Chape S. (2001). An overview of integrated approaches to conservation and community development in the Lao People's Democratic Republic. Parks 11: 24–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson B., Wang D., Capen D. and Thompson E. (2004). An evaluation of GIS-derived landscape diversity units to guide landscape-level mapping of natural communities. J. Nat. Conserv. 12(1): 15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R., Voinov A., Boumans R., Maxwell T., Villa F., Wainger L. and Voinov H. (2002). Integrated ecological economic modeling of the Patuxent River watershed, Maryland. Ecol. Monogr. 72: 203–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauber J., Hirsch M., Simmering D., Waldhardt R., Otte A. and Wolters V. (2003). Landscape structure as an indicator of biodiversity: matrix effects on species richness. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 98: 321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dramstad W.E., Fry G., Fjellstad W.J., Skar B., Helliksen W., Sollund M.-L.B., Tveit M.S., Geelmuyden A.K. and Framstad E. (2001). Integrating landscape-based values: Norwegian monitoring of agricultural landscapes. Landscape Urban Plan 57: 257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drechsler M. (2004). Model-based conservation decision aiding in the presence of goal conflicts and uncertainty. Biodivers. Conserv. 13: 141–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Equihua M. (1990). Fuzzy clustering of ecological data. J. Ecol. 78: 519–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks D.H.K. (2004). Regional land-use impacts affecting avian richness patterns in Southern Africa insights from historical avian atlas data. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 101: 269–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faith D.P. and Walker P.A. (1996). Integrating conservation and development: effective trade-offs between biodiversity and cost in the selection of protected areas. Biodivers. Coserv. 5: 431–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J.-L., Zhen W.-Z. and Xie W.-X. (2003). Suppressed fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 24: 1607–1612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y. (2000). The research about a quantitative evaluation method of sustainable development level and ability in mountain counties. Chinese J. Econ. Geogr. 20: 16–19 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu B.J., Wang K.L., Lu Y.H., Liu S.L., Ma K.M., Chen L.D. and Liu G.H. (2004). Entangling the complexity of protected area management: the case of Wolong Biosphere Reserve, southwestern China. Environ. Manage. 33(6): 788–798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli N.J. and Colwell R.K. (2001). Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 4: 379–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowdy J.M. and McDaniel C.N. (1995). One worldone experiment: addressing the biodiversity-economics conflict. Ecol. Econ. 15: 181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley T.A. (1993). Balancing economic developmentbiological conservation and human culture: The Sitka black-tailed deer Odocoileus hemionus sitkensis as an ecological indicator. Biol. Conserv. 66: 61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway R.J., Bezdek J.C. and Hu Y. (2000). Generalized fuzzy c-means clustering strategies using Lp norm distances. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 8: 576–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hietala-Koivu R., Lankoski J. and Tarmi S. (2004). Loss of biodiversity and its social cost in an agricultural landscape. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 103: 75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honnay O., Piessens K., Van Landuyt W., Hermy M. and Gulinck H. (2003). Satellite based land use and landscape complexity indices as predictors for regional plant species diversity. Landscape Urban Plan. 63: 241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanneret P., Schuepbach B. and Luka H. (2003). Quantifying the impact of landscape and habitat features on biodiversity in cultivated landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 98: 311–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jepson P. and Whittaker R.J. (2002). Ecoregions in Context: a Critique with Special Reference to Indonesia. Conserv. Biol. 16: 42–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J., Ouyang Z., Pimm S.L., Raven P.H., Wang X., Miao H. and Han N. (2003). Protecting China's biodiversity. Science 300: 1240–1241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu M. and Samal A. (2002). A fuzzy clustering approach to delineate agroecozones. Ecol. Model. 149: 215–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lü Y., Chen L., Fu B. and Liu S. (2003). A framework for evaluating the effectiveness of protected areas: the case of Wolong Biosphere Reserve. Landscape Urban Plan. 63: 213–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne P.L. (1995). Biological and cultural diversity in Papua New Guinea: conservation, conflicts, constraints and compromise. Ambio 24: 231–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Panayotou T. (1994). Conservation of biodiversity and economic development: The concept of transferable development rights. Environ. Resour. Econ. 4: 91–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poiani K.A., Richter B.D., Anderson M.G. and Richter H.E. (2000). Biodiversity conservation at multiple scales: Functional sites, landscapes, and networks. BioScience 50: 133–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pykh Y.A. (2002). Lyapunov functions as a measure of biodiversity: theoretical background. Ecol. Indicators 2: 123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao M., Rabinowitz A. and Khaing S.T. (2002). Status review of the protected-area system in Myanmarwith recommendations for conservation planning. Conserv. Biol. 16: 360–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D. (1998). Flagships, umbrellas and keystones: is single-species management passé in the landscape era?. Biol. Conserv. 83: 247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seely M.K., Zeidler J., Henschel J.R. and Barnard P. (2003). Creative problem solving in support of biodiversity conservation. J. Arid Environ. 54: 155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soberon J., Rodriguez P. and Vazquez-Dominguez E. (2000). Implications of the hierarchical Structure of Biodiversity for the development of ecological indicators of sustainable use. Ambio 29: 136–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley J.J. (2002). Framework for measuring sustainable development in catchment systems. Environ. Manage. 29: 195–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X., Wang Y. and Wang L. (2004). Improving fuzzy c-means clustering based on feature-weight learning. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 25: 1123–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolong Nature Reserve Administration Bureau (1998). The Master Plan of Wolong Nature Reserve. WNRAB, Wolong, 87

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J. and Loucks O.L. (1995). From balance-of-nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. Q. Rev. Biol. 70: 439–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H., Liu D. and Wu H. (2001). Environmental regionalization for the management of township and village enterprises in China. J. Environ. Manage. 63: 203–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Younge A. and Fowkes S. (2003). The Cape Action Plan for the environment: overview of an ecoregional planning process. Biol. Conserv. 112: 15–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Lab of Systems Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 2871, Beijing, 100085, China

    Yihe Lu, Bojie Fu, Liding Chen, Zhiyun Ouyang & Jianying Xu

Authors
  1. Yihe Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bojie Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liding Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhiyun Ouyang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jianying Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bojie Fu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lu, Y., Fu, B., Chen, L. et al. Resolving the Conflicts Between Biodiversity Conservation and Socioeconomic Development in China: Fuzzy Clustering Approach. Biodivers Conserv 15, 2813–2827 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-3016-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-3016-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation