Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Performance of non-native species within marine reserves

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conservation of biodiversity is a major aim of marine reserves; however the effects of reserves on non-native species, a major threat to biodiversity globally, is not widely known. Marine reserves could resist non-native species due to enhanced native diversity and biomass that heightens biotic resistance. Or non-native species could be enhanced by reserves by at least three mechanisms, including protection from harvesting, increased fishing pressure outside reserves facilitating invasions at a regional scale and increasing the exposure of reserves to more potential invaders, and increased propagule pressure from human visitation. We exhaustively searched the literature and found 13 cases that contained quantitative data on non-native species inside and outside marine reserves. In no cases did reserves resist non-native species. Of the seven cases where reserves were established prior to the arrival of the non-native species, five had no effect on the non-native species and two enhanced non-native species. Of the six cases where reserves were established in areas that had pre-existing non-native species, two had no effect on the non-native species and four enhanced the non-native species. These results suggest that while non-native species do equally well or better within marine reserves, too few data are currently available to draw broad, general conclusions regarding the effects of marine reserves on non-native species. Management plans for marine reserves rarely include guidelines for preventing or managing non-native species. If the trends we have detected here are supported by future studies, non-native species should be a priority for management of marine reserves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdulla A, Gomei M, Maison E, Piante C (2008) Status of marine protected areas in the Mediterranean Sea. IUCN, Malaga and WWF, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen JA, Brown CS, Stohlgren TJ (2009) Non-native plant invasions of the United States National Parks. Biol Invasions 11:2195–2207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avila E, Carballo JL (2009) A preliminary assessment of the invasiveness of the Indo-Pacific sponge Chalinula nematifera on coral communities from the tropical Eastern Pacific. Biol Invasions 11:257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett NS, Buxton CD, Edgar GJ (2009) Changes in invertebrate and macroalgal populations in Tasmanian marine reserves in the decade following protection. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 370:104–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bax N, Williamson A, Aguero M, Gonzalez E, Geeves W (2003) Marine invasive alien species: a threat to global biodiversity. Mar Policy 27:313–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton-Simmons KH, Abbott KC (2008) Short- and long-term effects of disturbance and propagule pressure on a biological invasion. J Ecol 96:68–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers JE (2005) Marine reserves enhance abundance but not competitive impacts of a harvested nonindigenous species. Ecology 86:487–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers JE, Noonburg EG (2003) Scale dependent effects of biotic resistance to biological invasion. Ecology 84:1428–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers JE, Noonburg EG (2007) Poaching, enforcement, and the efficacy of marine reserves. Ecol App 17:1851–1856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton JT (1999) Scale and ecological consequences of biological invasions in the world’s oceans. In: Sandlund OT, Schei PJ, Viken A (eds) Invasive species and biodiversity management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 195–212

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clark GF, Johnson EL (2009) Propagule pressure and disturbance interact to overcome biotic resistance of marine invertebrate communities. Oikos 118:1679–1689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daskalov GM, Grishin AN, Rodionov S, Mihneva V (2007) Trophic cascades triggered by overfishing reveal possible mechanisms of ecosystem regime shifts. PNAS 104:10518–10523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MA, Grime JP, Thompson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J Ecol 88:528–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deRivera CE, Ruiz GM, Crooks JA, Wasson K, Lonhart SI, Fofonoff P, Steves BP, Rumrill SS, Brancato MS, Pegau WS, Bulthuis DA, Preisler RK, Schooch GC, Browlby E, DeVogelaere A, Crawford MK, Gittings SR, Hines AH, Takata L, Larson K, Huber T, Leyman AM, Collinetti E, Pasco T, Shull S, Anderson M, Powell S (2005) Broad-scale non-indigenous species monitoring along the west coast in national marine sanctuaries and national estuarine research reserves. Aquatic Invasions Institute, Portland, Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar GJ, Last PR, Barrett NS, Gowlett-Holmes K, Driessen M, Mooney P (2010) Conservation of natural wilderness values in the Port Davey marine and estuarine protected area, south-western Tasmania. Aquatic Conserv Marine Freshw Eco 20:297–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasion by animals and plants. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridley JD, Stachowicz JJ, Naeem S, Sax DF, Seabloom EW, Smith MD, Stohlgren TJ, Tilman D, Von Holle B (2007) The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. Ecology 88:3–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grosholz ED, Ruiz GM (1995) Spread and potential impact of the recently introduced European green crab, Carcinus maenas, in central California. Mar Biol 122:239–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern BS (2003) The impact of marine reserves: do reserves work and does reserve size matter? Ecol App 13(1):S117–S137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison F (2011) Getting started with meta-analysis. Meth Ecol Evol 2:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellner JB, Hastings A (2009) A reserve paradox: introduced heterogeneity may increase regional invasability. Conserv Lett 2:115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinger T, Padilla DK, Britton-Simmons K (2006) Two invaders achieve higher densities in reserves. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Eco 16:301–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson J, Davenport J, Whitaker A (2004) Barnacle distribution in Lough Hyne Marine nature reserve: a new baseline and an account of invasion by the introduced Australasian species Elminius modestus Darwin. Est Coast Shelf Sci 60:729–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester SE, Halpern BS, Grorud-Colvert K, Lubchenco J, Ruttenberg BI, Gaines SD, Airame S, Warner RR (2009) Biological effects within no-take marine reserves: a global synthesis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 384:33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Stiling P (2006) Testing the enemy release hypothesis: a review and meta-analysis. Biol Invasions 7:1535–1545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale WM (1999) Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80:1522–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco J, Palumbi SR, Gaines SD, Andelman S (2003) Plugging a hole in the ocean: the emerging science of marine reserves. Ecol App 13:S3–S7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald IAW, Loope LL, Usher MB, Hamann O (1989) Wildlife conservation and the invasion of nature reserves by introduced species: a global perspective. In Drake JA, Mooney HA, di Castri F, Groves RH, Kruger EJ, Rejmanek M, Williamson M (eds) Biological invasions: a global perspective. Scope 37. Wiley, Chichester, England, pp 215–256

  • Minchinton TE, Bertness MD (2003) Disturbance-mediated competition and the spread of Phragmites australis in a coastal marsh. Ecol Appl 13:1400–1416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument (PMNM) (2008) Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument managment plan. Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument, Honolulu, Hawai’i

  • Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52:273–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz GM, Fofonoff PW, Carlton JT, Wonham MJ, Hines AH (2000) Invasion of coastal marine communities in North America: apparent patterns, processes, and biases. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:481–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2000) No reserve is an island: marine reserves and nonindigenous species. Bull Mar Sci 66:567–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Von Holle B (1999) Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol Invasions 1:21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stachowicz JJ, Whitlatch RB, Osman RW (1999) Species diversity and invasion resistance in a marine ecosystem. Science 286:1577–1579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stachowicz JJ, Fried H, Osman RW, Whitlatch RB (2002) Biodiversity, invasion resistance, and marine ecosystem function: reconciling pattern and process. Ecology 83:2575–2590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner SC, Willette DA (2010) Distribution and size of benthic marine habitats in Dominica, Lesser Antilles. Rev Biol Tropo 58:589–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren TJ, Barnett DT, Kartesz JT (2003) The rich get richer: patterns of plant invasions in the United States 1:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas LK (1988) Management of exotic species in natural communities. Conference on science in the National Parks, volume 5. The George Wright Society and the USDA National Park Service, Ft. Collins, Colorado, USA

  • Thresher R, Proctor C, Ruiz G, Gurney R, MacKinnon C, Walton W, Rodriguez L, Bax N (2003) Invasion dynamics of the European shore crab, Carcinus maenas, in Australia. Mar Biol 142:867–876

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher MB (1988) Biological invasions of nature reserves: a search for generalisations. Biol Consv 44:119–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasson K, Lohrer D, Crawforf M, Rumrill S (2002) Non-native species in our nation’s estuaries: a framework for an invasion monitoring program, National Esturine Research Reserve Technical Report Series 2002:1

  • West EJ, Barnes P, Wright J, Davis A (2007) Anchors aweigh: fragment generation of invasive Caulerpa taxifolia by boat anchors and its resistance to desiccation. Aquat Bot 87:196–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westman WE (1990) Park management of exotic plant species: problems and issues. Cons Biol 4:251–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willette DA, Ambrose RF (2009) The distribution and expansion of the invasive seagrass Halophila stipulacea in Dominica, West Indies, with a preliminary report from St. Lucia. Aquat Bot 91:137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witte S, Buschbaum C, van Beusekom JEE, Reise K (2010) Does climatic warming explain why an introduced barnacle finally takes over after a lag of more than 50 years? Biol Invasions 12:3579–3589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood LJ (2007) MPA Global: A database of the world’s marine protected areas. Sea Around Us Project, UNEP-WCMC & WWF. Available from www.mpaglobal.org. Accessed August 2010

  • Worm B, Barbier EB, Beaumont N, Duffy E, Folke C, Halpern BS, Jackson JBC, Lotze HK, Micheli F, Palumbi SR, Sala E, Selkoe KA, Stachowicz JJ, Watson R (2006) Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314:787–790

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the many authors we contacted for providing additional information. Funding was provided by an Australian Research Council Grant (LP0989796) to R.M.C. and K.A.P. We would also like to acknowledge the anonymous reviewers for their comments, which improved the quality of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Australian Rivers Institute - Coasts and Estuaries, Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, QLD, 4222, Australia

    Dana D. Burfeind, Kylie A. Pitt & Rod M. Connolly

  2. Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    James E. Byers

Authors
  1. Dana D. Burfeind
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kylie A. Pitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rod M. Connolly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. James E. Byers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dana D. Burfeind.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 27 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burfeind, D.D., Pitt, K.A., Connolly, R.M. et al. Performance of non-native species within marine reserves. Biol Invasions 15, 17–28 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0265-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0265-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation