Skip to main content
Log in

Insufficient uracil supply in fully aerobic chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae leads to respiro-fermentative metabolism and double nutrient-limitation

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Biotechnology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A combination of chemostat cultivation and a defined medium was used to demonstrate that uracil limitation leads to a drastic alteration in the physiology of auxotrophic cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Under this condition, the carbon source is dissimilated mainly to ethanol and acetate, even in fully aerobic cultures grown at 0.1 h−1, which is far below the critical dilution rate. Differently from nitrogen-, sulphur-, or phosphate-limited cultures, uracil limitation leads to residual sugar (either glucose or sucrose) concentrations below 2 mM, which characterizes a situation of double-limitation: by the carbon source and by uracil. Furthermore, the specific rates of CO2 production and O2 consumption are increased when compared to the corresponding prototrophic strain. We conclude that when auxotrophic strains are to be used for quantitative physiological studies, special attention must be paid to the cultivation conditions, mainly regarding medium formulation, in order to avoid limitation of growth by the auxotrophic nutrient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott DA, Knijnenburg TA, de Poorter LMI, Reinders MJT, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA (2007) Generic and specific transcriptional responses to different weak organic acids in anaerobic chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 7:819–833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barford JP, Johnston JH, Mwesigye PK (1995) Continuous-culture study of transient behaviour of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growing on sucrose and fructose. J Ferment Bioeng 79:158–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boer VM, de Winde JH, Pronk JT, Piper MD (2003) The genome-wide transcriptional responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown on glucose in aerobic chemostat cultures limited for carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, or sulfur. J Biol Chem 278:3265–3274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boer VM, Amini S, Botstein D (2008) Influence of genotype and nutrition on survival and metabolism of starving yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:6930–6935

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brauer MJ, Huttenhower C, Airoldi EM, Rosenstein R, Matese JC, Gresham D, Boer VM, Troyanskaya OG, Botstein D (2008) Coordination of growth rate, cell cycle, stress response, and metabolic activity in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 19:352–367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Çakar ZP, Sauer U, Bailey JE (1999) Metabolic engineering of yeast: the perils of auxotrophic hosts. Biotechnol Lett 21:611–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diderich JA, Schepper M, Van Hoek P, Luttik MA, Van Dijken JP, Pronk JT, Klaassen P, Boelens HF, Teixeira-de-Mattos J, Van Dam K, Kruckeberg AL (1999) Glucose uptake kinetics and transcription of HXT genes in chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 274:15350–15359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frick O, Wittmann C (2005) Characterization of the metabolic shift between oxidative and fermentative growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by comparative C-13 flux analysis. Microb Cell Fact 4:16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mashego MR, van Gulik WM, Vinke JL, Heijnen JJ (2003) Critical evaluation of sampling techniques for residual glucose determination in carbon-limited chemostat culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 83:395–399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson L, Nielsen J (1997) On-line and in situ monitoring of biomass in submerged cultivations. TIBTECH 15:517–522

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pantazopoulou A, Diallinas G (2007) Fungal nucleobase transporters. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31:657–675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Postma E, Verduyn C, Scheffers WA, Van Dijken JP (1989) Enzymic analysis of the Crabtree effect in glucose-limited chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:468–477

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pronk JT (2002) Auxotrophic yeast strains in fundamental and applied research. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:2095–2100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rose M, Winston F (1984) Identification of a Ty insertion within the coding sequence of the S. cerevisiae URA3 gese. Mol Gen Genet 193:557–560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman F (1991) Getting started with yeast. Meth Enzymol 194:3–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA, Van Dijken JP (1992) Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts—a continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 8:501–517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Luiz C. Basso (University of Sao Paulo, Brazil) for providing equipment for sugar analysis. This work was financed by grants from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP, São Paulo, Brazil), within the BIOEN framework, and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brasília, Brazil). Ph.D. grants were given to T.O.B and M.G.D. by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Brasília, Brazil).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Karoly Gombert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Basso, T.O., Dario, M.G., Tonso, A. et al. Insufficient uracil supply in fully aerobic chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae leads to respiro-fermentative metabolism and double nutrient-limitation. Biotechnol Lett 32, 973–977 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-010-0248-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-010-0248-2

Keywords

Navigation