Abstract
A computer-based tool called PRONTI (priority ranking of non-target invertebrates) has been developed to aid the selection of non-target species (NTS) for pre-release testing with entomophagous biological control agents. To test whether PRONTI can improve NTS selection, we used it to produce a prioritised list of NTS for the agent Cotesia urabae Austin & Allen (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), and compared it with the original list that was produced before this species was released in New Zealand in 2011. While the two lists were similar, with five NTS occurring in the top nine of both lists, the remaining four NTS in the top nine of each list were different, primarily because the selection criteria used by the two methods were weighted differently (e.g., PRONTI put more weight on the likelihood of a NTS being exposed to the agent). Post-release testing has demonstrated that C. urabae is able to oviposit in two NTS that were ranked highly on both lists, suggesting both methods are useful for species selection. The main advantages of PRONTI were considered to be its ability to rank hundreds of NTS simultaneously, and to provide a body of information that can be used to both understand each NTS’ ranking and to justify more objectively the selection of NTS for pre-release testing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen GR (1990) Influence of host behavior and host size on the success of oviposition of Cotesia urabae and Dolichogenidea eucalypti (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). J Insect Behav 3:733–749
Anon (1996) Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996. New Zealand Government, Wellington
Austin AD, Allen GR (1989) Parasitoids of Uraba lugens Walker (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in South Australia, with description of two new species of Braconidae. Trans Royal Soc S Aust 113:169–184
Avila GA, Berndt LA, Holwell GI (2013) First releases and monitoring of the biological control agent Cotesia urabae Austin and Allen (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). NZ Entomol 36:65–72
Avila GA, Withers TM, Holwell GI (2014) Host testing of the parasitoid Cotesia urabae (Austin & Allen, 1989) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to assess the risk posed to the New Zealand nolid moth Celama parvitis (Howes, 1917) (Lepidoptera: Nolidae): do host deprivation and experience influence acceptance of non-target hosts? Austral Entomol 54:270–277
Avila GA, Withers TM, Holwell GI (2016a) Laboratory odour-specificity testing of Cotesia urabae to assess potential risks to non-target species. BioControl 61:365–377
Avila GA, Withers TM, Holwell GI (2016b) Olfactory cues used in host-habitat location and host location by the parasitoid Cotesia urabae. Entomol Exp Appl 158:202–209
Avila GA, Withers TM, Holwell GI (2016c) Retrospective risk assessment reveals likelihood of potential non-target attack and parasitism by Cotesia urabae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): a comparison between laboratory and field-cage testing results. Biol Control 103:108–118
Barratt BIP (2004) Microctonus parasitoids and New Zealand weevils: comparing laboratory estimates of host ranges to realized host ranges. In: van Driesche RG, Reardon R (eds) Assessing host ranges for parasitoids and predators used for classical biological control: A guide to best practice. USDA Forest Service, Morgantown, pp 103–120
Barratt BIP, Moeed A (2005) Environmental safety of biological control: Policy and practice in New Zealand. Biol Control 35:247–252
Barratt BIP, Ferguson CM, McNeill MR, Goldson SL (1999) Parasitoid host specificity testing to predict host range. In: Withers TM, Barton Browne L, Stanley JN (eds) Host specificity testing in Australasia: towards improved assays for biological control. CRC for Tropical Pest Management, Brisbane, pp 70–83
Barratt BIP, Ferguson CM, Bixley AS, Crook KE, Barton DM, Johnstone PD (2007) Field parasitism of nontarget weevil species (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) by the introduced biological control agent Microctonus aethiopoides Loan (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) over an altitude gradient. Environ Entomol 36:826–839
Barratt BIP, Todd JH, Ferguson CM, Crook K, Burgess EPJ, Barraclough EI, Malone LA (2013) Biosafety testing of genetically modified ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) plants using a model for the optimum selection of test invertebrates. Environ Entomol 42:820–830
Barratt BIP, Todd JH, Malone LA (2016) Selecting non-target species for arthropod biological control agent host range testing: evaluation of a novel method. Biol Control 93:84–92
Berndt LA (2010) Will competition from Meteorus pulchricornis (Wesmael) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) limit the success of the potential biocontrol agent Cotesia urabae Austin & Allen (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)? Aust J Entomol 49:369–376
Berndt LA (2011) Wasp released to control gum leaf skeletoniser. Biosecurity Magazine 102:14–15
Berndt LA, Berry JA, Brockerhoff EG (2006) Parasitoids and predators of the endemic defoliator Pseudocoremia suavis (Butler) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae: Ennominae). N Z Entomol 29:89–98
Berndt LA, Mansfield S, Withers TM (2007) A method for host range testing of a biological control agent for Uraba lugens. N Z Plant Prot 60:286–290
Berndt LA, Withers TM, Mansfield S, Hoare RJB (2009) Non-target species selection for host range testing of Cotesia urabae. N Z Plant Prot 62:168–173
Berndt LA, Sharpe A, Withers TM, Kimberley M, Gresham B (2010) Evaluation and review report for the release of Cotesia urabae for the biological control of gum leaf skeletoniser. Application ER-AF-NOR-1-2 09/05. Appendix 2: risks to non-target species from potential biological control agent Cotesia urabae against Uraba lugens in New Zealand. http://www.epa.govt.nz/search-databases/HSNO%20Application%20Register%20Documents/Application%20Appendix%202.pdf. Accessed 2 March 2016
Bourchier RS (2003) Receptor characterization of nontarget butterflies for risk assessment of biological control with the egg parasitoid Trichogramma minutum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Can Entomol 135:449–466
Charles JG, Dugdale JS (2011) Non-target species selection for host-range testing of Mastrus ridens. N Z Entomol 34:45–51
Crowe A (2002) Which New Zealand Insect? Penguin Books (NZ) Ltd, Auckland
Gibbs GW (1962) The New Zealand genus Metacrias Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) systematics and distribution. Trans Royal Soc NZ, Zool 2:153–167
Gordon DP (2010) New Zealand inventory of biodiversity. In: Kingdom animalia—chaetognatha, ecdysozoa, ichnofossils, Vol 2. Canterbury University Press, Christchurch
Kriticos DJ, Potter KJB, Alexander NS, Gibb AR, Suckling DM (2007) Using a pheromone lure survey to establish the native and potential distribution of an invasive Lepidopteran, Uraba lugens. J Appl Ecol 44:853–863
Kuhlmann U, Schaffner U, Mason PG (2006) Selection of non-target species for host specificity testing. In: Bigler F, Babendreier D, Kuhlmann U (eds) Environmental impact of invertebrates for biological control of arthropods: methods and risk assessment. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 15–37
Lafontaine JD, Fibiger M (2006) Revised higher classification of the Noctuoidea (Lepidoptera). Can Entomol 138:610–635
Malone LA, Todd JH, Burgess EPJ, Walter C, Wagner A, Barratt BIP (2010) Developing risk hypotheses and selecting species for assessing non-target impacts of GM trees with novel traits: the case of altered-lignin pine trees. Environ Biosafety Res 9:181–198
Mitchell A, Mitter C, Regier JC (2005) Systematics and evolution of the cutworm moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): evidence from two protein-coding nuclear genes. Syst Entomol 31:21–46
Ramsay GW (1963) Predaceus shield-bugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) in New Zealand. NZ Entomol 3:3–7
Spiller DM, Wise KAJ (1982) A catalogue (1860–1960) of New Zealand insects and their host plants. DSIR Science Information Division, Wellington
Stufkens MW, Farrell JA, Goldson SL (1987) Establishment of Microctonus aethiopoides, a parasitoid of the sitona weevil in New Zealand. In: Proceedings 40th New Zealand Weed & Pest control conference 40:31–32
Todd JH, Ramankutty P, Barraclough EI, Malone LA (2008) A screening model for optimising the selection of non-target species for testing the biosafety of transgenic crops. Environ Biosaf Res 7:35–56
Todd JH, Barratt BIP, Tooman L, Beggs JR, Malone LA (2015) Selecting non-target species for risk assessment of entomophagous biological control agents: evaluation of the PRONTI decision-support tool. Biol Control 80:77–88
van Driesche RG, Hoddle M (1997) Should arthropod parasitoids and predators be subject to host range testing when used as biological control agents? Agric Hum Values 14:211–226
van Driesche RG, Reardon R (2004) Assessing host ranges for parasitoids and predators used for classical biological control: A guide to best practice. USDA Forest Serv, Morgantown
van Lenteren JC, Babendreier D, Bigler F, Burgio G, Hokkanen HMT, Kuske S, Loomans AJM, Menzler-Hokkanen I, van Rijn PCJ, Thomas MB, Tommasini MG, Zeng QQ (2003) Environmental risk assessment of exotic natural enemies used in inundative biological control. BioControl 48:3–38
Acknowledgments
This work was partly funded by Plant & Food Research, AgResearch and Scion as part of the Better Border Biosecurity (B3) (http://www.b3nz.org/home) research collaboration. We would like to thank Libby Burgess, Natalie Page-Weir and the anonymous reviewers for their comments and improvements to the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling Editor: Dirk Babendreier
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Todd, J.H., Barratt, B.I.P., Withers, T.M. et al. A comparison of methods for selecting non-target species for risk assessment of the biological control agent Cotesia urabae . BioControl 62, 39–52 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-016-9770-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-016-9770-z