Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Megazonation of earthquake-induced soil liquefaction hazard in continental Europe

  • S.I. : The H2020 European Project LiqueFACT
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mapping large territories for earthquake-induced soil liquefaction hazard may sound like an oxymoron since soil liquefaction is by itself a spatially highly localized phenomenon. Thus, the zonation of liquefaction hazard at the continental scale (i.e. megazonation) is a truly hard facing challenge even if accepting a low level accuracy. Yet, the availability of a megazonation chart of liquefaction hazard could be useful to identify territories that in case of an earthquake may display this phenomenon of soil instability distinguishing them from the regions where soil liquefaction is not expected even in case of strong ground shaking. A representation of the spatial variability of liquefaction hazard potential within a single country is within reach considering the resolution and accuracy of geological and geotechnical information that is currently available in the most developed nations. The LIQUEFACT project fully addressed in a specific work package the problem of constructing georeferenced, earthquake-induced soil liquefaction hazard maps in continental Europe for various return periods. They were built using homogeneous datasets in Europe on the expected seismic hazard and on the geological, geomorphological, hydrogeological, shallow lithology and digital terrain information. A probabilistic prediction model based on a logistic regression for liquefaction occurrence was purposely developed using a set of optimal geospatial predictors (explanatory variables) which include the weighted-magnitude peak ground acceleration, the weighted-mean shear-wave velocity in the top 30 m (VS30) and the compound topographic index. The optimal geospatial descriptors were selected based on the Luco and Cornell methodology, namely on the criteria of efficiency, practicality and proficiency. To calibrate and successively validate the logistic regression, a database of liquefaction manifestations occurred in continental Europe was used. Although the level of accuracy provided by these models at a local scale is low, still the availability of continental charts of liquefaction hazard may help policy makers and administrators to prioritize which urbanized territories should be investigated further to assess the seismic risk of structures and infrastructures associated to the occurrence of soil liquefaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baise LG, Daley D, Zhu J, Thompson EM, Knudsen K (2012) Geospatial liquefaction hazard model for Kobe, Japan and Christchurch, New Zealand. Seismol Res Lett 83:458

    Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol Sci Bull 24:43–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2004) Eurocode 8. Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, Pr-EN1998-1, European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels

  • Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall LO, Kegelmeyer WP (2002) SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J Artif Intell Res 16:321–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen R, Harmsen S (2012) Probabilistic ground motion calculations and implementation of PGA scaling by magnitude for assessing liquefaction hazard, Technical Document 2012-1, Seismic Hazard Zonation Program.

  • Cornell CA, Luco N (2001) Ground motion intensity measures for structural performance assessment at near-fault sites. In: Proceedings U.S.-Japan joint workshop and third grantees meeting, U.S.-Japan Coop. Res. on Urban EQ. Disaster Mit. Seattle, Aug. 15–16 2001, University of Washington

  • Fawcett T (2005) An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognit Lett 27:861–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández A, García S, Galar M, Prati RC, Krawczyk B, Herrera F (2018) Learning from imbalanced data, 1st ed. Springer, Berlin. ISBN-10: 3319980734. ISBN-13: 978-3319980737

  • Galli P (2000) New empirical relationships between magnitude and distance for liquefaction. Tectonophysics 324:169–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner JK, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in southern California, with afteshocks removed, Poissonian? Bull Seismol Soc Am 64(5):1363–1367

    Google Scholar 

  • Green RA, Bommer JJ (2019) What is the smallest earthquake magnitude that needs to be considered in assessing liquefaction hazard? Earthq Spectra 35(3):1441–1464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He H, Bai Y, Garcia EA, Li S (2008) ADASYN: adaptive synthetic sampling approach for imbalanced learning. In: 2008 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN 2008)

  • Jarvis A, Reuter HI, Nelson A, Guevara E (2008) Hole-filled SRTM for the globe Version 4, available from the CGIAR-CSI SRTM 90m Database. http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org

  • Karimzadeh S, Miyajima M, Hassanzadeh R, Amiraslanzadeh R, Kamel B (2014) A GIS-based seismic hazard, building vulnerability and human loss assessment for the earthquake scenario in Tabriz. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 66(10):263–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen K, Bott J (2011) Geologic and geomorphic evaluation of liquefaction case histories for rapid hazard mapping. Seismol Res Lett 82:334

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai CG, Bozzoni F, De Marco M, Zuccolo E, Bandera S, Mazzocchi G (2018) GIS database of the historical liquefaction occurrences in Europe and European empirical correlations to predict the liquefaction occurrence starting from the main seismological information. Deliverable D2.4. V 1.0. Liquefact Project, H2020-DRA-2015, GA no. 700748

  • Lai CG, Bozzoni F, Meisina C, Poggi V, Zuccolo E, Bonì R, Conca D, Famà A, Cosentini R (2019a) Mapping the liquefaction hazard at different geographical scales. In: Proceedings of the VII ICEGE 7th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Rome, Italy, 17–20 June 2019

  • Lai CG, Conca D, Bozzoni F, Bonì R, Meisina C (2019b) Earthquake-induced soil liquefaction risk: macrozonation of the European territory taking into account exposure. In: IABSE symposium 2019 Guimarães. Towards a resilient built environment—risk and asset management. March 27–29, 2019, Guimarães, Portugal

  • Lai CG, Meisina C, Bozzoni F, Conca D, Bonì R (2019c) Report to describe the adopted procedure for the development of the European liquefaction hazard map. Deliverable D2.6. V 1.0. Liquefact Project, H2020-DRA-2015, GA no. 700748

  • Lemoine A, Douglas J, Cotton F (2012) Testing the applicability of correlations between topographic slope and Vs30 for Europe. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102(6):2585–2599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luco N, Cornell CA (2007) Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions. Earth Spectra 23(2):357–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuoka M, Wakamatsu K, Hashimoto M, Senna S, Midorikawa S (2015) Evaluation of liquefaction potential for large areas based on geomorphologic classification. Earthq Spectra 31:2375–2395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer BW, Green RA, van Ballegooy S, Wotherspoon L (2019) Development of region-specific soil behavior type index correlations for evaluating liquefaction hazard in Christchurch, New Zealand. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 117:96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Gessler PE, Nielsen GA, Petersen GA (1993) Terrain attributes: estimation methods and scale effects. In: Jakeman AJ, Beck MB, McAleer M (eds) Modeling change in environmental systems. Wiley, London, pp 189–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Moustafa SSR (2015) Application of the analytic hierarchy process for evaluating geo-hazards in the greater Cairo area. Egypt EJGE 20:6

    Google Scholar 

  • NTC18. Norme tecniche per le Costruzioni, D.M. 17.1.2018 (Italian Building Code)

  • Padgett JE, Nielson BG, DesRoches R (2008) Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios. Earth Eng Struct Dyn 37(5):711–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panagos P, Van Liedekerke M, Jones A, Montanarella L (2012) European Soil Data Centre: response to European policy support and public data requirements. Land Use Policy 29(2):329–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panahi M, Rezaie F, Meshkani S (2014) Seismic vulnerability assessment of school buildings in Tehran city based on AHP and GIS. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci Discus 1:4511–4538

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahimi S, Wood CM, Wotherspoon LM, Green RA (2020) Efficacy of Aging Correction for Liquefaction Assessment of Case Histories Recorded during the 2010 Darfield and 2011 Christchurch Earthquakes in New Zealand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 146(8):04020059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald DJ, Allen TI (2007) Topographic slope as a proxy for seismic site conditions and amplification. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:1379–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Shafieezadeh A, Ye A (2018) Optimal intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand modeling of extended pile-shaft-supported bridges in liquefied and laterally spreading ground. Bull Earthq Eng 16:229–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0199-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson PJ, Gallant GC (2000) Terrain analysis: principles and applications. ISBN 0-471-32188-5

  • Yilmaz C, Silva V, Weatherill G, Rathje E (2018) Probabilistic seismic loss estimation due to ground failure. In: Proceedings of the VII ICEGE 7th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Rome, Italy, 17–20 June 2019

  • Youd TL, Idriss IM, Andrus RD, Arango I, Castro G, Christian JT, Dobry R, Finn WDL, Harder LF, Hynes ME, Ishihara K, Koester JP, Liao SSC, Marcuson WF, Martin GR, Mitchell JK, Moriwaki Y, Power MS, Robertson PK, Seed RB, Stokoe KH (2001) Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996. NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on the evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127:817–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youd TL, Perkins DM (1978) Mapping liquefaction-induced ground failure potential. J Geotech Eng Div 104(4):433–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Baise L, Thompson E (2017) An updated geospatial liquefaction model for global application. Bull Seismol Soc Am 107(3):1365–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Daley D, Baise L, Thompson E, Wald D, Knudsen K (2015) A geospatial liquefaction model for rapid response and loss estimation. Earthq Spectra 31(3):1813–1837

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been carried out within the framework of the European LIQUEFACT project. The LIQUEFACT project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement No. 700748. This support is gratefully acknowledged by the authors. The recommendations of three anonymous reviewers have helped to improve the clarity of the manuscript and they are gratefully acknowledged by the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering, Eucentre, Pavia, Italy

    F. Bozzoni

  2. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy

    R. Bonì & C. Meisina

  3. Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, University of Pavia, Eucentre, Pavia, Italy

    D. Conca, C. G. Lai & E. Zuccolo

Authors
  1. F. Bozzoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Bonì
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Conca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. G. Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. E. Zuccolo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. C. Meisina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Bozzoni.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bozzoni, F., Bonì, R., Conca, D. et al. Megazonation of earthquake-induced soil liquefaction hazard in continental Europe. Bull Earthquake Eng 19, 4059–4082 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-01008-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-01008-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation