Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of column-to-beam strength ratio on the seismic response of steel MRFs

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The strong-column/weak-beam seismic design concept in moment resisting frames is perhaps one of the least well-understood design provisions. This study is aimed at improving the understanding of the effect of column-to-beam strength ratio (CBSR) on several seismic performance measures. Through nonlinear analyses of 3-, 9-, and 20-story moment resisting frame, the impacts of CBSR on member ductility demands, maximum inter-story drifts, and floor acceleration amplifications are investigated. For each frame, the value of CBSR is varied by changing the yield strength of the material and/or by altering sizes of the columns. The probabilities of exceeding certain performance limits are investigated through fragility analyses. The single curvature bending of the columns within a story is found to be inevitable due to the participation of higher modes of vibration. Consequently, under large ground motions, the yielding of the columns is expected even for CBSRs larger than 2.0. The fragility relationships were used to calculate the design force modification factors needed for achieving a comparable probability of column yielding for different values of CBSR. The values of the yield base shear and the inter-story drifts were found to depend more on the strength of the beams than the value of CBSR. The floor acceleration amplification was found to be the least sensitive demand parameter to the CBSR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Applied Technology Council (ATC) (1996) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Report No. ATC-40, Redwood City, CA

  • Applied Technology Council (ATC) (2009) NEHRP seismic design technical brief no. 2 seismic design of steel special moment frames: a guide for practicing engineers. Report No. NIST GCR 09–917-3, Redwood City, CA

  • AISC (1997) ANSI/AISC 341–97 Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction Inc, Chicago, IL

  • AISC (2002) ANSI/AISC 341–02 Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction Inc, Chicago, IL

  • AISC (2005) ANSI/AISC 341–05 Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction Inc, Chicago, IL

  • AISC (2010) ANSI/AISC 341–10 Draft Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction Inc, Chicago, IL

  • CEN. EN 1998–1 (2004) Eurocode 8: Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures, Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium

  • Choi SW, Kim Y, Lee J, Hong K, Park HS (2013) Minimum column-to-beam strength ratios for beam–hinge mechanisms based on multi-objective seismic design. J Const Steel Res 88:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra AK (2006) Dynamics of structures, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell AC, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO, Foutch DA (2002) Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines. J Struct Eng 128:526–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2000) FEMA-356 Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

  • Gupta A, Krawinkler H (1999) Seismic demands for performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures. John A. Blume Earthquake Engrg. Ctr. Report No. 132, Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Stanford University, Stanford, CA

  • Krawinkler H, Medina R, Alavi B (2003) Seismic drift and ductility demands and their dependence on ground motions. Eng Struct 25:637–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuntz GL, Browning J (2003) Reduction of column yielding during earthquakes for reinforced concrete frames. Struct J 100:573–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina RA, Krawinkler H (2005) Strength demand issues relevant for the seismic design of moment-resisting frames. Earthq Spectr 21:415–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakashima M, Sawaizumi S (2000) Column-to-beam strength ratio required for ensuring beam collapse mechanisms in earthquake responses of steel moment frames. In: Proceedings of 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, Auckland, New Zealand

  • Nakashima M, Roeder C, Maruoka Y (2000) Steel moment frames for earthquakes in United States and Japan. J Struct Eng 126:861–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielson GB, DesRoches R (2007) Analytical seismic fragility curves for typical bridges in the central and southeastern United States. Earthq Spectr EERI 23:615–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (2013) OpenSees: the open system for earthquake engineering simulation. University of California. http://opensees.berkeley.edu/index.php. Accessed 10 Dec 2013

  • Roeder CW, Carpenter JE, Taniguchi H (1988) Predicted ductility demands for steel moment resisting frames. Earthq Spectr EERI 5:409–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeder CW, Schneider SP, Carpenter JE (1993) Seismic behavior of moment resisting steel frames: experimental study. J Struct Eng ASCE 119:1885–1902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAC (2000) Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings, prepared by the SAC Joint Venture, a partnership of the Structural Engineers Association of California, the applied Technology Council, and California Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering, for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA 350 Report. Washington, DC, USA

  • Schneider SP, Roeder CW, Carpenter JE (1991) Seismic performance of weak-column strong-beam steel moment-resisting frames. Final Report, Dept. of Civil Engrg., Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

  • Somerville PG, Smith NF, Punyamurthula SS, Joseph I (1997) Development of ground motion time histories for Phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC Steel Project, SAC Joint Venture, Report no. SAC/BD-97/04

  • The Office of National Building Codes of Iran’s Ministry of Housing and Urban Development (2009) Chapter 10: Design and construction of steel structures. Tehran, Iran

  • Wieser J, Pekcan G, Zaghi AE, Itani A, Maragakis EM (2013) Floor accelerations in yielding SMRF structures. Earthq Spectr EERI 29:987–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Unit 3037, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT , 06269, USA

    Arash E. Zaghi & Masoud Mehrraoufi

  2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, MS 258, Reno, NV , 89557, USA

    Siavash Soroushian, Ahmad Itani & Gokhan Pekcan

  3. College of Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, MS 258, Reno, NV , 89557, USA

    E. Manos Maragakis

Authors
  1. Arash E. Zaghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Siavash Soroushian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ahmad Itani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. Manos Maragakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gokhan Pekcan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Masoud Mehrraoufi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arash E. Zaghi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zaghi, A.E., Soroushian, S., Itani, A. et al. Impact of column-to-beam strength ratio on the seismic response of steel MRFs. Bull Earthquake Eng 13, 635–652 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9634-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9634-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation