Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Artificial Tactile Sense in Mass Detection in Silicone Phantom for the Diagnosis of Prostate Tumor

  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

We analyzed the kinetic and kinematic variables of artificial tactile and artificial vibrotactile sensing test for mass detection in silicon phantom to determine tactile intensity and speed to obtain the best result in detecting the type and location of the mass. This study has utilized Artificial Tactile Sensing Instrument for Mass Detection (ATSIMD) in cylindrical silicone phantoms. The masses embedded in these samples were inserted in axial and environmental, deep and surface positions. The loading velocity, probe location, and the frequency of the applied force were considered as the independent variables in this study. It was found that for superficial mases the accuracy of detection at low speed 5 mm/sec, although dependent on the probe, but was 50% higher than under other conditions. For deep masses, with increasing mass depth, the accuracy of detection at medium speed of 8 mm/sec was 30% higher than at low speed. Mass detection by ATSIMD used in this study showed maximum efficiency at medium loading velocity. At low and high loading velocities, the dependence of mass detection on the probe location is related to the interaction of the testing method, tissue, and viscoelastic properties of the tissue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahn B, Kim Y, Oh C.K, Kim J. Robotic palpation and mechanical property characterization for abnormal tissue localization. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2012;50(9):961-971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahn B, Lee H, Kim Y, Kim J. Robotic system with sweeping palpation and needle biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis. Int. J. Med. Robot. 2014;10(3):356-367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Åstrand AP, Andersson BM, Jalkanen V, Ljungberg B, Bergh A, Lindahl OA. Prostate cancer detection with a tactile resonance sensor — measurement considerations and clinical setup. Sensors (Basel). 2017;17(11). pii: E2453. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17112453.

  4. Drake RL, Vogl AW, Mitchell A. Gray’s anatomy for students. Churchill Livingstone, 2014

  5. Heron M. Deaths: Leading Causes for 2016. Natl Vital Stat. Rep. 2018;67(6):1-77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jalkanen V, Andersson BM, Bergh A, Ljungberg B, Lindahl OA. Prostate tissue stiffness as measured with a resonance sensor system: A study on silicone and human prostate tissue in vitro. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2006;44(7):593-603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee H, Kim Y, Shin YK, Ahn B, Rha K, Kim J. Localization of abnormality using finite element modeling of prostate glands with robotic system: A preliminary study. 2012 4th IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, BioRob 2012. P. 889-893.

  8. Murphy SL, Xu J, Kochanek KD, Arias E. Mortality in the United States, 2017. NCHS Data Brief. 2018;(328):1-8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peng Q, Omata S, Peehl DM, Constantinou C.E. Stiffness mapping prostate biopsy samples using a tactile sensor. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2011;2011:8515-8518.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Scanlan P, Hammer SJ, Good DW, Phipps S, Stewart GD, McNeill AS, Shu W, Reuben RL. Development of a novel actuator for the dynamic palpation of soft tissue for use in the assessment of prostate tissue quality. Sensors Actuators A Phys. 2015;232:310-318.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Tabatabai Ghomsheh.

Additional information

Translated from Byulleten’ Eksperimental’noi Biologii i Meditsiny, Vol. 169, No. 4, pp. 484-490, April, 2020

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zein, S., Ghomsheh, F.T. & Jamshidian, H. Evaluation of Artificial Tactile Sense in Mass Detection in Silicone Phantom for the Diagnosis of Prostate Tumor. Bull Exp Biol Med 169, 497–503 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-020-04917-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-020-04917-3

Key Words

Navigation