Abstract
We report two Internet studies that investigated sex differences in the accuracy and precision of judging time to arrival. We used accuracy to mean the ability to match the actual time to arrival and precision to mean the consistency with which each participant made their judgments. Our task was presented as a computer game in which a toy UFO moved obliquely towards the participant through a virtual three-dimensional space on route to a docking station. The UFO disappeared before docking and participants pressed their space bar at the precise moment they thought the UFO would have docked. Study 1 showed it was possible to conduct quantitative studies of spatiotemporal judgments in virtual reality via the Internet and confirmed reports that men are more accurate because women underestimate, but found no difference in precision measured as intra-participant variation. Study 2 repeated Study 1 with five additional presentations of one condition to provide a better measure of precision. Again, men were more accurate than women but there were no sex differences in precision. However, within the coincidence-anticipation timing (CAT) literature, of those studies that report sex differences, a majority found that males are both more accurate and more precise than females. Noting that many CAT studies report no sex differences, we discuss appropriate interpretations of such null findings. While acknowledging that CAT performance may be influenced by experience we suggest that the sex difference may have originated among our ancestors with the evolutionary selection of men for hunting and women for gathering.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bard, C., Fleury, M., Carrière, L., & Bellec, J. (1981). Components of the coincidence-anticipation behavior of children aged from 6 to 11 years. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 52, 547–556.
Brady, F. (1996). Anticipation of coincidence, gender and sports classification. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 227–239.
Cahill, L. (2006). Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 477–484.
Dorfman, P. W. (1977). Timing and anticipation: A developmental perspective. Journal of Motor Behavior, 9, 67–79.
Dunham, P. (1977). Age, sex, speed, and practice in coincidence-anticipation performance of children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45, 187–193.
Dunham, P., & Reid, D. (1987). Information processing: Effect of stimulus speed variation on coincidence-anticipation of children. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 13, 151–156.
Eals, M., & Silverman, I. (1994). The hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: Proximate factors mediating the female advantage in recall of object arrays. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 95–105.
Fausto-Sterling, A. (1985). Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men. New York: Basic Books.
Fausto-Sterling, A. (1992). Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
Grodin, S. (Ed.). (2008). Psychology of time. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
Halpern, D. F. (1986). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Halpern, D. F. (1992). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1986). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53–69.
Isaacs, L. D. (1983). Coincidence-anticipation in simple catching. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 9, 195–201.
Jordan-Young, R. M. (2010). Brain storm: The flaws in the science of sex differences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Lee, R. B., & DeVore, I. (1968). Problems in the study of hunters and gatherers. In R. B. Lee & I. DeVore (Eds.), Man the hunter (pp. 3–12). Edison, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1986). A meta-analysis of gender differences in spatial ability: Implications for mathematics and science achievement. In J. S. Hyde & M. C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 67–101). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
McLeod, R. W., & Ross, H. E. (1983). Optic-flow and cognitive factors in time-to-collision estimates. Perception, 12, 417–423.
Meck, W. H. (Ed.). (2003). Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Millslagle, D. (2004). Coincidence anticipation and dynamic visual acuity in young adolescents. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 99, 1147–1156.
Overdorf, V., Schweighardt, R., Page, S. J., & McGrath, R. E. (2004). Mental and physical practice schedules in acquisition and retention of novel timing skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 99, 51–62.
Petrakis, E. (1985). Sex differences and specificity of anticipation of coincidence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 1135–1138.
Rodrigues, P. C., Freitas, C., Vasconcelos, M. O., & Barreiros, J. (2007). Preferência manual numa tarefa de antecipiação-coincidência: efeitos da direcção do estímulo [Manual preference in a coincidence-anticipation task: Effects of varying the stimulus orientation]. Revista Portuguesa de Ciências do Desporto, 7, 109–115.
Rodrigues, P. C., Vasconcelos, O., Barreiros, J., Barbosa, R., & Trifilio, F. (2009). Functional asymmetry in a simple coincidence-anticipation task: Effects of handedness. European Journal of Sport Science, 9, 115–123.
Sanders, G. (in press). The sex difference in coincidence-anticipation timing (CAT): A case of difficulty. Perceptual and Motor Skills.
Sanders, G., Madden, A., & Thorpe, G. (2008). Task selection is critical for the demonstration of reciprocal patterns of sex differences in hand/arm motor control and near/far visual processing. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 342–364.
Sanders, G., Sinclair, K., & Walsh, T. (2007). Testing predictions from the hunter-gatherer hypothesis-2: Sex differences in the visual processing of near and far space. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 666–679.
Sanders, G., Sjodin, M., & de Chastelaine, M. (2002). On the elusive nature of sex differences in cognition: Hormonal influences contributing to within-sex variation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 145–152.
Sanders, G., & Wright, M. (1997). Sexual orientation differences in cerebral asymmetry and in the performance of sexually dimorphic cognitive and motor tasks. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 463–480.
Schiff, W., & Oldak, R. (1990). Accuracy of judging time to arrival: Effects of modality, trajectory and gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 303–316.
Silverman, I., & Eals, M. (1992). Sex differences in spatial abilities: Evolutionary theory and data. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 533–549). New York: Oxford University Press.
Smith, G. A., & McPhee, K. A. (1987). Performance on a coincidence timing task correlates with intelligence. Intelligence, 11, 161–167.
Tooby, J., & DeVore, I. (1987). The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In W. G. Kinzey (Ed.), The evolution of human behavior: Primate models (pp. 183–237). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.
Watson, N. V., & Kimura, D. (1989). Right-hand superiority for throwing but not for intercepting. Neuropsychologia, 27, 1399–1414.
Watson, N. V., & Kimura, D. (1991). Nontrivial sex differences in throwing intercepting: Relation to psychometrically-defined spatial functions. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 375–385.
Williams, L. R., & Jasiewicz, J. M. (2001). Knowledge of results, movement type, and sex in coincidence timing. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 92, 1057–1068.
Williams, L. R. T., Katene, W. H., & Fleming, K. (2002). Coincidence timing of a tennis stroke: Effects of age, skill level, gender, stimulus velocity, and attention demand. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73, 28–37.
Wrisberg, C. A., Hardy, C. J., & Beitel, P. A. (1982). Stimulus velocity and movement distance as determiners of movement velocity and coincident timing accuracy. Human Factors, 24, 599–608.
Wrisberg, C. A., & Mead, B. J. (1981). Anticipation of coincidence in children: A test of schema theory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 52, 599–606.
Wrisberg, C. A., & Mead, B. J. (1983). Developing coincident timing skill in children: A comparison of training methods. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 54, 67–74.
Wrisberg, C. A., Paul, J. H., & Ragsdale, M. J. (1979). Subject gender, knowledge of results and receptor anticipation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 50, 699–708.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sanders, G., Sinclair, K. Sex Differences in Accuracy and Precision When Judging Time to Arrival: Data from Two Internet Studies. Arch Sex Behav 40, 1189–1198 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9704-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9704-2