Skip to main content
Log in

Cross-border mergers and acquisitions by Chinese listed companies: A principal–principal perspective

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chinese listed firms have gained the world’s attention with several ambitious, high-profile cross-border mergers and acquisitions. In most of these deals, the Chinese government is the largest shareholder of the acquiring firms. As such, it may be the case that the Chinese government pushes through such deals even though they are not in the best interests of minority shareholders, giving rise to principal–principal conflicts. Along these lines, we hypothesize that increased government ownership in the acquiring firm will be associated with investors viewing a cross-border merger deal in less favorable terms. In addition, we hypothesize that environmental complexity will moderate this negative relationship. We test our hypotheses with a sample of cross-border mergers and acquisitions involving Chinese firms from 2000 to 2008. We find support for the main hypothesis, that is, that investors are indeed skeptical of cross-border mergers and acquisitions deals when the government is the majority owner (i.e., principal–principal conflicts). However, we find no support for the moderating effect. We discuss the implications of these findings for researchers and practitioners and suggest future research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Notes

  1. A-shares are issued by China registered companies listed in either the Shanghai Stock Exchange or the Shenzhen Stock exchange. Shares are denominated in RMB which is not a freely-traded currency. Only Chinese citizens or foreign investors with Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor (QFII) status are allowed to trade. H-share is in fact A-share of mainland Chinese companies listed on Hong Kong Stock market. They are priced in HK dollars and freely purchasable by international investors. Persons from China are not allowed to trade H-shares except through Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII). However A- and H-shares cannot be converted to each other.

References

  • Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amihud, Y., & Lev, B. 1981. Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers. Bell Journal of Economics, 12: 605–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boisot, M., & Meyer, M. W. 2008. Which way through the open door? Reflections on the internationalization of Chinese firms. Management and Organization Review, 4(3): 349–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. 1985. Measuring security price performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 8: 205–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck, T., Filatotchev, I., Nolan, P., & Wright, M. 2000. Different paths to economic reform in China and Russia: Causes and consequences. Journal of World Business, 35(4): 379–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. L., Clegg, L. J., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. 2007. The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38: 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. 1961. The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E. 1971. International corporations: The industrial economics of foreign investment. Economica, 38(149): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E. 1989. Mergers, takeovers, and economic efficiency. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 7: 151–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. 2003. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corenett, M. M., Hovakimianb, G., Paliac, D., & Tehranian, H. 2003. The impact of the manager–shareholder conflict on acquiring bank returns. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27: 103–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Rajagopalan, N. 2003. Governance through ownership: Centuries of practice, decades of research. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2): 151–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, A., Kroll, M., & Wright, P. 2005. Outside board monitoring and the economic outcomes of acquisitions: A test of the substitution hypothesis. Journal of Business Research, 58: 926–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess, G. C., & Beard, D. W. 1984. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 52–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dharwadkar, R., George, G., & Brandes, P. 2000. Privatization in emerging economies: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25(3): 650–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. 1977. Trade, location of economic activity and the MNE: A search for an eclectic approach. In B. Ohlin, P. O. Hesselborn & P. M. Wijkmon (Eds.), The international location of economic activity: 395–418. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. 2006. Comment on dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 139–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. 1965. The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18: 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. J. 2005. The determinants and evaluation of merger success. Business Horizons, 48(1): 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., & Boyd, B. K. 1998. How much does the CEO matter? The role of managerial discretion in the setting of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 41(2): 179–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. R. 1977. Organization design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, B. 1974. The effects of environment and technology on managerial roles. Journal of Management, 20: 581–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossack, I. 1965. Towards an integration of static and dynamic measures of industry concentration. Review of Economics and Statistics, 7: 301–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B., & Tirole, J. 1993. Market liquidity and performance monitoring. Journal of Political Economy, 101(4): 678–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. 1976. The international operations of national firms: A study of direct investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, K., & Pucik, V. 1993. R&D spending, domestic competition and export performance of Japanese manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, E. 2006. Investors’ perceptions of managerial opportunism in corporate acquisitions: The moderating role of environmental conditions. Corporate Governance, 14(5): 377–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keasey, K., Thompson, S., & Wright, M. 1997. The corporate governance problem—competing diagnoses and solutions. In K. Keasey, S. Thompson & M. Wright (Eds.), Corporate governance: Economic, management and financial issues. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keats, B. W., & Hitt, M. A. 1988. A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3): 570–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Chang, S. J. 1991. Technological capabilities and Japanese foreign direct investment in the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(3): 401–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, M., Wright, P., Toombs, L., & Leavell, H. 1997. Form of control: A critical determinant of acquisition performance and CEO rewards. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, C. M., Fan, D. K. K., Young, M. N., & Wu, S. 2007. Corporate governance effectiveness during institutional transition. International Business Review, 16: 425–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, J. 1967. Organization and environment. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Y. F. 2006. Domestic enterprises’ overseas M&A. Beijing: China Economy Press (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. F., Cai, F., & Li, Z. 1997. Complete information and SOEs reforms. Shanghai: Shanghai Sanlian Press and Shanghai People’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin, M., & Shrieves, R. 1986. Towards a reconciliation of market performance measures to strategic management research. Academy of Management Review, 3: 497–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. 2007. International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38: 481–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X. M., & Wei, J. G. 2004. Searching for protection of minority interest in China. Beijing: China Economic Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascarenhas, B. 1986. International strategies of non-dominant firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 17: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsusaka, J. G. 1993. Takeover motives during the conglomerate merger wave. RAND Journal of Economics, 24: 357–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. 1997. Event studies in management research: Theoretical and empirical issues. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 626–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Commerce, PRC. 2007. Statistical bulletin of China’s outward foreign direct investment. Beijing: Ministry of Commerce, PRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Commerce, PRC. 2008. Report of department of outward investment and economic cooperation. Beijing: Ministry of Commerce, PRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Zhao, M. Y. 2008. Perspectives on China’s outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(3): 337–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. 1990. Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance, and experimental design. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. 2006. Making M&A fly in China. Harvard Business Review, 84(3): 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi, D., Wu, W., & Zhang, H. 2000. Shareholding and corporate performance of partially privatized firms: Evidence from the listed Chinese firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 8(4): 587–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, B., Au, K., & Birtch, T. 2009. China’s business network structure during institutional transitions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26: 219–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAFE (State Administration of Foreign Exchange). 2008. Monthly foreign exchange reserves. http://www.safe.gov.cn, Accessed Oct. 16, 2008.

  • Sharfman, M. P., & Dean, J. W. 1991a. Conceptualizing and measuring the organizational environment: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Management, 17: 681–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharfman, M. P., & Dean, J. W. 1991b. Dimensions and constructs: A response to Dess and Rasheed. Journal of Management, 17: 711–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, W. H. 1976. Organizations and their environments. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, Y., Xu, D., & Phan, P. H. 2008. Principal-principal conflicts in the governance of the Chinese public corporation. Management and Organization Review, 4(1): 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Q., & Tong, W. 2003. China share issue privatization: The extent of its success. Journal of Financial Economics, 70(1): 183–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Q., Tong, W., & Tong, J. 2002. How does government ownership affect firm performance? Evidence from China’s privatization experience. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 29(1): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organizations in actions. New York: MiGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, L. 2001. Government shareholding and the value of China’s modern firms. William Davidson Institute working paper no. 395, University of Michigan, Michigan.

  • Very, P., & Schweiger, D. M. 2001. The acquisition process as a learning process: Evidence from a study of critical problems and solutions in domestic and cross-border deals. Journal of World Business, 36(1): 11–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, C. E., & Howie, J. T. 2003. Privatizing China: The stock markets and their role in corporate reform. Singapore: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. W. 2003. Governance role of different types of state-share holders: Evidence from China’s listed companies. PhD dissertation, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong.

  • Wei, G. 2007. Ownership structure, corporate governance and company performance in China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 13(4): 519–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P., Ferris, S. P., Hiller, J. S., & Kroll, M. 1995. Competitiveness through management of diversity: Effects on stock price valuation. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 272–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X., & Wang, Y. 1999. Ownership structure and corporate governance in Chinese stock companies. China Economic Review, 10(1): 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue, J. F. 2001. Ownership structure, corporate governance and corporate performance. PhD dissertation, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, the People’s Republic of China.

  • Yamakawa, Y., Peng, M. W., & Deeds, D. L. 2008. What drives new ventures to internationalize from emerging to developed economies?. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 32(1): 59–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiu, D. W., Lau, C. M., & Bruton, G. D. 2007. International venturing by emerging economy firms: The effects of firm capabilities, home country networks, and corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 38: 519–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. N., & McGuinness, P. B. 2001. The missing link: Why stock markets have been ineffective in Chinese SOE reform. Business Horizons, 44: 55–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. 2008. Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal–principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1): 196–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C. M., & Ito, K. 1988. Oligopolistic reaction and foreign direct investment: The case of the US tire and textile industries. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3): 449–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, H. Q. 1999. An analysis of dividends policy of China-listed companies. PhD dissertation, Shanghai University of Finance and Economic, the People’s Republic of China.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuan Yi Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, Y.Y., Young, M.N. Cross-border mergers and acquisitions by Chinese listed companies: A principal–principal perspective. Asia Pac J Manag 27, 523–539 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-009-9150-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-009-9150-7

Keywords